Research Article
Effect of Various Irrigating Devices on the Removal of Two Different Forms of Calcium Hydroxide from Internal Resorption Cavities
Table 1
Comparison of removal efficacy between CH removal methods in group I.
| Groups | Number (%) | Total | Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 | Score 3 |
| Negative control | 10 (100)A | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | Positive control | 0 (0)D | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | 10 (100) | PUI | 17 (70.8)A | 6 (25) | 1 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 24 (100) | XP-endo Finisher | 11 (45.8)B | 8 (33.3) | 2 (8.3) | 3 (12.5) | 24 (100) | EA | 4 (16.7)C | 5 (20.8) | 9 (37.5) | 6 (25) | 24 (100) | SNI | 4 (16.7)C | 6 (25) | 4 (16.7) | 10 (41.7) | 24 (100) |
|
|
Different uppercase letters show significant difference between groups (in a column).
|