International Journal of Endocrinology

International Journal of Endocrinology / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 572713 | 12 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/572713

The Relevance of the Renin-Angiotensin System in the Development of Drugs to Combat Preeclampsia

Academic Editor: Francesco Perticone
Received15 Oct 2014
Revised28 Mar 2015
Accepted28 Mar 2015
Published27 Apr 2015

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder that occurs during pregnancy. It has an unknown etiology and affects approximately 5–8% of pregnancies worldwide. The pathophysiology of preeclampsia is not yet known, and preeclampsia has been called “a disease of theories.” The central symptom of preeclampsia is hypertension. However, the etiology of the hypertension is unknown. In this review, we analyze the molecular mechanisms of preeclampsia with a particular focus on the pathogenesis of the hypertension in preeclampsia and its association with the renin-angiotensin system. In addition, we propose potential alternative strategies to target the renin-angiotensin system, which is enhanced during pregnancy.

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia refers to a new onset of hypertension (systolic pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥90 mmHg on two occasions at least 4 hours apart) and either proteinuria (≥300 mg in 24 hours) or end-organ dysfunction (including thrombocytopenia, renal insufficiency, impaired liver function, pulmonary edema, and cerebral symptoms) after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously normotensive woman. Severe hypertension (systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg on two occasions at least 4 hours apart while the patient is on bed rest) and symptoms of end-organ injury comprise the severe end of the spectrum of the disease [1]. Worldwide, 10–15% of direct maternal deaths are associated with preeclampsia/eclampsia [2].

Preeclampsia not only is a hypertensive disorder, but also is associated with metabolic defects such as glucose intolerance and dyslipidemia. Preeclamptic women exhibit increased risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes later in life [3]. During oral glucose tolerance tests, preeclamptic women display higher insulin levels compared with those of normal pregnant women. Preeclampsia is also associated with insulin resistance, and serum free fatty acid levels in preeclamptic women appear to be higher [3, 4]. Insulin resistance, even despite normal glucose levels in early pregnancy, is also associated with preeclampsia onset in later gestational periods [4]. The mechanism explaining such metabolic defects in preeclampsia remains unclear. Therefore, understanding the biology of preeclampsia is important to uncover metabolic defects in pregnancy, a condition associated with potential harmful effects for both the baby and the mother.

Despite such clinical significance, the pathophysiology that leads to preeclampsia remains unknown. Therefore, pathophysiology-based therapies have not yet been established. Hypertension is the major symptom of preeclampsia. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of hypertension in preeclampsia have not been clearly established. In this review, we analyzed the molecular mechanisms of preeclampsia, with a particular focus on the molecular mechanisms of hypertension in preeclampsia.

2. Hypertension in Preeclampsia

Using its worldwide definition, hypertension is the condition of a systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or/and diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg. The pathogenesis of hypertension during pregnancy is not completely understood, and it likely depends on the complex interplay between increased angiotensin II (ATII) activity and mineralocorticoid excess [5], genetic factors [6], endothelial dysfunction [7], neurovascular anomalies [8], and increased sympathetic nervous activity [9].

Clinically, hypertension is the most serious symptom affecting maternal and neonatal health in preeclampsia. In normal human pregnancy, the systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures decrease slightly due to the reduced total peripheral vascular resistance throughout the course of pregnancy. Normal pregnant women are also known to increase their secretion of aldosterone and to be quite resistant to the pressor effects of ATII [10]. The lowest pressures occur at approximately 28 weeks of gestation; thereafter, the blood pressure fluctuates and tends to return to levels similar to those observed in nonpregnant women [1014]. Indeed, during pregnancy, left ventricular function is increased as a result of a combination of increased preload, decreased afterload and an increase in intrinsic myocardial contractility that is independent of the loading condition [15]. Plasma volume expansion in pregnant women contributes to protect against placental hypoperfusion [16].

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in maintaining normal blood pressure, and renin has been recognized as a volume sensor. Low plasma renin activity (PRA) is associated with plasma volume expansion in nonpregnant individuals. The PRA in preeclamptic women is lower compared with that of normal pregnant women [17, 18]. However, such PRA suppression in preeclampsia is unlikely given that the hypertension in preeclampsia is associated with volume-dependent hypertension.

Gant et al. published seminal reports regarding the role of the RAS in the pathogenesis of pregnancy-induced hypertension [19]. In their report, they analyzed the pressor responses to infused ATII that were required to achieve a 20 mmHg rise in diastolic blood pressure in nonpregnant women and 192 pregnant women. Of the latter, 120 women had normal blood pressure throughout the pregnancy, and 72 women subsequently developed pregnancy-induced hypertension. The authors first found that the doses required for a pressor response in normal pregnant women were generally higher than those in nonpregnant women ( ng/kg/min). The dose required in normal pregnancy increased toward 28 weeks of gestation, and after 30 weeks of gestation, the pressor response dose decreased ( ng/kg/min at 7–10 weeks of gestation,  ng/kg/min at 28 weeks of gestation, and  ng/kg/min at 38 weeks of gestation). Compared with nonpregnant women, the amount of ATII required to raise the blood pressure in normal pregnant women was significantly higher. However, the women who later developed pregnancy-induced hypertension were sensitive to the pressor effects of ATII compared with normotensive pregnant women. Women who developed pregnancy-induced hypertension also exhibited resistance to the pressor response early in their pregnancy ( ng/kg/min at 15–18 weeks of gestation). However, this resistance progressively declined as the pregnancy progressed.

By 23–26 weeks of gestation, there was a clear difference in the pressor response between women with normal pregnancy and women with pregnancy-induced hypertension. The mean required dose of ATII for a pressor response in women who developed pregnancy-induced hypertension progressively declined compared with normotensive pregnant women, and the difference was even greater compared with nonpregnant women. It is important that the sensitivity to ATII between 23 and 32 weeks of gestation was increased in women who developed pregnancy-induced hypertension [19]. Hanssens et al. showed that the lowest ATII levels were found in women with severe pregnancy-induced hypertension [20].

Angiotensin-(1-7) is a bioactive component of the RAS and that displays antagonistic actions of ATII by acting as a modulator of vascular tone and by releasing nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins. Angiotensin-(1-7) is generated from ATII by angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [2123]. In human studies, plasma angiotensin-(1-7) increases in normal pregnancy and decreases in preeclampsia, and such alternative profiles of ATII products may be relevant to the hypertension and metabolic defects in preeclampsia [21].

In contrast, several groups have suggested that hypertensive disorders result from the presence of agonistic autoantibodies (AAs) that bind to and activate the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor [24]. Wallukat et al. initially described the presence of AT1-AAs in preeclampsia. Immunoglobulins from the serum of women with preeclampsia stimulated the AT1 receptor and had agonistic activity, but immunoglobulins from normotensive pregnant women had no effect [25]. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) from preeclamptic women contributed to the production of reactive oxygen species by stimulating nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity in vascular smooth muscle cells and human trophoblasts [24]. AT1-AAs resulted in increased soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and soluble endoglin (sEng) production from human trophoblasts and placental explants [26, 27]. Irani et al. showed that AT1-AAs induced apoptosis in the placentas of pregnant mice, human villous explants, and human trophoblast cells in culture. The AT1-AAs crossed the placenta and entered the fetal circulation. Finally, the authors showed that the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan diminished intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and placental apoptosis, which might be associated with AT1-AAs. The administration of agonistic AT1-AAs obtained from preeclamptic women induced key features of preeclampsia such as hypertension, proteinuria, glomerular endotheliosis, placental abnormalities, and embryonic defects in pregnant mice. These AT1-AA-induced preeclamptic-like symptoms in pregnant mice were attenuated by the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan or neutralizing peptide against AT1-AAs [28]. Wenzel et al. showed that AT1-AAs induced ATII sensitivity in pregnant rats [29].

The evidence from the past studies clearly demonstrates that vasoconstrictive angiotensin receptor signaling activation might be the key to understanding the pathophysiology of hypertension in preeclampsia, despite the suppression of PRA. These findings also indicate that preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder connected to vasoconstriction induced by vasoactive substances.

3. Molecular Regulation of the RAS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used to treat hypertension (Figure 1). The first oral ACEI, captopril, was synthesized in 1975 and approved for clinical use in 1981 by the Food and Drug Administration [30]. Today, RAS inhibitors are considered a major drug classification in the treatment of chronic hypertension. Captopril can be used safely and effectively in managing postpartum hypertension in women with severe preeclampsia [31]. However, the toxicity of these drugs during pregnancy is well documented, and thus, they are contraindicated.

3.1. Mechanism

The RAS regulates a variety of physiological/pathological functions, including blood pressure and extracellular fluid volumes [32]. ATII acts directly on vascular smooth muscle cells to produce vasoconstriction, stimulates aldosterone release from the adrenal cortex, and directly suppresses renin release [33]. ATII receptors exist as two subtypes, type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2). The main vasopressor effects are mediated through AT1 receptor binding [34, 35]. AT1 receptors are expressed in multiple organs, including the heart, kidneys, blood vessels, lungs, brain, liver, and adrenals [36].

ACEIs exert their antihypertensive effects by both inhibiting the conversion of angiotensin I (ATI) to ATII and degrading bradykinin, a potent vasodilator [37]. Consequently, ACEIs also decrease the ATII-induced production of aldosterone. ACEIs enhance the distribution of blood flow to the kidneys, heart, and brain without altering cardiac output [38]. Despite the reduction in blood pressure, ACEIs have little effect on heart rate [33, 37]. ACEI treatment results in a reduced total peripheral resistance, and there is little change in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [33].

3.2. The Mechanisms of Placentation by Oxygen Levels

The placenta is an essential organ that provides oxygen, water, carbohydrates, amino acids, lipids, vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients to the fetus. At the same time, the placenta is responsible for removing carbon dioxide and other waste products from the fetus [39]. Fetoplacental vasculogenesis begins on day 21 after conception with the differentiation of angioblasts, and angiogenesis begins on day 32 after conception and continues until 25 weeks of gestation [40, 41]. Trophoblast cells undergo proliferation and differentiation into cytotrophoblasts (CTBs) and extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs). CTBs penetrate the layer of syncytiotrophoblasts (SCTs) to form columns of EVTs. EVTs invade the decidua and remodel maternal blood vessels. This process produces dilated uterine arterioles that are unresponsive to maternal vasoconstrictors. Consequently, the placental circulation is independent of blood pressure regulation mediated by maternal factors [39, 42].

The embryo and human placenta develop in a low-oxygen environment during the first trimester in the absence of the maternal circulation, resulting in a reduced risk of free radicals for the early conceptus. The hypoxic environment during the first trimester is believed to facilitate trophoblast invasion, although some authors have suggested that the hypoxic conditions inhibit trophoblast invasion. The low-oxygen condition induces hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and transforming growth factor- (TGF-) β3 [43]. TGF-β3 inhibits trophoblast differentiation toward an invasive phenotype in first-trimester human placental explants. HIF-1α mRNA levels are high in placental trophoblasts between 5 and 8 weeks of gestation, and then they fall steeply at approximately 10 to 12 weeks of gestation, when the intraplacental oxygen concentration rises three-fold compared with the early first trimester because the maternal intervillous circulation becomes established [44]. The increasing placental pO2 reduces HIF-1α expression and consequently downregulates trophoblast TGF-β3 expression. As a result, the downregulation of TGF-β3 triggers trophoblastic differentiation into invasive EVTs, which invade deep into the maternal uterus to remodel maternal spiral arteries. Abnormalities in TGF-β3 expression are associated with preeclampsia [4347].

The antitrophoblast invasion roles of HIF-1α overexpression and TGF-β3 expression have largely been corroborated by experiments using the endogenous HIF-1α inhibitory molecule 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME). 2ME is a metabolite of estradiol and is generated by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) through the intermediate metabolite 2-hydroxyestradiol (Figure 2). 2ME induces the invasion of cytotrophoblasts specifically under low-oxygen conditions (2.5% O2), and the invasive effects of 2ME under low-oxygen conditions are associated with a decrease in the expression of HIF-1α and TGF-β3. Under low-oxygen exposure conditions with 2ME, trophoblasts differentiate with an invasive phenotype and migrate through Matrigel. Neither low-oxygen tension nor 2ME alone stimulates invasion by trophoblasts. The invasion of trophoblasts into the myometrium is regulated by the oxygen concentration gradient between the placenta, decidua, and uterine wall. It is hypothesized that trophoblasts lose their invasive phenotype as they invade deeper into the uterine wall and encounter higher oxygen levels [48]. 2ME is elevated during the third trimester of normal human pregnancy. However, the level of 2ME is significantly lower in women with severe preeclampsia [4951].

3.3. The Relevance of the RAS in Placentation

Hypoxia (3% oxygen) enhances vascular endothelial growth factor- (VEGF-) stimulated human placental artery endothelial cells. VEGF is the principal mediator of angiogenesis, and the major transcriptional activator of the VEGF gene is HIF-1α [44, 46, 52, 53]. The activation of AT1 receptors increases VEGF in human umbilical vein endothelial cells [54]. VEGF induces endothelial proliferation, acting through two tyrosine kinase receptors, VEGFR1 (FLT1) and VEGFR2 (KDR). Moreover, the increased endothelial proliferation is suppressed by the administration of an AT1 receptor blocker or VEGF antagonist [5457].

