Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Endocrinology
Volume 2015, Article ID 675340, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/675340
Clinical Study

Comparison of the Spine and Hip BMD Assessments Derived from Quantitative Computed Tomography

1Department of Radiology and Orthopaedic Biomechanical Laboratory of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China
2Department of Endocrinology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China

Received 14 October 2014; Revised 19 December 2014; Accepted 5 January 2015

Academic Editor: Yebin Jiang

Copyright © 2015 Xiao-Hui Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E.-M. Lochmüller, D. Bürklein, V. Kuhn et al., “Mechanical strength of the thoracolumbar spine in the elderly: prediction from in situ dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), upper and lower limb peripheral QCT, and quantitative ultrasound,” Bone, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Grampp, M. Jergas, C. C. Glüer, P. Lang, P. Brastow, and H. K. Genant, “Radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: current methods and perspectives,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1133–1145, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. M. Ott, “Methods of determining bone mass,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 6, supplement 2, pp. S71–S76, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Engelke, J. E. Adams, G. Armbrecht et al., “Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 123–162, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. A. Kanis, E. V. McCloskey, H. Johansson, A. Oden, L. J. Melton III, and N. Khaltaev, “A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis,” Bone, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 467–475, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. G. Faulkner, E. von Stetten, and P. Miller, “Discordance in patient classification using T-scores,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 343–350, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. American College of Radiology, ACR-SPR-SSR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Bone Densitometry (Amended 2014 Resolution 39), American College of Radiology, Reston, Va, USA, 2008, http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/QCT.pdf.
  8. P. Pickhardt, G. Bodeen, A. Brett, J. K. Brown, and N. Binkley, “Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. C. C. Khoo, K. Brown, C. Cann et al., “Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1539–1545, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Q. Cheng, Y. X. Zhu, M. X. Zhang, L. H. Li, P. Y. Du, and M. H. Zhu, “Age and sex effects on the association between body composition and bone mineral density in healthy Chinese men and women,” Menopause, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 448–455, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Iwamoto, T. Takeda, S. Ichimura, Y. Tsukimura, and Y. Toyama, “Age-related changes in cortical bone in men: Metacarpal Bone Mass Measurement Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Iwamoto, T. Takeda, T. Otani, and Y. Yabe, “Age-related changes in cortical bone in women: Metacarpal Bone Mass Measurement Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 90–94, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. E. Adams, “Quantitative computed tomography,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 415–424, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Nonaka and S. Uchiyama, “Assessment of volumetric bone mineral density and geometry for hip with clinical CT device,” Clinical Calcium, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1003–1009, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Li, X. M. Li, L. Xu et al., “Comparison of QCT and DXA: osteoporosis detection rates in postmenopausal women,” International Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 2013, Article ID 895474, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Baim, N. Binkley, J. P. Bilezikian et al., “Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD position development conference,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–91, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis, National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  18. C. E. Cann, J. E. Adams, J. K. Brown, and A. D. Brett, “CTXA hip—an extension of classical DXA measurements using quantitative CT,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e91904, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. G. Cheng, L. Wang, Q. Q. Wang, Y. M. Ma, Y. B. Su, and K. Li, “Validation of quantitative computed tomography-derived areal bone mineral density with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in an elderly Chinese population,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 1445–1449, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. C. Looker, L. J. Melton III, T. B. Harris, and J. A. Shepherd, “Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2005-2006 compared with NHANES III,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 64–71, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. A. Fink, S. L. Harrison, B. C. Taylor et al., “Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spine: study of osteoporotic fractures,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 250–259, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. A. Stoch, E. Wysong, C. Connolly, R. A. Parker, and S. L. Greenspan, “Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in men is dependent on site-specific analysis,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 311–317, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. D. Leslie, J. F. Tsang, P. A. Caetano, L. M. Lix, and Manitoba Bone Density Program, “Number of osteoporotic sites and fracture risk assessment: a cohort study from the manitoba bone density program,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 476–483, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. O'Gradaigh, I. Debiram, S. Love, H. K. Richards, and J. E. Compston, “A prospective study of discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and proximal femur bone densitometry,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Younes, S. Ben Hammouda, M. Jguirim et al., “Discordance between spine and hip Bone Mineral Density measurement using DXA in osteoporosis diagnosis: prevalence and risk factors,” La Tunisie Médicale, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2014. View at Google Scholar