Research Article
Prediction of Extrathyroidal Extension Using Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography
Table 3
Diagnostic accuracy of combining the preoperative US and CT to predict the extrathyroidal extension.
| Findings | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | AUC (95% CIs) | US | CT |
| Contact with capsule | Contact with capsule | 98.0 | 25.7 | 64.9 | 90.0 | 0.428 (0.352–0.574) | More than 25% contact | 87.8 | 48.6 | 70.5 | 73.9 | 0.472 (0.415–0.666) | More than 50% contact | 18.4 | 94.3 | 81.9 | 45.2 | 0.521 (0.483–0.637) |
| Disruption of capsule | Contact with capsule | 97.6 | 40.7 | 71.9 | 91.7 | 0.654 (0.525–0.729) | More than 25% contact | 92.9 | 70.4 | 83.0 | 86.4 | 0.744 (0.646–0.802) | More than 50% contact | 59.5 | 92.6 | 92.7 | 59.5 | 0.725 (0.672–0.809) |
|
|
US, ultrasonography; CT, computed tomography; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CIs, confidence intervals.
|