In contrast, AT2 receptor expression is downregulated in maternal tissues in pregnancy because activation of the AT2 receptor inhibits VEGF [58, 59]. AT1-AAs have a direct effect on cell migration and angiogenesis through activating the AT1 receptor and are positively correlated with VEGF levels in endothelial ovarian cancer patients. ATII-induced tumor cell invasion, angiogenesis, and peritoneal dissemination are blocked by AT1 receptor antagonists [60, 61]. AT1 receptor-regulated cell migration is also likely to be crucial for placentation, because AT1 receptor-deficient female mice exhibited placental defects that included a thickened decidual layer and abolished giant cell and labyrinth [62].

Trophoblast-secreted plasminogen activator (PA) activates plasminogen. PA also remains in an active form bound to PA receptors on the cell membrane [63]. Plasminogen is converted into active plasmin through the action of urokinase-type PA (uPA). uPA is implicated in the control of implantation due to its role in extracellular matrix degradation. Plasmin, a serine protease, results in the activation of metalloproteinases. Metalloproteinases and plasmin appear to be the key enzymes in trophoblast invasion [63, 64]. The activity of uPA is regulated by plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) [65]. The activation of AT1 receptor by ATII stimulates PAI-1 production by human trophoblasts in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Similarly, hypoxia increases the expression of PAI-1 mRNA and protein [66]. The activation of AT1 receptors increases cell proliferation and decreases trophoblast invasion by increasing the TGF-β1 and PAI-1 levels [65]. TGF-β1 increases the synthesis of PAI-1 [67, 68]. PAI-1 levels are significantly increased in the plasma and placenta of preeclamptic women compared with normal pregnant women. Increased PAI-1 is associated with shallow trophoblast invasion and hypercoagulation [65, 69]. AT1-AAs activate AT1 receptors on human trophoblasts resulting in increased expression of the PAI-1 protein. Then, AT1-AA-induced PAI-1 overproduction is blocked by the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan [65, 6971].

3.4. The RAS and Fetal Development

The RAS is active during fetal development and has an important role in controlling the umbilical-placental circulation, fetal blood pressure, and cardiovascular function through ATII [72, 73]. Animal studies also demonstrated that ATII induces cell growth through AT1 receptor, which is essential for the development of the fetal kidney [74].

In humans, all of the components of the RAS are expressed as early as 5 weeks of gestation in human embryos [7577]. One study found the expression of only AT2 receptors in the kidneys of 17–26 weeks of gestation in human fetuses [78]. In humans, nephrogenesis begins in 5 weeks of gestation and ceases by approximately 36 weeks of gestation, by which time approximately 1 million nephrons per kidney are present. The fetus starts to produce urine by 9–12 weeks of gestation [79, 80]. The GFR increases progressively up to 34 to 36 weeks of gestation and matures rapidly in the early postnatal period [81, 82]. In humans, mutations in genes that encode renin, angiotensinogen, ACE, and AT1 were found to be associated with the autosomal recessive disease renal tubular dysgenesis. Renal tubular dysgenesis causes oligohydramnios, which leads to the Potter sequence and skull ossification defects [83].

In AT1 receptor-deficient pregnant mice, the number of live newborns is significantly reduced by the placental malformation in 30% of all uteroplacental units. Within the malformed uteroplacental units, normal embryonic structure is not observed [62]. The human-angiotensinogen transgenic female mice (hAG+/+) mated with the human-renin transgenic male mice (hRN+/+) display hypertension in late pregnancy due to secretion of human renin from the fetal side into the maternal circulation and exhibit placental abnormalities, maternal cardiac hypertrophy, proteinuria, and IUGR [84, 85]. However, hAG+/+ females lacking ATII receptor type 1a (mAT1a) mated with hRN+/+ male mice (pregnant hAG+/+/mAT1a−/−) have a normotensive phenotype, and the placental abnormalities, maternal cardiac hypertrophy, and IUGR are ameliorated [85]. Similarly, pregnant hAG+/+ mice administered AT1 antagonist (5 mg/kg/day) on gestation days 18 and 19 exhibit improved hypertension and IUGR [85]. In brief, the lack of maternal AT1 might not affect fetal development while having a positive effect on maternal hypertension. ARB might therefore be an effective medication for pregnancy-induced hypertension.

3.5. The Use of ACEIs or ARBs in the First Trimester

Cooper et al. studied a cohort of 29,507 infants enrolled in Tennessee Medicaid whose mothers had no evidence of maternal diabetes. The risk of major congenital anomalies among 209 infants with exposure to ACEIs in the first trimester alone was compared with the risk in 202 infants with exposure to other antihypertensive medications (excluding ARB) in the first trimester alone and 29,096 infants with no exposure to antihypertensive drugs at any time during pregnancy. They found that 7.1% of the infants with exposure to ACEIs in the first trimester alone had major congenital anomalies after adjusting for confounders, which was 2.7-fold higher than infants with no exposure to antihypertensive drugs at any time during pregnancy. And they found a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular (risk ratio, 3.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.89–7.30) and central nervous system (CNS; risk ratio, 4.39; 95% CI, 1.37–14.02) malformations [86]. However, some women with undiagnosed diabetes were not excluded, and also prepregnancy body mass index was not controlled in this study, despite maternal diabetes, overweight, and obesity being associated with congenital malformations [8789].

The association between maternal use of ACEIs or other antihypertensive medications in the first trimester and congenital anomalies among infants was explored in a record linkage study performed through the Swedish Medical Birth Register [90]. In this study, women treated with antihypertensive medications had an increased risk of preterm delivery, placental abruption, caesarean delivery, and labor induction. Cardiovascular defects occurred with adjusted odds rate of 2.59 (95% CI, 1.92–3.51). However, the results were similar for the use of an ACEI or ARB during the first trimester compared with other antihypertensive medications, particularly beta blockers [90].

Outcomes were studied in 91 pregnant women in which the mother took either an ACEI or ARB during early pregnancy. Of the 71 pregnancies in women taking an ACEI, six babies (10.2%) had developmental anomalies: one small ventricular septal defect (1.4%), one mild sensorineural deafness (1.4%), one mild microcephaly (1.4%), one hypospadias (1.4%), one umbilical hernia (1.4%), and one mild congenital hypotonia (1.4%). In the 20 pregnancies (21 babies) in women who conceived while taking an ARB, two developmental defects were identified: one inguinal hernia (5%) and one craniosynostosis with tower skull (5%). This study did not find any convincing excess of congenital anomalies in women taking an ACEI or ARB in early pregnancy [91].

