Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Research Letters in Ecology
Volume 2008, Article ID 260754, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/260754
Research Letter

Assessment of Nutrient Limitation in Floodplain Forests with Two Different Techniques

1Department of Biology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346, USA
2Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
3Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Box 2324, Route 2, Newton, GA 39870, USA

Received 29 November 2007; Accepted 7 April 2008

Academic Editor: Shibu Jose

Copyright © 2008 Matthew A. Neatrour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. M. Vitousek and R. W. Howarth, “Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur?,” Biogeochemistry, vol. 13, no. 2, 87 pages, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. P. M. Vitousek, J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth et al., “Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences,” Ecological Applications, vol. 7, no. 3, 737 pages, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. W. Koerselman and A. F. M. Meuleman, “The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 33, no. 6, 1441 pages, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. Z.-Q. Cai and F. Bongers, “Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiencies in trees and lianas from a tropical montane rain forest in Xishuangbanna, south-west China,” Journal of Tropical Ecology, vol. 23, no. 1, 115 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. E. Fenn, M. A. Poth, and D. W. Johnson, “Evidence for nitrogen saturation in the San Bernardino Mountains in southern California,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 82, no. 1–3, 211 pages, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Gallardo and F. Covelo, “Spatial pattern and scale of leaf N and P concentration in a Quercus robur population,” Plant and Soil, vol. 273, no. 1-2, 269 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. D. May, S. B. Burdette, F. S. Gilliam, and M. B. Adams, “Interspecific divergence in foliar nutrient dynamics and stem growth in a temperate forest in response to chronic nitrogen inputs,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 35, no. 5, 1023 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. E. B. Schilling and B. G. Lockaby, “Relationships between productivity and nutrient circulation within two contrasting southeastern U.S. floodplain forests,” Wetlands, vol. 26, no. 1, 181 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. T. Tessier and D. J. Raynal, “Use of nitrogen to phosphorus ratios in plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 40, no. 3, 523 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. M. Tibbets and M. C. Molles, Jr., “C:N:P stoichiometry of dominant riparian trees and arthropods along the Middle Rio Grande,” Freshwater Biology, vol. 50, no. 11, 1882 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. T. E. Wood, D. Lawrence, and D. A. Clark, “Variation in leaf litter nutrients of a Costa Rican rain forest is related to precipitation,” Biogeochemistry, vol. 73, no. 2, 417 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. B. C. Blair and I. Perfecto, “Nutrient content and substrate effect on fine root density and size distribution in a Nicaraguan rain forest,” Biotropica, vol. 33, no. 4, 697 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. E. Cuevas and E. Medina, “Nutrient dynamics within amazonian forests—II: fine root growth, nutrient availability and leaf litter decomposition,” Oecologia, vol. 76, no. 2, 222 pages, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. K. Gleeson and R. E. Good, “Root allocation and multiple nutrient limitation in the New Jersey Pinelands,” Ecology Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, 220 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. E. Gress, T. D. Nichols, C. C. Northcraft, and W. T. Peterjohn, “Nutrient limitation in soils exhibiting differing nitrogen availabilities: what lies beyond nitrogen saturation?,” Ecology, vol. 88, no. 1, 119 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. W. T. Peterjohn, C. J. Foster, M. J. Christ, and M. B. Adams, “Patterns of nitrogen availability within a forested watershed exhibiting symptoms of nitrogen saturation,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 119, no. 1–3, 247 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. W. Raich, R. H. Riley, and P. M. Vitousek, “Use of root-ingrowth cores to assess nutrient limitations in forest ecosystems,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 24, no. 10, 2135 pages, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. C. G. Stewart, “A test of nutrient limitation in two tropical montane forests using root ingrowth cores,” Biotropica, vol. 32, no. 2, 369 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. do Rosario, G. Oliveira, M. van Noordwijk et al., “Auger sampling, ingrowth cores, and pinboard methods,” in Root Methods: A Handbook, A. L. Smit, A. G. Bengough, C. Engels, M. van Noordwijk, S. Pellerin, and S. C. van de Geijn, Eds., p. 175, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  20. B. G. Lockaby and W. H. Conner, “N:P balance in wetland forests: productivity across a biogeochemical continuum,” The Botanical Review, vol. 65, no. 2, 171 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. C. H. Wharton, W. M. Kitchens, E. C. Pendleton, and T. W. Sipe, “The ecology of bottomland hardwood swamps of the Southeast: a community profile,” FWS/OBS, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Service Program, Washington, DC, USA, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  22. B. G. Lockaby, F. C. Thornton, R. H. Jones, and R. G. Clawson, “Ecological responses of an oligotrophic floodplain forest to harvesting,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 23, no. 5, 901 pages, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  23. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil survey of Calhoun and Early Counties, Georgia, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA, 1985.
  24. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil survey of Baker and Mitchell Counties, Georgia, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA, 1986.
  25. A. Mehlich, “Determination of P, K, Na, Ca, Mg and NH4,” Soil Test Division Mimeo, North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Raleigh, NC, USA, 1953.
  26. H. D. Chapman and P. F Pratt, Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters, University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Berkely, Calif, USA, 1961.
  27. K. T. Killingbeck, “Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency,” Ecology, vol. 77, no. 6, 1716 pages, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Hodge, D. Robinson, B. S. Griffiths, and A. H. Fitter, “Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 22, no. 7, 811 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. D. Robinson, “The response of plants to nonuniform supplies of nutrients,” New Phytologist, vol. 127, no. 4, 635 pages, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. R. Aerts and F. S. Chapin, “The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns,” Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 30, 1 pages, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  31. P. M. Vitousek, D. R. Turner, and K. Kitayama, “Foliar nutrients during long-term soil development in Hawaiian montane rain forest,” Ecology, vol. 76, no. 3, 712 pages, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Güsewell, “N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance,” New Phytologist, vol. 164, no. 2, 243 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. H. Olde Venterink, M. J. Wassen, A. W. M. Verkroost, and P. C. de Ruiter, “Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands,” Ecology, vol. 84, no. 8, 2191 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar