Sex- and Age-Specific Optimal Anthropometric Indices as Screening Tools for Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese Adults
Table 5
AUCs, optimal cut-off points, and sensitivities and specificities of the cut-off points of the anthropometric indices for predicting MetS in the ROC analyses according to age group.
Index
Age group
Women
Men
AUC
95% CI
Cut-off
Sen
Spe
AUC
95% CI
Cut-off
Sen
Spe
BMI
Global
0.760ac
0.753–0.767
23.03
0.704
0.688
0.719ac
0.714–0.724
24.64
0.709
0.613
High sensitivity
22.27
0.800
0.580
23.91
0.800
0.511
<45
0.761ac
0.747–0.775
22.10
0.746
0.650
0.734a
0.727–0.742
24.88
0.690
0.657
45–59
0.699a
0.688–0.711
23.52
0.657
0.638
0.700a
0.692–0.709
24.65
0.711
0.581
≥60
0.673a
0.650–0.696
23.45
0.694
0.568
0.722a
0.706–0.738
24.56
0.686
0.650
WC
Global
0.770ab
0.763–0.777
77.25
0.726
0.677
0.721ab
0.716–0.726
87.25
0.703
0.621
High sensitivity
75.75
0.809
0.589
84.75
0.826
0.478
<45
0.740ab
0.726–0.755
74.75
0.704
0.655
0.731a
0.723–0.738
85.80
0.750
0.587
45–59
0.701a
0.689–0.712
78.75
0.700
0.587
0.695a
0.687–0.703
87.25
0.737
0.546
≥60
0.672a
0.649–0.695
80.25
0.751
0.506
0.723a
0.707–0.740
88.25
0.678
0.645
WHtR
Global
0.782abc
0.776–0.789
0.490
0.735
0.689
0.727abc
0.721–0.732
0.510
0.748
0.584
High sensitivity
0.480
0.800
0.618
0.503
0.800
0.524
<45
0.751abc
0.737–0.765
0.477
0.654
0.716
0.736ac
0.729–0.744
0.502
0.752
0.601
45–59
0.707ac
0.695–0.718
0.498
0.698
0.604
0.698a
0.690–0.706
0.524
0.668
0.625
≥60
0.676a
0.653–0.699
0.531
0.669
0.592
0.720a
0.703–0.736
0.529
0.689
0.638
ABSI
Global
0.648abc
0.640–0.657
0.0769
0.565
0.655
0.585abc
0.579–0.591
0.0790
0.586
0.540
High sensitivity
0.0738
0.800
0.379
0.0767
0.800
0.307
<45
0.569abc
0.552–0.585
0.0731
0.712
0.394
0.570abc
0.561–0.578
0.0765
0.716
0.386
45–59
0.581abc
0.568–0.593
0.0772
0.533
0.589
0.559abc
0.550–0.568
0.0789
0.671
0.426
≥60
0.571abc
0.547–0.596
0.0781
0.732
0.397
0.582abc
0.563–0.600
0.0801
0.672
0.466
BRI
Global
0.782abc
0.776–0.789
3.179
0.735
0.689
0.727abc
0.721–0.732
3.547
0.748
0.584
High sensitivity
2.996
0.800
0.618
3.413
0.800
0.524
<45
0.751abc
0.737–0.765
2.931
0.654
0.716
0.736ac
0.729–0.744
3.388
0.752
0.602
45–59
0.707ac
0.695–0.718
3.329
0.699
0.604
0.698a
0.690–0.706
3.818
0.668
0.625
≥60
0.676a
0.653–0.699
3.963
0.669
0.592
0.720a
0.703–0.736
3.929
0.689
0.638
CI
Global
0.716abc
0.709–0.724
1.178
0.685
0.635
0.660abc
0.655–0.666
1.231
0.688
0.548
High sensitivity
1.151
0.800
0.494
1.211
0.800
0.416
<45
0.655abc
0.639–0.670
1.144
0.669
0.565
0.661abc
0.652–0.669
1.214
0.693
0.544
45–59
0.640abc
0.628–0.652
1.190
0.634
0.571
0.630abc
0.621–0.639
1.248
0.649
0.544
≥60
0.623abc
0.600–0.647
1.234
0.680
0.517
0.654abc
0.637–0.672
1.281
0.548
0.687
AUC: area under the curve; MetS: metabolic syndrome; ROC: receiver-operating characteristic; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; Sen: sensitivity; Spe: specificity; BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; WHtR: waist-to-height ratio; ABSI: a body shape index; BRI: body roundness index; CI: conicity index. AUC in the ROC analysis, . Hanley and McNeil’s approach was used to compare the AUCs of the indices. , compared with the AUC of BMI; , compared with the AUC of WC. The bold indicates the highest AUC value among the indices.