Porta et al. reported the experience from the DIRECT (Diabetic Retinopathy and Candesartan Trials) study. A group of 615 women with type 1 diabetes and no retinopathy and 813 women with type 1 diabetes and mild to moderately severe nonproliferative retinopathy were randomized to either candesartan (32 mg/day) or placebo. A total of 42 women taking candesartan and 45 taking a placebo became pregnant and discontinued treatment 0 to 8 weeks after their last menstrual period. Pregnancy outcomes were found to be similar for both groups, with no increase in the rate of malformation in neonates. There were two stillbirths and two “sick babies” in the candesartan group; there were one stillbirth, eight “sick babies,” and one ventricular septal defect in the placebo group. This study was a randomized trial, and all of the women had diabetes and were normotensive. Although no woman continued candesartan after eight weeks of gestation, the average length of time the women were exposed to candesartan is not known [92].

Li et al. conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 465,754 pregnant women in northern California and their live-born offspring. Women who used an ARB during pregnancy were excluded from the study. The controls were two cohorts composed of women who had diagnoses of hypertension but had not used any antihypertensive drug during pregnancy and women who had neither a diagnosis of hypertension nor a record of any prescription for an antihypertensive drug. After adjustment for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, and obesity, the rate of congenital heart defects among the offspring of women who used an ACEI in the first trimester (15/381 (3.9%)) was similar to the rate among the offspring of women who used other antihypertensive drugs (28/1090 (2.6%)). This study found a similarly elevated risk of congenital heart defects in the offspring of women who had used either ACEIs or other antihypertensive drugs or who had hypertension and did not use antihypertensive drugs during the first trimester of pregnancy (708/29735 (2.4%)). The authors suggested that it is likely that underlying hypertension increased the risk of congenital heart defects in the offspring [93].

3.6. The Use of ACEIs or ARBs in the Second or Third Trimester

Using captopril (2.8–3.5 mg/kg) in pregnant sheep during late pregnancy (119–133 days of gestation—term is 147 days) reduced the maternal blood pressure transiently for 2 h. However, the fetal blood pressure remained reduced for up to 2 days [94]. The pressor response was evoked by an intravenous bolus of ATI (167–426 ng/kg). When the blood pressure was again stable, captopril was again given to the ewe. Basal blood pressures had fallen in all ewes and fetuses by 10 min after captopril administration. The risk of stillbirth was significantly elevated, and 7 of the 8 ewes produced stillborn lambs. The administration of captopril (3.3 mg) to late-gestational-age rabbits (24–28 days of gestation—term is 31 days) resulted in a 37% stillbirth rate compared with 6% in saline control rabbits. The inhibition of AT II synthesis reduced uterine blood flow and increased fetal mortality [94]. Harewood et al. investigated fetal deaths were associated with the decrease of maternal blood pressure, and the fetal mortality was likely secondary to the direct effect of enalapril (7.5 mg/day) on the fetal RAS rather than to the effects of placental ischemia. Postmortem examination of the dead fetuses revealed no fetal anomalies [95]. Some animal experiments suggest that the use of ACEIs in the second or third trimester leads to decreased uteroplacental blood flow, low birth weight, fetal hypotension, preterm delivery, and fetal death.

In human studies, the most commonly reported adverse effects of ACEIs or ARBs taken in the second or third trimester include suppressed fetal renal function and reduced urine output, which lead to oligohydramnios with fetal anuria, neonatal hypotension, renal failure, and hypocalvaria [9699].

According to the above reports, fetal exposure to ACEIs or ARBs in the first trimester only is not likely to be associated with fetal anomalies. However, fetal exposure to ACEIs or ARBs during the second or third trimester is associated with fetal anomalies. ACEIs and ARBs should be avoided in women who are or may become pregnant.

4. Perspective: What Alternative Therapies Are Available?

Theoretically, suppression of the RAS would be reasonable in preeclampsia treatment; however, due to the anomalies reported with the use of drugs that suppress the RAS, we cannot recommend this class of drugs for the treatment of preeclamptic women. For alternative strategies to target the RAS, we have provided several ideas to combat preeclampsia that are associated with potential RAS inhibition.

4.1. Rest and Physical Activity

Preeclampsia has been believed as the condition associated with depletion of plasma volume [100]. Placental perfusion is likely decreased by exercise and the bed rest in pregnant women displays increased placental perfusion, the hypothetical condition associated with the onset of preeclampsia [101]. Indeed the bed rest has been considered in many pregnancies to prevent or treat a variety of conditions, such as spontaneous abortion, preterm labor, fetal growth retardation, edema, chronic hypertension, and preeclampsia. However in the treatment of preeclampsia, the effects of bed rest are still questionable in its view [102]. Also there might be risks associated with rest, such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism [103]. In WHO, advice rest at home and strict bedrest are not recommended for prevention or improving pregnancy outcomes in women with preeclampsia [104].

Renin-angiotensin system is altered by physical exercise. In the patient with heart failure, physical exercise has been shown to reduce sympathoexcitatory process by reducing oxidative stress, increasing nitric oxide (NO), and reducing ATII [105]. Epidemiological data suggested that the physical activity either occupational or leisure-time was associated with the reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia [106]. However, it is not concluded whether interventional physical exercise is of benefit to the disease progression of preeclampsia since very limited information is only available in the literature [106108].

4.2. Antioxidants

Oxidative stress, which diminishes the bioavailability of NO, has been proposed to increase the risk of essential hypertension and preeclampsia [109, 110]. In animal studies, ATII increases vascular superoxide production, which reduces the biologic activity of endothelium-derived NO [111]. In humans, ATII blockade attenuates endothelium-dependent forearm vasodilation, and vitamin C improves the endothelial impairment [112]. Some authors have assessed the effects of antioxidant supplementation with vitamins C and E on the risk of preeclampsia. Pregnant women between 9 and 16 weeks of gestation or between 14 and 22 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to daily supplementation with 1000 mg of vitamin C and 400 IU of vitamin E or placebo until delivery. Supplementation with vitamins C and E initiated at 9 to 16 weeks of gestation or at 14 and 22 weeks of gestation until delivery did not reduce the rate of preeclampsia [110, 113]. Previous studies have suggested that low maternal serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels increase the risk of preeclampsia and that vitamin D supplementation lowers this risk [114]. Compared with normotensive individuals with sufficient 25(OH)D levels (≥30.0 ng/mL), individuals with 25(OH)D insufficiency (15.0 to 29.9 ng/mL) and deficiency (<15.0 ng/mL) had higher circulating ATII levels. Moreover, compared with individuals with sufficient vitamin D levels (145 mL/min/1.73 m2), those with vitamin D deficiency (115 mL/min/1.73 m2) had significantly slowed renal plasma flow responses to infused ATII [115].

4.3. Anticoagulation Therapies

Preeclampsia is associated with thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and platelet aggregation. In addition, abnormal placental development results in placental ischemia. In vitro, aspirin suppresses ATII-mediated AT1R and VEGF expression in HMVECs [116]. Previous studies suggested that daily administration of antiplatelet agents, particularly low-dose aspirin beginning as early as the second trimester, had benefits for the prevention of preeclampsia. No harmful effects were identified, but the long-term evidence is limited [117, 118]. CLASP, a multicenter trial in which 9364 women were randomly assigned 60 mg aspirin daily or a matching placebo, suggested that low-dose aspirin did not prevent the incidence of proteinuric preeclampsia [119]. Furthermore, Kyle et al. suggested a contrasting result and showed that the administration of low-dose aspirin (60 mg/day) did not prevent preeclampsia when initiated in 28 weeks of gestation in ATII-sensitive women [120]. In 2014, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended the use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/day) as a preventive medication after 12 weeks of gestation in women who are at high risk for preeclampsia [117].

4.4. COMT and 2ME

Kanasaki et al. reported that pregnant mice deficient in COMT showed a preeclampsia-like phenotype resulting from the absence of 2ME, a natural metabolite of estradiol that is elevated during the third trimester of normal human pregnancy [49, 51]. COMT is a catabolic enzyme involved in the degradation of a number of bioactive molecules such as catecholamines and catecholestrogens. Estradiol is metabolized by cytochrome p450, and the resultant 17-hydroxyestradiol is a substrate for COMT, which converts 17-hydroxyestradiol into 2ME as a rate-limiting step in estrogen breakdown. The concentration of maternal 2ME in the circulation immediately increases during normal pregnancy; however, the levels of COMT and 2ME are significantly lower in women with severe preeclampsia [4951]. We know that hydralazine is widely used in the treatment of preeclampsia. However, hydralazine inhibits placental COMT activity [121]; thus, physicians should be careful when using it.

2ME has been shown to ameliorate all preeclampsia-like features without toxicity in Comt(−/−) pregnant mice and to suppress placental hypoxia, HIF-1α expression, and increased sFLT-1 expression [49]. Furthermore, 2ME may directly function as a vasodilator and inhibit vasospasm in pregnant women [122]. 2ME suppresses the AT1 receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells [123]. Finally, as described above, 2ME ameliorates the restricted trophoblast invasion in preeclampsia via suppression of HIF-1α. 2ME (Panzem) is now in development as an anticancer drug that induces HIF-1α suppression (phase II clinical trials) [124126]. Therefore, 2ME is available as a drug that is orally available. If 2ME is safe to use in pregnant women, it could be a therapeutic drug for preeclampsia.

Alternatively, nutritional intervention also can enhance the COMT-2ME system during pregnancy. Elevated homocysteine levels might be associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, and homocysteine is converted into S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH), a potent COMT inhibitor. Folic acid acts to remethylate homocysteine, converting homocysteine back into methionine [127129]. Supplementation with folic acid during the second trimester is associated with a reduced risk of preeclampsia [130]. COMT may be suppressed by various endogenous and exogenous molecules, including polychlorinated biphenols (PCBs), dioxin, mercury, and SAH. Therefore, epidemiologically, avoiding exposure to such environmental COMT suppressors would be relevant to the design of any antipreeclampsia strategy.

5. Conclusions

The pathophysiology of preeclampsia is not completely understood. Many hypotheses, theories, and models are associated with preeclampsia, many of which have focused on the abnormalities of angiogenesis. However, few investigators have tested whether the proposed hypertensive mechanisms are relevant to the pathophysiology of hypertension in preeclamptic women. Careful attention should be paid when designing strategies to combat preeclampsia based on the pathogenesis known in both human disease and animal models. Further research would be required to obtain deeper insight into the pathogenesis of preeclampsia by designing experiments to test each hypothesis in relation to human disease.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy, “Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 1122–1131, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Duley, “The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 130–137, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. M. Villa, H. Laivuori, E. Kajantie, and R. Kaaja, “Free fatty acid profiles in preeclampsia,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Kaaja, H. Laivuori, M. Laakso, M. J. Tikkanen, and O. Ylikorkala, “Evidence of a state of increased insulin resistance in preeclampsia,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 892–896, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. S. MacKenzie and M. J. Brown, “Molecular and clinical investigations in patients with low-renin hypertension,” Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. R. Taal, G. C. Verwoert, A. Demirkan et al., “Genome-wide profiling of blood pressure in adults and children,” Hypertension, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 241–247, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. M. Vanhoutte, “Endothelium and control of vascular function. State of the art lecture,” Hypertension, vol. 13, no. 6, part 2, pp. 658–667, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Naraghi, H. Geiger, J. Crnac et al., “Posterior fossa neurovascular anomalies in essential hypertension,” The Lancet, vol. 344, no. 8935, pp. 1466–1470, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Oparil, M. A. Zaman, and D. A. Calhoun, “Pathogenesis of hypertension,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 139, no. 9, pp. 761–776, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. M. Jones, R. Lloyd-Jones, A. Riondel et al., “Aldosterone secretion and metabolism in normal men and women and in pregnancy,” Acta Endocrinologica (Copenhagen), vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 321–342, 1959. View at: Google Scholar
  11. K. L. Thornburg, S.-L. Jacobson, G. D. Giraud, and M. J. Morton, “Hemodynamic changes in pregnancy,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 11–14, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Wilson, A. A. Morganti, I. Zervoudakis et al., “Blood pressure, the renin-aldosterone system and sex steroids throughout normal pregnancy,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 97–104, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Abdul-Karim and N. S. Assali, “Pressor response to angiotonin in pregnant and nonpregnant women,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 246–251, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  14. D. Kumar, L. A. W. Feltham, and A. G. Gornall, “Aldosterone excretion and tissue electrolytes in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 273, no. 7072, pp. 541–545, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. J. Gilson, S. Samaan, M. H. Crawford, C. R. Qualls, and L. B. Curet, “Changes in hemodynamics, ventricular remodeling, and ventricular contractility during normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 957–962, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. Visser and H. C. S. Wallenburg, “Maternal and perinatal outcome of temporizing management in 254 consecutive patients with severe pre-eclampsia remote from term,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 147–154, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. August, T. Lenz, K. L. Ales et al., “Longitudinal study of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive pregnant women: deviations related to the development of superimposed preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 163, no. 5, pp. 1612–1621, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. A. Brown, V. C. Zammit, D. A. Mitar, and J. A. Whitworth, “Renin-aldosterone relationships in pregnancy-induced hypertension,” The American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 5, no. 6, part 1, pp. 366–371, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. N. F. Gant, G. L. Daley, S. Chand, P. J. Whalley, and P. C. MacDonald, “A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravid pregnancy,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2682–2689, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Hanssens, M. J. N. C. Keirse, B. Spitz, and F. A. Van Assche, “Angiotensin II levels in hypertensive and normotensive pregnancies,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 155–161, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. C. Merrill, M. Karoly, K. Chen et al., “Angiotensin-(1–7) in normal and preeclamptic pregnancy,” Endocrine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 239–245, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. B. Brosnihan, L. A. A. Neves, L. Anton, J. Joyner, G. Valdes, and D. C. Merrill, “Enhanced expression of Ang-(1-7) during pregnancy,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1255–1262, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. M. Ferrario, M. C. Chappell, E. A. Tallant, K. B. Brosnihan, and D. I. Diz, “Counterregulatory actions of angiotensin-(1–7),” Hypertension, vol. 30, no. 3, part 2, pp. 535–541, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Dechend, C. Viedt, D. N. Müller et al., “AT1 receptor agonistic antibodies from preeclamptic patients stimulate NADPH oxidase,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 1632–1639, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Wallukat, V. Homuth, T. Fischer et al., “Patients with preeclampsia develop agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 945–952, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. C. Zhou, S. Ahmad, T. Mi et al., “Autoantibody from women with preeclampsia induces soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 production via angiotensin type 1 receptor and calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells signaling,” Hypertension, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1010–1019, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. C. Zhou, R. A. Irani, Y. Zhang et al., “Angiotensin receptor agonistic autoantibody-mediated tumor necrosis factor-α induction contributes to increased soluble endoglin production in preeclampsia,” Circulation, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 436–444, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. A. Irani, Y. Zhang, S. C. Blackwell et al., “The detrimental role of angiotensin receptor agonistic autoantibodies in intrauterine growth restriction seen in preeclampsia,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 12, pp. 2809–2822, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. Wenzel, A. Rajakumar, H. Haase et al., “Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies and increased angiotensin II sensitivity in pregnant rats,” Hypertension, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. W. Cushman and M. A. Ondetti, “History of the design of captopril and related inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme,” Hypertension, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 589–592, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. M. Taslimi, A. R. Harbin, and A. Gonzalez-Ruiz, “Captopril in severe preeclampsia,” Journal of the National Medical Association, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 721–723, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  32. B. R. Carr and N. F. Gant, “The endocrinology of pregnancy-induced hypertension,” Clinics in Perinatology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 737–761, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  33. G. H. Williams, “Converting-enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 319, no. 23, pp. 1517–1525, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Alwan, J. E. Polifka, and J. M. Friedman, “Angiotensin II receptor antagonist treatment during pregnancy,” Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. L. Izzo Jr. and M. R. Weir, “Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,” Journal of Clinical Hypertension, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 667–675, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Kim and H. Iwao, “Molecular and cellular mechanisms of angiotensin II-mediated cardiovascular and renal diseases,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 11–34, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  37. W. C. Mabie, J. R. Barton, and B. M. Sibai, “Adult respiratory distress syndrome in pregnancy,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 167, no. 4, part 1, pp. 950–957, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Hanssens, M. J. N. C. Keirse, F. Vankelecom, and F. A. van Assche, “Fetal and neonatal effects of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 128–135, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  39. N. M. Gude, C. T. Roberts, B. Kalionis, and R. G. King, “Growth and function of the normal human placenta,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 114, no. 5-6, pp. 397–407, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. Demir, P. Kaufmann, M. Castellucci, T. Erbengi, and A. Kotowski, “Fetal vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in human placental villi,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 190–203, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Kaufmann, T. M. Mayhew, and D. S. Charnock-Jones, “Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. II. Changes during normal pregnancy,” Placenta, vol. 25, no. 2-3, pp. 114–126, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. Y. Khong, F. de Wolf, W. B. Robertson, and I. Brosens, “Inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and by small-for-gestational age infants,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1049–1059, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I. Caniggia, H. Mostachfi, J. Winter et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 mediates the biological effects of oxygen on human trophoblast differentiation through TGFβ3,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 577–587, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. E. Jauniaux, A. L. Watson, J. Hempstock, Y.-P. Bao, J. N. Skepper, and G. J. Burton, “Onset of maternal arterial blood flow and placental oxidative stress: a possible factor in human early pregnancy failure,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 157, no. 6, pp. 2111–2122, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. O. Genbacev, R. Joslin, C. H. Damsky, B. M. Polliotti, and S. J. Fisher, “Hypoxia alters early gestation human cytotrophoblast differentiation/invasion in vitro and models the placental defects that occur in preeclampsia,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 540–550, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. G. J. Burton and E. Jauniaux, “Placental oxidative stress: from miscarriage to preeclampsia,” Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 342–352, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. I. Caniggia, S. Grisaru-Gravnosky, M. Kuliszewsky, M. Post, and S. J. Lye, “Inhibition of TGF-β3 restores the invasive capability of extravillous trophoblasts in preeclamptic pregnancies,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 1641–1650, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. B. Lee, A. P. Wong, K. Kanasaki et al., “Preeclampsia: 2-Methoxyestradiol induces cytotrophoblast invasion and vascular development specifically under hypoxic conditions,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 710–720, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. K. Kanasaki, K. Palmsten, H. Sugimoto et al., “Deficiency in catechol-O-methyltransferase and 2-methoxyoestradiol is associated with pre-eclampsia,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7198, pp. 1117–1121, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. E. R. Barnea, N. J. MacLusky, A. H. DeCherney, and F. Naftolin, “Catechol-o-methyl transferase activity in the human term placenta,” The American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. Berg, R. Sonsala, and E. Kuss, “Concentrations of 2-methoxyoestrogens in human serum measured by a heterologous immunoassay with an 125I-labeled ligand,” Acta Endocrinologica, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 282–288, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  52. D. Qian, H.-Y. Lin, H.-M. Wang et al., “Normoxic induction of the hypoxic-inducible factor-1α by interleukin-1β involves the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway in normal human cytotrophoblast cells,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1822–1827, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. L. Semenza, “HIF-1 and tumor progression: pathophysiology and therapeutics,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 8, no. 4, supplement, pp. S62–S67, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. D. Herr, M. Rodewald, H. M. Fraser et al., “Regulation of endothelial proliferation by the renin-angiotensin system in human umbilical vein endothelial cells,” Reproduction, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 125–130, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. D. S. Charnock-Jones, P. Kaufmann, and T. M. Mayhew, “Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. I. Molecular regulation,” Placenta, vol. 25, no. 2-3, pp. 103–113, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. Pupilli, L. Lasagni, P. Romagnani et al., “Angiotensin II stimulates the synthesis and secretion of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor in human mesangial cells,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 245–255, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  57. N. Ferrara and T. Davis-Smyth, “The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 4–25, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. R. Benndorf, R. H. Böger, S. Ergün, A. Steenpass, and T. Wieland, “Angiotensin II type 2 receptor inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-induced migration and in vitro tube formation of human endothelial cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 438–447, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. de Gasparo, K. J. Catt, T. Inagami, J. W. Wright, and T. Unger, “International union of pharmacology. XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 415–472, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  60. T. Suganuma, K. Ino, K. Shibata et al., “Functional expression of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor in human ovarian carcinoma cells and its blockade therapy resulting in suppression of tumor invasion, angiogenesis, and peritoneal dissemination,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2686–2694, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. L. Song, S.-L. Zhang, K.-H. Bai et al., “Serum agonistic autoantibodies against type-1 angiotensin II receptor titer in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a potential role in tumor cell migration and angiogenesis,” Journal of Ovarian Research, vol. 6, no. 1, article 22, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. T. Walther, A. Jank, S. Heringer-Walther, L.-C. Horn, and H. Stepan, “Angiotensin II type 1 receptor has impact on murine placentation,” Placenta, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 905–909, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. P. K. Lala and C. H. Graham, “Mechanisms of trophoblast invasiveness and their control: the role of proteases and protease inhibitors,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 369–379, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. F. Khamsi, D. T. Armstrong, and X. Zhang, “Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator in human preimplantation embryos,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 273–276, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. Y. Xia, H. Y. Wen, and R. E. Kellems, “Angiotensin II inhibits human trophoblast invasion through AT1 receptor activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 27, pp. 24601–24608, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. T. E. Fitzpatrick and C. H. Graham, “Stimulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in immortalized human trophoblast cells cultured under low levels of oxygen,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. H. W. Schnaper, J. B. Kopp, A. C. Poncelet et al., “Increased expression of extracellular matrix proteins and decreased expression of matrix proteases after serial passage of glomerular mesangial cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 109, part 10, pp. 2521–2528, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  68. K. Kanasaki, D. Koya, T. Sugimoto, M. Isono, A. Kashiwagi, and M. Haneda, “N-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline inhibits TGF-beta mediated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression via inhibition of Smad pathway in human mesangial cells,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 863–872, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. A. Estellés, J. Gilabert, S. Grancha et al., “Abnormal expression of type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor and tissue factor in severe preeclampsia,” Thrombosis & Haemostasis, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 500–508, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  70. D. T. Dinh, A. G. Frauman, C. I. Johnston, and M. E. Fabiani, “Angiotensin receptors: distribution, signalling and function,” Clinical Science (London), vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 481–492, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Araki-Taguchi, S. Nomura, K. Ino et al., “Angiotensin II mimics the hypoxic effect on regulating trophoblast proliferation and differentiation in human placental explant cultures,” Life Sciences, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 59–67, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. R. Soares de Moura and M. A. Cerqueira Lopes, “Effects of captopril on the human foetal placental circulation: an interaction with bradykinin and angiotensin I,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 497–501, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. Tabacova, “Mode of action: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition—developmental effects associated with exposure to ACE inhibitors,” Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 35, no. 8-9, pp. 747–755, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. T. Sekine, K.-I. Miura, K. Takahashi, and T. Igarashi, “Children's toxicology from bench to bed—drug-induced Renal Injury (1): the toxic effects of ARB/ACEI on fetal kidney development,” The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. SP245–SP250, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. Quan, “Fetopathy associated with exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists,” Early Human Development, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. C. Gubler and C. Antignac, “Renin-angiotensin system in kidney development: renal tubular dysgenesis,” Kidney International, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 400–406, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. S. Schütz, J. M. le Moullec, P. Corvol, and J.-M. Gasc, “Early expression of all the components of the renin-angiotensin-system in human development,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 2067–2079, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  78. H.-J. Gröne, M. Simon, and E. Fuchs, “Autoradiographic characterization of angiotensin receptor subtypes in fetal and adult human kidney,” The American Journal of Physiology—Renal Fluid and Electrolyte Physiology, vol. 262, no. 2, part 2, pp. F326–F331, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  79. M. F. Schreuder, R. R. Bueters, M. C. Huigen, F. G. M. Russel, R. Masereeuw, and L. P. van Den Heuvel, “Effect of drugs on renal development,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 212–217, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. E. Polifka, “Is there an embryopathy associated with first-trimester exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists? A critical review of the evidence,” Birth Defects Research, Part A—Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 576–598, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. J. P. Guignard, “Effect of drugs on the immature kidney,” Advances in Nephrology from the Necker Hospital, vol. 22, pp. 193–211, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  82. M. Puddu, V. Fanos, F. Podda, and M. Zaffanello, “The kidney from prenatal to adult life: perinatal programming and reduction of number of nephrons during development,” The American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 162–170, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. M. Lacoste, Y. Cai, L. Guicharnaud et al., “Renal tubular dysgenesis, a not uncommon autosomal recessive disorder leading to oligohydramnios: role of the renin-angiotensin system,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2253–2263, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. E. Takimoto, J. Ishida, F. Sugiyama, H. Horiguchi, K. Murakami, and A. Fukamizu, “Hypertension induced in pregnant mice by placental renin and maternal angiotensinogen,” Science, vol. 274, no. 5289, pp. 995–998, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. T. Saito, J. Ishida, E. Takimoto-Ohnishi et al., “An essential role for angiotensin II type 1a receptor in pregnancy-associated hypertension with intrauterine growth retardation.,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 388–390, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  86. W. O. Cooper, S. Hernandez-Diaz, P. G. Arbogast et al., “Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 23, pp. 2443–2451, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. K. J. Stothard, P. W. G. Tennant, R. Bell, and J. Rankin, “Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 301, no. 6, pp. 636–650, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. D. Racusin, B. Stevens, G. Campbell, and K. M. Aagaard, “Obesity and the risk and detection of fetal malformations,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 213–221, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. J. S. Sheffield, E. L. Butler-Koster, B. M. Casey, D. D. McIntire, and K. J. Leveno, “Maternal diabetes mellitus and infant malformations,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 100, no. 5, part 1, pp. 925–930, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. R. Lennestål, P. O. Olausson, and B. Källén, “Maternal use of antihypertensive drugs in early pregnancy and delivery outcome, notablythe presence of congenital heart defects in the infants,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 615–625, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. V. J. Karthikeyan, R. E. Ferner, S. Baghdadi, D. A. Lane, G. Y. H. Lip, and D. G. Beevers, “Are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers safe in pregnancy: a report of ninety-one pregnancies,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 396–399, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. Porta, J. W. Hainer, S. O. Jansson et al., “Exposure to candesartan during the first trimester of pregnancy in type 1 diabetes: experience from the placebo-controlled diabetic retinopathy candesartan trials,” Diabetologia, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1298–1303, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. D.-K. Li, C. Yang, S. Andrade, V. Tavares, and J. R. Ferber, “Maternal exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in the first trimester and risk of malformations in offspring: a retrospective cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 343, no. 7829, article d5931, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. F. B. Pipkin, E. M. Symonds, and S. R. Turner, “The effect of captopril (SQ14,225) upon mother and fetus in the chronically cannulated ewe and in the pregnant rabbit,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 323, pp. 415–422, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. W. J. Harewood, A. F. Phippard, G. G. Duggin, J. S. Horvath, and D. J. Tiller, “Fetotoxicity of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in primate pregnancy: a prospective, placebo-controlled study in baboons (Papio hamadryas),” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 171, no. 3, pp. 633–642, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. H. S. Buttar, “An overview of the influence of ACE inhibitors on fetal-placental circulation and perinatal development,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 176, no. 1-2, pp. 61–71, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. M. Barr, “Teratogen update: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,” Teratology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 399–409, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. M. Barr Jr. and M. M. Cohen Jr., “ACE Inhibitor fetopathy and hypocalvaria: the kidney-skull connection,” Teratology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 485–495, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. F. W. Rosa, L. A. Bosco, C. F. Graham, J. B. Milstien, M. Dreis, and J. Creamer, “Neonatal anuria with maternal angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 74, no. 3, part 1, pp. 371–374, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  100. I. Cope, “Plasma and blood volume changes in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia,” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, vol. 68, pp. 413–416, 1961. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. D. D. Mathews, T. P. Shuttleworth, and E. F. B. Hamilton, “Modern trends in management of non-albuminuric hypertension in late pregnancy,” British Medical Journal, vol. 2, no. 6137, pp. 623–625, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. S. Meher, E. Abalos, and G. Carroli, “Bed rest with or without hospitalisation for hypertension during pregnancy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD003514, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  103. S. Colman-Brochu, “Deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy,” MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 186–192, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. World Health Organization, WHO Recommendations for Prevention and Treatment of Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia, 2011.
  105. I. H. Zucker, H. D. Schultz, K. P. Patel, and H. Wang, “Modulation of angiotensin II signaling following exercise training in heart failure,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. T. L. Weissgerber, L. A. Wolfe, and G. A. L. Davies, “The role of regular physical activity in preeclampsia prevention,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2024–2031, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. M. D. Avery, A. S. Leon, and R. A. Kopher, “Effects of a partially home-based exercise program for women with gestational diabetes,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. S. Yeo, N. M. Steele, M.-C. Chang, S. M. Leclaire, D. L. Ronis, and R. Hayashi, “Effect of exercise on blood pressure in pregnant women with a high risk of gestational hypertensive disorders,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 293–298, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  109. G. Zalba, G. S. José, M. U. Moreno et al., “Oxidative stress in arterial hypertension: role of NAD(P)H oxidase,” Hypertension, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1395–1399, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. A. R. Rumbold, C. A. Crowther, R. R. Haslam, G. A. Dekker, and J. S. Robinson, “Vitamins C and E and the risks of preeclampsia and perinatal complications,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 17, pp. 1796–1806, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. S. Rajagopalan, S. Kurz, T. Münzel et al., “Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation: contribution to alterations of vasomotor tone,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1916–1923, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. Y. Hirooka, K. Eshima, S. Setoguchi, T. Kishi, K. Egashira, and A. Takeshita, “Vitamin C improves attenuated angiotensin II-induced endothelium-dependent vasodilation in human forearm vessels,” Hypertension Research, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 953–959, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. J. M. Roberts, L. Myatt, C. Y. Spong et al., “Vitamins C and E to prevent complications of pregnancy-associated hypertension,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 14, pp. 1282–1291, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. E. Hyppönen, A. Cavadino, D. Williams et al., “Vitamin d and pre-eclampsia: original data, systematic review and meta-analysis,” Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 331–340, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. J. P. Forman, J. S. Williams, and N. D. L. Fisher, “Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and regulation of the renin-angiotensin system in humans,” Hypertension, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1283–1288, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. S. Mitra, X. Wang, M. Khaidakov et al., “Aspirin downregulates angiotensin type 1 receptor transcription implications in capillary formation from endothelial cells,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. J. T. Henderson, E. P. Whitlock, E. O'Connor, C. A. Senger, J. H. Thompson, and M. G. Rowland, “Low-dose aspirin for prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 160, no. 10, pp. 695–703, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. L. M. Askie, L. Duley, D. J. Henderson-Smart, and L. A. Stewart, “Antiplatelet agents for prevention of pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9575, pp. 1791–1798, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. G. Beroyz, R. Casale, A. Farreiros et al., “CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant women,” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8898, pp. 619–629, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. P. M. Kyle, D. Buckley, J. Kissane, M. De Swiet, and C. W. G. Redman, “The angiotensin sensitivity test and low-dose aspirin are ineffective methods to predict and prevent hypertensive disorders in nulliparous pregnancy,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 173, no. 3, part 1, pp. 865–872, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. E. R. Barnea, H. Fakih, G. Oelsner, S. Walner, A. H. DeCherney, and F. Naftolin, “Effect of antihypertensive drugs on catechol-O-methyltransferase and monoamine oxidase activity in human term placental explants,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 124–130, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. J. Yan, C. Chen, J. Lei et al., “2-methoxyestradiol reduces cerebral vasospasm after 48 hours of experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 348–356, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. S. Koganti, R. Snyder, and T. Thekkumkara, “Pharmacologic effects of 2-methoxyestradiol on angiotensin type 1 receptor down-regulation in rat liver epithelial and aortic smooth muscle cells,” Gender Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 76–93, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. N. J. Lakhani, M. A. Sarkar, J. Venitz, and W. D. Figg, “2-Methoxyestradiol, a promising anticancer agent,” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. C. Sweeney, G. Liu, C. Yiannoutsos et al., “A phase II multicenter, randomized, double-blind, safety trial assessing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of oral 2-methoxyestradiol capsules in hormone-refractory prostate cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 6625–6633, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. A. J. Tevaarwerk, K. D. Holen, D. B. Alberti et al., “Phase I trial of 2-methoxyestradioI NanoCrystal dispersion in advanced solid malignancies,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1460–1465, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. E. Mantovani, F. Filippini, R. Bortolus, and M. Franchi, “Folic acid supplementation and preterm birth: results from observational studies,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 481914, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. Z. Li, R. Ye, L. Zhang, H. Li, J. Liu, and A. Ren, “Folic acid supplementation during early pregnancy and the risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia,” Hypertension, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 873–879, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. A. L. Miller, “The methionine-homocysteine cycle and its effects on cognitive diseases,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–19, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  130. S. W. Wen, X.-K. Chen, M. Rodger et al., “Folic acid supplementation in early second trimester and the risk of preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 45.e1–45.e7, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Norikazu Ueki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1923 Views | 642 Downloads | 13 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder