International Journal of Endocrinology

International Journal of Endocrinology / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 684659 |

Annamaria Morelli, Paolo Comeglio, Erica Sarchielli, Ilaria Cellai, Linda Vignozzi, Gabriella B. Vannelli, Mario Maggi, "Negative Effects of High Glucose Exposure in Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons", International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2013, Article ID 684659, 8 pages, 2013.

Negative Effects of High Glucose Exposure in Human Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons

Academic Editor: Amelie Bonnefond
Received13 Nov 2013
Revised13 Dec 2013
Accepted18 Dec 2013
Published31 Dec 2013


Metabolic disorders are often associated with male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, suggesting that hypothalamic defects involving GnRH neurons may impair the reproductive function. Among metabolic factors hyperglycemia has been implicated in the control of the reproductive axis at central level, both in humans and in animal models. To date, little is known about the direct effects of pathological high glucose concentrations on human GnRH neurons. In this study, we investigated the high glucose effects in the human GnRH-secreting FNC-B4 cells. Gene expression profiling by qRT-PCR, confirmed that FNC-B4 cells express GnRH and several genes relevant for GnRH neuron function (KISS1R, KISS1, sex steroid and leptin receptors, FGFR1, neuropilin 2, and semaphorins), along with glucose transporters (GLUT1, GLUT3, and GLUT4). High glucose exposure (22 mM; 40 mM) significantly reduced gene and protein expression of GnRH, KISS1R, KISS1, and leptin receptor, as compared to normal glucose (5 mM). Consistent with previous studies, leptin treatment significantly induced GnRH mRNA expression at 5 mM glucose, but not in the presence of high glucose concentrations. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate a deleterious direct contribution of high glucose on human GnRH neurons, thus providing new insights into pathogenic mechanisms linking metabolic disorders to reproductive dysfunctions.

1. Introduction

The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis is finely regulated at a central level by the activity of GnRH neurons, a peculiar hypothalamic neuronal subpopulation, comprising few cells (800–2000 cells in the adult brain) scattered within the preoptic area (POA) of the hypothalamus [1, 2]. The anatomical position of GnRH neurons makes them especially vulnerable to peripheral nutrient changes, due to the close proximity to the blood brain barrier (BBB), within the third ventricle [3]. Moreover, recent findings demonstrated that a subpopulation of GnRH neurons projects dendrites in regions outside the BBB, where they may directly sense molecules circulating in the bloodstream, therefore extending the range of factors that are integrated by these neurons for the control of the reproductive axis [4].

Over the past years, compelling experimental evidences have deciphered several mechanisms through which peripheral signals and neuroendocrine pathways are integrated and conveyed to finally regulate GnRH neuron function. In particular, metabolic hormones, including leptin, insulin, ghrelin, and polypeptide XX, may regulate GnRH neuron activity and thereby the HPG axis [5]. In addition to peripheral hormones, novel central mediators responsible for relaying such metabolic messages to centers governing reproduction have been identified. The most recent data from experimental animals indicate a central role played by the kisspeptin/KISS1R system in mediating a range of metabolic inputs known to regulate GnRH secretion ([68], for reviews).

Derangements of the HPG axis are often associated with metabolic disorders. In the male population, hypogonadism, a frequent condition in middle-aged and elderly subjects [9], affects patients with type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) more frequently than subjects without [1012]. In T2DM patients androgen deficiency is associated with inappropriately normal or even low plasma concentrations of the pituitary gonadotropins—LH and FSH—[1315] indicating hypothalamic defects and/or impaired pituitary response to GnRH. A normal LH and FSH response to GnRH has been demonstrated in subjects with T2DM, suggesting a hypothalamic rather than a pituitary defect [16]. However, the pathogenic mechanism underlying a relationship between hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) and metabolic disorders remains to be fully elucidated. Several studies have documented that insulin resistance is the most important factor responsible for the association between low testosterone and T2DM ([15], for review), although conflicting results exist about the level—central and/or peripheral—at which the underlying pathogenic mechanisms may interfere with the HPG axis activity. By assessing insulin sensitivity with hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, Pitteloud et al. [17] demonstrated that increased insulin resistance was associated with decreased Leydig cell testosterone secretion and not with LH pulses, thus indicating the implication of a peripheral impairment of the reproductive axis. A more recent study reported that patients with T2DM showed lower hypothalamic pulse frequency without changes in the pituitary response to GnRH nor testicular response to hCG [18]. Interestingly, in the same study it was reported that glucose levels were strongly correlated with the number of LH pulses, thus suggesting a specific negative effect of hyperglycemia in the hypothalamic secretion of GnRH [18]. In addition, hyperglycaemia has been identified as one of the major determinants for the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and hypogonadism [19]. A recent study in an animal model of high fat diet-induced MetS [20], aimed at investigating the contribution of the different metabolic derangements on the related HH condition, identified a strong association of reduced LH plasma levels with glucose intolerance severity, as well as with peculiar hypothalamic alterations, including increased expression of the glucose transporter GLUT4 [21]. These alterations occurred in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus, lining the third ventricle, where GnRH neurons reside and, accordingly, the same hypothalamic area was characterized by reduced immunopositivity for GnRH [20] and KISS1R [21]. Overall, these findings lead to further investigating the direct role specifically played by glucose in regulating GnRH neuron function.

To date, little is known about the direct effects of metabolic derangements on GnRH neurons in the human brain. In this study we took advantage of an in vitro model, the FNC-B4 cells, a long-term primary culture of human foetal GnRH-secreting neurons, obtained from a male fetus and previously characterized [2224], which also express the kisspeptin/KiSS1R system [25, 26]. In order to investigate the direct effects of uncontrolled hyperglycemia on GnRH neurons, we exposed FNCB4 cells to elevated concentrations of glucose.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

The human GnRH-secreting FNC-B4 cells were established, cloned, and propagated in vitro from the olfactory system of a male fetus, cryogenically preserved, and previously characterized [22]. Cells were grown using Coon’s modified F-12 medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) and antibiotic/antimycotic solution (penicillin, 100 IU/mL; streptomycin, 100 mg/mL). Before each experiment, cells at passages 5 to 10 were incubated with serum-free medium for 24 hours and then experiments were performed using glucose-free medium supplemented with either normal glucose (5 mM), high glucose (22 mM), very high glucose (40 mM), or mannitol (22 mM) for 24 hours. A subset of experiments was performed treating cells with 1 nM leptin for 24 hour in the presence of either 5 mM, 22 mM, or 40 mM glucose. Cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and processed for quantitative mRNA expression or for immunocytochemistry procedures.

2.2. RNA Extraction and Quantitative RT-PCR

Isolation of RNA was performed using TRIZOL reagents according to manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies Europe, Monza, Italy). cDNA synthesis was carried out using the iScriptTM cDNA Synthesis Kit purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA). Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with the fluorescent TaqMan methodology, as previously published [25], using specific primers and probe mixtures for GnRH1 (Hs00171272_m1), KISS1R (Hs00261399_m1), KISS1 (Hs00158486_m1), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1; Hs00241111_m1), neuropilin 2 (NRP2; Hs00187290_m1), semaphorin 3A (SEMA3A; Hs00173810_m1), semaphorin 3F (SEMA3F; Hs00188273_m1), tachykinin 3 (TAC3; Hs00203109_m1), TAC3 receptor (TAC3R; Hs00357277_m1), androgen receptor (AR; Hs00171172_m1), estrogen receptor-α (ERα; Hs01046818_m1), ERβ (Hs01100358_m1), G protein-coupled ER (GPER/GPR30; Hs00173506_m1), leptin receptor (LEPR; Hs00174497_m1), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1; Hs00197884_m1), GLUT3 (Hs00359840_m1), and GLUT4 (Hs00168966_m1) mRNA, purchased from Life Technologies. The expression of the 18S ribosomal RNA subunit, chosen as the housekeeping gene, was quantified with a predeveloped assay (Hs99999901_s1; Life Technologies). Data analysis was based on the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method, as previously described [27]. Amplification and detection were performed with the MyiQTM2 Two-Color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

