Suppression of Aldosterone Synthesis and Secretion by <svg style="vertical-align:-0.26999pt;width:42.75px;" id="M1" height="22.012501" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 42.75 22.012501" width="42.75"      xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
	
		
			<g transform="matrix(.022,0,0,-.022,.062,21.613)"><path id="x43" d="M614 175l29 -10q-33 -109 -57 -154q-121 -26 -184 -26q-90 0 -160.5 29t-112.5 77t-63.5 105.5t-21.5 119.5q0 157 108 253t277 96q36 0 71.5 -5t69 -13.5t36.5 -8.5q15 -102 20 -150l-29 -8q-20 79 -66.5 114t-128.5 35q-119 0 -187.5 -86t-68.5 -207
q0 -140 73.5 -227.5t188.5 -87.5q73 0 119.5 37.5t86.5 116.5z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.022,0,0,-.022,15.149,21.613)"><path id="x61" d="M433 39l-85 -51q-27 0 -47 20q-16 16 -24 44q-5 -3 -24 -16.5t-27 -18.5t-23 -13.5t-25 -12t-19 -3.5q-52 0 -86 36.5t-34 85.5q0 71 81 99q128 43 155 65v17q0 54 -23 83.5t-62 29.5q-28 0 -45 -19t-29 -66q-7 -23 -29 -23q-15 0 -29 13t-14 30t31 40q25 19 68.5 40.5
t81.5 29.5q49 0 82 -27q45 -39 45 -123v-185q0 -60 35 -60q18 0 36 11zM275 84v156q-12 -6 -49 -23t-41 -19q-31 -14 -46 -31t-15 -43q0 -35 22.5 -55.5t48.5 -20.5q19 0 42 10.5t38 25.5z"/></g>

			<g transform="matrix(.016,0,0,-.016,25.013,10.863)"><path id="x1D7D0" d="M453 211h25l-46 -211h-415v23q97 102 151 166q42 49 81 110q51 78 51 148q0 56 -31.5 91.5t-87.5 35.5q-77 0 -122 -90h-28q67 204 223 204q82 0 132 -49.5t50 -133.5q0 -110 -114 -218l-162 -154h140q82 0 107 13q27 13 46 65z"/></g><g transform="matrix(.016,0,0,-.016,32.858,10.863)"><path id="x2B" d="M535 230h-212v-233h-58v233h-213v50h213v210h58v-210h212v-50z"/></g>

		
	
</svg> Channel Antagonists

Ikeda, Keiichi; Isaka, Tsuyoshi; Fujioka, Kouki; Manome, Yoshinobu; Tojo, Katsuyoshi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/519467

International Journal of Endocrinology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 | Article ID 519467 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/519467

Suppression of Aldosterone Synthesis and Secretion by Channel Antagonists

Keiichi Ikeda,¹Tsuyoshi Isaka,²Kouki Fujioka,¹Yoshinobu Manome,¹and Katsuyoshi Tojo²

Academic Editor: Morag Young

Received27 Jul 2012

Accepted17 Sept 2012

Published11 Oct 2012

Abstract

Aldosterone, a specific mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) agonist and a key player in the development of hypertension, is synthesized as a final product of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Hypertension can be generally treated by negating the effects of angiotensin II through the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs). However, the efficacy of angiotensin II blockade by such drugs is sometimes diminished by the so-called “aldosterone breakthrough” effect, by which ACE-Is or ARBs (renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors) gradually lose their effectiveness against hypertension due to the overproduction of aldosterone, known as primary aldosteronism. Although MR antagonists are used to antagonize the effects of aldosterone, these drugs may, however, give rise to life-threatening adverse actions, such as hyperkalemia, particularly when used in conjunction with RAS inhibitors. Recently, several groups have reported that some dihydropyridine Ca²⁺ channel blockers (CCBs) have inhibitory actions on aldosterone production in in vitro and in the clinical setting. Therefore, the use of such dihydropyridine CCBs to treat aldosterone-related hypertension may prove beneficial to circumvent such therapeutic problems. In this paper, we discuss the mechanism of action of CCBs on aldosterone production and clinical perspectives for CCB use to inhibit MR activity in hypertensive patients.

1. Introduction

Aldosterone is an endogenous mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) agonist synthesized in the adrenal glomerular layer as a final product of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS); it is strongly involved in the development of hypertension due to excessive sodium retention. It has been reported that suppression of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) provides an effective treatment against cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension and cardiac failure [1, 2]. Several studies have also revealed that the blockade of MR by an MR antagonist (MRA), such as spironolactone or eplerenone, offers an effective approach to treat cardiac disease, especially cardiac failure [3–6]. These facts indicate that RAAS may contribute to the underlying mechanisms of cardiac diseases for which its control may play a critical role in ameliorating the effectiveness of treatments [7]. Although the blockade of RAS by ACE-Is or ARBs (RAS inhibitors) may be effective, the long-term treatment of hypertension by drugs classified as such often results in a diminished efficacy owing to the inadequate suppression of aldosterone synthesis. This phenomenon is known as “aldosterone breakthrough” [8, 9]. An effective approach may therefore be to use an MRA in addition to RAS inhibitors to avoid such deterioration of the ACE-I/ARB efficacy due to aldosterone breakthrough. To this extent, however, MRA use has been associated with an increased risk of fatal hyperkalemia, and the concomitant use of MRAs with RAS inhibitors may have synergistic effects, potentiating the risk for hyperkalemia [10]. In addition, aldosterone-related hypertension may also be caused by autonomous aldosterone secretion, such as primary hyperaldosteronism, which is often associated with severe hypertension and obesity [11]. These findings indicate that it is necessary that the suppression of aldosterone production be considered as an alternative choice to control blood pressure. Recently, several groups have reported that Ca²⁺ channel blockers (CCBs), which are another class of antihypertensive agent widely used to control blood pressure, may have inhibitory actions on aldosterone synthesis. Here, we provide an overview of the effects of CCBs on the production of aldosterone and discuss clinical perspectives of their use to curb aldosterone production.

2. Overview of Steroid Biosynthesis in Adrenal Cells

A brief summary of steroid biosynthesis in human adrenal cells is provided here for the convenience of the reader. The biosynthetic pathways of adrenal steroids are summarized in Figure 1 [12, 13]. Briefly, steroid biosynthesis is initiated by steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), which transports cholesterol into the mitochondria. The side chain of cholesterol is then cleaved by cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage enzyme (CYP11A1) to produce pregnenolone. In the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal gland (solid line in Figure 1), which does not express cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase (CYP17), pregnenolone is converted to progesterone by 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (3β-HSD2). CYP17, which is expressed by cells of the zona fasciculata (dotted line in Figure 1) and the zona reticularis (broken line in Figure 1), catalyzes the conversion of pregnenolone and progesterone to 17α-hydroxypregnenolone and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone, respectively. Via a different pathway, progesterone is catalyzed to 11-deoxycorticosterone (DOC), and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone to 11-deoxycortisol, respectively, by hydroxylation with steroid 21-hydroxylase (CYP21A2). Corticosterone is generated from DOC by 11β-hydroxylase (CYP11B1), which also generates cortisol from 11-deoxycortisol in zona fasciculata cells, and, in turn, aldosterone is generated from 18-hydroxycorticosterone by CYP11B2, which is also known as aldosterone synthetase. The regulation of CYP11B2 is mediated by Ca²⁺-sensitive manner through mechanisms involving calmodulin and calmodulin-dependent kinases, and the 11β-hydroxylase activity is also stimulated by Ca²⁺ [14, 15]. The previous experiments revealed that angiotensin II-induced aldosterone synthesis is involved in activation of the low voltage-activated T-type Ca²⁺ channel [16, 17], and the expression of CYP11B2 mRNA was suppressed by some dihydropyridine CCBs, which can inhibit the T-type Ca²⁺ channel [18–20]. In the adrenal cells of the zona reticularis, 17α-hydroxypregnenolone and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone are also catalyzed to dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and androstenedione, respectively. The DHEA is further sulfated to DHEA-sulfate (DHEA-S) by sulfotransferase (SULT2A1) and reversely sulfated from DHEA-S by steroid sulfatase (STS). Androstenedione on the other hand is converted to testosterone by 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 (17β-HSD3).

Both the expression of StAR at mRNA and protein levels and its activity were shown to be increased by nifedipine and efonidipine in MA-10 mouse Leydig cells and NCI-H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells, but decreased by amlodipine, azelnidipine, or R(-)-efonidipine [21, 22]. Likewise, CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 are decreased by azelnidipine, benidipine, and efonidipine (* in Figure 1) in NCI-H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells [18–20], while efonidipine increases DHEA-S production in NCI-H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells probably as a result of increased StAR expression (^# in Figure 1) [22]. The reported actions of dihydropyridine CCBs on the expression of steroidogenic enzymes in in vitro studies are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 [18–25].

