Clinical Study

Clinical Advantages and Limitations of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Full Arch Implant Supported Reconstruction: Case Series

Table 2

Results of 14 cases in which monolithic zirconia framework for full arch implant supported reconstruction was used.

Subjects Location Number of implants Type of restoration Time of follow-upComplications

1Mandible4Screw-retained 10 monthsNone
Maxilla6Screw-retained 10 monthsNone

2Mandible4Screw-retained 1 year, 10 monthsNone
Maxilla7Screw-retained 1 year, 10 monthsNone

3Mandible6Screw-retained 1 year, 8 monthsNone
Maxilla6Screw-retained 1 year, 8 monthsNone

4Mandible4Screw-retained 5 monthsNone
Maxilla6Screw-retained 5 monthsNone

5Mandible6Screw-retained 1 yearNone
Maxilla6Screw-retained 1 yearNone

6Mandible4Screw-retained 7 monthsNone
Maxilla6Screw-retained 7 monthsNone

7Mandible4Screw-retained 3 monthsNone
Maxilla4Screw-retained 3 monthsNone

8Mandible4Screw-retained 1 year, 3 monthsNone
Maxilla8Screw-retained 1 year, 3 monthsChipping #9, at 1-year follow-up

9Mandible6Screw-retained 10 monthsNone
Maxilla7Screw-retained 10 monthsNone

10Mandible6Screw-retained 2 yearsNone
Maxilla8Screw-retained 2 yearsNone

11Mandible7Screw- and cement-retained3 years, 6 months None
Maxilla8Screw- and cement-retained 3 years, 6 months None

12Maxilla8Screw-retained 3 years, 6 months None

13Maxilla9Screw-retained 1 yearNone

14Maxilla6 Screw-retained 4 monthsNone
Mandible6Screw-retained 4 monthsNone