2.3. Immunocytochemistry

FNC-B4 cells were cultured on slides in the appropriate medium, then were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) for 10 minutes and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 10 minutes. After rinsing in PBS, the slides were incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin for 15 minutes. Immunostaining was performed as previously described [25] using monoclonal anti-GnRH I antibody (1 : 200 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), rabbit polyclonal anti-kisspeptin (1 : 2000 dilution, Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Belmont, CA), or rabbit polyclonal anti-KISS1R (1 : 100 dilution; Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) followed by the conjugated antibodies: R6393 rhodamine red goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (1 : 200, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for anti-GnRH I and A-11001 Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (1 : 200, Molecular Probes), for anti-kisspeptin or anti-KISS1R. The slides were evaluated and photographed using a Nikon Microphot-FXA microscope (Nikon). Immunopositivity quantification was performed using Photoshop 5.5 software (Adobe Systems Inc.).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean standard error of the mean (SEM) for n samples. Differences between more than two groups were assessed with one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey-Kramer post hoc analysis. was considered significant.

3. Results

In order to provide a better characterization of the FNC-B4 cell phenotype, gene expression profiling was performed by quantitative RT-PCR in untreated cells. No differences were observed between the different passages (from 5 to 10), therefore, results were pooled and reported in Figure 1. FNC-B4 cells abundantly expressed GnRH and, at a lower extent, KISS1 and KISS1R mRNA. The most abundant expression was detected for genes known to be implicated in GnRH neuron migration, such as FGFR1, semaphorins (SEMA3A and SEMA3F), and their cognate receptor neuropilin 2 (NRP2). In contrast, TAC3 (otherwise known as neurokinin B) was almost undetectable and its cognate receptor (TAC3R) was not expressed by FNC-B4 cells. Interestingly, among the sex steroid receptors, AR and the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER1/GPR30 were the most abundant, when compared to the classical ERs (ERα and ERβ). Moreover, FNC-B4 cells expressed high levels of leptin receptor (LEPR), along with the glucose transporter isoforms GLUT1 and GLUT3. Although at a lower extent, FNC-B4 also expressed the insulin-dependent isoform GLUT4.

To study whether the prolonged exposure to increasing glucose concentrations could interfere with the expression of genes related to GnRH neuron function, FNC-B4 cells were cultured for 24 hours in the presence of three different glucose concentrations (5 mM, 22 mM, and 40 mM). As shown in Figure 2, both high (22 mM) and very high (40 mM) glucose concentrations significantly reduced the mRNA expression of GnRH (Figure 2(a)) and KISS1R (Figure 2(b)), while KISS1 mRNA was inhibited only at the highest glucose concentration. Osmolarity-induced alterations were ruled out since no effects were observed by exposing cells to 22 mM mannitol (Figures 2(a)2(c)). High glucose dependent down-regulation of GnRH, KISS1R, and KISS1 expression was also confirmed by immunocytochemistry analysis, as shown in Figure 2 by representative microphotographs (panels d-e, g-h, and j-k, resp.) and by the related computer-assisted quantification of immunopositivity intensity (panels f, i, and l, resp.).

The effects of high glucose exposure on GnRH expression were also studied in the presence of leptin, which is able to induce it in FNC-B4 cells, as previously demonstrated [26]. Accordingly, leptin treatment (1 nM, 24 hours) significantly increased GnRH mRNA expression in FNC-B4 cells at normal glucose (5 mM) (Figure 3(a)). However, this effect was lacking in the presence of high glucose concentrations (22 and 40 mM) (Figure 3(b)).

4. Discussion

Perturbation of glucose metabolism has been implicated as one of the pathogenic factors responsible for the association between HH and metabolic disorders [19]. In experimental MetS, hyperglycemia and related hypothalamic inflammatory processes have been associated with the impairment of GnRH/gonadotropin release [20]. Using a well-characterized cellular model, we here demonstrate a direct inhibitory action of increasing glucose concentrations on human foetal GnRH-secreting neurons, the FNC-B4 cells, thus unraveling that under pathological conditions, high levels of glucose may directly inhibit the expression of genes relevant for GnRH neuron function.

It is well known that glucose is a key metabolic regulator of the reproductive axis, able to fine-tune pulsatile GnRH release ([28], for review). The study by Herde et al. [4], showing that subpopulations of GnRH neurons may direct sense from the periphery, greatly improved our understanding of how abrupt changes in the plasma level of molecules can modulate pulsatile GnRH/LH secretion. Recent evidences in the mouse GT1-7 clonal GnRH cell line have implicated this GnRH neuronal cell line as direct sensor of glucose, further suggesting that GnRH neurons may sense changes in extracellular glucose directly [29, 30] and that this glucosensing is modulated by gonadal steroids [29, 31]. However, the majority of existing evidence for glucose regulation of GnRH neuron activity is derived from studies of experimental glucoprivation, showing that GnRH neurons are sensitive to changes in glucose concentrations within the physiological range (up to 5 mM), with low doses ( 0.5 mM) being able to downregulate GnRH release [29, 31, 32]. In this study, we have tested the effects of exposing FNC-B4 cells to extremely high glucose concentrations (22 and 40 mM), in order to mimic pathological conditions, such as uncontrolled diabetic hyperglycemia, when brain glucose levels more likely exceed 5 mM.

The investigation of GnRH neuron biology is strongly hampered by the peculiar anatomical distribution of these few hundreds of cells scattered within the hypothalamic POA. The availability of FNC-B4 cells have facilitated the study of mechanisms regulating GnRH neurons of human origin [2226, 3336]. These cells express and release GnRH in response to different stimuli, including sex steroids [23], kisspeptin [25], and leptin [26]. Moreover, previous studies have identified that FNC-B4 cells express the insulin growth factor (IGF) system which was downregulated by high glucose (20 mM) exposure [37]. We here show that FNC-B4 cells express glucose transporters (GLUT1, GLUT3, and GLUT4) and further demonstrate that these cells may respond to changes in glucose concentrations, thus opening new mechanistic insights into the direct metabolic control of GnRH release. Exposing FNC-B4 cells to high glucose significantly reduced gene and protein expression not only of GnRH but also KISS1R, which, upon activation by kisspeptin, is regarded as the master regulator of GnRH production. As previously demonstrated [25], we here confirm that FNC-B4 cells express KISS1, whose expression is also impaired by high glucose exposure. This finding is apparently in contrast with the current understanding of KISS1/KISS1R system in the forebrain of the mouse and rat, which indicates that kisspeptin-secreting neurons are a hypothalamic neuronal subpopulation distinct from that of GnRH-secreting neurons ([8], for review). However, in good agreement with our results, the mouse GT1-7 cell line, which are immortalized hypothalamic GnRH neurons [38], express KISS1 [39]. Gene expression profiling better clarified the FNC-B4 phenotype, which abundantly express genes, such as FGFR1, NRP2, SEMA3A, and SEMA3F, known to be involved in the normal migratory processes, through which GnRH neurons reach the final hypothalamic destination during embryogenesis. It is well known that FGFR1 mutations cause the Kallmann syndrome, a heterogeneous genetic disorder that associates HH due to GnRH deficiency with anosmia [40]. Similarly, neuropilins (NRP1 and NRP2) and their ligands semaphorins (SEMA3A and SEMA3F) have been implicated in the development of the GnRH system [41]. Interestingly, FNC-B4 cells not only express the classical androgen and estrogen receptors (AR, ERα, and ERβ), as previously reported [23, 26], but also the membrane estrogen receptor GPER1/GPR30, which has been recently implicated in rapid action of estrogen both in primates [42] and mice [43] GnRH neurons. Moreover, the identity of FNC-B4 cells as GnRH neurons is corroborated by the observation that these cells do not express TAC3, the gene encoding the neurokinin B (NKB), nor do they express TAC3R, which encodes for NKB receptor. This finding is in agreement with studies reporting the lack of TAC3R in GnRH neurons of sheep [44, 45] and mice [46]. Indeed, it has been assumed that that NKB is released by KISS1 neurons and not by GnRH neurons and acts to enhance kisspeptin secretion by an autocrine or paracrine mechanism through TAC3R [47]. Accordingly, kisspeptin infusion restores gonadotropin pulsatility in patients with TAC3 or TAC3R loss-of-function mutations [47].

In this study, we originally demonstrated the regulation of leptin signalling in FNC-B4 cells by glucose exposure. The role of leptin as permissive metabolic signal for reproduction, acting through a stimulatory effect of the hormone on GnRH secretion is well known [48]. As previously demonstrated [26], we here confirm that at 5 mM glucose concentration leptin retained the ability of inducing GnRH expression in FNC-B4 cells. In contrast, leptin failed to stimulate GnRH expression in the presence of high glucose doses, thus suggesting an impaired leptin signalling, most likely due to the inhibitory effect of both 22 and 40 mM glucose concentrations on LEPR expression. Although it is generally accepted that GnRH neurons do not physiologically express LEPR, suggesting the involvement of intermediate neuronal circuits and signals [49], our results are in agreement with previous reports showing that the stimulatory effect of leptin on GnRH secretion may be direct on cells, which, similarly to FNC-B4, express LEPR [50].

Since FNC-B4 cells have a male karyotype, any extrapolation of our results to explain the control of GnRH neurons by glucose is limited to male patients. Indeed, the effects of MetS on the reproductive female system (increased secretion of LH, hyperandrogenism) are quite different from those occurring in males. Sexual dimorphism of hypothalamic nuclei, which in females are involved in mediating the positive feedback of ovarian steroids, essential for the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge, could be implicated in the different response of the female reproductive system to metabolic disorders. Further studies could clarify whether neurons, similar to FNC-B4, with a female karyotype would have a different control of the same genes and proteins.

In conclusion, even if obtained in vitro, our findings support the idea of a deleterious direct contribution of hyperglycemia on human GnRH neurons, thus providing new insights into the pathogenic mechanisms linking HH to metabolic disorders.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.


This research was supported by Under40-Young Investigators funds from the Italian Minister of Health (Grant no. GR2008-1137632) and by Fondo per gli Investimenti alla Ricerca di Base (FIRB, Protocol no. 2010RBFR10VJ56 002) from the Italian Minister of University, Research and Instruction.


  1. M. Schwanzel-Fukuda, “Origin and migration of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons in mammals,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Wray, “Development of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-1 neurons,” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 292–316, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. E. Herbison, “Physiology of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuronal network,” in Physiology of Reproduction, E. Knobil and J. D. Neill, Eds., pp. 1415–1482, Raven Press, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. K. Herde, K. Geist, R. E. Campbell, and A. E. Herbison, “Gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons extend complex highly branched dendritic trees outside the blood-brain barrier,” Endocrinology, vol. 152, no. 10, pp. 3832–3841, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Fernandez-Fernandez, A. C. Martini, V. M. Navarro et al., “Novel signals for the integration of energy balance and reproduction,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 254-255, pp. 127–132, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. T. George, R. P. Millar, and R. A. Anderson, “Hypothesis: kisspeptin mediates male hypogonadism in obesity and type 2 diabetes,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 302–307, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Castellano and M. Tena-Sempere, “Metabolic regulation of kisspeptin,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 784, pp. 363–383, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  8. L. Pinilla, E. Aguilar, C. Dieguez, R. P. Millar, and M. Tena-Sempere, “Kisspeptins and reproduction: physiological roles and regulatory mechanisms,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 1235–1316, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. Buvat, M. Maggi, A. Guay, and L. O. Torres, “Testosterone deficiency in men: systematic review and standard operating procedures for diagnosis and treatment,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 245–284, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  10. S. Dhindsa, M. G. Miller, C. L. McWhirter et al., “Testosterone concentrations in diabetic and nondiabetic obese men,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1186–1192, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Kapoor, H. Aldred, S. Clark, K. S. Channer, and T. H. Jones, “Clinical and biochemical assessment of hypogonadism in men with type 2 diabetes: correlations with bioavailable testosterone and visceral adiposity,” Diabetes Care, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 911–917, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Grossmann, M. C. Thomas, S. Panagiotopoulos et al., “Low testosterone levels are common and associated with insulin resistance in men with diabetes,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 1834–1840, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Dhindsa, S. Prabhakar, M. Sethi, A. Bandyopadhyay, A. Chaudhuri, and P. Dandona, “Frequent occurrence of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in type 2 diabetes,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 5462–5468, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Corona, E. Mannucci, L. Petrone et al., “Association of hypogonadism and type II diabetes in men attending an outpatient erectile dysfunction clinic,” International Journal of Impotence Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 190–197, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Dandona and S. Dhindsa, “Update: hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in type 2 diabetes and obesity,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 2643–2651, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Tripathy, S. Dhindsa, R. Garg, A. Khaishagi, T. Syed, and P. Dandona, “Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in erectile dysfunction associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a common defect?” Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  17. N. Pitteloud, M. Hardin, A. A. Dwyer et al., “Increasing insulin resistance is associated with a decrease in Leydig cell testosterone secretion in men,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 2636–2641, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. R. Costanzo, S. M. Suarez, H. E. Scaglia, C. Zylbersztein, L. E. Litwak, and P. Knoblovits, “Evaluation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in eugonadal men with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Andrology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 117–124, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Corona, E. Mannucci, G. Forti, and M. Maggi, “Hypogonadism, ED, metabolic syndrome and obesity: a pathological link supporting cardiovascular diseases,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 587–598, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Filippi, L. Vignozzi, A. Morelli et al., “Testosterone partially ameliorates metabolic profile and erectile responsiveness to PDE5 inhibitors in an animal model of male metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 3274–3288, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Morelli, E. Sarchielli, P. Comeglio et al., “Metabolic syndrome induces inflammation and impairs gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in the preoptic area of the hypothalamus in rabbits,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 382, no. 1, pp. 107–119, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  22. G. B. Vannelli, F. Ensoli, R. Zonefrati et al., “Neuroblast long-term cell cultures from human fetal olfactory epithelium respond to odors,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 4382–4394, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  23. T. Barni, M. Maggi, G. Fantoni et al., “Sex steroids and odorants modulate gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in primary cultures of human olfactory cells,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 4266–4273, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. Maggi, T. Barni, G. Fantoni et al., “Expression and biological effects of endothelin-1 in human gonadotropin-releasing hormone-secreting neurons,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1658–1665, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Morelli, M. Marini, R. Mancina et al., “Sex steroids and leptin regulate the “first kiss” (KiSS 1/g-protein-coupled receptor 54 system) in human gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-secreting neuroblasts,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1097–1113, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Morelli, B. Fibbi, M. Marini et al., “Dihydrotestosterone and leptin regulate gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) expression and secretion in human GnRH-secreting neuroblasts,” Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 397–407, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. X.