3. Actions of Dihydropyridine CCBs on Adrenal Steroid Synthesis

A previous study reported that a specific step in the steroidogenic pathway may be directly linked to agonist-induced increases in the cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration in intact isolated zona glomerulosa cells [26]. Stimulation by angiotensin II or exposure to high extracellular potassium (which depolarized the cell membrane) elevates the intracellular Ca²⁺ [27] and induces aldosterone production. This increase in intracellular Ca²⁺ can be blocked by the L-type CCB nifedipine, though not completely in the case of the angiotensin II-induced intracellular Ca²⁺ elevation [27], with a concomitant decrease in aldosterone production [28]. In addition, even verapamil and diltiazem, which are nondihydropyridine L-type Ca²⁺ channel antagonists, exerted inhibitory actions on aldosterone production in rat’s adrenal glands [29]. These findings indicate that the production of aldosterone may be stimulated by processes other than by Ca²⁺ influx through the L-type calcium channel. For example, other studies on adrenal glomerulosa cells, in which T-type Ca²⁺ channel-specific antagonists (mibefradil, tetrandrine, and Ni²⁺) were used, reported involvement of the T-type Ca²⁺ channel in aldosterone production in addition to the L-type Ca²⁺ channel [28, 30–32]. These results indicate that adrenal aldosterone production requires the activation of T-type Ca²⁺ channels. Thereafter, it was reported that a newly developed dihydropyridine CCB, efonidipine, which has inhibitory properties for both L- and T-type Ca²⁺ channels [33], suppressed aldosterone and cortisol production more potently than nifedipine by reducing the expression of CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 [18, 20]. Interestingly, however, when used on NCI-H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells, efonidipine increased the expression of StAR mRNA and protein, possibly resulting in the increased production of DHEA-S [22]. It has also been reported that azelnidipine and benidipine, as well as efonidipine, have inhibitory actions on adrenal aldosterone production by decreasing the expression of CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 more potently than nifedipine [19, 20], and cilnidipine suppressed angiotensin II-induced CYP11B2 mRNA expression, but not CYP11B1. Moreover, while azelnidipine, benidipine, and efonidipine have inhibitory properties against T-type Ca²⁺ channels (α1H and α1G), nifedipine has little effect on these T-type Ca²⁺ channel subtypes [24], indicating that the effects of CCBs on the T-type Ca²⁺ channel, in addition to that on the L-type Ca²⁺ channel, may be involved in their inhibitory actions on aldosterone production. Recently, another group reported that cilnidipine, which has little or no effect on T-type Ca²⁺ channels [24] but significant inhibitory actions against an N-type Ca²⁺ channel [34], also suppressed aldosterone production in NCI-H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells [23]. The N-type Ca²⁺ channel may be involved in aldosterone production, because ω-conotoxin GIVA, a specific N-type Ca²⁺ channel blocker, significantly suppressed aldosterone and cortisol secretions in NCI-H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells without significantly influencing CYP11B2 or CYP11B1 mRNA expression [23].

Given that aldosterone is a key factor in cardiac pathological stress, promoting processes such as fibrosis and oxidative stress [7], it is important to evaluate the effects of above-mentioned CCBs on aldosterone production in in vivo animal preparations and in patients with cardiovascular diseases. In this way, in vivo studies with benidipine and cilnidipine were found to reduce the plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats [35], in the ischemia reperfusion mouse model [36], and in male SHR/Izm rats [37]. In clinical studies, azelnidipine, benidipine, and efonidipine were shown to exert suppressive actions on PAC in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [38], in patients with mild-to-moderate stage chronic kidney disease with albuminuria [39], in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis [40], and in patients with essential hypertension [41].

