Table of Contents
International Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 808247, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/808247
Research Article

Individual Genetic Contributions to Genital Shape Variation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana

Department of Biology, Western University, BGS 2080, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7

Received 11 July 2014; Accepted 7 August 2014; Published 8 September 2014

Academic Editor: Yoko Satta

Copyright © 2014 Hélène LeVasseur-Viens and Amanda J. Moehring. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. F. Dixson, “Sexual selection, genital morphology, and copulatory behavior in male Galagos,” International Journal of Primatology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. Böhme and T. Ziegler, “A review of iguanian and anguimorph lizard genitalia (squamata: Chamaeleonidae; Varanoidea, shinisauridae, xenosauridae, anguidae) and their phylogenetic significance: comparisons with molecular data sets,” Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 189–202, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. G. Eberhard, Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1985.
  4. O. Richards, “The specific characters of the British humblebees (Hymenoptera),” Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, vol. 75, pp. 233–268, 1927. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Liu, J. M. Mercer, L. F. Stam, G. C. Gibson, Z.-B. Zeng, and C. C. Laurie, “Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana,” Genetics, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 1129–1145, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Song, “Species-specificity of male genitalia is characterized by shape, size, and complexity,” Insect Systematics & Evolution, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 159–170, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Arnqvist and R. Thornhill, “Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta),” Genetical Research, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 193–212, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. W. Simmons, C. M. House, J. Hunt, and F. García-González, “Evolutionary response to sexual selection in male genital morphology,” Current Biology, vol. 19, pp. 1442–1446, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  9. W. G. Eberhard, “Animal genitalia and female choice,” American Scientist, vol. 78, pp. 134–141, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  10. W. G. Eberhard, “Species isolation, genital mechanics, and the evolution of species- specific genitalia in three species of Macrodactylus beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae, Melolonthinae),” Evolution, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1774–1783, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. P. Masly, “170 years of “Lock-and-Key”: genital morphology and reproductive isolation,” International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 2012, Article ID 247352, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. D. J. Hosken and P. Stockley, “Sexual selection and genital evolution,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87–93, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Arnqvist, “The evolution of water strider mating systems: causes and consequences of sexual conflicts,” in The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids, pp. 146–163, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Books Online, Cambridge, UK, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. M. Shapiro and A. H. Porter, “The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 34, pp. 231–245, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  15. W. G. Eberhard, “Evaluating models of sexual selection: genitalia as a test case,” The American Naturalist, vol. 142, pp. 564–571, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  16. W. G. Eberhard, “Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions,” Genetica, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. A. Coyne, “Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila,” Evolution, vol. 37, pp. 1101–1118, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  18. H. M. Robertson, “Mating asymmetries and phylogeny in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex,” Pacific Science, vol. 42, pp. 72–80, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  19. J. A. Coyne, “The genetics of an isolating mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila,” Evolution, vol. 47, pp. 778–788, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  20. C. S. C. Price, C. H. Kim, C. J. Gronlund, and J. A. Coyne, “Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex,” Evolution, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Jagadeeshan and R. S. Singh, “A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1058–1070, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. P. Masly, J. E. Dalton, S. Srivastava, L. Chen, and M. N. Arbeitman, “The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila,” Genetics, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 357–374, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Z.-B. Zeng, J. Liu, L. F. Stam, C.-H. Kao, J. M. Mercer, and C. C. Laurie, “Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species,” Genetics, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 299–310, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. M. Robertson, “Mating behavior and the evolution of Drosophila mauritiana,” Evolution, vol. 37, pp. 1283–1293, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  25. V. T. K. McNiven and A. J. Moehring, “Identification of genetically linked female preference and male trait,” Evolution, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 2155–2165, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Iwata and Y. Ukai, “SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors,” The Journal of Heredity, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 384–385, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. A. Coyne, J. Rux, and J. R. David, “Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives,” Genetical Research, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. J. Macdonald and D. B. Goldstein, “A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits distinguishing the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia,” Genetics, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 1683–1699, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. M. House, Z. Lewis, D. J. Hodgson et al., “Sexual and natural selection both influence male genital evolution,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e63807, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. L. McNeil, C. L. Bain, and S. J. Macdonald, “Multiple quantitative trait loci influence the shape of a male-specific genital structure in Drosophila melanogaster,” G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 343–351, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. S. Chatterjee, L. D. Uppendahl, M. A. Chowdhury, P.-L. Ip, and M. L. Siegal, “The female-specific Doublesex isoform regulates pleiotropic transcription factors to pattern genital development in Drosophila,” Development, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 1099–1109, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. J. Marygold, P. C. Leyland, R. L. Seal et al., “FlyBase: improvements to the bibliography,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. D751–D757, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. J. Moehring, J. Li, M. D. Schug et al., “Quantitative trait loci for sexual isolation between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana,” Genetics, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 1265–1274, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Laturney and A. J. Moehring, “The genetic basis of female mate preference and species isolation in Drosophila,” International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 2012, Article ID 328392, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar