Effect on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Conventional Glass Ionomer Luting Cements by Incorporation of All-Ceramic Additives: An In Vitro Study

Table 1

Two groups of control and prepared experimental glass ionomer cements.

Group 1	Group 2
Control–Ketac™ cem with 0% ceramic powder	Control-GC corporation gold label type 1 glass ionomer luting and lining cement with 0% ceramic powder
Experimental GIC 1 Ketac™ cem with 5% IPS empress 2 incisal ceramic powder	Experimental GIC 1-GC corporation gold label type 1 glass ionomer luting and lining cement with 5% IPS empress 2 incisal ceramic powder
Experimental GIC 2 Ketac™ cem with 10% IPS empress 2 incisal ceramic powder	Experimental GIC 2-GC corporation gold label type 1 glass ionomer luting and lining cement with 10% IPS empress 2 incisal ceramic powder
Experimental GIC 3 ketac cem with 15% IPS empress 2 incisal ceramic powder	Experimental GIC 3-GC corporation gold label type 1 glass ionomer luting and lining cement with 15% IPS empress 2 incisal ceramic powder
Experimental GIC 4 Ketac™ cem with 5% IPS empress 2 dentin ceramic powder	Experimental GIC 4-GC corporation gold label type 1 glass ionomer luting and lining cement with 5% IPS empress 2 dentin ceramic powder
Experimental GIC 5 Ketac™ cem with 10% IPS empress 2 dentin ceramic powder	Experimental GIC 5-GC corporation gold label type 1 glass ionomer luting and lining cement with 10% IPS empress 2 dentin ceramic powder
Experimental GIC 6 Ketac™ cem with 15% IPS empress 2 dentin ceramic powder	Experimental GIC 6-GC corporation gold label type 1 glass ionomer luting and lining cement with 15% IPS empress 2 dentin ceramic powder