Activation of MR by aldosterone is one of the important causes of arterial hypertension, and, due to the extrarenal effects of aldosterone, such as cardiac fibrosis and vascular inflammation [42], it is very important to antagonize the MR activities in such patients. Dihydropyridine CCBs are widely recommended in the treatment of hypertension by several guidelines [43–47] and may have more therapeutic potential in combination with antagonists for RAS [48–50]. Combination therapies with RAS inhibitors and CCBs are well-tolerated in hypertensive patients [51–54], indicating that CCBs are the potentially important candidates as a concomitant drug with RAS inhibitors. Also, because monotherapy by RAS inhibitors for hypertension may often cause diminished efficacy of treatment, so-called “aldosterone breakthrough [8, 9],” treatment of hypertensive patients with RAS inhibitor alone is often required to add another antihypertensive drug to avoid aldosterone breakthrough. MRAs are often considered for such purpose, but concomitant usage of MRAs with RAS inhibitors increases incidence of hyperkalemia, which is one of the life-threatening adverse effects [10]. Furthermore, recent data suggest that primary aldosteronism is present in approximately 10% of hypertensive patients [55], indicating that the suppressive property of adrenal aldosterone production without severe adverse effects may be a key element in treatment of hypertension. Therefore, CCBs, which suppress adrenal aldosterone production and have tolerable property in concomitant usage with RAS inhibitors, may be another useful choice to overcome aldosterone breakthrough and aldosterone-related hypertension without intolerable adverse effects, such as severe hyperkalemia. Therefore, taken together with the recently reported data concerning the antagonistic properties of CCBs against MR activity [56, 57], such dihydropyridine CCBs may act as a new class of MRAs providing a therapeutic advantage for the treatment of aldosterone-related hypertensive patients.

4. Conclusion

Recent studies have revealed that dihydropyridine CCBs, such as azelnidipine, benidipine, cilnidipine, efonidipine, and nifedipine, have inhibitory actions on adrenal aldosterone biosynthesis in vitro. Some studies have also shown that plasma aldosterone levels are decreased in the patients prescribed such dihydropyridine CCBs. Based on accumulating evidence from in vitro and clinical studies of the actions of these drugs on aldosterone production, the clinical use of dihydropyridine CCBs may provide therapeutic advantages to combat aldosterone-related hypertension in affected patients.

