International Journal of Food Science

International Journal of Food Science / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 157026 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/157026

Gerardo Casco, Jennifer L. Johnson, T. Matthew Taylor, Carlos N. Gaytán, Mindy M. Brashears, Christine Z. Alvarado, "Controlling Listeria monocytogenes Scott A on Surfaces of Fully Cooked Turkey Deli Product Using Organic Acid-Containing Marinades as Postlethality Dips", International Journal of Food Science, vol. 2015, Article ID 157026, 5 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/157026

Controlling Listeria monocytogenes Scott A on Surfaces of Fully Cooked Turkey Deli Product Using Organic Acid-Containing Marinades as Postlethality Dips

Academic Editor: Fabienne Remize
Received03 Apr 2015
Accepted16 Jun 2015
Published25 Jun 2015

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of organic acids applied singly or in combination as postlethality dips to sliced uncured turkey deli loaves to inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) Scott A. Treatments consisted of sodium lactate (SL; 3.6%), potassium lactate (PL; 3.6%), sodium citrate (SC; 0.75%), a combination of SL and sodium diacetate (SDA; 0.25%), and a combination of SL/PL/SDA, alongside appropriate negative and positive controls. Products were inoculated with 104–105 CFU/mL streptomycin-resistant (1500 μg/mL) Lm Scott A prior to treatment. Products were then stored at ~4°C and sampled at 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 d. The SL/SDA combination applied to turkey slices extended the lag phase through 21 days of refrigerated storage. Numbers of Lm Scott A rose by 0.7 log10 CFU/g through the 56 d storage period. The application of the SL/PL/SDA treatment to turkey product surfaces extended the lag phase through 42 d, with pathogen numbers declining after 21 d. Combination organic acid dips prolonged the lag phase for 2 to 6 wk on turkey product surfaces and can be useful as antimicrobial agents for Lm control on postlethality exposed sliced deli products.

1. Introduction

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; Atlanta, GA) [1] reported 1651 cases of human foodborne listeriosis from Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) which occurred from 2009 to 2011, with a case-fatality rate of 21%. Nevertheless, the US Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) has reported a decline in the prevalence of Lm in ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry products (including deli products) collected through its sampling program, from 4.61% in 1990 to 0.27% in 2011 [2]. The USDA has also recently provided guidance for the control of Lm growth on RTE meats, including the proper application of antimicrobial agents (AAs) in the manufacturing of deli products [3]. Antimicrobial hurdles consist of a combination of several processes and/or interventions that result in a growth-limiting impact on pathogenic bacteria. Commercial AAs may contribute to the hurdles by reducing the water activity () of foods, lowering product pH, REDOX potential modulation, or combination of these and other processes [35].

Organic acids and their salts applied to RTE deli products either in the product formula or to the product’s surface postlethality and are known to possess Lm growth-inhibiting capabilities. Islam et al. [6] tested the ability of organic acid marinades applied to turkey frankfurters as postcook dips to reduce Lm growth, reporting reductions of 1.0 to 2.0 log10-cycles compared to nontreated controls. Carroll et al. [7] evaluated the addition of organic acid marinades to turkey deli loaf formulae and found the Lm lag phase was extended through 56 days on slices treated with a 3.0% sodium lactate and 0.25% sodium diacetate combination. Porto et al. [8] concluded that incorporation of potassium lactate (PL) into vacuum-sealed frankfurters stored at 4°C and 10°C provided listeriostatic effects, extending the lag phase for the duration of the study (90 and 60 days, resp.) compared to a frankfurter without PL. Nuñez De Gonzalez et al. [9] reported an overall growth inhibition of ≤2.0 log10 CFU/frank in Lm counts on beef frankfurters formulated without or with 3.3% PL, and surface dip-treated with potassium lactate (3.3%) or lactic acid (3.4%) over 12 wk refrigerated storage. Barmpalia et al. [10] found that growth was inhibited in frankfurters formulated with lactate and diacetate and then treated with lactic or acetic acid postcook dips.

Antilisterial properties of differing organic acids and their salts can be affected by processing methodology and product formulae [8]. In addition, despite the establishment of the USDA’s “zero tolerance” policy for Lm on RTE foods and consequent decline in the prevalence of the pathogen on RTE products, L. monocytogenes remains a persistent contaminant on RTE deli products with high severity [2, 9]. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect on an isolate of Lm Scott A growth caused by sodium lactate (SL), potassium lactate (PL), sodium citrate (SC), and sodium diacetate (SDA), applied individually or in combination (SL/SDA, SL/PL/SDA) as postcook dips to inoculated turkey deli loaf slices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Microorganism and Handling Procedures

L. monocytogenes Scott A, obtained from the Auburn University (Auburn, AL) frozen culture collection, was stored in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes (VWR Int., West Chester, PA, USA) at −80°C prior to revival. To revive the organism, 1.0 mL of frozen culture was pipetted into 9.0 mL sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke/Hampshire, England) and incubated overnight at 37°C. Turbid cultures were transferred to virgin BHI medium and subculturing was repeated in identical fashion. Five 1 : 10 serial dilutions were prepared into tubes containing 9.0 mL sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Pierce Perbio Thermo Scientific, Bonn, Germany). To determine the growth of Lm Scott A following subculturing, dilutions were plated in duplicate on 15 × 100 mm Petri plates containing BHI agar (Difco, Lawrence, KS, USA), followed by overnight incubation at 37°C. The incubated plates were enumerated with photographic ColorCount recognition technology using the count instrument (Spiral Biotech, Norwood, MA, USA).

Streptomycin resistance () was induced through exposure of the organism to antibiotic in medium. L. monocytogenes Scott A cells were gradually exposed to increasing concentrations of streptomycin in BHI broth and BHI agar according to previous procedures [11]. A stock solution was prepared by mixing streptomycin sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) in sterile distilled water with stirring and gentle heating when necessary. The solution was filter sterilized into 250 mL bottles (Pyrex, Lowell, MA, USA) using a 60 mL syringe filter (0.2 μm pore diameter) (VWR Int.). This then was added to sterilized medium in a laminar flow hood to the desired exposure concentration. Pending survival at the initial exposure concentrations (0.2, 1.6, 6.4, and 12.8 μg/mL) antibiotic concentration applied in broth and agar was systematically doubled to increase Lm resistance, until a maximal resistance of 1,500 μg/mL was obtained. Desired cultures were subsequently frozen in sterile 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and stored at −80°C until required for use. The strains were initially incubated in 10 mL of BHI broth with 10% glycerol solution at 37°C [11]. From this, 300 μL was added to a 700 μL volume of glycerol in microcentrifuge tubes and vortexed prior to freezing. A sample of each strain was subsequently thawed and cultured to determine bacterial survival following the procedure.

cultures were grown on BHI slants and submitted for identification by the USDA-Agricultural Research Service (ARS; Athens, GA, USA). Cultures were streaked on modified Oxford’s (MOX) agar (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA) for cultivation of characteristic small-black colonies. A sterile loop was used to collect 5 to 10 colonies for β-hemolysis identification on horse blood overlay plates. At least two colonies were collected from hemolysis-positive plates for confirmatory testing including Gram-stain, CAMP test, rhamnose utilization, catalase reaction, and tumbling motility under wet mount [12].

2.2. Turkey Deli Loaf Preparation

Preparation of a turkey loaf product followed industry standard procedures. Turkey lobe meat (Patuxent Farms, Columbia, MD, USA) was ground (20%) using a Waring grinder (Waring Products, Inc., Torrington, CT, USA) while the remaining meat (80%) was hand-sectioned into 1.0 in3 cubes. Deli product formulation incorporated noniodized refined salt (1.5%; Morton, Chicago, IL, USA) and sodium tripolyphosphate (STP; 0.45%, Innophos, Cranbury, NJ, USA) in a 20% marinade (7 : 3 water : ice ratio) of the final batch weight. Marinade was prepared using a handheld biohomogenizer (ESGE m13333-1281-O, Bartlesville, OK, USA) until all ingredients were dissolved and incorporated through vacuum tumbling (Hollymatic Corp., Countryside, IL, USA) for 1 h at 25 mm Hg, 14 rpm, at 4°C. This was followed by equilibration at 4°C for 3 h. All meat used was maintained at 4°C through transport and processing. The marinated turkey batter was manually stuffed into 10.16 cm diameter fibrous cellulose casing (EZ Peel fibrous casing, Viskase Companies, Inc., Willowbrook, IL, USA) by hand crank manual stuffer (Koch, Kansas City, MO, USA); each loaf was approximately 63.5 cm in length. Loaves were trucked into a single truck smokehouse (Alkar, Lodi, WI, USA) and cooked according to a stepped processing schedule (Table 1). Loaves were then removed and chilled overnight to an internal temperature of ~4°C. A turkey loaf was hand peeled and sliced into ~2 mm slices (9512 12′′ Max Manual Meat Slicer, Univex Corp., Salem, NH); the blade was calibrated by caliper and sanitized with 70% (v/v) ethanol before being used again (Marathon Watch Co., Ontario, Canada). Ten slices were individually weighed and averaged to obtain an approximate slice weight to be used in later calculations. Slices were collected onto a table lined with sterile foil prior to inoculation and treatment with different postcook antimicrobial dips.


StepDry bulb temp. (°C)Wet bulb temp. (°C)Time (min)Smoke

153.9−17.830OFF
265.646.1120OFF
376.758.960OFF
48568.9Until 71.1°C internal tempOFF
5−17.8−17.815 (cold shower)OFF

2.3. Deli Meat Slice Inoculation Procedures

The Lm Scott A culture was passed at least three times before inoculation to allow for revival as described above. The Lm Scott A stock was decimally diluted from inoculated BHI broth into the necessary sterile test tube containing 9.0 mL sterile PBS to generate countable plates (25–250 CFU). Each dilution was spread in duplicate on 15 × 100 mm Petri plates containing BHI agar and incubated overnight at 37°C. The incubated plates were enumerated with a photographic ColorCount recognition technology using the count instrument (Spiral Biotech). The working stock solution was prepared to target 105 CFU/g on turkey slices. Each slice () was inoculated with 0.1 mL stock culture using 10 μL aliquots. Disposable, sterile 10 μL volume inoculating loops (VWR Int.) were used to spread inoculum across the surfaces of meat slices. This was performed on a single side of the slice. Inoculated slices were set aside for 2 min to allow for bacterial attachment. Transfer of slices to segregated stations was conducted using ethanol/flame-sterilized forceps.

2.4. Organic Acid Dip Immersion Treatments

Organic acid treatments applied individually and in combination to the Lm Scott A-inoculated slices were (1) sodium lactate (SL; 3.6%, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA); (2) potassium lactate (PL; 3.6%, City Chemicals, West Haven, CT); (3) sodium citrate (SC; 0.75%, Fisher Scientific); (4) sodium lactate (SL; 3.6%) + sodium diacetate (SDA; 0.25%, Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corp., Gardena, CA); (5) SL (3.6%) + PL (3.6%) + SDA (0.25%); (6) positive control (LM-inoculated slices dipped in sterile distilled water); and (7) negative control (noninoculated slices dipped in sterile distilled water). Slices were dipped in 100 mL freshly prepared solution for 1.0 min and removed with sterile forceps for drying on sterile foil-lined drying racks. Excess dip fluid was allowed to dry for at least 10 min with intermediate flipping of the slices. Dry slices were packaged in groups of three, by treatment, using 24 oz. Whirlpak bags (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI) and stored at ~4°C until their appropriate sampling times were reached. Slices were stored aerobically due to nonavailability of biosafety level 2 (BSL2)-compliant vacuum sealing technology in the research pilot plant laboratory. Three slices were allocated to each of 7 time points per each of the 5 treatments, totaling 105 slices per replicate; two additional slices per time point were allotted for a positive and negative control, providing an additional 28 slices.

2.5. Microbiological Testing of Treated Slices

Packaged slices were removed from refrigerated storage for sampling on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56. Sterile forceps were used to divide the slices into individual filtered stomacher bags. Each bag was filled with 50 mL sterile PBS and homogenized using a Stomacher 400 Circulator (Seward, West Sussex, UK) for 2 min at 245 rpm. Decimal dilutions were prepared prior to inoculation onto streptomycin-loaded (1,500 μg/mL) BHI agar-containing Petri plates. Samples were incubated for 48 h at 35°C prior to colony enumeration. Duplicate plate counts were taken, subjected to log10-transformation, and averaged. The average slice weight was considered with 50 mL PBS added to create the first dilution.

2.6. Statistical Analysis Procedure

The log10/g average plate counts from each of three inoculated slices treated in identical fashion with one of the 7 treatments at each of the seven sample points (0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 days) over three identically completed replicates () were subjected to statistical analysis using the PROC GLM procedure of SAS v11.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Separation of statistically differing means was carried out within a sampling period across treatments using Duncan’s Multiple Ranges Test at .

3. Results and Discussion

The potential for Lm Scott A survival on food processing machinery, environmental niches, and fixtures from processing facilities is of great concern as cross-contamination of deli products can occur during postlethality handling [13]. The use of postlethality antimicrobial dips could provide a barrier in the control for L. monocytogenes growth inhibition.

