Interaction between Rural People’s Basic Needs and Forest Products: A Case Study of the Katha District of Myanmar
Table 5
OLS regression model of collected forest products varieties for both subsistence and income of the forest products against the household characteristics and household income activities ().
Collected forest products varieties
Forest cash income
Forest total income (cash and subsistence)
Coefficient
Household characteristics
Household size
0.1 (±0.1)
2106.5 (±1147.1)
21395.7 (±3762.2)
Working people
−0.1 (±0.1)
−4495.0 (±1677.5)
−24568.1 (±5161.0)
Sex of HHH
1.2 (±0.3)
−1147.7 (±4869.8)
−13289.9 (±15216.2)
Age of HHH
0.0 (±0.0)
−182.3 (±130.9)
−210.4 (±48.1)
Education level of HHH
−0.4 (±0.2)
−6992.1 (±2468.6)
−9841.7 (±7456.9)
Agricultural land area (ha)
−0.1 (±0.0)
−823.9 (±399.6)
−2449.1 (±1291.4)
Number of livestock
0.1 (±0.1)
164.1 (±2163.7)
−1019.3 (±6787.6)
Constant
5.9 (±0.9)
71765.3 (±12573.0)
164065.9 (±38095.7)
R-square = 0.17, R-square (adjusted) = 0.14, F = 5.16, P > F = 0.00
R-square = 0.23, R-square (adjusted) = 0.17, F = 4.25, P > F = 0.00
R-square = 0.22, R-square (adjusted) = 0.19, F = 7.29, P > F = 0.00
Household activities
Agricultural income
−0.0 (±0.0)
0.0 (±0.3)
Livestock income
0.0 (±0.0)
0.0 (±0.3)
Other incomes
−0.0 (±0.0)
0.0 (±0.0)
Constant
61900.9 (±8351.3)
62263.9 (±26648.1)
R-square = 0.19, R-square (adjusted) = 0.12, F = 2.73, P > F = 0.03
R-square = 0.14, R-square (adjusted) = 0.09, F = 3.03, P > F = 0.04