-H. Zhang, A. Morelli, M. Luconi et al., “Testosterone regulates PDE5 expression and in vivo responsiveness to tadalafil in rat corpus cavernosum,” European Urology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 409–416, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. V. Roland and S. M. Moenter, “Regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons by glucose,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 443–449, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Zhang, M. A. Bosch, J. E. Levine, O. K. Rønnekleiv, and M. J. Kelly, “Gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons express KATP channels that are regulated by estrogen and responsive to glucose and metabolic inhibition,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 38, pp. 10153–10164, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Beall, D. L. Hamilton, J. Gallagher et al., “Mouse hypothalamic GT1-7 cells demonstrate AMPK-dependent intrinsic glucose-sensing behavior,” Diabetologia, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2432–2444, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. V. Roland and S. M. Moenter, “Glucosensing by GnRH neurons: inhibition by androgens and involvement of AMP-activated protein kinase,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 847–858, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. A. McFadden, J. A. Menchella, J. A. Chalmers, M. L. Centeno ML, and D. D. Belsham, “Glucose responsiveness in a novel adult-derived GnRH cell line, mHypoA-GnRH/GFP: involvement of AMP-activated protein kinase,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 377, no. 1-2, pp. 65–74, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. G. Romanelli, T. Barni, M. Maggi et al., “Expression and function of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor in human olfactory GnRH-secreting neurons: an autocrine GnRH loop underlies neuronal migration,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 117–126, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. G. Romanelli, T. Barni, M. Maggi et al., “Role of endothelin-1 in the migration of human olfactory gonadotropin-releasing hormone-secreting neuroblasts,” Endocrinology, vol. 146, no. 10, pp. 4321–4330, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. González-Martínez, S.-H. Kim, Y. Hu et al., “Anosmin-1 modulates fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 signaling in human gonadotropin-releasing hormone olfactory neuroblasts through a heparan sulfate-dependent mechanism,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 46, pp. 10384–10392, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Hu, S. Poopalasundaram, A. Graham, and P. M. Bouloux, “GnRH neuronal migration and olfactory bulb neurite outgrowth are dependent on FGF receptor 1 signaling, specifically via the PI3K p110alpha isoform in chick embryo,” Endocrinology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 388–399, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. Giannini, S. Benvenuti, P. Luciani et al., “Intermittent high glucose concentrations reduce neuronal precursor survival by altering the IGF system: the involvement of the neuroprotective factor DHCR24 (Seladin-1),” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 523–532, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. P. L. Mellon, J. J. Windle, P. C. Goldsmith, C. A. Padula, J. L. Roberts, and R. I. Weiner, “Immortalization of hypothalamic GnRH neurons by genetically targeted tumorigenesis,” Neuron, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. T. Terasaka, F. Otsuka, N. Tsukamoto et al., “Mutual interaction of kisspeptin, estrogen and bone morphogenetic protein-4 activity in GnRH regulation by GT1-7 cells,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 381, no. 1-2, pp. 8–15, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  40. N. Pitteloud, A. Meysing, R. Quinton et al., “Mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 cause Kallmann syndrome with a wide spectrum of reproductive phenotypes,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 254-255, pp. 60–69, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Cariboni, J. Hickok, S. Rakic et al., “Neuropilins and their ligands are important in the migration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2387–2395, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. D. Noel, K. L. Keen, D. I. Baumann, E. J. Filardo, and E. Terasawa, “Involvement of G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) in rapid action of estrogen in primate LHRH neurons,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 349–359, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Sun, Z. Chu, and S. M. Moenter, “Diurnal in vivo and rapid in vitro effects of estradiol on voltage-gated calcium channels in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 3912–3923, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. H. J. Billings, J. M. Connors, S. N. Altman et al., “Neurokinin B acts via the neurokinin-3 receptor in the retrochiasmatic area to stimulate luteinizing hormone secretion in sheep,” Endocrinology, vol. 151, no. 8, pp. 3836–3846, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Amstalden, L. M. Coolen, A. M. Hemmerle et al., “Neurokinin 3 receptor immunoreactivity in the septal region, preoptic area and hypothalamus of the female sheep: colocalisation in neurokinin B cells of the arcuate nucleus but not in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone neurones,” Journal of Neuroendocrinology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. V. M. Navarro, M. L. Gottsch, M. Wu et al., “Regulation of NKB pathways and their roles in the control of Kiss1 neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the male mouse,” Endocrinology, vol. 152, no. 11, pp. 4265–4275, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Young, J. T. George, J. A. Tello et al., “Kisspeptin restores pulsatile LH secretion in patients with neurokinin B signaling deficiencies: physiological, pathophysiological and therapeutic implications,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Gamba and F. P. Pralong, “Control of GnRH neuronal activity by metabolic factors: the role of leptin and insulin,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 254-255, pp. 133–139, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. J. Cunningham, D. K. Clifton, and R. A. Steiner, “Leptin's actions on the reproductive axis: perspectives and mechanisms,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 216–222, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Magni, R. Vettor, C. Pagano et al., “Expression of a leptin receptor in immortalized gonadotropin-releasing hormone-secreting neurons,” Endocrinology, vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 1581–1585, 1999. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Annamaria Morelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.