International Journal of Forestry Research

International Journal of Forestry Research / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 120979 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/120979

Fábio de Almeida Vieira, Cristiane Gouvêa Fajardo, Anderson Marcos de Souza, Dulcinéia de Carvalho, "Landscape-Level and Fine-Scale Genetic Structure of the Neotropical Tree Protium spruceanum (Burseraceae)", International Journal of Forestry Research, vol. 2010, Article ID 120979, 8 pages, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/120979

Landscape-Level and Fine-Scale Genetic Structure of the Neotropical Tree Protium spruceanum (Burseraceae)

Academic Editor: Yousry El-Kassaby
Received06 Feb 2010
Revised14 May 2010
Accepted20 May 2010
Published28 Jun 2010

Abstract

Knowledge of genetic structure at different scales and correlation with the current landscape is fundamental for evaluating the importance of evolutionary processes and identifying conservation units. Here, we used allozyme loci to examine the spatial genetic structure (SGS) of 230 individuals of Protium spruceanum, a native canopy-emergent in five fragments of Brazilian Atlantic forest (1 to 11.8 ha), and four ecological corridors (460 to 1 000 m length). Wright's statistic and Mantel tests revealed little evidence of significant genetic structure at the landscape-scale ( ; , ). At fine-scale SGS, low levels of relatedness within fragments and corridors ( , ) were observed. Differences in the levels and distribution of the SGS at both spatial scales are discussed in relation to biological and conservation strategies of corridors and forest fragments.

1. Introduction

Forest loss and spatial isolation of natural populations affect negatively the reproductive success of many tropical plants [1, 2]. In contrast, some studies have shown that the habitat fragmentation had resulted in facilitated pollen movement [3, 4], whilst gene flow measured among populations of several insect-pollinated woody plant species [5, 6] and in a wind-pollinated tree species [7] was not reduced, facilitating too the long distance dispersal and high genetic diversity of remnant populations [8]. However, when comparing continuous and naturally fragmented populations in a tropical tree species, fragmented populations exhibited slightly lower genetic diversity [9]. Landscape structures, such as ecological corridors, are then an important alternative in the demographic and genetic connection of isolated forest fragments, thus minimizing the negative effects of habitat fragmentation [10]. Nonetheless, most studies deal only with the use of corridor’s importance for fauna conservation [11]; little is known about corridor importance for plant species mainly on genetic processes [12].

The genetic differentiation in fragment/corridor may be quantified with indirect methods which are based on the structure of neutral genetic diversity amongst populations, contributing to the knowledge of how landscape characteristics structure populations [13]. Moreover, studies of spatial genetic structure (SGS) provide insight into micro-evolutionary patterns by elucidating the movement of genes at a range of spatial scales [14]. At landscape-level scales between natural populations, genetic structure has been attributed to historical factors and isolation by distance [15]. At fine-scale SGS, seed dispersal and demographic processes acting at specific temporal and spatial scales probably have the greatest influence on the presence or absence of significant fine-scale genetic structuring [16].

The forest remnants in southern Minas Gerais state are characterized by a hilly topography covered by Atlantic seasonal forests. These plant formations were seriously plundered since European occupation goes back to colonial times ca. two centuries ago, resulting in the fragmentation and isolation of these populations at a particularly rapid pace. At the same time, ditches to divide rural properties ( 6 m-wide) were constructed by slaves, resulting in the ecological corridors (colonization by native tree species) that connect small fragments [17]. Protium spruceanum is a large canopy tree (up to 25 m tall) found in those fragment and ecological corridors, selected for this research as representative of a mass-flowering insect-pollinated and bird-dispersed tropical tree. The small pale yellowish flowers are functionally unisexual and organized in dense inflorescences, the individuals are dioecious. The effective pollinators are Apis mellifera and Trigona sp. [17].

We examined the neutral genetic differentiation between populations that can help define important strategies for conservation genetics of remaining populations and ecological corridors. We therefore asked the following questions: (1) what are the levels and spatial scales of relatedness in P. spruceanum across landscape-level and within population? (2) is there any correlation between the fragment-corridor connection and genetic differentiation? And if so, are genotypes randomly or distributed clusters in corridors? (3) what are the potential ecological mechanisms likely responsible for the observed fine-scale SGS?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampled Sites

The fragment-corridor system studied is located in the city of Lavras, South of Minas Gerais state, in Brazil (Figure 1). The populations studied have rapidly declined because of habitat fragmentation caused by anthropogenic disturbance over the last 200 years, corroborated by detection of recent bottlenecks [17]. Five interlinking fragments and an ecological corridor were analyzed. Protium spruceanum presence in fragments F2, F3, and F4 coincides with the presence of water courses. In fragments F1 and F5 the species occur in a large part of the fragment, which may be determined by the almost permanently flooded soil(Figure 4).All samples along the fragments came from trees with diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) 20 cm and 16 m height, that is, representing a larger diameter class. The sampling in each corridor axis was along the length of each corridor axis. Individuals were mapped by their compass direction and distance from the last individual was sampled. Live tissue was transported on ice and stored at °C until enzyme extraction.

2.2. Enzyme Extraction and Electrophoresis

Enzymes were extracted from 200 mg of frozen leaf tissue in 1 mL of phosphate extraction buffer: 0.2 mM sucrose, 2.5% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 5.7 mM ascorbic acid, 5.8 mM sodium diethyl carbamate (DIECA), 2.6 mM sodium bisulphite, 2.5 mM Borax, and 0.2%   -mercaptoethanol [18]. Discontinuous vertical electrophoresis in a polyacrylamide gel was performed using 10% gels and carried out at 4°C over 3 hours (constant current of 80 mA, and voltage of 300 V). Eight enzymatic systems were used: alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh, E.C.1.1.1.1), glucose dehydrogenase (Gdh, E.C.1.1.1.47), β-galactose dehydrogenase (Gldh, E.C.1.1.1.48), glutamate dehydrogenase (Gtdh, E.C.1.4.1.3), malate dehydrogenase (Mdh, E.C.1.1.1.37), peroxidase (Per, E.C.1.11.1.7), sorbitol dehydrogenase (Sdh, E.C.1.1.1.14), and shikimate dehydrogenase (Skdh, E.C.1.1.1.25). Stain recipes were taken fromWendel and Weeden[19]. Allozymes had banding patterns consistent with expected quaternary structures and putative loci, and alleles were designated sequentially. The one with the most anodally migrating allozyme or alleles was designated as 1 and the next as 2 (Figure 5). The Mdh and Per enzyme patterns showed two polymorphic loci; so we used ten polymorphic loci to genotype the individuals.

2.3. Genetic Differentiation Analysis at Landscape Level

A G-test, based on 3 600 permutations of genotypes among samples, was performed to test for population differentiation at allozymes loci [20]. We adjusted the significance level for multiple pairwise comparisons using a sequential Bonferroni correction. The overall was calculated based on allele frequencies of the population of each at allozyme loci [21], using the program FSTAT 2.9.3.2 [22]. The degree of mean values of each fragment in comparison with those of the remaining fragments was estimated (Figure 2). To test for isolation by distance (rM Mantel tests), pairwise matrices [23] were related to geographical distances between fragments, using 1 000 permutations. These calculations were performed using the program FSTAT. Additionally, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to test if gene diversity ( ) varies according to fragment size.

2.4. Fine-Scale SGS Analysis

Population structure was further analyzed using Nason’s kinship coefficients ( ) between pairs of individuals and [24]. This coefficient can estimate, between pairs of mapped individuals and a ratio of differences of probabilities of identity-in-state between homologous genes [25]. Distance class intervals between individuals were determined by testing to get rule of thumb for each distance interval as suggested by Hardy and Vekemans [26]. To test for significant deviations from random SGS, observed values for each distance class were compared to the 95% confidence interval derived from 1 000 permutations. The extent of SGS was estimated using the Sp statistic following Vekemans and Hardy [14]. The Sp statistic here is used as a simple measure to allow for comparisons among fragments, not as an estimate of the variance in gene dispersal distances. Sp was quantified by , where is the regression slope and is the mean kinship coefficient between individuals belonging to the first distance interval (0–20 m). The standard errors were obtained by jack-knifing over loci. These calculations were performed using the program SPAGeDi 1.2 g [26].

