The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Material</td><td class="align_center">Fabricante</td><td class="align_center">Composition</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Fuji II capsule</td><td class="align_center">GC corp., Tokyo, Japan</td><td class="align_center"><i>Powder</i>: calcium fluoroaluminosilicate polyacrylic acid powder, iron oxide<br/><i>Liquid</i>: polyacrylic acid (aqueous solution), tartaric acid, water</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Fuji II LC capsule</td><td class="align_center">GC corp., Tokyo, Japan</td><td class="align_center"><i>Liquid</i>: PAA, HEMA, proprietary ingredient, 2,2,4-trimethyl hexamethylene dicarbonate, TEGDMA<br/><i>Powder</i>: (fluoro) alumino silicate glass</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Ionoseal</td><td class="align_center">Voco, GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany</td><td class="align_center">Fluoroalminumsilicate glass, bis-GMA, HEMA, TEDMA, 1,6-hexanediylbismethacrylate</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td><div>PAA: polyacrylic acid; HEMA: 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate; TEGDMA: triethylene-glycol-dimethacrylate; bis-GMA: bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate; TEDMA: triethylene glycol dimethacrylate.<br/></div></td></tr></table>

<div>Composition of the materials tested in the study.</div>

International Journal of Dentistry

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements 