Research Article

Dry Socket: Incidence, Clinical Features, and Predisposing Factors

Table 3

Indications of exodontia and incidence of dry socket in 1182 patients with 1362 teeth.

Indication for exodontia2010 n (%)2011 n (%)2012 n (%)2013 n (%)Total

Reversible pulpitis21 (5.1)15 (2.9)2 (0.6)2 (6.7)40 (2.9)
Irreversible pulpitis63 (15.2)47 (9.0)40 (12.5)12 (11.5)162 (11.9)
Retained root26 (6.3)33 (6.3)22 (6.9)4 (3.8)85 (6.2)
Pericoronitis19 (4.6)14 (2.7)5 (1.6)3 (2.9)41 (3.0)
Chronic apical periodontitis8 (1.9)8 (1.5)1 (0.3)3 (2.9)20 (1.5)
Acute apical periodontitis148 (35.7)261 (49.9)163 (50.9)32 (30.8)604 (44.3)
Chronic periodontitis25 (6.0)22 (4.2)14 (4.4)7 (6.7)68 (5.0)
Dentoalveolar abscess23 (5.5)28 (5.4)21 (6.6)6 (5.8)78 (5.7)
Periodontal abscess4 (1.0)3 (0.6)1 (0.3)1 (1.0)9 (0.7)
Fracture15 (3.6)27 (5.2)9 (2.8)5 (4.8)56 (4.1)
Cervical abrasion0 (0)1 (0.2)2 (0.6)1 (1.0)4 (0.3)
Failed RCT2 (0.5)1 (0.2)2 (0.6)0 (0)5 (0.4)
Displacement0 (0)1 (0.2)7 (2.2)0 (0)8 (0.8)
Not stated61 (14.8)62 (11.9)31 (9.7)27 (26.0)181 (13.3)
Incidence rate
 Number of teeth with dry socket10 (2.4)6 (1.1)2 (0.6)1 (1.0)19 (1.4)
 Total number of teeth415 (30.5)523 (38.4)320 (23.5)104 (7.6)1362 (100)
Incidence2.4%1.1%0.6%1.0%1.4%