References

V. Gerc and M. Buksa, “Advantages of renin-angiotensin system blockade in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases,” Medicinski Arhiv, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 295–299, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Verdecchia, G. Gentile, F. Angeli, and G. Reboldi, “Beyond blood pressure: evidence for cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal protective effects of renin-angiotensin system blockers,” Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 81–91, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Pitt, F. Zannad, W. J. Remme et al., “The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 10, pp. 709–717, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Pitt, W. Remme, F. Zannad et al., “Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 14, pp. 1309–1321, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Pitt, N. Reichek, R. Willenbrock et al., “Effects of eplerenone, enalapril, and eplerenone/enalapril in patients with essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy: the 4E-Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Study,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 15, pp. 1831–1838, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zannad, J. J. V. McMurray, H. Krum et al., “Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Manrique, G. Lastra, M. Gardner, and J. R. Sowers, “The renin angiotensin aldosterone system in hypertension: roles of insulin resistance and oxidative stress,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 569–582, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sato and T. Saruta, “Aldosterone breakthrough during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 781–788, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. P. Rossi, “Aldosterone breakthrough during RAS blockade: a role for endothelins and their antagonists?” Current Hypertension Reports, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 262–268, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Sica, “The risks and benefits of therapy with aldosterone receptor antagonist therapy,” Current Drug Safety, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sarzani, F. Guerra, L. Mancinelli, A. Buglioni, E. Franchi, and P. Dessi-Fulgheri, “Plasma Aldosterone is increased in class 2 and 3 obese essential hypertensive patients despite drug treatment,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 818–826, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Miller, “Steroidogenic enzymes,” Endocrine Development, vol. 13, pp. 1–18, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. L. Miller and R. J. Auchus, “The molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology of human steroidogenesis and its disorders,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 81–151, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Moustafa and S. B. Koritz, “Studies on the stimulation by Ca²⁺ and the inhibition by ADP of steroid 11β-hydroxylation in adrenal mitochondria,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 231–238, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Pezzi, C. D. Clyne, S. Ando, J. M. Mathis, and W. E. Rainey, “Ca²⁺-regulated expression of aldosterone synthase is mediated by calmodulin and calmodulin-dependent protein kinases,” Endocrinology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 835–838, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Rossier, M. M. Burnay, M. B. Vallotton, and A. M. Capponi, “Distinct functions of T- and L-type calcium channels during activation of bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 137, no. 11, pp. 4817–4826, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. L. Chen, D. A. Bayliss, R. J. Fern, and P. Q. Barrett, “A role for T-type Ca²⁺ channels in the synergistic control of aldosterone production by ANG II and K⁺,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 276, no. 5, pp. F674–F683, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Imagawa, S. Okayama, M. Takaoka et al., “Inhibitory effect of efonidipine on aldosterone synthesis and secretion in human adrenocarcinoma (H295R) cells,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 133–138, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Akizuki, A. Inayoshi, T. Kitayama et al., “Blockade of T-type voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels by benidipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, inhibits aldosterone production in human adrenocortical cell line NCI-H295R,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 584, no. 2-3, pp. 424–434, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Isaka, K. Ikeda, Y. Takada, Y. Inada, K. Tojo, and N. Tajima, “Azelnidipine inhibits aldosterone synthesis and secretion in human adrenocortical cell line NCI-H295R,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 605, no. 1–3, pp. 49–52, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Pandey, W. Li, X. Yin, D. M. Stocco, P. Grammas, and X. Wang, “Blocking L-type calcium channels reduced the threshold of cAMP-induced steroidogenic acute regulatory gene expression in MA-10 mouse Leydig cells,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ikeda, T. Saito, and K. Tojo, “Efonidipine, a Ca²⁺-channel blocker, enhances the production of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in NCI-H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells,” Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 224, no. 4, pp. 263–271, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Aritomi, H. Wagatsuma, T. Numata et al., “Expression of N-type calcium channels in human adrenocortical cells and their contribution to corticosteroid synthesis,” Hypertension Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 193–201, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Furukawa, T. Nukada, Y. Namiki et al., “Five different profiles of dihydropyridines in blocking T-type Ca²⁺ channel subtypes (Ca_v3.1 (α_1G), Ca_v3.2 (α_1H), and Ca_v3.3 (α_1I)) expressed in Xenopus oocytes,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 613, no. 1–3, pp. 100–107, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Perez-Reyes, A. L. Van Deusen, and I. Vitko, “Molecular pharmacology of human Ca_v3.2 T-type Ca²⁺ channels: block by antihypertensives, antiarrhythmics, and their analogs,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 621–627, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Python, O. P. Laban, M. F. Rossier, M. B. Vallotton, and A. M. Capponi, “The site of action of Ca²⁺ in the activation of steroidogenesis: studies in Ca²⁺-clamped bovine adrenal zona-glomerulosa cells,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 305, no. 2, pp. 569–576, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
I. M. Bird, R. A. Word, C. Clyne, J. I. Mason, and W. E. Rainey, “Potassium negatively regulates angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in human adrenocortical H295R cells,” Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1129–1134, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Gallo-Payet, E. Grazzini, M. Côté et al., “Role of Ca²⁺ in the action of adrenocorticotropin in cultured human adrenal glomerulosa cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 460–466, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
V. N. Uebele, C. E. Nuss, J. J. Renger, and T. M. Connolly, “Role of voltage-gated calcium channels in potassium-stimulated aldosterone secretion from rat adrenal zona glomerulosa cells,” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 209–218, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Rossier, C. P. Python, A. M. Capponi, W. Schlegel, C. Y. Kwan, and M. B. Vallotton, “Blocking T-type calcium channels with tetrandrine inhibits steroidogenesis in bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 1035–1043, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Rossier, E. A. Ertel, M. B. Vallotton, and A. M. Capponi, “Inhibitory action of mibefradil on calcium signaling and aldosterone synthesis in bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 287, no. 3, pp. 824–831, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
