Research Article

Financial Assessment of Forest Management Systems in the Community Forests: A Case Study from the Midhills of Nepal

Table 1

Comparison of two forest management systems.

CriteriaConvFMSciFM

Year of initiation20012014
Management objectiveMeeting subsistence needs for forest products especially timber and firewoodCommercial production of forest products, especially timber and firewood
Management principlePrecautionary, incremental harvesting in the prescribed block while in the forestSustained yield, following the silviculture system based on correct assessment of attributes of forest crops in prescribed coupes
Forest areaNot specifiedAt least 100 ha (preferably 200 ha)
Rotation periodNot definedGuided by physical rotation, i.e., with the natural life of a species. For example, 80 years for Sal (Shorea robusta)
Management plan periodNot specified, generally for 5–10 yearsDepends on the rotation period (dominant species of the forests), generally 80 years; a harvesting plan is prepared for 10 years
Harvesting areaNot specified, selection felling either in one block or in the entire forest area every year not exceeding annual increment of the forestsRelatively small area or felling coupes, determined by rotation age of species (felling area is 1/80th of the forest if the rotation is 80 years)
Silviculture systemSelection systemIrregular shelter wood system
Harvesting techniqueSelective felling, based on annual increment, generally harvesting of the dead, dying, diseased, decayed, and deformed treesAccording to exploitable diameter (above 30 cm dbh) living few seed trees (10–25 trees/ha)
Management plan preparation costCheap (NRs 50,000–55,000 for 50 ha of forests)Expensive (NRs 300,000–NRs 700,000 per community forest)

Source: collated from the Community Forestry Inventory Guidelines, 2004, and Scientific Forest Management Guideline, 2014. Note: 1 US$ = equivalent to NRs 110 (on 1st August 2018).