Review Article
The Use of Titanium Mesh in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review
Table 3
Evaluation of titanium mesh exposure.
| | Mesh exposure | % mesh exposure | Mesh removed | Bone loss | Remotion time | Types of meshes used |
| Lizio et al. [17] | 12 | 80 | — | Yes | | Ti mesh (ridge-form mesh; OsteoMed) 0.2 mm thick | Corinaldesi et al. [18] | 0 | 0 | — | | | Ace titanium micromesh, ACE surgical supply, Brighton Modus 1.5 mesh, Straumann | Corinaldesi et al. [19] | 4 | 14.8 | 3 | | 3–5 mesi | Ace titanium micromesh, ACE surgical supply company Modus 0.9 mesh, Medartis | Poli et al. [22] | 1 | 7.69 | — | | | 0.2 mm thick Ti-Mesh (KIS Martin, Tuttlinger, Germany) | Proussaefs and Lozada [20] | 6 | 35.29 | — | Yes | | Mesh (Osteo-Tram; OsteoMed) | Miyamoto et al. [16] | 18 | 36 | 4 | Yes | | 0.1 and 0.2 mm thickness; M-TAM, Stryker Leinger GmbH & Co., KG, Freiburg ASTM F-67 Jeil Medical Corp., Seoul, Korea | Uehara et al. [21] | 16 | 70 | 6 | Yes | 3–7 mesi | 0.3 mm thick microtitanium mesh (Striker-Leibinger), Freiburg, Germany 1.4 HOMS Engineering, Chino, Japan | Tot. | 57 | | 13 | | | | Mean | | 34.8 | 22.8 | | | |
|
|