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Differentiation and Spatial Genetic Structure

Wright’s revealed little evidence of significant genetic structure between fragments. The average genetic differentiation ( ) in each forest fragment pair was generally low ( ). Only the genetic differentiation between fragment F3 and F5 was significant ( ). Indeed, the mean results showed the greater genetically distinct fragments, F3 and F5 (Figure 2). At landscape-level scales, the Mantel test suggests that the populations’structure appears not to be due to differences in gene flow produced by an isolation by distance model ( ). The degree of mean values was also calculated considering both fragments and corridors, indicating the decrease of the level of divergence (Figure 2). All fragments have generally lower genetic differentiation with corridors to which they are connected (Figure 1). The highest and most significant genetic differentiation occurred between fragment F5 and F2-F3 ( %, ) and F3-F4 ( %, ) axis. Negative correlation was observed between gene diversity and fragment size (Pearson , d.f. = 4).

3.2. Fine Scale SGS

At fine-scale, in all fragments, coancestry values were within the range of 95% confidence limits in all of the distance classes (Figure 3). Random genotype distribution was observed also when estimating the coancestry for individuals within ecological corridors, in all distance classes. Coancestry values were close to zero or negative, and nonsignificant at 95% probability. Sp values revealed weak patterns SGS (average ) and the slope of the regression of was not significant.

4. Discussion

4.1. Genetic Diversity

Allozyme study showed that the species exhibited high levels of gene diversity ( ) in fragments and in corridors (Table 1). In fact, forest trees are generally highly genetically diverse and characterized by high levels of gene diversity within populations and comparatively low gene diversity between them [27]. In addition, the highlights importance of small-sized fragments was demonstrated by negative correlation between fragment size and gene diversity. Some studies have shown a tendency of lower genetic diversity within small fragments [28], but little or no genetic diversity difference has been found between populations of large and small fragments [29]. However, our findings show that small-sized fragments may be important units within fragmented landscape and may play a fundamental role to connect larger fragments and contribute to gene flow between populations.


FragmentsCorridor axis

F1F2F3F4F5F1-F2F2-F3F3-F4F4-F5

Area (ha)1.07.211.87.47.86504601 000540
Length (m)
N303030303020202020
(SD)0.480 (0.016)0.469 (0.015)0.381 (0.065)0.437 (0.027)0.507 (0.002)0.454 (0.050)0.383 (0.071)0.336 (0.094)0.470 (0.041)
f 0.078

: sample size; , Nei’s gene diversity; SD: standard deviations; : mean fixation index. Detailed descriptions of genetic diversity parameters ( and ) may be found in de Almeida Vieira and de Carvalho [17].
4.2. Landscape-Level and Fine-Scale Genetic Structure

At both spatial scales, the average relatedness estimates indicated essentially random spatial distributions of alleles. At the landscape-scale (fragments), local populations of P. spruceanum exhibit little variation in their internal genetic structures. This suggests that the causal mechanisms generating genetic structure (e.g., seed dispersal, recruitment processes, etc.) are relatively homogeneous at this scale. Considering that for an insect-pollinated, bird dispersed tree, connectivity by ecological corridors, low genetic differentiation among fragments was actually expected and observed ( ). Results obtained for genetic differentiation between fragments and ecological corridors corroborate this hypothesis, because all fragments have generally lower genetic differentiation with corridors which they are connected to. The level of divergence (mean ) for each fragment against the rest of the fragments showed the greater genetically distinct fragments (F3 and F5) and could be included in a high-priority conservation programme.

At fine scale, many factors interact to determine genetic structure within populations including mating system and colonization history [14, 30]. The failure to detect genetic structure within populations may be due to the adult density (average = 232 individual ), intraspecific competition or random mortality among samplings, resulting in extensive thinning within maternal half-sib groups. To determine whether this form of thinning occurred during recruitment in the study populations, investigations on contemporary patterns of genetic structure within populations and long-term demographic data are necessary to provide a clear picture of the genetic structure across demographic stages. In fact, our findings show that the magnitude of fine-scale SGS in P. spruceanum was observed to be decreasing from smaller- to larger-diameter classes (F.A. Vieira, unpublished data, 2010), within a small fragment (1.0 ha, fragment F1). Thus, we found SGS in the young plants, but this structure almost completely disappeared in the old plants, due to random thinning of individuals (F.A. Vieira, unpublished data, 2010). In general, other studies have also found within-population genetic structure to be greater in juveniles than adult trees [31, 32].

The statistic is robust to different sampling schemes, being useful here to compare among species and sites [14]. The fine-scale SGS in P. spruceanum (average ) was similar to that observed for trees ( ), outcrossing species ( ) and animal-dispersed ( ) species [14]. Spatial patterns of genetic variation within populations depend primarily on the seed dispersal and adult densities [16]. This way, the high density of seed sources and random thinning of individuals should favor the random divergence of the allelic frequency of Protium spruceanum in the fragments and corridors.

4.3. Implications for Conservation Genetics

Here, we studied a mass-flowering insect-pollinated and bird-dispersed tropical tree, as representative of a tree species with similar life history characteristics that occur in the fragments and corridor systems. Our findings show higher gene diversity and a low differentiation between the studied forest fragments. Moreover, those ecological corridors presented high gene diversity, absence of inbreeding, and little genetic differentiation with the fragments. Thus, the creation and the protection of ecological corridors should be an effective conservation strategy for tree species. That would be an important alternative in the demographic and genetic connection of isolated forest fragments, thus minimizing the negative effects of habitat fragmentation. Some studies have provided convincing evidence that, in some cases, corridors can enhance migration rates among fragments [10, 33]. In addition, the functional aspect of such an approach relates to the biological response of the species and landscape structure, thus new approaches of other species with different life history characteristics would be very important aspects to be considered.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Cristiane A. F. Reis and Leandra H. Nascimento for field assistance. The authors also thank Dr. Dion Devey (Royal Botanic Kew Garden) for his helpful suggestions on the manuscript. The Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and the Conselho Nacional Pesquisa (CNPq) are also acknowledged for providing a Dr. Fellowship for F.A. Vieira and research fellowship for D. Carvalho. This paper was financed by FAPEMIG (Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais).

References

  1. M. A. Aizen and P. Feinsinger, “Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a chaco dry forest, Argentina,” Ecology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 330–351, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. Ghazoul, K. A. Liston, and T. J. B. Boyle, “Disturbance-induced density-dependent seed set in Shorea siamensis (Dipterocarpaceae), a tropical forest tree,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 462–473, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. M. White, D. H. Boshier, and W. Powell, “Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 2038–2042, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. W. Dick, G. Etchelecu, and F. Austerlitz, “Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 753–764, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. D. Nason and J. L. Hamrick, “Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of neotropical canopy trees,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 264–276, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  6. V. L. Sork, P. E. Smouse, V. J. Apsit, R. J. Dyer, and R. D. Westfall, “A two-generation analysis of pollen pool genetic structure in flowering dogwood, Cornus florida (Cornaceae), in the Missouri Ozarks,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 262–271, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  7. C. F. E. Bacles, J. Burczyk, A. J. Lowe, and R. A. Ennos, “Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L,” Evolution, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 979–990, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  8. C. F. E. Bacles, A. J. Lowe, and R. A. Ennos, “Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape,” Science, vol. 311, no. 5761, p. 628, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Pither, J. S. Shore, and M. Kellman, “Genetic diversity of the tropical tree Terminalia amazonia (Combretaceae) in naturally fragmented populations,” Heredity, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 307–313, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. G. Mech and J. G. Hallett, “Evaluating the effectiveness of corridors: a genetic approach,” Conservation Biology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 467–474, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. M. Debinski and R. D. Holt, “A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments,” Conservation Biology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 342–355, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. Kirchner, J.-B. Ferdy, C. Andalo, B. Colas, and J. Moret, “Role of corridors in plant dispersal: an example with the endangered Ranunculus nodiflorus,” Conservation Biology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 401–410, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Storfer, M. A. Murphy, and M. A. Murphy, “Putting the landscape in landscape genetics,” Heredity, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 128–142, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. X. Vekemans and O. J. Hardy, “New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 921–935, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. Ouinsavi, N. Sokpon, and D. P. Khasa, “Genetic diversity and population structure of a threatened African tree species, Milicia excelsa, using nuclear microsatellites DNA markers,” International Journal of Forestry Research, vol. 2009, Article ID 210179, 8 pages, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  16. F. A. Jones and S. P. Hubbell, “Demographic spatial genetic structure of the Neotropical tree, Jacaranda copaia,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3205–3217, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. De Almeida Vieira and D. De Carvalho, “Genetic structure of an insect-pollinated and bird-dispersed tropical tree in vegetation fragments and corridors: implications for conservation,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2305–2321, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. C. Alfenas, “Extração de proteínas para eletroforese,” in Eletroforese de Isoenzimas e Proteínas Afins: Fundamentos e Aplicações em Plantas e Microrganismos, A. C. Alfenas, Ed., pp. 85–114, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  19. J. F. Wendel and N. F. Weeden, “Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes,” in Isozymes in Plant Biology, D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis, Eds., pp. 5–45, Dioscorides Press, Portland, Ore, USA, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. Goudet, M. Raymond, T. De Meeüs, and F. Rousset, “Testing differentiation in diploid populations,” Genetics, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 1933–1940, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. Wright, “The genetical structure of populations,” Ann Eugethcs, vol. 15, pp. 323–354, 1951. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. Goudet, “FSTAT version. 2.9.3.2,” Department of Ecology Biology Building, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2002, http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm. View at: Google Scholar
  23. F. Rousset, “Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance,” Genetics, vol. 145, no. 4, pp. 1219–1228, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  24. B. A. Loiselle, V. L. Sork, J. Nason, and C. Graham, “Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae),” American Journal of Botany, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 1420–1425, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  25. F. Rousset, “Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?” Heredity, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 371–380, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. O. J. Hardy and X. Vekemans, “SPAGeDI: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels,” Molecular Ecology Notes, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 618–620, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. D. Loveless and J. L. Hamrick, “Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 15, pp. 65–95, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  28. E. V. Franceschinelli, G. M. P. Vasconcelos, E. C. Landau, K. Y. Ono, and F. A. M. Santos, “The genetic diversity of Myrciaria floribunda (Myrtaceae) in Atlantic Forest fragments of different sizes,” Journal of Tropical Ecology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 361–367, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. J. Lowe, D. Boshier, M. Ward, C. F. E. Bacles, and C. Navarro, “Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees,” Heredity, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 255–273, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. de Almeida Vieira, D. de Carvalho, P. Higuchi, E. L. M. Machado, and R. M. dos Santos, “Spatial pattern and fine-scale genetic structure indicating recent colonization of the palm Euterpe edulis in a Brazilian Atlantic forest fragment,” Biochemical Genetics, vol. 48, pp. 96–103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. K. K. S. Ng, S. L. Lee, and C. L. Koh, “Spatial structure and genetic diversity of two tropical tree species with contrasting breeding systems and different ploidy levels,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 657–669, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. B. D. Hardesty, C. W. Dick, A. Kremer, S. Hubbell, and E. Bermingham, “Spatial genetic structure of Simarouba amara Aubl. (Simaroubaceae), a dioecious, animal-dispersed Neotropical tree, on Barro Colorado Island, Panama,” Heredity, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 290–297, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Aars and R. A. Ims, “The effect of habitat corridors on rates of transfer and interbreeding between vole demes,” Ecology, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1648–1655, 1999. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Fábio de Almeida Vieira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1176
Downloads633
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.