Table of Contents
International Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 2012, Article ID 860797, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/860797
Research Article

Whole-Genome Profiling of a Novel Mutagenesis Technique Using Proofreading-Deficient DNA Polymerase

1Genome Research Center, NODAI Research Institute, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan
2Neo-Morgan Laboratory Inc., 907 Nogawa, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 216-0001, Japan
3Department of Bioscience, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan

Received 9 February 2012; Accepted 20 March 2012

Academic Editor: Hiromi Nishida

Copyright © 2012 Yuh Shiwa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. E. Labrou, “Random mutagenesis methods for in vitro directed enzyme evolution,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. O. Selifonova, F. Valle, and V. Schellenberger, “Rapid evolution of novel traits in microorganisms,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 3645–3649, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Furusawa and H. Doi, “Promotion of evolution: disparity in the frequency of strand-specific misreading between the lagging and leading DNA strands enhances disproportionate accumulation of mutations,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Tanabe, T. Kondo, Y. Onodera, and M. Furusawa, “A conspicuous adaptability to antibiotics in the Escherichia coli mutator strain, dnaQ49,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 191–196, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Shimoda, A. Itadani, A. Sugino, and M. Furusawa, “Isolation of thermotolerant mutants by using proofreading-deficient DNA polymerase δ as an effective mutator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Genes and Genetic Systems, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 391–397, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Itakura, K. Tabata, S. Eda et al., “Generation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum mutants with increased N2O reductase activity by selection after introduction of a mutated dnaQ gene,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 74, no. 23, pp. 7258–7264, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Abe, Y. Fujita, Y. Chiba, Y. Jigami, and K. I. Nakayama, “Upregulation of genes involved in gluconeogenesis and the glyoxylate cycle suppressed the drug sensitivity of an N-glycan-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1398–1403, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Abe, Y. Fujita, Y. Takaoka et al., “Ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated under selective conditions by over-expression of a proofreading-deficient DNA polymerase δ,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 199–204, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Abe, Y. Takaoka, Y. Chiba et al., “Development of valuable yeast strains using a novel mutagenesis technique for the effective production of therapeutic glycoproteins,” Glycobiology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 428–436, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Y. Park, Y. Ito, M. Nariyama et al., “The improvement of riboflavin production in Ashbya gossypii via disparity mutagenesis and DNA microarray analysis,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1315–1326, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. T. Matsuzawa, Y. Fujita, N. Tanaka, H. Tohda, A. Itadani, and K. Takegawa, “New insights into galactose metabolism by Schizosaccharomyces pombe: isolation and characterization of a galactose-assimilating mutant,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 158–166, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Flibotte, M. L. Edgley, I. Chaudhry et al., “Whole-genome profiling of mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Genetics, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 431–441, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Fukui, K. Yamauchi, T. Muroya et al., “Distinct roles of DNA polymerases delta and epsilon at the replication fork in Xenopus egg extracts,” Genes to Cells, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 179–191, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Li, K. M. Murphy, U. Kanevets, and L. J. Reha-Krantz, “Sensitivity to phosphonoacetic acid: a new phenotype to probe DNA polymerase δ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Genetics, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 569–580, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Morrison, A. L. Johnson, L. H. Johnston, and A. Sugino, “Pathway correcting DNA replication errors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1467–1473, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Morrison and A. Sugino, “The 3′→5′exonucleases of both DNA polymerases δ and ε participate in correcting errors of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Molecular and General Genetics, vol. 242, no. 3, pp. 289–296, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. A. N. McElhinny, C. M. Stith, P. M. J. Burgers, and T. A. Kunkel, “Inefficient proofreading and biased error rates during inaccurate DNA synthesis by a mutant derivative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 4, pp. 2324–2332, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. N. Venkatesan, J. J. Hsu, N. A. Lawrence, B. D. Preston, and L. A. Loeb, “Mutator phenotypes caused by substitution at a conserved motif A residue in eukaryotic DNA polymerase δ,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 7, pp. 4486–4494, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Timmermann, S. Jarolim, H. Russmayer et al., “A new dominant peroxiredoxin allele identified by whole-genome re-sequencing of random mutagenized yeast causes oxidant-resistance and premature aging,” Aging, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 475–486, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. D. Gietz and A. Sugino, “New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites,” Gene, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 527–534, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. E. Lea and C. A. Coulson, “The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations,” Journal of Genetics, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 264–285, 1949. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Li and R. Durbin, “Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 14, pp. 1754–1760, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. H. Li, B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker et al., “The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2078–2079, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. T. Robinson, H. Thorvaldsdóttir, W. Winckler et al., “Integrative genomics viewer,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 24–26, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Henikoff and J. G. Henikoff, “Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 22, pp. 10915–10919, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Lynch, W. Sung, K. Morris et al., “A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 27, pp. 9272–9277, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. S. Wong, D. Roccatano, M. Zacharias, and U. Schwaneberg, “A statistical analysis of random mutagenesis methods used for directed protein evolution,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 355, no. 4, pp. 858–871, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. S. Rasila, M. I. Pajunen, and H. Savilahti, “Critical evaluation of random mutagenesis by error-prone polymerase chain reaction protocols, Escherichia coli mutator strain, and hydroxylamine treatment,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 388, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Furusawa, “Implications of double-stranded DNA structure for development, cancer and evolution,” Open Journal of Genetics, vol. 01, no. 03, pp. 78–87, 2011. View at Google Scholar