Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Endocrinology
Volume 2019, Article ID 5893028, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5893028
Review Article

“Gut Microbiota-Circadian Clock Axis” in Deciphering the Mechanism Linking Early-Life Nutritional Environment and Abnormal Glucose Metabolism

1Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Translational Medicine Center, Ministry of Health, Department of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
2Department of Endocrinology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518020, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xinhua Xiao; moc.361.piv@4102hxoaix and Lijing Jia; moc.621@mdgnijilaij

Received 11 May 2019; Accepted 16 July 2019; Published 27 August 2019

Academic Editor: Dario Acuña-Castroviejo

Copyright © 2019 Liyuan Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has been increasing dramatically worldwide, but the pathogenesis is still unknown. A growing amount of evidence suggests that an abnormal developmental environment in early life increases the risk of developing metabolic diseases in adult life, which is referred to as the “metabolic memory” and the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis. The mechanism of “metabolic memory” has become a hot topic in the field of DM worldwide and could be a key to understanding the pathogenesis of DM. In recent years, several large cohort studies have shown that shift workers have a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and worse control of blood glucose levels. Furthermore, a maternal high-fat diet could lead to metabolic disorders and abnormal expression of clock genes and clock-controlled genes in offspring. Thus, disorders of circadian rhythm might play a pivotal role in glucose metabolic disturbances, especially in terms of early adverse nutritional environments and the development of metabolic diseases in later life. In addition, as a peripheral clock, the gut microbiota has its own circadian rhythm that fluctuates with periodic feeding and has been widely recognized for its significant role in metabolism. In light of the important roles of the gut microbiota and circadian clock in metabolic health and their interconnected regulatory relationship, we propose that the “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis” might be a novel and crucial mechanism to decipher “metabolic memory.” The “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis” is expected to facilitate the future development of a novel target for the prevention and intervention of diabetes during the early stage of life.

1. Introduction

According to the latest data from the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), there were approximately 425 million adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) worldwide in 2017. By 2045, this number is expected to increase to 629 million, which will bring a tremendous economic burden to the world. In China, the number of diabetic patients has reached 114.4 million, making it the country with the highest prevalence of diabetes in the world. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for more than 90% of the diabetes in the diabetic population [1]. T2DM is a chronic complex disease characterized by high levels of blood glucose, insulin resistance, and relative insulin deficiency. Genes and traditional environmental factors, including obesity and physical inactivity, have been widely recognized in the pathogenesis of T2DM [2], but these factors could not completely explain the current high prevalence and rapid growth of diabetes [3, 4]. Therefore, the etiology and pathogenesis of T2DM are still not fully understood. In recent years, the relationship between the adverse developmental environment in early life and glucose metabolism has gained wide attention from the academic community. “Metabolic memory” and the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis were subsequently proposed [5]. Our previous research [6, 7] and accumulating evidence [810] have indicated that an adverse nutritional environment in the uterus significantly increases the risk of chronic metabolic diseases in adulthood. The biological basis of the relationship between the early-life nutritional environment and adult chronic diseases may be the key to the pathogenesis of T2DM. Thus, this review discusses a novel mechanism to elucidate the DOHaD hypothesis.

2. Circadian Misalignment Plays an Important Role in Nutrition Intake Disorders and Abnormal Glucose Metabolism

The Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in 2017 was awarded to Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash, and Michael W. Young for discovering the molecular mechanisms that control circadian rhythm [11]. The circadian clock, or circadian rhythm, is an intrinsic rhythm formed by the organism’s rotation with the earth to adapt to the periodic alterations in the environment. When the environment changes, the body can readjust its own circadian clock by sensing external clues (mainly light). The circadian clock system includes a central circadian clock and peripheral circadian clocks. The central circadian clock is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, which is thought to be the primary pacemaker of circadian rhythm by sensing the light in the environment and integrating the information to form a 24-hour circadian rhythm. In addition, the SCN is also responsible for transmitting signals to the peripheral circadian clock through hormones or synapses and controlling the circadian rhythm of the body. The peripheral circadian clock is widely distributed in tissues, including the intestine, pancreas, heart, liver, skeletal muscles, and kidneys. The peripheral circadian clock is partly controlled by the central circadian clock in circadian rhythm, and at the same time, it has its own oscillator to regulate the function of various tissues and organs [1214]. Most of the circadian clock components are transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The most widely studied clock genes include Bmal1 (aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like, also known as Arntl), Clock (circadian locomotor output cycles kaput), Per1/2/3 (period circadian clock), and Cry1/2 (cryptochrome). The expression of the clock genes also has a circadian rhythm, which is mainly regulated by a transcription-translation feedback loop. The CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer can bind to the enhancer in the promoter region of Per, Cry, and other genes to initiate the expression of downstream genes. In contrast, the PER/CRY heterodimer can, in turn, inhibit the expression of Clock and Bmal1 to form a regulatory feedback loop for the expression levels of Clock/Bmal1-Per/Cry [15]. Furthermore, these clock genes perform circadian rhythm output by regulating the expression of multiple downstream clock-controlled genes. In addition to light, dietary nutrition [16, 17], temperature [18, 19], sleep [1922], stress [23, 24], and exercise [2527] all have a regulatory effect on the circadian clock.

It is well known that there is a close relationship between circadian rhythm and metabolism. As early as the 1970s and 1980s, Professor Panda discovered that some patients who had poor glucose response in the evening had no symptoms of DM when they received the same challenge in the morning. Even in healthy people, the rate of glucose metabolism at nighttime meals is also much slower than that at breakfast, indicating that glucose metabolism is associated with circadian rhythm [28]. A large number of clinical studies [2931] on shift workers and animal experiments [32, 33] have confirmed that circadian rhythm disorders play an important role in the pathogenesis of DM. For shift workers, their sleeping and eating times are disrupted. Then, circadian misalignment occurs, which makes midnight eating possible. However, feeding behavior plays an important role in the nutritional status of the body, which includes nutrition components, nutrition intake, and feeding time. The feeding time is mainly determined by the endogenous time mechanism of the body. In addition, it is also affected by food supply, sense of hunger and satiety, social habits, and convenience. Accumulating evidence in recent years has suggested that the timing of nutrition intake may affect a variety of physiological processes, including sleep-wake cycles, core body temperature, behavior, alertness, and energy metabolism [34, 35]. Animal studies have found that mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) during the day (sleeping time) gained more weight and had worse glucose tolerance than those fed a high-fat diet during the night (active time). At the same time, the expression of clock genes in adipose tissue and the liver also changed, and the circadian rhythm disorder occurred, while the central circadian clock was not significantly influenced [3638]. In addition, a moderate mealtime disorder can also lead to disorders of glucose metabolism. A randomized clinical study showed that skipping breakfast significantly increased postprandial blood glucose and decreased insulin and GLP-1 levels compared with consuming three meals a day [39]. The expression of the clock genes in the peripheral blood leukocytes of the breakfast skippers was significantly changed, and the circadian rhythm was disrupted [40]. Animal studies have also demonstrated that skipping breakfast leads to expression disorders of peripheral clock genes and downstream metabolic genes in the liver, while skipping dinner affects lipid metabolism and adipose tissue aggregation [41]. Furthermore, there is a close relationship between the changes in intake of nutrition components and the disorders of circadian clock. Recently, several studies have explored the role of circadian clock in the abnormal glucose metabolism caused by HFD (overnutrition). In the HFD group, the feeding rhythm changed compared with the feeding rhythm associated with the normal diet, with more food eaten during the day (resting period). The expression of clock genes as well as downstream clock-control genes in peripheral circadian clocks such as liver, kidney, adipose tissue, and pancreas changed significantly, leading to disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism [37, 4245]. In another way, growing evidence showed that modulating the daily period of feeding and fasting, which readjusts the circadian rhythm, could counter the deleterious effects of nutrient imbalance on metabolism [4648]. Time-restricted feeding (TRF), where food access is restricted to certain hours of the day, is found to have protective effects against HFD or high-fructose diets induced metabolic disorders [49]. Mitchell et al. found that extended daily fasting, independent of the nutrition challenges, could produce metabolic health and longevity benefits in male mice [50]. Thus, regulating the circadian rhythm of food intake could protect against the metabolic disorders induced by adverse nutrient intake. In future, more associated studies need to be done in human to validate these findings.

Therefore, circadian misalignment might be a crucial factor in mediating abnormal nutritional intake and glucose intolerance. In light of the significantly increased risk of metabolic diseases in later life after exposure to an adverse nutritional environment in early life, we further discuss the role of the circadian clock in “metabolic memory.”

3. Disorders of Circadian Rhythm Might Be an Important Mechanism Relating Early-Life Nutritional Environment and Abnormal Glucose Metabolism

Early life, including intrauterine development and the neonatal period, is a critical period for fetal growth and development. The early developmental environment has a lasting memory effect that lasts the whole life, called “metabolic memory,” which has been widely accepted and recognized by the academic community. Since Barker first discovered that people with lower birth weight had higher death rates from ischemic heart disease [51], large number of clinical studies [5257] and animal experiments [7, 5863] have demonstrated that adverse early-life exposures, such as nutrient restriction or overnutrition, gestational diabetes and maternal obesity and HFD, significantly increased the risk of developing metabolic diseases in later life. However, the precise underlying mechanism by which deciphers the “metabolic memory” is still not fully understood. Some of the recent studies found that maternal obesity and maternal HFD consumption could inhibit and reprogram the expression of clock genes, including Clock, Bmal1, REV-ERBα, Cry, and Per, in the liver and heart of the offspring, which further led to abnormal glucose and lipid metabolism in offspring and produced long-term memory effects [64, 65]. Mouralidarane et al. demonstrated that the interaction between maternal obesity and a past-natal obesogenic environment increased offspring risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease through programming disruptions of 24-h rhythm in clock genes, including Clock, Bmal1, Cry2, and Per2 in mice [66]. In addition to clock genes, our previous study [58] and other research [67] showed that adverse early-life nutritional challenges programed metabolic diseases in later life; in the meantime, clock-control genes were significantly disrupted, such as PPARα, inositol-requiring 1 alpha (IRE1α), protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK),and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) in the endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling pathways, of which the expressions are rhythmic and play a key role in the link between circadian rhythm and metabolism.

Thus, disorders in circadian rhythm might be a crucial mechanism in linking an adverse nutritional environment in early life and increased risks of metabolic disorders in later life. However, the specific mechanism of the circadian rhythm reprogramming is not yet clear. In light of the significant relationship between gut microbiota and nutrient intake, whether gut microbiota is a crucial factor during this process is unknown. We further discuss the crosstalk between the circadian clock and the gut microbiota in mediating “metabolic memory.”

4. The “Gut Microbiota-Circadian Clock Axis” May Be the Key to How an Adverse Nutritional Environment Results in Glucose Metabolism Disturbances

The intestine is the largest immune organ of the human body. As one of the peripheral circadian clock organs, it receives the synchronized information of the central circadian clock. The intestine also has its own oscillator, which is mainly regulated by the nutrition in food [17, 68]. The gut microbiota, with a total weight of 1-2 kg in the intestine, includes more than 1000 species and more than 1014 microorganisms. These microorganisms usually have a balanced symbiotic relationship with the host and play an important role in human health. The intestinal microbiota has a variety of important physiological functions. In terms of metabolism, the intestinal microbiota can synthesize the amino acids required by the host, absorb fat and fat-soluble vitamins from the diet, participate in bile acid-related metabolism, help the host digest complex carbohydrates and plants, and produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as butyric acid, acetic acid, and propionic acid. In addition, gut microbiota plays important roles in the maintenance of the intestinal epithelial barrier, the regulation of intestinal permeability, and the maturation and regulation of host innate immunity and adaptive immunity, through which it is linked to various organ systems throughout the body [6971]. More importantly, emerging evidence has showed that the intestinal microbial community interacted with the circadian clock, and disrupting this interaction could result in metabolic diseases [72].

It has been previously found that there are diurnal oscillations in composition and function of gut microbiota itself whose regulation is controlled by host feeding rhythms and the types of food consumed [73, 74]. If the rhythmic feeding times are disrupted, such as host genetic molecular clock deficiency and time-shift-induced jet lag, then aberrant gut microbiota diurnal rhythmicity and dysbiosis occurred. Further transplanting the time-shifted microbiota into germ-free mice led to a significant increase in body adiposity, which implicated that jet lag induced metabolic disorders were transmissible by gut microbiota [72]. Another study also showed that continuous circadian misalignment produced decreased alpha diversity, a higher ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteriodetes, increased intestinal permeability, and changed clock gene expression in intestine of mice fed a high-fat, high-sugar diet [75]. As food intake has been proved to affect the gut microbial community structure and nutrition consumed could regulate peripheral clock rhythm, emerging recent studies have shown that gut microbiota might be responsible for the reprogramming of circadian rhythmicity. Firstly, circadian clock genes, including kaiA, kaiB, and kaiC, have been identified in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 [76]. Secondly, evidence has shown that some bacteria could rhythmically regulate the behavior of host and synchronize with the host [77, 78]. Furthermore, the absence of gut microbiota has been found to disrupt the circadian clock genes, including Bmal1, Cry1, Per1, and Per2, of intestinal epithelial cells and liver in germ-free and antibiotic-induced mice [79, 80]. Murakami et al. using fecal transplant model demonstrated that gut microbiota from the HFD fed mice dramatically reprogrammed the liver circadian clock by PPARγ [81]. Another study found that gut microbiota regulated body composition through circadian transcription factor NFIL3, which is a significant link among microbiota, host metabolism, and circadian clock [82]. Therefore, the circadian clock influences the composition of gut microbiota, and inversely, the gut microbiota can also regulate the circadian rhythm, which indicates bidirectional communication between gut microbiota and circadian clock (Table 1). In other words, there is a “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis.”

Table 1: The summarization of the relationship between gut microbiota and circadian clock.

As for the concrete molecular mechanism of the role of “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis” in metabolism, a growing amount of evidence demonstrated that microbiota-derived metabolites might play a crucial role. Leone et al. detected the intestinal microbial metabolic products, SCFAs, and H2S production in mice fed the low-fat diet or high-fat diet and showed that the metabolites also exhibited rhythmic fluctuations, particularly the butyrate. They found that the HFD led to significant alterations in microbial composition and circadian oscillations, as well as the bacterial metabolic products. Further adding the butyrate to a hepatic model in vitro significantly influenced the expression of Bmal1 and Per2. Thus, bacterial metabolites might be a crucial mediator between gut microbiota and circadian clock [80]. Subsequently, Tahara et al. also confirmed the day-night differences of gut microbial-dependent SCFAs in mice, especially the acetate and butyrate. In addition, they also found that oral administration of SCFAs can result in dramatic changes of clock genes in peripheral clocks [83]. In addition to SCFAs, bile acid is found to be another factor participating in crosstalk between microbiota and circadian rhythms. Bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol moieties and are conjugated to taurine or glycine. Then, the conjugated bile acids were deconjugated by microbiota in the intestine. Govindarajan et al. showed that microbe-derived unconjugated bile acids can alter the expression of clock genes in the ileum, colon, and liver [84]. Therefore, adverse nutritional environment affects the structure and function of gut microbiota, and the changed microbial metabolites can further influence the circadian clock and metabolic health. The “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis” disorders may be a key mechanism by which adverse nutritional environments lead to abnormal glucose metabolism [80].

We previously reviewed the role of gut microbiota in the effects of maternal obesity on metabolism of offspring and indicated that gut microbiota might be an essential programing factor for the increased risk of metabolic disorders in later life induced by adverse nutritional environments in early life [85]. Our research [7] and other studies [8689] have found that the composition and diversity of gut microbiota changed significantly, which was accompanied by metabolic disorders in later life, after exposure to adverse nutritional environments in early life. An animal experiment has shown that alpha diversity was significantly decreased in the gut microbiota of mice from HFD-fed dams compared with the chow diet-fed dams [9]. Another fecal transplantation study found that the beta diversity of intestinal microbiota in offspring from dams transplanted microbiota from mice-fed HFD was lower than that from the mice-fed normal diet, and the number of Firmicutes phylum was also decreased, which could produce butyrate [90]. Furthermore, Ma et al. demonstrated that the relative abundance of Campylobacter was persistently decreased until juveniles in primates from HFD fed mothers compared with that from the normal group [88]. Human studies also indicated that maternal HFG or obesity can significantly reduce the abundance of Bacteroides, Blautia spp., and Eubacterium spp. and increase the numbers of Parabacteroides spp. and Oscillibacter spp., which have been found to be associated with obesity previously [9193]. In addition, evidence from human studies and animal models showed that early-life antibiotics use, which led to imbalance of gut microbiota, could result in long-term deleterious effects on health, including obesity and diabetes mellitus [9496]. Thus, the changes of gut microbiota play important roles in linking adverse early-life exposures and metabolic disorders in later life.

In light of the important roles of circadian rhythm and gut microbiota, respectively, in early-life nutrition and metabolic health in later life and the close communication between gut microbiota and circadian clock, we propose that the “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis” might be a novel and crucial mechanism for deciphering “metabolic memory.” Adverse early-life exposures can significantly alter the composition and function of gut microbiota and associated microbe-derived metabolites, which further regulate the circadian clock and metabolism in peripheral tissues. However, the evidence is still scarce and more related studies need to be done in the future.

5. Conclusions and Prospects

The overall health resources for chronic diseases in China, and throughout the world, are mostly allocated to treating diseases or complications that have already developed. Thus, the prevention, early identification, and early treatment of diseases are extremely urgent. The momentum of DM development is impossible to stop in the short term, and it is necessary to adjust the prevention and control strategies in a timely manner. It is important to note that the prevalence of DM in adolescents has increased significantly. However, the inherent genetic factors and traditional environmental factors cannot completely explain the rapid increase in the prevalence of diabetes. What is the best way to identify groups that are at high risk of developing diabetes early? How can an earlier intervention be carried out? How can treatment effectiveness be improved? These are key issues in the prevention and treatment of metabolic diseases such as DM. Early detection of these problems with the philosophy that a “Good doctor treats when the disease does not appear” can generate twice the results with half the effort. Therefore, exploring the specific mechanism of “metabolic memory” in terms of the adverse nutrient environment in early life and identifying the key mechanism underlying the rapid increase in the development of DM may have far-reaching effects on reducing the barriers to the prevention and treatment of metabolic diseases.

A multitude of studies have shown that a maternal HFD during pregnancy and lactation could increase the risk of developing obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance and fatty liver in offspring in early life, and these health problems can continue through adulthood and even to old age. Therefore, the adverse nutritional environment in early life can significantly increase the risk of abnormal glucose metabolism in later life. However, the concrete mechanism remains largely unclear. With the prevalence of shift working and jet lag, the role of circadian misalignment in metabolic diseases gained increasing attention. Emerging studies have shown that there were significant relationships between nutrient intake and circadian clock, especially in the early life. In addition, it is well known that adverse nutritional environment affects the structure and function of gut microbiota. Recently, several experimental animal models indicated that there was bidirectional communication between gut microbiota and circadian clock and the changed microbial metabolites could further influence the circadian clock and metabolic health. Thus, the intestinal microbial community plays a pivotal role in the adverse nutrient environment and circadian rhythm disorders. Based on the abovementioned fact, we propose that the disorder of the “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis” plays an important role in the “metabolic memory” (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Overview of the role of “gut-microbiota-circadian clock axis” in the effects of adverse early-life nutritional environment on the metabolism in later life. HFD, high-fat diet; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; EWG, excess weight gain; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

However, studies clarifying the specific mechanism of “gut microbiota-circadian clock axis” and the cause and effect of the changes of metabolic health in later life and the axis are still limited, although they are of great significance for the prevention and early treatment of T2DM. Thus, there is an urgent need for more studies to further explore the underlying mechanisms. This review proposes a novel mechanism to decipher the “metabolic memory” and combine gut microbiota and circadian rhythm to reveal the effects of early-life adverse nutritional environments on glucose metabolism in adulthood. In this way, we can prevent diabetes in the high-risk population early and provide corresponding interventions to diabetic patients. This concept is expected to provide an important theoretical basis and a new drug target during the early stage of life to effectively prevent the occurrence and development of T2DM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

LYZ and LK contributed equally to this work. LYZ and LK wrote the original draft. XHX, LJJ, QZ, and MQD reviewed the manuscript. All of the authors had approved the final version of the article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81170736, 81570715, 81870579, and 81870545).

References

  1. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th edition, 2017, http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas.
  2. S. E. Kahn, M. E. Cooper, and S. Del Prato, “Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9922, pp. 1068–1083, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. S. Tomar, D. S. P. Tallapragada, S. S. Nongmaithem, S. Shrestha, C. S. Yajnik, and G. R. Chandak, “Intrauterine programming of diabetes and adiposity,” Current Obesity Reports, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 418–428, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Knutsson and A. Kempe, “Shift work and diabetes-a systematic review,” Chronobiology International, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1146–1151, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. S. Rosenfeld, “Homage to the “H” in developmental origins of health and disease,” Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 8–29, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Zheng, X. Xiao, Q. Zhang et al., “The effects of maternal and post-weaning diet interaction on glucose metabolism and gut microbiota in male mice offspring,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 36, no. 3, Article ID e00341, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Zheng, X. Xiao, Q. Zhang et al., “The programming effects of nutrition-induced catch-up growth on gut microbiota and metabolic diseases in adult mice,” MicrobiologyOpen, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 296–306, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. R. Dunford and J. M. Sangster, “Maternal and paternal periconceptional nutrition as an indicator of offspring metabolic syndrome risk in later life through epigenetic imprinting: a systematic review,” Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews, vol. 11, pp. S655–S662, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. U. D. Wankhade, Y. Zhong, P. Kang et al., “Enhanced offspring predisposition to steatohepatitis with maternal high-fat diet is associated with epigenetic and microbiome alterations,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 4, Article ID e0175675, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Sanguinetti, T. Liistro, M. Mainardi et al., “Maternal high-fat feeding leads to alterations of brain glucose metabolism in the offspring: positron emission tomography study in a porcine model,” Diabetologia, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 813–821, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R.-C. Huang, “The discoveries of molecular mechanisms for the circadian rhythm: the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine,” Biomedical Journal, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Poggiogalle, H. Jamshed, and C. M. Peterson, “Circadian regulation of glucose, lipid, and energy metabolism in humans,” Metabolism, vol. 84, pp. 11–27, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Sato, A. Kohsaka, U. Bhawal, and Y. Muragaki, “Potential roles of Dec and Bmal1 genes in interconnecting circadian clock and energy metabolism,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 781, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Serin and N. Acar Tek, “Effect of circadian rhythm on metabolic processes and the regulation of energy balance,” Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 322–330, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. M. Bailey, U. S. Udoh, and M. E. Young, “Circadian regulation of metabolism,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. R75–R96, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Ikeda, M. Kamagata, M. Hirao et al., “Glucagon and/or IGF-1 production regulates resetting of the liver circadian clock in response to a protein or amino acid-only diet,” EBioMedicine, vol. 28, pp. 210–224, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Tognini, M. Murakami, Y. Liu et al., “Distinct circadian signatures in liver and gut clocks revealed by ketogenic diet,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 523–538.e5, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Chen, E. Buhl, M. Xu et al., “Drosophila ionotropic receptor 25a mediates circadian clock resetting by temperature,” Nature, vol. 527, no. 7579, pp. 516–520, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Yadlapalli, C. Jiang, A. Bahle, P. Reddy, E. Meyhofer, and O. T. Shafer, “Circadian clock neurons constantly monitor environmental temperature to set sleep timing,” Nature, vol. 555, no. 7694, pp. 98–102, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Ray and A. B. Reddy, “Cross-talk between circadian clocks, sleep-wake cycles, and metabolic networks: dispelling the darkness,” BioEssays, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 394–405, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. S. Musiek and D. M. Holtzman, “Mechanisms linking circadian clocks, sleep, and neurodegeneration,” Science, vol. 354, no. 6315, pp. 1004–1008, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Cedernaes, M. E. Osler, S. Voisin et al., “Acute sleep loss induces tissue-specific epigenetic and transcriptional alterations to circadian clock genes in men,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. E1255–E1261, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Tahara, S. Aoyama, and S. Shibata, “The mammalian circadian clock and its entrainment by stress and exercise,” The Journal of Physiological Sciences, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Imamura, H. Yoshitane, K. Hattori et al., “ASK family kinases mediate cellular stress and redox signaling to circadian clock,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 14, pp. 3646–3651, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Yasumoto, R. Nakao, and K. Oishi, “Free access to a running-wheel advances the phase of behavioral and physiological circadian rhythms and peripheral molecular clocks in mice,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 1, Article ID e0116476, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Wolff and K. A. Esser, “Scheduled exercise phase shifts the circadian clock in skeletal muscle,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1663–1670, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. Tahara and S. Shibata, “Entrainment of the mouse circadian clock: effects of stress, exercise, and nutrition,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 119, pp. 129–138, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. M. Kuehn, “Resetting the circadian clock might boost metabolic health,” JAMA, vol. 317, no. 13, pp. 1303–1305, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Ika, E. Suzuki, T. Mitsuhashi, S. Takao, and H. Doi, “Shift work and diabetes mellitus among male workers in Japan: does the intensity of shift work matter?” Acta Med Okayama, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. R. Shiri, “Shift work and diabetes: a meta-analysis,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 804-805, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. G. Vimalananda, J. R. Palmer, H. Gerlovin et al., “Night-shift work and incident diabetes among African-American women,” Diabetologia, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 699–706, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Qian, B. Yeh, K. Rakshit, C. S. Colwell, and A. V. Matveyenko, “Circadian disruption and diet-induced obesity synergize to promote development of β-cell failure and diabetes in male rats,” Endocrinology, vol. 156, no. 12, pp. 4426–4436, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. S. Pijut, D. E. Corbett, Y. Wang, J. Li, R. J. Charnigo, and G. A. Graf, “Effect of peripheral circadian dysfunction on metabolic disease in response to a diabetogenic diet,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 310, no. 11, pp. E900–E911, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. D. Johnston, “Physiological responses to food intake throughout the day,” Nutrition Research Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 107–118, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. Okauchi, C. Hashimoto, R. Nakao, and K. Oishi, “Timing of food intake is more potent than habitual voluntary exercise to prevent diet-induced obesity in mice,” Chronobiology International, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. M. Arble, J. Bass, A. D. Laposky, M. H. Vitaterna, and F. W. Turek, “Circadian timing of food intake contributes to weight gain,” Obesity, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2100–2102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Kohsaka, A. D. Laposky, K. M. Ramsey et al., “High-fat diet disrupts behavioral and molecular circadian rhythms in mice,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 414–421, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Mukherji, A. Kobiita, P. Chambon et al., “Shifting the feeding of mice to the rest phase creates metabolic alterations, which, on their own, shift the peripheral circadian clocks by 12 hours,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 48, pp. E6683–E6690, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Jakubowicz, J. Wainstein, B. Ahren, Z. Landau, Y. Bar-Dayan, and O. Froy, “Fasting until noon triggers increased postprandial hyperglycemia and impaired insulin response after lunch and dinner in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial,” Diabetes Care, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1820–1826, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. Jakubowicz, J. Wainstein, Z. Landau et al., “Influences of breakfast on clock gene expression and postprandial glycemia in healthy individuals and individuals with diabetes: a randomized clinical trial,” Diabetes Care, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1573–1579, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Wu, L. Sun, F. ZhuGe et al., “Differential roles of breakfast and supper in rats of a daily three-meal schedule upon circadian regulation and physiology,” Chronobiology International, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 890–903, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Miranda, M. P. Portillo, J. A. Madrid, N. Arias, M. T. Macarulla, and M. Garaulet, “Effects of resveratrol on changes induced by high-fat feeding on clock genes in rats,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 110, no. 8, pp. 1421–1428, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Y. Mi, G. Qi, R. Fan, X. Ji, Z. Liu, and X. Liu, “EGCG ameliorates diet-induced metabolic syndrome associating with the circadian clock,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1863, no. 6, pp. 1575–1589, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. K. Honma, M. Hikosaka, K. Mochizuki, and T. Goda, “Loss of circadian rhythm of circulating insulin concentration induced by high-fat diet intake is associated with disrupted rhythmic expression of circadian clock genes in the liver,” Metabolism, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 482–491, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M.-C. Hsieh, S.-C. Yang, H.-L. Tseng, L.-L. Hwang, C.-T. Chen, and K.-R. Shieh, “Abnormal expressions of circadian-clock and circadian clock-controlled genes in the livers and kidneys of long-term, high-fat-diet-treated mice,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 227–239, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Hatori, C. Vollmers, A. Zarrinpar et al., “Time-restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 848–860, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. V. D. Longo and S. Panda, “Fasting, circadian rhythms, and time-restricted feeding in healthy lifespan,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1048–1059, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. Antoni, K. L. Johnston, A. L. Collins, and M. D. Robertson, “Effects of intermittent fasting on glucose and lipid metabolism,” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 361–368, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Chaix, A. Zarrinpar, P. Miu, and S. Panda, “Time-restricted feeding is a preventative and therapeutic intervention against diverse nutritional challenges,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 991–1005, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. J. Mitchell, M. Bernier, J. A. Mattison et al., “Daily fasting improves health and survival in male mice independent of diet composition and calories,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 221–228.e3, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. J. P. Barker, C. Osmond, P. D. Winter, B. Margetts, and S. J. Simmonds, “Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease,” The Lancet, vol. 334, no. 8663, pp. 577–580, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. X. Xiao, Z.-X. Zhang, H. J. Cohen et al., “Evidence of a relationship between infant birth weight and later diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in a Chinese population,” Diabetes Care, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 483–487, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. X. Xiao, Z.-X. Zhang, W.-H. Li et al., “Low birth weight is associated with components of the metabolic syndrome,” Metabolism, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 1282–1286, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. K. A. Sauder, C. W. Hockett, B. M. Ringham, D. H. Glueck, and D. Dabelea, “Fetal overnutrition and offspring insulin resistance and β-cell function: the exploring perinatal outcomes among children (EPOCH) study,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1392–1399, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Jacota, A. Forhan, C. Saldanha-Gomes, M. A. Charles, and B. Heude, “Maternal weight prior and during pregnancy and offspring’s BMI and adiposity at 5-6 years in the EDEN mother-child cohort,” Pediatric Obesity, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 320–329, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. B. Landon, M. M. Rice, M. W. Varner et al., “Mild gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term child health,” Diabetes Care, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 445–452, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. L. G. Grunnet, S. Hansen, L. Hjort et al., “Adiposity, dysmetabolic traits, and earlier onset of female puberty in adolescent offspring of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a clinical study within the Danish national birth cohort,” Diabetes Care, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1746–1755, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. Zheng, X. Xiao, Q. Zhang, M. Yu, J. Xu, and Z. Wang, “Maternal high-fat diet modulates hepatic glucose, lipid homeostasis and gene expression in the PPAR pathway in the early life of offspring,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 14967–14983, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. Zheng, X. Xiao, Q. Zhang, T. Wang, M. Yu, and J. Xu, “Maternal low-protein diet modulates glucose metabolism and hepatic MicroRNAs expression in the early life of offspring,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 205, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. B. N. Radford and V. K. M. Han, “Offspring from maternal nutrient restriction in mice show variations in adult glucose metabolism similar to human fetal growth restriction,” Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 469–478, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. G. A. Ribaroff, E. Wastnedge, A. J. Drake, R. M. Sharpe, and T. J. G. Chambers, “Animal models of maternal high fat diet exposure and effects on metabolism in offspring: a meta-regression analysis,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 673–686, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H. A. Paul, M. R. Bomhof, H. J. Vogel, and R. A. Reimer, “Diet-induced changes in maternal gut microbiota and metabolomic profiles influence programming of offspring obesity risk in rats,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 20683, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. J. Pereira, B. L. Moyce, S. M. Kereliuk, and V. W. Dolinsky, “Influence of maternal overnutrition and gestational diabetes on the programming of metabolic health outcomes in the offspring: experimental evidence,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 438–451, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. D. Wang, S. Chen, M. Liu, and C. Liu, “Maternal obesity disrupts circadian rhythms of clock and metabolic genes in the offspring heart and liver,” Chronobiology International, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 615–626, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. J. Borengasser, P. Kang, J. Faske et al., “High fat diet and in utero exposure to maternal obesity disrupts circadian rhythm and leads to metabolic programming of liver in rat offspring,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e84209, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. Mouralidarane, J. Soeda, D. Sugden et al., “Maternal obesity programs offspring non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through disruption of 24 h rhythms in mice,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1339–1348, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. Soeda, P. Cordero, J. Li et al., “Hepatic rhythmicity of endoplasmic reticulum stress is disrupted in perinatal and adult mice models of high-fat diet-induced obesity,” International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 455–466, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. Yoshida, N. Aoki, M. Tanaka, S. Aoyama, and S. Shibata, “The circadian clock controls fluctuations of colonic cell proliferation during the light/dark cycle via feeding behavior in mice,” Chronobiology International, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1145–1155, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. M. M. Natividad and E. F. Verdu, “Modulation of intestinal barrier by intestinal microbiota: pathological and therapeutic implications,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. T. Gensollen, S. S. Iyer, D. L. Kasper, and R. S. Blumberg, “How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6285, pp. 539–544, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. G. den Besten, K. van Eunen, A. K. Groen, K. Venema, D.-J. Reijngoud, and B. M. Bakker, “The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2325–2340, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. A. Thaiss, D. Zeevi, M. Levy et al., “Transkingdom control of microbiota diurnal oscillations promotes metabolic homeostasis,” Cell, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 514–529, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. C. A. Thaiss, M. Levy, T. Korem et al., “Microbiota diurnal rhythmicity programs host transcriptome oscillations,” Cell, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 1495–1510.e12, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. X. Liang, F. D. Bushman, and G. A. FitzGerald, “Rhythmicity of the intestinal microbiota is regulated by gender and the host circadian clock,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 33, pp. 10479–10484, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. R. M. Voigt, C. B. Forsyth, S. J. Green et al., “Circadian disorganization alters intestinal microbiota,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e97500, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. Kondo, “A cyanobacterial circadian clock based on the Kai oscillator,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. E. A. Heath-Heckman, S. M. Peyer, C. A. Whistler, M. A. Apicella, W. E. Goldman, and M. J. McFall-Ngai, “Bacterial bioluminescence regulates expression of a host cryptochrome gene in the squid-vibrio symbiosis,” mBio, vol. 4, no. 2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. K. Paulose, J. M. Wright, A. G. Patel, and V. M. Cassone, “Human gut bacteria are sensitive to melatonin and express endogenous circadian rhythmicity,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 1, Article ID e0146643, p. e0146643, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A. Mukherji, A. Kobiita, T. Ye, and P. Chambon, “Homeostasis in intestinal epithelium is orchestrated by the circadian clock and microbiota cues transduced by TLRs,” Cell, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 812–827, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. V. Leone, S. M. Gibbons, K. Martinez et al., “Effects of diurnal variation of gut microbes and high-fat feeding on host circadian clock function and metabolism,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 681–689, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. Murakami, P. Tognini, Y. Liu, K. L. Eckel-Mahan, P. Baldi, and P. Sassone-Corsi, “Gut microbiota directs PPARγ-driven reprogramming of the liver circadian clock by nutritional challenge,” EMBO Reports, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1292–1303, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. Y. Wang, Z. Kuang, X. Yu, K. A. Ruhn, M. Kubo, and L. V. Hooper, “The intestinal microbiota regulates body composition through NFIL3 and the circadian clock,” Science, vol. 357, no. 6354, pp. 912–916, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. Y. Tahara, M. Yamazaki, H. Sukigara et al., “Gut microbiota-derived short chain fatty acids induce circadian clock entrainment in mouse peripheral tissue,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1395, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. K. Govindarajan, J. MacSharry, P. G. Casey, F. Shanahan, S. A. Joyce, and C. G. M. Gahan, “Unconjugated bile acids influence expression of circadian genes: a potential mechanism for microbe-host crosstalk,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 12, Article ID e0167319, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. L. Zhou and X. Xiao, “The role of gut microbiota in the effects of maternal obesity during pregnancy on offspring metabolism,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 38, no. 2, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. C. Collado, S. Rautava, J. Aakko, E. Isolauri, and S. Salminen, “Human gut colonisation may be initiated in utero by distinct microbial communities in the placenta and amniotic fluid,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 23129, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. T. K. Soderborg, S. J. Borengasser, L. A. Barbour, and J. E. Friedman, “Microbial transmission from mothers with obesity or diabetes to infants: an innovative opportunity to interrupt a vicious cycle,” Diabetologia, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 895–906, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. Ma, A. L. Prince, D. Bader et al., “High-fat maternal diet during pregnancy persistently alters the offspring microbiome in a primate model,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 3889, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. A. L. Kozyrskyj, R. Kalu, P. T. Koleva, and S. L. Bridgman, “Fetal programming of overweight through the microbiome: boys are disproportionately affected,” Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. A. J. Bruce-Keller, S.-O. Fernandez-Kim, R. L. Townsend et al., “Maternal obese-type gut microbiota differentially impact cognition, anxiety and compulsive behavior in male and female offspring in mice,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 4, Article ID e0175577, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. J. D. Galley, M. Bailey, C. Kamp Dush, S. Schoppe-Sullivan, and L. M. Christian, “Maternal obesity is associated with alterations in the gut microbiome in toddlers,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, Article ID e113026, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. D. M. Chu, K. M. Antony, J. Ma et al., “The early infant gut microbiome varies in association with a maternal high-fat diet,” Genome Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 77, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. S. F. Clarke, E. F. Murphy, O. O’Sullivan et al., “Targeting the microbiota to address diet-induced obesity: a time dependent challenge,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65790, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. S. G. Yallapragada, C. B. Nash, and D. T. Robinson, “Early-life exposure to antibiotics, alterations in the intestinal microbiome, and risk of metabolic disease in children and adults,” Pediatric Annals, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. e265–e269, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. J. Li, K. Yang, T. Ju et al., “Early life antibiotic exposure affects pancreatic islet development and metabolic regulation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 41778, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. A. P. Ville, M. B. Heyman, R. Medrano, and J. M. Wojcicki, “Early antibiotic exposure and risk of childhood obesity in Latinos,” Childhood Obesity, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 231–235, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus