International Journal of Endocrinology

International Journal of Endocrinology / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 2846943 | 15 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2846943

Meta-Analysis of the Association between Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms and the Risk of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease

Academic Editor: Jack Wall
Received17 Sep 2017
Revised01 Dec 2017
Accepted17 Dec 2017
Published22 Mar 2018

Abstract

The association between vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms (rs731236, rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232) and the risk of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) had been investigated in previous studies. However, the results of these studies remained controversial. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to derive a more precise conclusion. All related articles were systematically searched by PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the strength of association. The overall results indicated that VDR rs731236 and rs2228570 polymorphisms were significantly associated with a reduced risk of AITD. However, a stratification analysis based on clinical types showed that VDR rs731236 and rs2228570 polymorphisms were associated only with a reduced risk of HT. A stratification analysis by ethnicity showed that VDR rs731236 polymorphism was significantly associated with a reduced risk of AITD in Asian and African populations. VDR rs2228570 polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of AITD in Asian populations. VDR rs1544410 polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of AITD in European and African populations, but with an increased risk of AITD in Asian populations. VDR rs7975232 polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of AITD in African populations. In conclusion, the present study suggested that VDR rs731236, rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232 polymorphisms were significantly associated with AITD risk. However, more well-designed studies should be performed to verify the current results.

1. Introduction

Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD), mainly including Graves’ disease (GD) and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT), is an organ-specific autoimmune disease and affects up to 5% of the general population [1, 2]. Although the pathogenesis of AITD is still unknown, it is generally acknowledged that environmental factors and the intrinsic genetic predisposition of an individual play critical roles in the occurrence of the disease [3]. Environmental factors, such as viral infections, irradiation, drugs, and iodine intake, may involve interference with thyroid function, direct toxic effects on thyrocytes, immune stimulation, or other immunomodulatory effects [3, 4]. However, it is difficult to directly link an environmental exposure with AITD due to the intervention of genetic factors. Increasing evidence suggests that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in AITD-related genes can influence individual predisposition to the disease [57].

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin and is activated in the liver and kidney [8]. Activated vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] can promote the differentiation of monocytes and inhibit the maturation of dendritic cells [9]. Furthermore, it can also suppress the production of cytokines, such as interleukin-1, interleukin-2, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor [10]. These cytokines play important roles in the development of lymphocytes, which are believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. The immunomodulatory actions of 1,25(OH)2D are mediated by its binding to vitamin D receptor (VDR), which belongs to the family of trans-acting transcriptional regulatory factors and is widely expressed in various immune cell subsets, including lymphocytes, macrophages, and several endocrine cells [11]. The gene encoding VDR contains 14 exons and spans approximately 75 kilobases on chromosome 12q13.11. Many SNPs have been identified in the VDR gene [12]. Among them, the association of VDR rs731236, rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232 polymorphisms with AITD risk has been widely reported [1334]. However, the results are inconsistent and ambiguous. Furthermore, considering that a single-center pilot study with small sample sizes may possess low statistical power, we performed a meta-analysis of all eligible studies to obtain a more precise conclusion.

2. Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

All related articles were obtained by systematically searching PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The search keywords were as follows: “vitamin D receptor OR VDR,” “polymorphism OR genetic variation OR genetic variant,” and “autoimmune thyroid disease OR AITD OR thyroid.” There were no limitations on language and year of publication. The last search was updated on August 28, 2017. Furthermore, the references of all related articles were also retrieved to find other eligible studies.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All eligible studies must meet the following inclusion criteria: (a) case-control studies; (b) evaluation of the association between VDR polymorphisms (rs731236, rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232) and AITD risk; and (c) available genotype/allele frequencies. In addition, the exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) letters, reviews, and case reports and (b) duplicate publication. If multiple studies had overlapping data, only those with complete data were included.

2.3. Data Extraction

Two authors independently reviewed the related articles and extracted the following data: first author’s name, year of publication, region, ethnicity, genotyping methods, the number of cases and controls, and genotype/allele frequency. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with each other.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control group of each study was calculated by chi-square goodness-of-fit test, and was considered as a deviation from HWE. The strength of the association between VDR polymorphisms (rs731236, rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232) and AITD risk was evaluated by the pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The significance of the pooled ORs was assessed by the Z test, and was considered statistically significant. The chi-square based Q-test was used to investigate the between-study heterogeneity. If indicated the existence of between-study heterogeneity, the random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled ORs; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was applied for the analysis. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting one study each time to estimate the stability of the result. Publication bias was determined by Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test. A symmetric funnel plot and value of Egger’s test more than 0.05 indicated the lack of publication bias. All statistical tests were performed using Review Manager 5.2 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen) and the STATA 12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection and Characteristics

The flowchart for identifying eligible studies is shown in Figure 1. A total of 139 articles were obtained through an initial search. After reviewing the titles and abstracts of these articles, we excluded 113 unrelated articles. The remaining articles were further checked by a full-text review. Finally, 22 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The main characteristics of all included articles are shown in Tables 1 and S1. A total of 24 studies from 22 articles assessed the association of VDR polymorphisms and AITD risk. Thereinto, there were 15 studies on rs731236, 18 studies on rs1544410, 15 studies on rs2228570, and 16 studies on rs7975232. All studies used polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) method for genotyping except for Meng et al.’s study.


First authorYear of publicationRegionEthnicityCasesControlsGenotyping methodPolymorphisms

Giovinazzo [13]2016ItalyEuropean100 HT100PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs1544410
Guleryuz [33]2016TurkeyAsian136 HT50PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs2228570
Long [14]2015ChinaAsian260 GD221PCR–RFLPrs7975232
Meng [15]2015ChinaAsian417 GD and 250 HT301MALDI-TOF-MSrs731236, rs7975232, rs2228570, rs1544410
Djurovic [16]2015SerbiaEuropean44 HT32PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs2228570
Inoue [17]2014JapanAsian139 GD and 116 HT76PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs2228570, rs1544410
Yu [18]2013ChinaAsian75 HT80PCR–RFLPrs1544410
Yazici [19]2013TurkeyAsian111 HT159PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs2228570, rs1544410
El Gawad [34]2012EgyptAfrican90 GD55PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs1544410
Hong [20]2011ChinaAsian82 HT80PCR–RFLPrs2228570
Huo [21]2010ChinaAsian120 GD and 115 HT120PCR–RFLPrs1544410
Horst-Sikorska [22]2008PolandEuropean75 GD163PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs2228570, rs1544410
Maalej [23]2008TunisiaAfrican100 AITD100PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs2228570, rs1544410
Jing [24]2008ChinaAsian115 HT120PCR–RFLPrs1544410
Stefanić [25]2008CroatiaEuropean145 HT145PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs1544410
Chen [31]2007TaiwanAsian88 GD90PCR–RFLPrs2228570
Lin [26]2006TaiwanAsian109 HT90PCR–RFLPrs2228570
Ramos-Lopez [27]2005Germany, Poland, SerbiaEuropean789 GD823PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs2228570, rs1544410
Stefanić [28]2005CroatiaEuropean110 GD99PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs1544410
Kang [29]2005ChinaAsian102 GD120PCR–RFLPrs7975232, rs1544410
Collins [32]2004United KingdomEuropean768 GD864PCR–RFLPrs731236, rs7975232, rs2228570, rs1544410
Ban [30]2000JapanAsian180 GD195PCR–RFLPrs7975232, rs2228570, rs1544410

PCR–RFLP: polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; MALDI-TOF-MS: matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.
3.2. Quantitative Synthesis

The association between VDR rs731236 polymorphism and AITD risk is shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. In the overall analysis, a significant association was found in homozygote comparison and recessive models (CC versus TT: , 95% CI: 0.48–0.93, ; CC versus CT + TT: , 95% CI: 0.66–0.95, ). In the stratification analysis based on clinical types, a significant association of VDR rs731236 polymorphism with HT risk was found in the homozygote comparison model (CC versus TT: , 95% CI: 0.40–0.85, ). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a significant association was found in Asian (CC versus TT: , 95% CI: 0.28–0.86, ) and African populations (CC versus TT: , 95% CI: 0.10–0.80, ; CT versus TT: , 95% CI: 0.16–0.74, ; CC + CT versus TT: , 95% CI: 0.16–0.86, ). The pooled analysis based on showed a significant association in the allele comparison model (C versus T: , 95% CI: 0.68–0.99, ).


Comparison modelSubgroupThe number of studiesSample size (cases/controls)I2Effect modelOR (95% CI)

Homozygote comparison (CC versus TT)AITD141930/134154%0.008Random0.67 [0.48, 0.93]0.02
HT7625/57941%0.12Fixed0.58 [0.40, 0.85]0.005
GD91305/108753%0.03Random0.71 [0.49, 1.04]0.08
European9930/89153%0.03Random0.75 [0.54, 1.05]0.09
Asian4942/42447%0.13Fixed0.49 [0.28, 0.86]0.01
African158/260.28 [0.10, 0.80]0.02
Heterozygote comparison (CT versus TT)AITD142674/194970%<0.001Random0.82 [0.64, 1.05]0.11
HT7827/77872%0.002Random0.82 [0.52, 1.29]0.38
GD91847/154665%0.004Random0.85 [0.65, 1.11]0.22
European91471/135450%0.04Random0.97 [0.84, 1.13]0.71
Asian41123/55182%<0.001Random0.69 [0.35, 1.35]0.27
African180/440.34 [0.16, 0.74]0.007
Dominant model (CC + CT versus TT)AITD142950/225475%<0.001Random0.79 [0.61, 1.02]0.07
HT7895/86175%<0.001Random0.81 [0.51, 1.29]0.38
GD92055/176971%<0.001Random0.81 [0.61, 1.07]0.13
European91705/161562%0.007Random0.90 [0.70, 1.15]0.39
Asian41155/58484%<0.001Random0.69 [0.34, 1.37]0.29
African190/550.33 [0.16, 0.68]0.003
Recessive model (CC versus CT + TT)AITD142950/22547%0.37Fixed0.80 [0.66, 0.95]0.01
HT7895/8610%0.44Fixed0.71 [0.50, 1.01]0.06
GD92055/17696%0.38Fixed0.84 [0.68, 1.03]0.09
European91705/161526%0.21Fixed0.83 [0.68, 1.01]0.06
Asian41155/5840%0.61Fixed0.67 [0.39, 1.17]0.16
African190/550.50 [0.20, 1.27]0.14
Allele comparison (C versus T)AITD153050/235473%<0.001Random0.85 [0.71, 1.02]0.09
HT7895/86170%0.003Random0.85 [0.61, 1.19]0.35
GD92055/176970%<0.001Random0.83 [0.68, 1.02]0.08
European91705/161566%0.003Random0.89 [0.74, 1.07]0.21
Asian41155/58479%0.003Random0.77 [0.47, 1.26]0.30
African2190/15592%<0.001Random0.84 [0.27, 2.54]0.75
142950/225472%<0.001Random0.82 [0.68, 0.99]0.04

PH: value of heterogeneity test; PZ: value of Z test.

The association of VDR rs1544410 polymorphism with AITD risk is presented in Table 3 and Figure 2. No significant association was observed in the overall analysis and stratification analysis by clinical types. However, a subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that VDR rs1544410 polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of AITD in European (AA versus GG: , 95% CI: 0.46–0.93, ; AG versus GG: , 95% CI: 0.71–0.97, ; AA + AG versus GG: , 95% CI: 0.68–0.91, ; A versus G: , 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, ) and African (AA versus GG: , 95% CI: 0.06–0.53, ; AA + AG versus GG: , 95% CI: 0.20–0.90, ; AA versus AG + GG: , 95% CI: 0.10–0.66, ) populations and with an increased risk of AITD in Asian populations (AG versus GG: , 95% CI: 1.08–1.67, ; AA + AG versus GG: , 95% CI: 1.05–1.90, ; A versus G: , 95% CI: 1.05–1.90, ). The pooled analysis based on showed that VDR rs1544410 polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of AITD (AA versus GG: , 95% CI: 0.45–0.98, ).


Comparison modelSubgroupThe number of studiesSample size (cases/controls)I2Effect modelOR (95% CI)

Homozygote comparison (AA versus GG)AITD172405/203257%0.002Random0.74 [0.53, 1.02]0.07
HT8763/83734%0.15Fixed0.80 [0.55, 1.16]0.24
GD121642/163168%<0.001Random0.71 [0.46, 1.09]0.11
European8959/107665%0.005Random0.60 [0.46, 0.93]0.02
Asian81400/9280%0.47Fixed1.51 [0.90, 2.55]0.12
African146/280.18 [0.06, 0.53]0.002
131823/153962%0.001Random0.66 [0.45, 0.98]0.04
4582/49328%0.24Fixed1.06 [0.70, 1.61]0.79
Heterozygote comparison (AG versus GG)AITD173180/278838%0.05Random0.99 [0.84, 1.18]0.93
HT8925/9840%0.63Fixed1.07 [0.84, 1.36]0.61
GD122255/228560%0.004Random0.99 [0.78, 1.25]0.94
European81432/16380%0.85Fixed0.83 [0.71, 0.97]0.02
Asian81666/111022%0.25Fixed1.34 [1.08, 1.67]0.008
African182/400.56 [0.25, 1.23]0.15
132475/210322%0.22Fixed0.95 [0.82, 1.08]0.42
4705/68571%0.01Random1.32 [0.69, 2.54]0.41
Dominant model (AA + AG versus GG)AITD173636/337361%<0.001Random0.98 [0.80, 1.20]0.82
HT81009/108925%0.23Fixed1.03 [0.82, 1.29]0.82
GD122627/276973%<0.001Random0.97 [0.74, 1.27]0.81
European81835/21773%0.41Fixed0.79 [0.68, 0.91]0.002
Asian81711/114144%0.09Random1.41 [1.05, 1.90]0.02
African190/550.42 [0.20, 0.90]0.02
132869/259356%0.008Random0.91 [0.74, 1.12]0.38
4767/78077%0.004Random1.39 [0.70, 2.76]0.34
Recessive model (AA versus AG + GG)AITD173636/337358%0.002Random0.79 [0.59, 1.06]0.11
HT81009/108935%0.15Fixed0.82 [0.59, 1.13]0.22
GD122627/276967%<0.001Random0.77 [0.53, 1.12]0.17
European81835/217771%0.001Random0.74 [0.53, 1.02]0.06
Asian81711/11410%0.57Fixed1.42 [0.87, 2.33]0.16
African190/550.26 [0.10, 0.66]0.005
132869/259363%0.001Random0.72 [0.51, 1.01]0.05
4767/7808%0.35Fixed1.18 [0.82, 1.72]0.37
Allele comparison (A versus G)AITD183736/347372%<0.001Random0.96 [0.81, 1.13]0.63
HT81009/108958%0.02Random1.08 [0.81, 1.44]0.60
GD122627/276980%<0.001Random0.97 [0.77, 1.21]0.76
European81835/217766%0.005Random0.82 [0.69, 0.98]0.02
Asian81711/114158%0.02Random1.41 [1.05, 1.90]0.02
African2190/15572%0.06Random0.64 [0.35, 1.15]0.14
132969/269370%<0.001Random0.89 [0.75, 1.06]0.21
4767/78079%0.002Random1.44 [0.78, 2.65]0.24

PH: value of heterogeneity test; PZ: value of Z test.

The association between VDR rs2228570 polymorphism and AITD risk is shown in Table 4 and Figure 2. A significant association was observed in the overall analysis (CT versus CC: , 95% CI: 0.56–0.95, ; TT + CT versus CC: , 95% CI: 0.54–0.93, ; T versus C: , 95% CI: 0.68–0.95, ). A further stratification analysis by clinical types showed a significant association in HT (T versus C: , 95% CI: 0.50–0.97, ) but not in GD. A subgroup analysis based on ethnicity showed a significant association in Asian populations (TT versus CC: , 95% CI: 0.42–0.93, ; TT + CT versus CC: , 95% CI: 0.45–0.95, ; TT versus CT + CC: , 95% CI: 0.58–0.91, ; T versus C: , 95% CI: 0.56–0.92, ), but not in European populations. A stratification analysis by PHWE value showed a significant association in studies of (CT versus CC: , 95% CI: 0.36–0.65, ; TT + CT versus CC: , 95% CI: 0.38–0.68, ; T versus C: , 95% CI: 0.55–0.93, ) but not in studies of .


Comparison modelSubgroupThe number of studiesSample size (cases/controls)I2Effect modelOR (95% CI)

Homozygote comparison (TT versus CC)AITD141713/147464%<0.001Random0.76 [0.55, 1.04]0.09
HT7509/44027%0.22Fixed0.77 [0.55, 1.07]0.11
GD91204/122473%<0.001Random0.79 [0.54, 1.15]0.22
European6819/90772%0.003Random0.93 [0.58, 1.49]0.76
Asian8894/56745%0.08Random0.63 [0.42, 0.93]0.02
111409/130171%<0.001Random0.78 [0.53, 1.14]0.20
3304/1730%0.89Fixed0.65 [0.42, 1.00]0.05
Heterozygote comparison (CT versus CC)AITD142478/212372%<0.001Random0.73 [0.56, 0.95]0.02
HT7665/60077%0.001Random0.61 [0.35, 1.06]0.08
GD91813/183265%0.004Random0.83 [0.64, 1.07]0.14
European61145/131577%<0.001Random0.78 [0.52, 1.16]0.22
Asian81333/80870%0.001Random0.68 [0.47, 1.00]0.05
112008/176266%0.001Random0.84 [0.64, 1.10]0.21
3470/36132%0.23Fixed0.48 [0.36, 0.65]<0.001
Dominant model (TT + CT versus CC)AITD143174/283676%<0.001Random0.71 [0.54, 0.93]<0.001
HT7839/78877%<0.001Random0.60 [0.35, 1.02]0.06
GD92335/242572%<0.001Random0.81 [0.62, 1.06]0.12
European61562/179580%<0.001Random0.78 [0.52, 1.18]0.24
Asian81612/104172%<0.001Random0.65 [0.45, 0.95]0.02
112616/241674%<0.001Random0.81 [0.60, 1.08]0.14
3558/42036%0.21Fixed0.51 [0.38, 0.68]<0.001
Recessive model (TT versus CT + CC)AITD143174/283654%0.008Random0.87 [0.68, 1.10]0.23
HT7839/7880%0.46Fixed0.79 [0.59, 1.06]0.11
GD92335/242564%0.004Random0.90 [0.68, 1.19]0.46
European61562/179560%0.03Random1.05 [0.76, 1.45]0.79
Asian81612/104123%0.24Fixed0.72 [0.58, 0.91]0.005
112616/241664%0.002Random0.83 [0.62, 1.11]0.20
3558/4200%0.89Fixed1.02 [0.71, 1.48]0.91
Allele comparison (T versus C)AITD153274/293675%<0.001Random0.80 [0.68, 0.95]0.01
HT7839/78872%0.001Random0.69 [0.50, 0.97]0.03
GD92335/242576%<0.001Random0.87 [0.73, 1.05]0.15
European61562/179579%<0.001Random0.90 [0.70, 1.16]0.41
Asian81612/104169%0.002Random0.72 [0.56, 0.92]0.008
African1100/1000.86 [0.53, 1.39]0.54
112716/251677%<0.001Random0.83 [0.68, 1.01]0.06
3558/42038%0.20Fixed0.72 [0.55, 0.93]0.01

PH: value of heterogeneity test; PZ: value of Z test.

For VDR rs7975232 polymorphism, no significant association was observed in the overall analysis and stratification analysis by clinical types and PHWE (Table 5 and Figure 2). However, a stratification analysis by ethnicity showed that VDR rs7975232 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of AITD in African populations (CC versus AA: , 95% CI: 2.00–17.02, ; CA versus AA: , 95% CI: 1.33–6.87, ; CC + CA versus AA: , 95% CI: 1.65–7.93, ; CC versus CA + AA: , 95% CI: 1.12–6.95, ; C versus A: , 95% CI: 1.41–3.73, ).


Comparison modelSubgroupThe number of studiesSample size (cases/controls)I2Effect modelOR (95% CI)

Homozygote comparison (CC versus AA)AITD161899/160676%<0.001Random1.16 [0.84, 1.61]0.37
HT6396/43433%0.19Fixed1.11 [0.80, 1.55]0.52
GD121503/140381%<0.001Random1.22 [0.81, 1.83]0.34
European9983/101671%<0.001Random1.10 [0.76, 1.60]0.62
Asian6876/56180%<0.001Random1.02 [0.55, 1.92]0.94
African140/295.84 [2.00, 17.02]0.001
121714/143976%<0.001Random1.14 [0.81, 1.61]0.45
4185/16782%0.001Random1.19 [0.39, 3.64]0.75
Heterozygote comparison (CA versus AA)AITD162436/228761%<0.001Random1.04 [0.83, 1.31]0.71
HT6504/53830%0.21Fixed1.11 [0.84, 1.47]0.45
GD121932/192667%<0.001Random1.03 [0.79, 1.36]0.81
European91468/158543%0.08Random1.02 [0.82, 1.27]0.86
Asian6904/65471%0.004Random0.91 [0.56, 1.47]0.70
African164/483.02 [1.33, 6.87]0.008
122152/197666%<0.001Random1.06 [0.83, 1.37]0.63
4284/31155%0.09Random0.96 [0.53, 1.75]0.90
Dominant model (CC + CA versus AA)AITD163544/311773%<0.001Random1.08 [0.84, 1.38]0.56
HT6757/81237%0.16Fixed1.08 [0.83, 1.40]0.56
GD122787/268178%<0.001Random1.09 [0.80, 1.49]0.57
European91884/201161%0.009Random1.04 [0.81, 1.34]0.73
Asian61570/105179%<0.001Random0.94 [0.55, 1.60]0.81
African190/553.62 [1.65, 7.93]0.001
123159/272775%<0.001Random1.10 [0.84, 1.45]0.50
4385/39071%0.02Random0.97 [0.48, 1.96]0.94
Recessive model (CC versus CA + AA)AITD163544/311759%0.001Random1.10 [0.90, 1.33]0.36
HT6757/81218%0.29Fixed0.97 [0.77, 1.21]0.78
GD122787/268167%<0.001Random1.13 [0.89, 1.42]0.31
European91884/201158%0.02Random1.06 [0.81, 1.40]0.65
Asian61570/105162%0.02Random1.06 [0.79, 1.42]0.71
African190/552.79 [1.12, 6.95]0.03
123159/272752%0.02Random1.06 [0.87, 1.28]0.57
4385/39077%0.005Random1.25 [0.58, 2.68]0.57
Allele comparison (C versus A)AITD163544/311775%<0.001Random1.06 [0.91, 1.24]0.44
HT6757/81233%0.19Fixed1.01 [0.87, 1.17]0.88
GD122787/268181%<0.001Random1.09 [0.90, 1.32]0.37
European91884/201170%<0.001Random1.04 [0.86, 1.25]0.69
Asian61570/105178%<0.001Random1.00 [0.77, 1.31]0.98
African190/552.29 [1.41, 3.73]<0.001
123159/272776%<0.001Random1.06 [0.90, 1.25]0.47
4385/39079%0.002Random1.04 [0.65, 1.66]0.88

PH: value of heterogeneity test; PZ: value of Z test.
3.3. Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias

A sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled OR values were not substantially changed after one study deletion each time, which suggests that results of this meta-analysis were stable. As shown in Figure 3, the shape of funnel plots was symmetric. In addition, all values of Egger’s test were more than 0.05, indicating the lack of publication bias (Table 6).


Comparison model value of Egger’s test
rs731236rs1544410rs2228570rs7975232

Homozygote comparison0.5160.6260.1250.258
Heterozygote comparison0.2710.5210.070.274
Dominant model0.2870.4440.070.283
Recessive model0.3810.9330.0920.130
Allele comparison0.3070.4220.0620.186

4. Discussion

As an immune modulator, vitamin D is involved in the onset and development of AITD [35, 36]. Low levels of vitamin D have been demonstrated in patients with AITD [36]. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency was correlated with the duration of HT, which led to an increase in thyroid volume and in antithyroid antibodies levels [36]. Vitamin D exerts its biological effects by binding to VDR and activating VDR-responsive genes [37]. VDR is an intracellular receptor belonging to the steroid/thyroid nuclear receptor family and expressed in human immune cells including macrophages, dendritic cells, and T and B lymphocytes [35]. Therefore, the abnormal function of VDR, which is attributable to VDR gene polymorphisms and altered transactivation, might affect the immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory functions of vitamin D and correlate with the pathogenesis of AITD. Some studies demonstrated that genetic polymorphisms (rs731236, rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232) in the VDR gene could affect the expression of VDR [38, 39]. For instance, Ogunkolade et al. found that rs2228570 in the coding region of VDR gene was associated with higher VDR mRNA copy numbers [38]. Uitterlinden et al. observed that rs731236, rs1544410, and rs7975232 in the 3 untranslated region of the VDR gene could affect VDR gene expression by modulating mRNA stability [39]. In view of all this, these functional polymorphisms were speculated to be associated with AITD risk. Interestingly, some epidemiological studies confirmed the speculation and found significant association between these polymorphisms and AITD risk. For instance, Long et al. and Meng et al. observed that VDR rs7975232 polymorphism was significantly associated with GD risk in Chinese populations [14, 15]. Djurovic et al. found a significant association between VDR rs2228570 polymorphism and HT risk in Serbian populations [16]. Stefanić et al. found that VDR rs731236, rs7975232, and rs1544410 polymorphisms were associated with GD susceptibility in Eastern Croatian populations [28]. Yazici et al. observed that VDR rs731236 and rs2228570 polymorphisms were significantly associated with HT risk in a Turkish population [19]. However, other studies including genome-wide association study showed that these polymorphisms did not influence individual susceptibility to AITD [13, 18, 20, 23, 24, 40, 41]. These inconsistent results may be due to the fact that a single-center pilot study with small sample sizes has low statistical power to detect a true association or that the genetic background of different populations changes the effect of low-penetration polymorphisms on AITD risk. In 2013, Feng et al. tried to clarify the association by meta-analysis and found that VDR rs1544410 and rs731236 polymorphisms were significantly associated with a reduced risk of AITD, while VDR rs7975232 and rs2228570 polymorphisms were not associated with AITD risk [42]. Due to the limited number of related studies, subgroup analyses by clinical types were not conducted. Furthermore, results of recent studies were still inconsistent with that of previous meta-analysis [13, 15, 16]. Therefore, an updated analysis was performed by combining the recent studies. Results indicated that VDR rs731236 and rs2228570 polymorphisms were significantly associated with reduced risk of AITD. A further stratification analysis based on clinical types showed that VDR rs731236 and rs2228570 polymorphisms were associated only with reduced risk of HT. In a stratification analysis based on ethnicity, VDR rs731236 polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of AITD in Asian and African populations but not in European populations. VDR rs2228570 polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of AITD only in Asian populations. It was worthy to note that VDR rs1544410 polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of AITD in European and African populations but has an increased risk of AITD in Asian populations. A stratification analysis by PHWE values showed that the significant association of VDR rs2228570 polymorphism with a reduced risk of AITD was observed only in studies with , which indicated that the effect of VDR rs2228570 polymorphism on AITD risk needed to be interpreted cautiously.

