Table of Contents
International Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 439046, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/439046
Research Article

Persistent Copulation in Asexual Female   Potamopyrgus antipodarum: Evidence for Male Control with Size-Based Preferences

Department of Biology, University of Iowa, 143 Biology Building, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324, USA

Received 30 September 2010; Revised 12 January 2011; Accepted 3 February 2011

Academic Editor: Jeremy Marshall

Copyright © 2011 Amanda E. Nelson and Maurine Neiman. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. C. Lahti, N. A. Johnson, B. C. Ajie et al., “Relaxed selection in the wild,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 487–496, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. D. W. Fong, T. C. Kane, and D. C. Culver, “Vestigialization and loss of nonfunctional characters,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 249–268, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. E. Dorken, K. J. Neville, and C. G. Eckert, “Evolutionary vestigialization of sex in a clonal plant: selection versus neutral mutation in geographically peripheral populations,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 271, no. 1555, pp. 2375–2380, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. M. Neiman, S. Meirmans, and P. G. Meirmans, “What can asexual lineage age tell us about the maintenance of sex?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1168, pp. 185–200, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. M. Daly, “The cost of mating,” The American Naturalist, vol. 112, no. 986, pp. 771–774, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. E. Magurran and B. H. Seghers, “A cost of sexual harassment in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 258, no. 1351, pp. 89–92, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. F. Chenoweth, D. Petfield, P. Doughty, and M. W. Blows, “Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1745–1750, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. D. J. Hosken and T. A. R. Price, “Genital evolution: the traumas of sex,” Current Biology, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. R519–R521, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. P. W. Bateman, J. W. H. Ferguson, and C. A. Yetman, “Courtship and copulation, but not ejaculates, reduce the longevity of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus),” Journal of Zoology, vol. 268, no. 4, pp. 341–346, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. den Hollander and D. T. Gwynne, “Female fitness consequences of male harassment and copulation in seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1061–1070, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Gay, P. E. Eady, R. Vasudev, D. J. Hosken, and T. Tregenza, “Costly sexual harassment in a beetle,” Physiological Entomology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. A.F. Long, A. Pischedda, A. D. Stewart, and W. R. Rice, “A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females,” PLoS Biology, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e1000254, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  13. I. Schlupp, R. M. Knab, and M. J. Ryan, “Sexual harassment as a cost for molly females: bigger males cost less,” Behaviour, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 277–286, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. U. Heubel and M. Plath, “Influence of male harassment and female competition on female feeding behaviour in a sexual-asexual mating complex of mollies (Poecilia mexicana, P. formosa),” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1689–1699, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. J. Muller, “The Darwinian and modern conceptions of natural selection,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 459–470, 1949. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. L. Carson, L. S. Chang, and T. W. Lyttle, “Decay of female sexual behavior under parthogenesis,” Science, vol. 218, no. 4567, pp. 68–70, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Neiman, “Physiological dependence on copulation in parthenogenetic females can reduce the cost of sex,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 811–822, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Ikeda and H. L. Carson, “Selection for mating reluctance in females of a diploid parthenogenetic strain of Drosophila mercatorum,” Genetics, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 541–555, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. W. A. M. Pijls, H. J. van Steenbergen, and J. J. M. van Alphen, “Asexuality cured: the relations and differences between sexual and asexual Apoanagyrus diversicornis,” Heredity, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 506–513, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Wallace, “Parthenogenesis, sex and chromosomes in Potamopyrgus,” Journal of Molluscan Studies, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 93–107, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. F. Dybdahl and C. M. Lively, “Diverse, endemic and polyphyletic clones in mixed populations of a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum),” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 385–398, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Neiman and C. M. Lively, “Pleistocene glaciation is implicated in the phylogeographical structure of Potamopyrgus antipodarum, a New Zealand snail,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 3085–3098, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. M. Neiman, J. Jokela, and C. M. Lively, “Variation in asexual lineage age in Potamopyrgus antipodarum, a New Zealand snail,” Evolution, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 1945–1952, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Neiman and C. M. Lively, “Male New Zealand mud snails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) persist in copulating with asexual and parasitically castrated females,” American Midland Naturalist, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 88–96, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Neiman, “Embryo production in a parthenogenetic snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) is negatively affected by the presence of other parthenogenetic females,” Invertebrate Biology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. C. Richards and D. C. Shinn, “Intraspecific competition and development of size structure in the invasive snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray, 1853),” American Malacological Bulletin, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 33–37, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. F. Dybdahl and S. L. Kane, “Adaptation vs. phenotypic plasticity in the success of a clonal invader,” Ecology, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 1592–1601, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. A. Fox, M. F. Dybdahl, J. Jokela, and C. M. Lively, “Genetic structure of coexisting sexual and clonal subpopulations in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum),” Evolution, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1541–1548, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. M. Lively and J. Jokela, “Temporal and spatial distributions of parasites and sex in a freshwater snail,” Evolutionary Ecology Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 219–226, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Haase, “The radiation of hydrobiid gastropods in New Zealand: a revision including the description of new species based on morphology and mtDNA sequence information,” Systematics and Biodiversity, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 99–159, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. Fretter, “Prosobranchs,” in The Mollusca, Volume 7: Reproduction, A. S. Tompa, N. H. Verdonk, and J. A. M. van den Biggelaar, Eds., Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. Jokela, C. M. Lively, M. F. Dybdahl, and J. A. Fox, “Evidence for a cost of sex in the freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum,” Ecology, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 452–460, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. O. V. Ambrogio and J. A. Pechenik, “Do sex-changing male snails use mate choice to get a jump on their "size advantage"?” Marine Biology, vol. 156, no. 10, pp. 2173–2180, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. M. Koene, K. Montagne-Wajer, and A. Maat, “Aspects of body size and mate choice in the simultaneously hermaphroditic pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis,” Animal Biology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 247–259, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Winterbourn, “The New Zealand species of Potamopyrgus (Gastropoda: Hydrobiidae),” Malacologia, vol. 10, pp. 283–321, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  36. A. M. Schurko, M. Neiman, and J. M. Logsdon, “Signs of sex: what we know and how we know it,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 208–217, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. K. Kraaijeveld, P. Franco, B. M. Reumer, and J. J. M. van Alphen, “Effects of parthenogenesis and geographic isolation on female sexual traits in a parasitoid wasp,” Evolution, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 3085–3096, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. W. E. Wagner, R. J. Kelley, K. R. Tucker, and C. J. Harper, “Females receive a life-span benefit from male ejaculates in a field cricket,” Evolution, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 994–1001, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. K. Reinhardt, R. A. Naylor, and M. T. Siva-Jothy, “Ejaculate components delay reproductive senescence while elevating female reproductive rate in an insect,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 51, pp. 21743–21747, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. C. W. Fox, “Multiple mating, lifetime fecundity and female mortality of the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae),” Functional Ecology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 203–208, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Andersson, Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1994.
  42. D. Joly and M. Schiffer, “Coevolution of male and female reproductive structures in Drosophila,” Genetica, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 105–118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. R. T. Dillon, The Ecology of Freshwater Molluscs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
  44. V. Fretter and A. Graham, British Prosobranch Molluscs: Their Functional Anatomy and Ecology, Ray Society, London, UK, 1962.
  45. T. Asami, R. H. Cowie, and K. Ohbayashi, “Evolution of mirror images by sexually asymmetric mating behavior in hermaphroditic snails,” The American Naturalist, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 225–236, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  46. M. Ridley, “The control and frequency of mating in insects,” Functional Ecology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. E. Gaino, F. Scoccia, T. Lancioni, and A. Ludovisi, “The invader mudsnail Potamopyrgus antipodarum in the Tiber River basin (Central Italy),” Italian Journal of Zoology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 253–261, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. M. Tibbets, A. C. Krist, R. O. Hall Jr., and L. A. Riley, “Phosphorus-mediated changes in life history traits of the invasive New Zealand mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum),” Oecologia, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 549–559, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  49. L. D. Dosen and R. Montgomerie, “Female size influences mate preferences of male guppies,” Ethology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 245–255, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. Daly and M. Wilson, Sex, Evolution, and Behavior: Adaptations for Reproduction, Duxbury Press, Belmont, Calif, USA, 1978.
  51. D. S. Schmeller, R. O'Hara, and H. Kokko, “Male adaptive stupidity: male mating pattern in hybridogenetic frogs,” Evolutionary Ecology Research, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1039–1050, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. T. J. Kawecki, “Unisexual/bisexual breeding complexes in Poeciliidae: why do males copulate with unisexual females?” Evolution, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1018–1023, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus