Table of Contents
International Journal of Family Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4929432, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4929432
Research Article

General Practitioners’ Participation in a Large, Multicountry Combined General Practitioner-Patient Survey: Recruitment Procedures and Participation Rate

1Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
2Department of Sociology and Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
3Hochschule Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Leipziger Straße 123, 36037 Fulda, Germany

Received 3 December 2015; Accepted 14 February 2016

Academic Editor: Hakan Yaman

Copyright © 2016 Peter P. Groenewegen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. V. Cook, H. O. Dickinson, and M. P. Eccles, “Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study,” BMC Health Services Research, vol. 9, article 160, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. W. Pit, T. Vo, and S. Pyakurel, “The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates—a systematic review,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 14, article 76, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. “PHAMEU database,” 2014, http://www.nivel.nl/en/dossier/country-information-primary-care.
  4. W. L. A. Schäfer, W. G. W. Boerma, D. S. Kringos et al., “QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 12, article 115, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. L. A. Schäfer, W. G. W. Boerma, D. S. Kringos et al., “Measures of quality, costs and equity in primary health care instruments developed to analyse and compare primary care in 35 countries,” Quality in Primary Care, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 67–79, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. R. Porter, “Raising response rates: what works? Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue,” New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 121, pp. 15–21, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. R. Porter, M. E. Whitcomb, and W. H. Weitzer, “Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue,” New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 2004, no. 121, pp. 63–73, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. B. S. Frey and S. Meier, “Pro-social behavior in a natural setting,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 65–88, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1971.
  10. A. Parkinson, L. Jorm, K. A. Douglas et al., “Recruiting general practitioners for surveys: reflections on the difficulties and some lessons learned,” Australian Journal of Primary Health, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 254–258, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. T. Wong, L. W. Chau, W. Hogg et al., “An international cross-sectional survey on the Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICO-PC): recruitment and data collection of places delivering primary care across Canada,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 16, article 20, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. D. S. Kringos, W. G. Boerma, Y. Bourgueil et al., “The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 11, article 81, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. World Values Survey, August 2014, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp.
  14. Eurostat, August 2014, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  15. D. Kringos, W. Boerma, Y. Bourgueil et al., “The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study,” British Journal of General Practice, vol. 63, no. 616, pp. e742–e750, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Brady, “Opportunity sampling,” in The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods, V. Jupp, Ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Barclay, C. Todd, I. Finlay, G. Grande, and P. Wyatt, “Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs,” Family Practice, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Hummers-Pradier, C. Scheidt-Nave, H. Martin, S. Heinemann, M. M. Kochen, and W. Himmel, “Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research,” Family Practice, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. L. Stinchecombe, The Logic of Social Research, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2005.
  20. G. Snijkers, G. Haraldsen, J. Jones, and D. K. Willimack, Designing and Conducting Business Surveys, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. Y. Baruch and B. C. Holtom, “Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research,” Human Relations, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1139–1160, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. F. Lewis, M. Hardy, and B. Snaith, “Estimating the effect of nonresponse bias in a survey of hospital organizations,” Evaluation & the Health Professions, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 330–351, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. S. Flanigan, E. McFarlane, and S. Cook, “Conducting survey research among physicians and other medical professionals: a review of current literature,” in Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Survey Research Methods Section (AAPOR '08), pp. 4136–4147, New Orleans, La, USA, May 2008.
  24. J. G. Lulofs, “Professies en de markt voor vertrouwensgoederen,” in Modellen in de Sociologie, S. Lindenberg and F. N. Stokman, Eds., Van loghum Slaterus, Deventer, Netherlands, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  25. E. A. Krause, Death of the Guilds: Professions, States and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn, USA, 1986.