Heterogeneity was observed in the current meta-analysis. We tried to investigate the sources of heterogeneity by a stratification analysis based on clinical types, ethnicity, and HWE, but the investigation results were not satisfactory and could not provide a reasonable explanation for the sources of heterogeneity. In view of factors affecting vitamin D levels and methodological issues, heterogeneity may result from differences in economic and public health indexes among different countries, variations in environment and climate, age and gender mismatch in published studies, and variations in diagnostic criteria for GD/HT.

Although the current results showed the statistically significant associations of VDR polymorphisms with AITD risk, such associations had a small influence on the occurrence of AITD. In addition, several limitations impeding accurate assessment should be noted. Firstly, raw data such as gender, age, living style, and drug consumption could not be obtained from all included studies. Secondly, the number of studies was small in the subgroup analysis, especially in African populations. Last but not least, the present analysis did not consider the gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

In conclusion, the present study suggested that VDR rs731236, rs1544410, rs2228570, and rs7975232 polymorphisms were significantly associated with AITD risk. However, more well-designed studies, especially studies on African populations, should be performed to verify the results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: genotype and allele frequency distributions of VDR polymorphisms in all included studies. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. W. M. G. Tunbridge, D. C. Evered, R. Hall et al., “The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: the Whickham survey,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 481–493, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. G. Hollowell, N. W. Staehling, W. D. Flanders et al., “Serum TSH, T(4), and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III),” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 489–499, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Antonelli, S. M. Ferrari, A. Corrado, A. Di Domenicantonio, and P. Fallahi, “Autoimmune thyroid disorders,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 174–180, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Orgiazzi, “Thyroid autoimmunity,” Presse Médicale, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. e611–e625, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. Brčić, A. Barić, S. Gračan et al., “Association of established thyroid peroxidase autoantibody (TPOAb) genetic variants with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Autoimmunity, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 480–485, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Durães, C. S. Moreira, I. Alvelos et al., “Polymorphisms in the TNFA and IL6 genes represent risk factors for autoimmune thyroid disease,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 8, article e105492, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Ban, T. Tozaki, M. Taniyama, M. Tomita, and Y. Ban, “Association of a CTLA-4 3 untranslated region (CT60) single nucleotide polymorphism with autoimmune thyroid disease in the Japanese population,” Autoimmunity, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 151–153, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. X. R. Gao, C. M. Wang, W. J. Wang, G. R. Han, and J. Q. Zhang, “Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B virus infection,” The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 10, no. 08, p. 851, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. Baeke, T. Takiishi, H. Korf, C. Gysemans, and C. Mathieu, “Vitamin D: modulator of the immune system,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 482–496, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Willheim, R. Thien, K. Schrattbauer et al., “Regulatory effects of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the cytokine production of human peripheral blood lymphocytes,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 3739–3744, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. W. Pike, “Vitamin D3 receptors: structure and function in transcription,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 189–216, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Valdivielso and E. Fernandez, “Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and diseases,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 371, no. 1-2, pp. 1–12, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Giovinazzo, T. M. Vicchio, R. Certo et al., “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms/haplotypes and serum 25(OH)D3 levels in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Endocrine, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 599–606, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. X. Long, W. F. Wu, Z. Q. Hu, and Z. M. Zhou, “Association between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and the risk of Graves’ disease,” Chinese Journal of Gerontology, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 3254–3256, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. Meng, S. T. He, W. J. Jiang et al., “Genetic susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid diseases in a Chinese Han population: role of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms,” Annales d'Endocrinologie, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 684–689, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Djurovic, O. Stojkovic, O. Ozdemir et al., “Association between FokI, ApaI and TaqI RFLP polymorphisms in VDR gene and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: preliminary data from female patients in Serbia,” International Journal of Immunogenetics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 190–194, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. Inoue, M. Watanabe, N. Ishido et al., “The functional polymorphisms of VDR, GC and CYP2R1 are involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune thyroid diseases,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 262–269, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. X. J. Yu and X. Q. Lan, “Association between vitamin D receptor Bsml polymorphism and the risk of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Chinese Journal of Gerontology, vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 1845-1846, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  19. D. Yazici, D. Yavuz, O. Tarcin, S. Sancak, O. Deyneli, and S. Akalin, “Vitamin D receptor gene ApaI, TaqI, FokI and BsmI polymorphisms in a group of Turkish patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Minerva Endocrinologica, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 195–201, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. H. Hong, “Association between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and the risk of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Medical Information, vol. 2, pp. 2963-2964, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  21. X. J. Huo, F. Wei, J. X. Huo, R. N. Shu, H. X. Xue, and J. H. Wei, “Association of vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism with autoimmune thyroid disease in Innermongolia people of the Han nationality,” Journal of Radioimmunology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 72–74, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  22. W. Horst-Sikorska, M. Ignaszak-Szczepaniak, M. Marcinkowska, M. Kaczmarek, M. Stajgis, and R. Slomski, “Association analysis of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density in young women with Graves’ disease,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 371–380, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. Maalej, E. Petit-Teixeira, G. Chabchoub et al., “Lack of association of VDR gene polymorphisms with thyroid autoimmune disorders: familial and case/control studies,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Jing, X. C. Lan, X. J. Huo, H. Qiu, and X. L. Liu, “Association of VDR gene BsmI polymorphism with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis,” Zhejiang Academic Conference on Endocrinology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 124-125, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. Stefanić, S. Papić, M. Suver, L. Glavas-Obrovac, and I. Karner, “Association of vitamin D receptor gene 3-variants with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis in the Croatian population,” International Journal of Immunogenetics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 125–131, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. Y. Lin, L. Wan, C. H. Tsai, R. H. Chen, C. C. Lee, and F. J. Tsai, “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with risk of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis in Chinese patients in Taiwan,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 109–112, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. Ramos-Lopez, A. Kurylowicz, T. Bednarczuk, J. Paunkovic, C. Seidl, and K. Badenhoop, “Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms are associated with Graves’ disease in German and Polish but not in Serbian patients,” Thyroid, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1125–1130, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Stefanić, I. Karner, L. Glavas-Obrovac et al., “Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with susceptibility to Graves’ disease in Eastern Croatian population: case-control study,” Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 639–646, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  29. D. H. Kang, M. C. Qiu, S. Gao, M. Li, Z. H. Gao, and W. L. Su, “Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with Graves’ disease in the population of Tianjing region,” Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 128-129, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  30. Y. Ban, M. Taniyama, and Y. Ban, “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism is associated with Graves’ disease in the Japanese population,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 4639–4643, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. H. Chen, C. T. Chang, H. Y. Chen, W. C. Chen, C. H. Tsai, and F. J. Tsai, “Association between vitamin-D receptor gene FokI polymorphism and Graves’ disease among Taiwanese Chinese,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 173–177, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. E. Collins, J. M. Heward, R. Nithiyananthan et al., “Lack of association of the vitamin D receptor gene with Graves’ disease in UK Caucasians,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 618–624, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. Guleryuz, F. Akin, M. T. Ata, M. M. Dalyanoglu, and S. Turgut, “Vitamin-D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms (TaqI, FokI) in Turkish patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: relationship to the levels of Vit-D and cytokines,” Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. El Gawad, E. Samee, A. Metwali, and M. El Gawad, “Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and its association with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in patients with Graves disease in an Egyptian population: a pilot study,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 132–139, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Kivity, N. Agmon-Levin, M. Zisappl et al., “Vitamin D and autoimmune thyroid diseases,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 243–247, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. Bizzaro and Y. Shoenfeld, “Vitamin D and autoimmune thyroid diseases: facts and unresolved questions,” Immunologic Research, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 46–52, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Verstuyf, G. Carmeliet, R. Bouillon, and C. Mathieu, “Vitamin D: a pleiotropic hormone,” Kidney International, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 140–145, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. B. W. Ogunkolade, B. J. Boucher, J. M. Prahl et al., “Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mRNA and VDR protein levels in relation to vitamin D status, insulin secretory capacity, and VDR genotype in Bangladeshi Asians,” Diabetes, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 2294–2300, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. G. Uitterlinden, Y. Fang, J. B. J. van Meurs, H. A. P. Pols, and J. P. T. M. van Leeuwen, “Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms,” Gene, vol. 338, no. 2, pp. 143–156, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. X. Chu, C. M. Pan, S. X. Zhao et al., “A genome-wide association study identifies two new risk loci for Graves’ disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 897–901, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. J. Simmonds, “GWAS in autoimmune thyroid disease: redefining our understanding of pathogenesis,” Nature Reviews. Endocrinology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 277–287, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Feng, H. Li, S. F. Chen, W. F. Li, and F. B. Zhang, “Polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and risk of autoimmune thyroid diseases: a meta-analysis,” Endocrine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 318–326, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Xue-Ren Gao and Yong-Guo Yu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

913 Views | 359 Downloads | 5 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.