Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Research Letters in Ecology
Volume 2008 (2008), Article ID 498390, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/498390
Research Letter

Shared Reproductive State Enhances Female Associations in Dolphins

Marine Mammal Research Group, Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia

Received 9 July 2007; Accepted 27 December 2007

Academic Editor: Daniel I. Rubenstein

Copyright © 2008 Luciana M. Möller and Robert G. Harcourt. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. B. Smuts and R. W. Smuts, “Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications,” Advances in the Study of Behavior, vol. 22, pp. 1–63, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. W. Wrangham, “An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups,” Behaviour, vol. 75, pp. 262–300, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  3. H. R. Pulliam and T. Caraco., “Living in groups: is there an optimal group size?” in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, Eds., Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  4. E. Otali and J. S. Gilchrist, “Why chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) mothers are less gregarious than nonmothers and males: the infant safety hypothesis,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 561–570, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. S. Wells, M. D. Scott, and A. B. Irvine, “The social structure of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins,” in Current Mammalogy, vol. 1, pp. 247–305, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  6. F. B. M. de Waal and L. M. Luttrell, “The similarity principle underlying social bonding among female rhesus monkeys,” Folia Primatologica, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 215–234, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Mann and B. B. Smuts, “Behavioral development in wild bottlenose dolphin newborns (Tursiops sp.),” Behaviour, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 529–566, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. L. M. Möller, L. B. Beheregaray, S. J. Allen, and R. G. Harcourt, “Association patterns and kinship in female Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) of southeastern Australia,” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. R. A. Smolker, A. F. Richards, R. C. Connor, and J. W. Pepper, “Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins,” Behaviour, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 38–69, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. C. Connor, R. S. Wells, J. Mann, and A. J. Read, “The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission-fusion society,” in Cetacean Societies: Field Studies of Dolphins and Whales, J. Mann, R. C. Connor, P. L. Tyack, and H. P. Whitehead, Eds., pp. 91–126, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. M. Möller, S. J. Allen, and R. G Harcourt, “Group characteristics, site fidelity and abundance of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in Jervis Bay and Port Stephens, southeastern Australia,” Australian Mammalogy, vol. 24, pp. 11–21, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. J. Cairns and S. J. Schwager, “A comparison of association indices,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1454–1469, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. H. P. Whitehead, “SOCPROG 1.2 (for matlab 5.1): programs for analysing social structure,” 1999, http://is.dal.ca/~hwhitehe/social.htm. View at Google Scholar
  14. B. F. J. Manly, “RT, a program for randomization testing, version 2.1,” 1997, Centre for Applications of Statistical and Mathematics, University of Otago. View at Google Scholar
  15. R. C. Connor, A. F. Richards, R. A. Smolker, and J. Mann, “Patterns of female attractiveness in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins,” Behaviour, vol. 133, no. 1-2, pp. 37–69, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  16. P. J. Corkeron, R. J. Morris, and M. M. Bryden, “Interactions between bottlenose dolphins and sharks in Moreton Bay, Queensland,” Aquatic Mammals, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 109–113, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  17. H. J. Bernard and A. A. Hohn, “Differences in feeding habits between pregnant and lactating spotted dolphins (Stenella attenuata ),” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 211–215, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  18. I. R. Fischhoff, S. R. Sundaresan, J. Cordingley, H. M. Larkin, M. J. Sellier, and D. I. Rubenstein, “Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 825–831, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. B. Silk, “Kin selection in primate groups,” International Journal of Primatology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 849–875, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. W. D. Hamilton, “The genetical evolution of social behavior, I and II,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 7, pp. 1–52, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  21. K. Smith, S. C. Alberts, and J. Altmann, “Wild female baboons bias their social behaviour towards paternal half-sisters,” Proceedings of the Royal Society. Series B, vol. 270, no. 1514, pp. 503–510, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. C. Owen, A comparison of maternal care by primiparous and multiparous bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)—does parenting improve with experience?, MSc thesis, 2001.
  23. L. S. Sayigh, P. L. Tyack, R. S. Wells, A. R. Solow, M. D. Scott, and A. Irvine, “Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: a field test using playback experiments,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Mann and J. J. Watson-Capps, “Surviving at sea: ecological and behavioural predictors of calf mortality in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops sp.,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 899–909, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar