Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Ecology
Volume 2010, Article ID 984396, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/984396
Research Article

Alien Mink Predation and Colonisation Processes of Rodent Prey on Small Islands of the Baltic Sea: Does Prey Naïveté Matter?

1Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
2School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington NSW 2052, Australia

Received 17 August 2009; Accepted 24 February 2010

Academic Editor: Andrew Sih

Copyright © 2010 Karen Fey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Levins, “Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control,” Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, pp. 15237–15240, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  2. I. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1997.
  3. R. Levins, “Extinction,” in Lectures on Mathematical Analysis of Biological Phenomena, pp. 123–138, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. A. Stamps, V. V. Krishnan, and M. L. Reid, “Search costs and habitat selection by dispersers,” Ecology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 510–518, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. K. Anderson, “Dispersal in rodents: a resident fitness hypothesis,” American Society of Mammalogy Special Publications, pp. 91–141, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  6. H. Steen, “Low survival of long distance dispersers of the root vole (Microtus oeconomus),” Annales Zoologici Fennici, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 271–274, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Steen, “Untangling the causes of disappearance from a local population of root voles, Microtus oeconomus: a test of the regional synchrony hypothesis,” Oikos, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. H. Metzgar, “An experimental comparison of screech owl predation on resident and transient white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus),” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 387–391, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. G. Cox and S. L. Lima, “Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 674–680, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. P. B. Banks and C. R. Dickman, “Alien predation and the effects of multiple levels of prey naïveté,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 229–230, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. C. R. Dickman, “Predation and habitat shift in the house mouse, Mus domesticus,” Ecology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 313–322, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. B. Banks, “Responses of Australian bush rats, Rattus fuscipes, to the odor of introduced Vulpes vulpes,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1260–1264, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Short, J. E. Kinnear, and A. Robley, “Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia—evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey species?” Biological Conservation, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 283–301, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. C. R. Dickman, “Impact of exotic generalist predators on the native fauna of Australia,” Wildlife Biology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 185–195, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Pokki, “Distribution, demography and dispersal of the field vole, Microtus agrestis (L.), in the Tvärminne archipelago, Finland,” Acta Zoologica Fennica, pp. 1641–1648, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  16. E. E. Crone, D. Doak, and J. Pokki, “Ecological influences on the dynamics of a field vole metapopulation,” Ecology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 831–843, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Nordström, J. Högmander, J. Nummelin, J. Laine, N. Laanetu, and E. Korpimäki, “Variable responses of waterfowl breeding populations to long-term removal of introduced American mink,” Ecography, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 385–394, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Nordström, J. Högmander, J. Laine, J. Nummelin, N. Laanetu, and E. Korpimäki, “Effects of feral mink removal on seabirds, waders and passerines on small islands in the Baltic Sea,” Biological Conservation, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 359–368, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. P. B. Banks, K. Norrdahl, M. Nordström, and E. Korpimäki, “Dynamic impacts of feral mink predation on vole metapopulations in the outer archipelago of the Baltic Sea,” Oikos, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Nordström and E. Korpimäki, “Effects of island isolation and feral mink removal on bird communities on small islands in the Baltic Sea,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 424–433, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Ahola, M. Nordström, P. B. Banks, N. Laanetu, and E. Korpimäki, “Alien mink predation induces prolonged declines in archipelago amphibians,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences, vol. 273, no. 1591, pp. 1261–1265, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  22. N. Dunstone, The Mink, T. & A. D. Poyser Ltd., London, UK, 1993.
  23. K. Kauhala, “Distributional history of the American mink (Mustela vison) in Finland with special reference to the trends in otter (Lutra lutra) populations,” Annales Zoologici Fennici, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 283–291, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Niemimaa and J. Pokki, “Minkin ravinnosta Suomenlahden ulkosaaristossa,” Suomen Riista, pp. 3618–3636, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  25. P. Salo, M. Toivola, M. Nordström, and E. Korpimäki, “Effects of home range characteristics on the diet composition of female American mink in the Baltic Sea archipelago,” Annales Zoologici Fennici, vol. 47, pp. 111–122, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  26. C. M. King, The Natural History of Weasels and Stoats, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1989.
  27. K. Fey, P. B. Banks, and E. Korpimäki, “Different microhabitat preferences of field and bank voles under manipulated predation risk from an alien predator,” Annales Zoologici Fennici, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  28. K. Fey, P. B. Banks, and E. Korpimäki, “Voles on small islands: effects of food limitation and alien predation,” Oecologia, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 419–428, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  29. E. Kostian, “Habitat requirements and breeding biology of the root vole, Microtus oeconomus (Pallas), on shore meadows inthe Gulf of Bothnia, Finland,” Annales Zoologici Fennici, pp. 7329–7340, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  30. T. Ebenhard, “Demography and island colonization of experimentally introduced and natural vole populations,” Acta Universitatis Upsalaiensis, pp. 1411–1428, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  31. X. Lambin, S. J. Petty, and J. L. Mackinnon, “Cyclic dynamics in field vole populations and generalist predation,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 106–118, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Forsman and L. E. Lindell, “Responses of a predator to variation in prey abundance: survival and emigration of adders in relation to vole density,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 1099–1108, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  33. N. Breslow, “Covariance analysis of censored survival data,” Biometrics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  34. I. Dvorchik and B. I. Carr, “A simple prognostic scoring system for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated by chemo-embolization,” Cancer Detection and Prevention, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 154–160, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  35. J. Fischer and D. B. Lindenmayer, “An assessment of the published results of animal relocations,” Biological Conservation, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. P. B. Banks, K. Norrdahl, and E. Korpimäki, “Mobility decisions and the predation risks of reintroduction,” Biological Conservation, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. E. Kenward, A. B. South, and S. S. Walls, Ranges 6 v1.2: For the Analysis of Tracking and Location Data, Anatrack Ltd., Wareham, UK, 2003.
  38. M. K. O'Bryan and D. R. McCullough, “Survival of black-tailed deer following relocation in California,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 115–119, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  39. B. M. Blanchard and R. R. Knight, “Biological consequences of relocating grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 560–565, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  40. D. van Vuren, A. J. Kuenzi, I. Loredo, A. L. Leider, and M. L. Morrison, “Translocation as a nonlethal alternative for managing California ground squirrels,” Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 351–359, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  41. M. Daly, M. I. Wilson, P. R. Behrends et al., “Sexually differentiated effects of radio transmitters on predation risk and behavior in kangaroo rats Dipodomys merriami,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1851–1855, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  42. A. B. Webster and R. J. Brooks, “Effects of radiotransmitters on the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus,” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 997–1001, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  43. E. Korpimäki, V. Koivunen, and H. Hakkarainen, “Do radio-collars increase the predation risk of small rodents?” Ethology Ecology and Evolution, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 377–386, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  44. E. Johannesen, H. P. Andreassen, and H. Steen, “Effect of radiocollars on survival of root voles,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 638–642, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  45. K. Norrdahl and E. Korpimäki, “Mortality factors in a cyclic vole population,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 261, no. 1360, pp. 49–53, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  46. K. Norrdahl and E. K. Orpimäki, “Does mobility or sex of voles affect risk of predation by mammalian predators?” Ecology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 226–232, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  47. P. B. Banks, K. Norrdahl, and E. Korpimäki, “Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 267, no. 1453, pp. 1621–1625, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  48. D. L. Nolte, J. R. Mason, G. Epple, E. Aronov, and D. L. Campbell, “Why are predator urines aversive to prey?” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1505–1516, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  49. P. Salo, M. Nordström, R. L. Thomson, and E. Korpimäki, “Risk induced by a native top predator reduces alien mink movements,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1092–1098, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed