Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 7692849 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7692849

# Application of Residual Power Series Method to Fractional Coupled Physical Equations Arising in Fluids Flow

Accepted03 Jun 2018
Published04 Jul 2018

#### Abstract

The approximate analytical solution of the fractional Cahn-Hilliard and Gardner equations has been acquired successfully via residual power series method (RPSM). The approximate solutions obtained by RPSM are compared with the exact solutions as well as the solutions obtained by homotopy perturbation method (HPM) and q-homotopy analysis method (q-HAM). Numerical results are known through different graphs and tables. The fractional derivatives are described in the Caputo sense. The results light the power, efficiency, simplicity, and reliability of the proposed method.

#### 1. Introduction

Fractional differential equations (FDEs) have found applications in many problems in physics and engineering [1, 2]. Since most of the nonlinear FDEs cannot be solved exactly, approximate and numerical methods must be used. Some of the recent analytical methods for solving nonlinear problems include the Adomian decomposition method [3, 4], variational iteration method , homotopy perturbation method [6, 7], homotopy analysis method [8, 9], spectral collocation method , the tanh-coth method , exp-function method , Mittag-Leffler function method , differential quadrature method , and reproducing kernel Hilbert space method [15, 16].

The Gardner equation  (combined KdV-mKdV equation) is a useful model for the description of internal solitary waves in shallow water,Those two models will be classified as positive Gardner equation and negative Gardner equation depending on the sign of the cubic nonlinear term [18, 19]. Gardner equation is widely used in various branches of physics, such as plasma physics, fluid physics, and quantum field theory [20, 21]. It also describes a variety of wave phenomena in plasma and solid state [22, 23].

The Cahn-Hilliard equation  is one type of partial differential equations (PDEs) and was first introduced in 1958 as a model for process of phase separation of a binary alloy under the critical temperature ,This equation is related to a number of interesting physical phenomena like the spinodal decomposition, phase separation, and phase ordering dynamics. On the other hand it becomes important in material sciences [26, 27].

The aim of this paper is to study the time-fractional Gardner equation  and time-fractional Cahn-Hilliard equation  of this form,where , , and Numerous methods have been used to solve this equations, for example, q-Homotopy analysis method , the new version of F-expansion method , reduced differential transform method , the generalized tanh-coth method , the generalized Kudryashov method , extended fractional Riccati expansion method , subequation method , homotopy analysis method , the Adomian decomposition method , improved expansion method , homotopy perturbation method , and variational iteration method . We solve Cahn-Hilliard equation and Gardner equation by RPSM.

The RPSM was first devised in 2013 by the Jordanian mathematician Omar Abu Arqub as an efficient method for determining values of coefficients of the power series solution for first and the second-order fuzzy differential equations . The RPSM is an effective and easy to construct power series solution for strongly linear and nonlinear equations without linearization, perturbation, or discretization. In the last few years, the RPSM has been applied to solve a growing number of nonlinear ordinary and PDEs of different types, classifications, and orders. It has been successfully applied in the numerical solution of the generalized Lane-Emden equation , which is a highly nonlinear singular differential equation, in the numerical solution of higher-order regular differential equations , in approximate solution of the nonlinear fractional KdV-Burgers equation , in construct and predict the solitary pattern solutions for nonlinear time-fractional dispersive PDEs , and in predicting and representing the multiplicity of solutions to boundary value problems of fractional order . The RPSM distinguishes itself from various other analytical and numerical methods in several important aspects . Firstly, the RPSM does not need to compare the coefficients of the corresponding terms and a recursion relation is not required. Secondly, the RPSM provides a simple way to ensure the convergence of the series solution by minimizing the related residual error. Thirdly, the RPSM is not affected by computational rounding errors and does not require large computer memory and time. Fourthly, the RPSM does not require any converting while switching from the low-order to the higher-order and from simple linearity to complex nonlinearity; as a result, the method can be applied directly to the given problem by choosing an appropriate initial guess approximation.

#### 2. Fundamental Concepts

Definition 1 (see ). The Caputo time-fractional derivatives of order of is defined as

Definition 2 (see [47, 48]). A power series representation of the formwhere is called fractional power series about

Theorem 3 (see [47, 48]). Suppose that has a fractional power series representation at of the form If are continuous on , then coefficients will take the form

Definition 4 (see ). A power series representation of the form is called a multiple fractional power series about

Theorem 5 (see [43, 44]). Suppose that has a multiple fractional Power series representation at of the form If are continuous on , then coefficients will take the form

Corollary 6 (see ). Suppose that has a multiple fractional Power series representation at of the form If are continuous on , then will take the form

#### 3. Basic Idea of RPSM

To give the approximate solution of nonlinear fractional order differential equations by means of the RPSM, we consider a general nonlinear fractional differential equation:where is nonlinear term and is a linear term. Subject to the initial conditionThe RPSM proposes the solution for (14) as a fractional power series about the initial point ,Next we let denote the kth truncated series of ,The 0th RPS approximate solution of isEquation (17) can be written asWe define the residual function for (14)Therefore, the kth residual function is

As in [40, 41], since the fractional derivative of a constant in the Caputo sense is zero and the fractional derivatives of and are matching at for each ; that is, ,

To determine we consider in (19) and substitute it into (21), applying the fractional derivative in both sides, , and finally we solve

#### 4. Applications

To illustrate the basic idea of RPSM, we consider the following two time-fractional Gardner and Cahn-Hilliard equations.

##### 4.1. Time-Fractional Gardner Equation

Consider the time-fractional homogeneous Gardner equationSubject to the initial ConditionThe exact solution when isWe define the residual function for (23) astherefore, for the kth residual function ,To determine , we consider in (27)But from (19) at ,

Now depending on the result of (22) In the case of k=1, we have ,To determine , we consider in (27)But from (19) at ,Applying on both sides and solving the equation , then we getThe solution in series form is given by

##### 4.2. Time-Fractional Cahn-Hilliard Equation

Consider the time-fractional Cahn-Hilliard equationSubject to the initial conditionThe exact solution when isWe define the residual function for (39) astherefore, for the kth residual function ,To determine , we consider in (43)From (19) at ,If we put , thenSimilarity, to determine , we substituteinto (43) where ,Solving the equation , we find thatTo determine , we substituteinto (43) where k=3,Applying on both sides and then solving the equation , we getThe solution in series form is given by

#### 5. Numerical Results

This section deals with the approximate analytical solutions obtained by RPSM for Gardner and Cahn-Hilliard equations. In classical case, Figure 1 and Tables 1 and 2 describe the comparison between RPSM with q-HAM  and HPM . In fractional case, Figures 2, 3, and 4 describe the geometrical behavior of the solutions obtained by RPSM for different fractional value of the two equations.

 x .1 .2 .3 .4 .5
 x .1 .2 .3 .4 .5

#### 6. Conclusions

This work has used the RPSM for finding the solution of the time-fractional Gardner and Cahn-Hilliard equations. A very good agreement between the results obtained by the RPSM and q-HAM  was observed in Figure 1(a) and Table 1. Figure 1(b) and Table 2 indicate that the mentioned method achieves a higher level of accuracy than HPM . Consequently, the work emphasized that the method introduces a significant improvement in this field over existing techniques.

#### Data Availability

The [approximate solution obtained by q-homotopy analysis method] data used to support the findings of this study have been deposited in the [article] repository ([doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2014.03.014]) . The [approximate solution obtained by homotopy perturbation method] data used to support the findings of this study have been deposited in the [article] repository ([doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2013.867627]) .

#### Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

1. L. Debnath, “Recent applications of fractional calculus to science and engineering,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, no. 54, pp. 3413–3442, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
2. M. Rahimy, “Applications of fractional differential equations,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 49-52, pp. 2453–2461, 2010. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
3. A. A. Arafa and S. Z. Rida, “Numerical solutions for some generalized coupled nonlinear evolution equations,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 56, no. 11-12, pp. 268–277, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
4. A. A. Arafa, “Series solutions of time-fractional host-parasitoid systems,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 1357–1367, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
5. N. H. Sweilam, M. M. Khader, and R. F. Al-Bar, “Numerical studies for a multi-order fractional differential equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 371, no. 1-2, pp. 26–33, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
6. A. Golbabai and K. Sayevand, “Fractional calculus- a new approach to the analysis of generalized fourth-order diffusion-wave equations,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications. An International Journal, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 2227–2231, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
7. K. A. Gepreel, “The homotopy perturbation method applied to the nonlinear fractional Kolmogorov-Petrovskii-PISkunov equations,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1428–1434, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
8. A. A. Arafa, S. Z. Rida, and H. Mohamed, “Approximate analytical solutions of Schnakenberg systems by homotopy analysis method,” Applied Mathematical Modelling: Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 4789–4796, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
9. A. A. Arafa, S. Z. Rida, and M. Khalil, “The effect of anti-viral drug treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 ({HIV}-1) described by a fractional order model,” Applied Mathematical Modelling: Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2189–2196, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
10. M. Javidi, “A numerical solution of the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation by spectral collocation method,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 338–344, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
11. A.-M. Wazwaz, “Analytic study on Burgers, Fisher, Huxley equations and combined forms of these equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 754–761, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
12. X.-W. Zhou, “Exp-function method for solving Huxley equation,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Art. ID 538489, 7 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
13. A. A. Arafa, S. Z. Rida, A. A. Mohammadein, and H. M. Ali, “Solving nonlinear fractional differential equation by generalized Mittag-Leffler function method,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 661–663, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
14. M. Sari and G. Gürarslan, “Numerical solutions of the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation by a differential quadrature method,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Art. ID 370765, 11 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
15. O. Abu Arqub, “An iterative method for solving fourth-order boundary value problems of mixed type integro-differential equations,” Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 857–874, 2015. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
16. O. Abu Arqub, “Fitted reproducing kernel Hilbert space method for the solutions of some certain classes of time-fractional partial differential equations subject to initial and Neumann boundary conditions,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1243–1261, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
17. A.-M. Wazwaz, “Solitons and singular solitons for the Gardner-{KP} equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 162–169, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
18. C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, “Method for solving the Korteweg-deVries equation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 1095–1097, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
19. A.-M. Wazwaz, “New solitons and kink solutions for the Gardner equation,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1395–1404, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
20. Z. Fu, S. Liu, and S. Liu, “New kinds of solutions to Gardner equation,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 301–309, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
21. G.-q. Xu, Z.-b. Li, and Y.-p. Liu, “Exact solutions to a large class of nonlinear evolution equations,” Chinese Journal of Physics, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 232–241, 2003. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
22. D. Baldwin, Ü. Göktas, W. Hereman, L. Hong, R. S. Martino, and J. C. Miller, “Symbolic computation of exact solutions expressible in hyperbolic and elliptic functions for nonlinear PDEs,” Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 669–705, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
23. W. Hereman and A. Nuseir, “Symbolic methods to construct exact solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
24. Y. Ugurlu and D. g. Kaya, “Solutions of the Cahn-Hilliard equation,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications. An International Journal, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 3038–3045, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
25. J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, “Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 258–267, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
26. S. M. Choo, S. K. Chung, and Y. J. Lee, “A conservative difference scheme for the viscous Cahn-Hilliard equation with a nonconstant gradient energy coefficient,” Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 51, no. 2-3, pp. 207–219, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
27. M. E. Gurtin, “Generalized Ginzburg-Landau and Cahn-Hilliard equations based on a microforce balance,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 92, no. 3-4, pp. 178–192, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
28. O. S. Iyiola and O. G. Olayinka, “Analytical solutions of time-fractional models for homogeneous Gardner equation and non-homogeneous differential equations,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 999–1004, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
29. Y. Pandir and H. H. Duzgun, “New Exact Solutions of Time Fractional Gardner Equation by Using New Version of F-Expansion Method,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
30. J. Ahmad and S. T. Mohyud-Din, “An efficient algorithm for some highly nonlinear fractional PDEs in mathematical physics,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, Article ID e109127, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
31. W. Li, H. Yang, and B. He, “Exact solutions of fractional Burgers and Cahn-Hilliard equations using extended fractional Riccati expansion method,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Art. ID 104069, 9 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
32. H. Jafari, H. Tajadodi, N. Kadkhoda, and D. Baleanu, “Fractional subequation method for Cahn-Hilliard and Klein-Gordon equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 587179, 5 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
33. M. S. Mohamed and K. S. Mekheimer, “Analytical approximate solution for nonlinear space-time fractional Cahn-Hilliard equation,” International Electronic Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 145–159, 2014. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
34. Z. Dahmani and M. Benbachir, “Solutions of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with time- and space-fractional derivatives,” International Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2009. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
35. D. Baleanu, Y. Ugurlu, M. Inc, and B. Kilic, “Improved ( G ' / G ) -Expansion Method for the Time-Fractional Biological Population Model and Cahn–Hilliard Equation,” Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 051016, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
36. A. Bouhassoun and M. Hamdi Cherif, “Homotopy Perturbation Method For Solving The Fractional Cahn-Hilliard Equation,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 513–524, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
37. J. Ahmad and S. T. Mohyud-Din, “An efficient algorithm for nonlinear fractional partial differential equations,” Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 381–388, 2015. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
38. J. Manafian and M. Lakestani, “A new analytical approach to solve some of the fractional-order partial differential equations,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 243–258, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
39. S. Tuluce Demiray, Y. Pandir, and H. Bulut, “Generalized Kudryashov method for time-fractional differential equations,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Art. ID 901540, 13 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
40. O. Abu Arqub, “Series solution of fuzzy differential equations under strongly generalized differentiability,” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–52, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
41. O. Abu Arqub, A. El-Ajou, A. S. Bataineh, and I. Hashim, “A representation of the exact solution of generalized Lane-Emden equations using a new analytical method,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, Art. ID 378593, 10 pages, 2013. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
42. O. Abu Arqub, Z. Abo-Hammour, R. Al-Badarneh, and S. Momani, “A reliable analytical method for solving higher-order initial value problems,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2013, Article ID 673829, 12 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
43. A. El-Ajou, O. Abu Arqub, and S. Momani, “Approximate analytical solution of the nonlinear fractional KdV-Burgers equation: a new iterative algorithm,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 293, pp. 81–95, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
44. O. A. Arqub, A. El-Ajou, and S. Momani, “Constructing and predicting solitary pattern solutions for nonlinear time-fractional dispersive partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 293, pp. 385–399, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
45. O. A. Arqub, A. El-Ajou, Z. A. Zhour, and S. Momani, “Multiple solutions of nonlinear boundary value problems of fractional order: A new analytic iterative technique,” Entropy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 471–493, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
46. A. El-Ajou, O. Abu Arqub, S. Momani, D. Baleanu, and A. Alsaedi, “A novel expansion iterative method for solving linear partial differential equations of fractional order,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 257, pp. 119–133, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
47. A. El-Ajou, O. Abu Arqub, Z. Al Zhour, and S. Momani, “New results on fractional power series: theories and applications,” Entropy. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Entropy and Information Studies, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 5305–5323, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
48. A. El-Ajou, O. Abu Arqub, and M. Al-Smadi, “A general form of the generalized Taylor's formula with some applications,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 256, pp. 851–859, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet