Review Article
From Local Adaptation to Speciation: Specialization and Reinforcement
Table 1
Classification of reinforcement mechanisms based on the life stage modified and their consequences on genetic associations involved in genetic clustering. This classification is orthogonal to the one- versus two-allele classification.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1This would also apply to loci involved in genetic incompatibilities in a secondary contact. 2Unless mating is selective and causes a direct advantage to locally adapted alleles (i.e., it changes frequency at the local adaptation loci), as found in model involving sexual selection [8, 103]. 3Notation as in [104, 105], where m is the modifier locus and a, b the local adaptation loci. ‘‘Primary’’ association refers to the fact that the phenotypic effect of the modifier causes first a direct change on the genetic composition of the population (on frequency, within or between loci associations), which may then change the efficacy of selection. Eventually, a modifier promoting clustering will end up associated to the beneficial allele locally (). See Figures 1, 2 and 4 for examples. 4Indirectly by increasing the variance in fitness and the efficacy of selection. 5Besides possible direct costs relative to the strategy used (e.g., cost of finding a mate or the right habitat). Different traits are exposed to a variety of other selective effects (see text). 6Which generates inbreeding depression. 7Phenotype 1 and 2 may result from alleles at the adaptation locus or to another unrelated marker trait. Similarly in a ‘‘one-allele’’ model, self-similarity may be evaluated in reference to a marker trait at another locus than the modifier or the local adaptation locus. In both cases, the marker trait has to diverge in the two incipient species, which is essentially a two-allele mechanism. Thus, with three locus like this, the one- versus two-allele distinction is made more complicated by the fact that the marker trait must diverge (two-allele), but the modifier of the strength of assortment need not (it can be one- or two-allele) [52]. Another complication of the one- and two-allele classification arises when the locus exposed to postzygotic selection also causes premating isolation (as seen in so-called “magic trait” models). This can be thought as the limit where the loci causing prezygotic isolation and postzygotic selection become confounded. |