Phosphate Ion Release and Alkalizing Potential of Three Bioactive Dental Materials in Comparison with Composite Resin

Table 1

Materials and their composition used in this study.

Materials	Manufacturer	Composition	Filler
Activa bioactive, ionic composite resin	Pulpdent, Corporation, Watertown, MA, USA	Blend of diurethane and other methacrylates with modified poly acrylic acid (44.6 %), contain no bisphenol A, noBis GMA, no BPA derivatives	Amorphous silica( 6.7%), Sodium fluoride (0.75%)
Cention N, alkasite, restorative, material	Ivoclar-Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Switzerland	UDMA, No Bis GMA, No TEGDMA, No HEMA	Barium aluminum silicate glass, Ytterbium trifluoride, Iso filler, calcium barium aluminum fluorosilicate glass, calcium fluorosilicate glass (57.6%)
Filtek Z250, Composite resin	3M ESPE, St, Paul, MN, USA	Bis GMA, UDMA, Bis EMA	Zirconia/silica
Fuji II LC, Capsulated, resin modified glassionomer cement	GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan	Alumino-fluorosilicate glass, polyacrylic acid, 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate, 2,2,4-trimethyl hexamethylene dicarbonate, triethylene glycol, Dimethacrylate	55 vol% FSG /poly-HEMA, average 5.9 μm