D. P. Lotshaw, “Role of membrane depolarization and T-type Ca²⁺ channels in angiotensin II and K⁺ stimulated aldosterone secretion,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 175, no. 1-2, pp. 157–171, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Masumiya, T. Shijuku, H. Tanaka, and K. Shigenobu, “Inhibition of myocardial L- and T-type Ca²⁺ currents by efonidipine: possible mechanism for its chronotropic effect,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 349, no. 2-3, pp. 351–357, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Uneyama, H. Uchida, T. Konda, R. Yoshimoto, and N. Akaike, “Selectivity of dihydropyridines for cardiac L-type and sympathetic N-type Ca²⁺ channels,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 373, no. 1, pp. 93–100, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Yamamoto, K. Kataoka, Y. F. Dong et al., “Benidipine, a dihydropyridine L-type/T-type calcium channel blocker, affords additive benefits for prevention of cardiorenal injury in hypertensive rats,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1321–1329, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ohtani, S. Usui, S. Kaneko et al., “Benidipine reduces ischemia reperfusion-induced systemic oxidative stress through suppression of aldosterone production in mice,” Hypertension Research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 287–294, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Aritomi, T. Konda, and M. Yoshimura, “L/N-type calcium channel blocker suppresses reflex aldosterone production induced by antihypertensive action,” Heart Vessels, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 419–423, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Isaka, N. Sakamoto, T. Hayashi, K. Ikeda, M. Sakamoto, and K. Tojo, “Azelnidipine decreased plasma aldosterone and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 levels in the hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—the Jikei Azelnidipine study in the patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus (JAz-HDM),” Therapeutic Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 371–381, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Abe, K. Okada, N. Maruyama et al., “Benidipine reduces albuminuria and plasma aldosterone in mild-to-moderate stage chronic kidney disease with albuminuria,” Hypertension Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 268–273, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ishimitsu, T. Kameda, A. Akashiba et al., “Efonidipine reduces proteinuria and plasma aldosterone in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis,” Hypertension Research, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 621–626, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tsutamoto, T. Tanaka, K. Nishiyama et al., “Long-term effect of efonidipine therapy on plasma aldosterone and left ventricular mass index in patients with essential hypertension,” Hypertension Research, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 670–674, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nguyen Dinh Cat and F. Jaisser, “Extrarenal effects of aldosterone,” Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 147–156, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
A. V. Chobanian, G. L. Bakris, H. R. Black et al., “Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure,” Hypertension, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1206–1252, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak et al., “2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC),” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1105–1187, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ogihara, K. Kikuchi, H. Matsuoka et al., “The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2009),” Hypertension Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–107, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Wang, K. Kario, T. Lau et al., “Use of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in the management of hypertension in Eastern Asians: a scientific statement from the Asian Pacific Heart Association,” Hypertension Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 423–430, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Rabi, S. S. Daskalopoulou, R. S. Padwal et al., “The 2011 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy,” Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 415–433, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
K. K. Gaddam and S. Oparil, “Diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: rationale for RAAS antagonist/CCB combination therapy,” Journal of the American Society of Hypertension, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52–68, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kario, “Proposal of RAS-diuretic vs. RAS-calcium antagonist strategies in high-risk hypertension: insight from the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profile and central pressure,” Journal of the American Society of Hypertension, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 215–218, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Mourad, S. Le Jeune, A. Pirollo, C. Mourad, Y. Gaudouen, and M. Lopez-Sublet, “Combinations of inhibitors of the reninangiotensin system with calcium channel blockers for the treatment of hypertension: focus on perindopril/amlodipine,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2263–2276, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nagahama, T. Norimatsu, T. Maki, M. Yasuda, and S. Tanaka, “The effect of combination therapy with an L/N-type Ca²⁺ channel blocker, cilnidipine, and an angiotensin II receptor blocker on the blood pressure and heart rate in Japanese hypertensive patients: an observational study conducted in Japan,” Hypertension Research, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 815–822, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Katayama, R. Kawamori, Y. Iwamoto, I. Saito, and K. Kuramoto, “In half of hypertensive diabetics, co-administration of a calcium channel blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor achieved a target blood pressure of <130/80 mmHg: the azelnidipine and temocapril in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (ATTEST) study,” Hypertension Research, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1499–1508, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Ogihara, T. Saruta, K. Shimada, and K. Kuramoto, “A randomized, double-blind, four-arm parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of azelnidipine and olmesartan medoxomil combination therapy compared with each monotherapy in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: The REZALT study,” Hypertension Research, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1148–1154, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Matsuzaki, T. Ogihara, S. Umemoto et al., “Prevention of cardiovascular events with calcium channel blocker-based combination therapies in patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1649–1659, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Sica, “Endocrine causes of secondary hypertension,” Journal of Clinical Hypertension, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 534–540, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Dietz, S. Du, C. W. Bolten et al., “A number of marketed dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers have mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist activity,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 742–748, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kosaka, K. Hirayama, N. Yoda et al., “The L-, N-, and T-type triple calcium channel blocker benidipine acts as an antagonist of mineralocorticoid receptor, a member of nuclear receptor family,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 635, no. 1–3, pp. 49–55, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Keiichi Ikeda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

7679

Downloads

1581

Citations