The inhibition of Lm Scott A on uncured turkey loaf slices by postcook organic acid dips is depicted in Figure 1. Combination treatments of SL/SDA and SL/PL/SDA suppressed Lm Scott A cell growth postprocessing (21 and 42 d, resp.) on turkey deli loaf slices compared to the other treatments on those sampling days (). SL and PL treatments () inhibited growth at day 7 when compared to the pathogen-inoculated positive control and the SC-treated slices. However, at 28 days’ refrigerated storage no differences were observed between the control and the SC treatment. Throughout the experimental period, Lm Scott A counts on SC-treated product did not differ from the inoculated positive control on any sampling day () (Figure 1). Overall, combination of SL (3.6%) plus SDA (0.25%) or SL (3.6%) + PL (3.6%) + SDA (0.25%) demonstrated inhibition of Lm Scott A growth on post-dipping refrigerated turkey deli slices over 56 days’ storage.

Antimicrobial activity of weak organic acids, including lactate, citrate, and acetate, is generally attributed to penetration of the undissociated acid molecule through the cell membrane, with resulting acidification of the cytoplasmic space and activation of active processes to reestablish internal pH homeostasis [14]. Weak organic acids such as lactic and citric acid are favored for intracellular permeability due to inherent hydrophobicity and the resulting interactions with the cellular lipid bilayer. This may result in cell damage, death, or exhaustion due to expenditure of energy and resources to exclude the acid. Additionally, lactic acid has been reported to permeabilize the outer membrane of some Gram-negative organisms, and multiple weak organic acids are reported to exert antimicrobial activity in the form of DNA degradation or ribosomal attack via the dissociated acid anion once the cytoplasm is reached [15, 16].

Extensive published research supports organic acids and their salts as effective AAs in poultry deli product formulae. However, knowledge of these AAs as postcook dip solution ingredients and their effects on Lm in poultry deli meat slices is not as extensive [8, 13, 1720]. Lianou et al. [21] simulated in-plant cross-contamination and found that combinations of commercial lactate (1.5%) and diacetate (0.05%) formulated into uncured turkey breast reduced Lm growth rates compared to untreated turkey breast over 12 d of storage at 7°C. Carroll et al. [7] found a combination treatment of 3% SL and 0.75% SDA applied to inoculated, vacuum-packaged turkey deli slices extended the lag phase of Lm through 63 d of storage at 4°C. The combined application of 2.0% SL + 0.25% SDA via edible coatings on fully cooked turkey breast stored at freezing resulted in enhanced reduction in Lm numbers versus coatings formulated with SL or SDA alone [22]. Collectively, combined application of lactate and diacetate solutions produces a greater antilisterial effect on fully cooked poultry deli products subject to Alternatives 1 or 2a of Title 9 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §430. Samelis et al. [23] noted that combination treatments of 0.25% SL with 0.25% SA, SDA, or glucono-δ-lactone applied to frankfurters extended the Lm lag phase throughout 120 d at refrigerated storage. Similarly, Palumbo and Williams [24] reported that inoculated, vacuum packaged frankfurters treated with a combination of 2.5% citric acid and 2.5% acetic acid dip suppressed Lm growth over 85 d at refrigerated (5°C) storage.

L. monocytogenes isolates are reported to vary in their sensitivity to antimicrobial exposure, including exposure to organic acids. Brandt et al. [25] reported Lm Scott A exhibited greatest sensitivity to nisin with a minimum inhibitory concentration approximately half that of other isolates tested. Similarly, Cheng et al. [26] reported that Lm M7, an avirulent isolate, demonstrated significantly slower growth and in some instances failed to grow and replicate in liquid medium infused with acetate or lactate to pH 5.5. Authors hypothesized that deletion of a sigma factor in the avirulent M7 Lm isolate was responsible for loss of pH homeostasis maintenance capacity and survival in acid-infused medium. The isolate used in the current study was not subjected to genome recombination procedures to weaken its capacity to tolerate tested organic acids, although its inhibition may not be identical to all Lm isolates, particularly in situations where acid tolerance is increased via prior sublethal organic acid exposure [27].

4. Conclusions

FSIS regulations for processing facilities producing RTE deli products require the development of interventions producing L. monocytogenes control measures in HACCP, SSOP, and/or other prerequisite programming systems. Organic acid combinations (SL + SDA or SL + PL + SDA) applied in postlethality dips inhibited the growth of L. monocytogenes Scott A on RTE deli turkey slices and can be applied as part of a multihurdle food safety system to extend the inhibition the growth of L. monocytogenes Scott A in sliced turkey deli products packed and held at refrigeration temperatures. These data can provide supporting information within a Listeria control plan for products manufactured under Alternatives 1 or 2b when developing postlethality interventions for processors of aerobically packed RTE deli products.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

Funding for this research was provided by a grant from the National Alliance for Food Safety and Security.

References

  1. B. J. Silk, B. E. Mahon, P. M. Griffin et al., “Vital signs: listeria illnesses, deaths, and outbreaks—United States, 2009–2011,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 62, no. 22, pp. 448–452, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  2. USDA-FSIS, FSIS Microbiological Testing Program for Ready to Eat (RTE) Meat and Poultry Products, 1990–2011, 2013, http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/data-collection-and-reports/microbiology/testing-program-for-rte-meat-and-poultry-products/testing-program-rte.
  3. USDA-FSIS, FSIS Compliance Guideline: Controlling Listeria Monocytogenes in Post-Lethality Exposed Ready-to-Eat Meat and Poultry Products, 2014, http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/d3373299-50e6-47d6-a577-e74a1e549fde/Controlling_LM_RTE_Guideline_0912?MOD=AJPERES.
  4. ICMSF, Micoorganisms in Foods 5. Microbiological Specifications of Food Pathogens, Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK, 1996.
  5. L. A. Shelef, “Antimicrobial effects of lactates: a review,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 445–450, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. Islam, J. Chen, M. P. Doyle, and M. Chinnan, “Control of Listeria monocytogenes on Turkey frankfurters by generally-recognized-as-safe preservatives,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1411–1416, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. C. D. Carroll, C. Z. Alvarado, M. M. Brashears, L. D. Thompson, and J. Boyce, “Marination of turkey breast fillets to control the growth of Listeria monocytogenes and improve meat quality in deli loaves,” Poultry Science, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 150–155, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. C. S. Porto, B. D. G. M. Franco, E. S. Sant'Anna, J. E. Call, A. Piva, and J. B. Luchansky, “Viability of a five-strain mixture of Listeria monocytogenes in vacuum-sealed packages of Frankfurters, commercially prepared with and without 2.0 or 3.0% added potassium lactate, during extended storage at 4 and 10°C,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 308–315, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. T. Nuñez De Gonzalez, J. T. Keeton, G. R. Acuff, L. J. Ringer, and L. M. Lucia, “Effectiveness of acidic calcium sulfate with propionic and lactic acid and lactates as postprocessing dipping solutions to control Listeria monocytogenes on frankfurters with or without potassium lactate and stored vacuum packaged at 4.5°C,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 915–921, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  10. I. M. Barmpalia, I. Geornaras, K. E. Belk et al., “Control of Listeria monocytogenes on frankfurters with antimicrobials in the formulation and by dipping in organic acid solutions,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 2456–2464, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  11. K. M. Killinger-Mann, “The repercussions of exposure to nalidixic acid for Salmonella Typhimurium: alterations in phenotype, multi-drug resistance and lactic acid susceptibility,” in Animal and Food Sciences, p. 166, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Tex, USA, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  12. E. T. Ryser and C. W. Donnelly, “Listeria,” in Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, F. P. Downes and K. Ito, Eds., pp. 343–356, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. J. Olsen, M. Patrick, S. B. Hunter et al., “Multistate outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes infection linked to delicatessen turkey meat,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 962–967, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. M. Davidson, T. M. Taylor, and S. E. Schmidt, “Chemical preservatives and natural antimicrobial compounds,” in Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers, M. P. Doyle and R. L. Buchanan, Eds., pp. 765–801, ASM Press, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  15. H.-L. Alakomi, E. Skyttä, M. Saarela, T. Mattila-Sandholm, K. Latva-Kala, and I. M. Helander, “Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2001–2005, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. B. Russell, “Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH: anion accumulation versus uncoupling,” Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 363–370, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. K. Miller and G. R. Acuff, “Sodium lactate affects pathogens in cooked beef,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. Mbandi and L. A. Shelef, “Enhanced antimicrobial effects of combination of lactate and diacetate on Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in beef bologna,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 191–198, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Lloyd, C. Z. Alvarado, and M. E. Berrang, “Organic acid formulation and dip to control Listeria monocytogenes in hot dogs,” International Journal of Poultry Science, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 469–473, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Lloyd, C. Z. Alvarado, M. M. Brashears, L. D. Thompson, S. R. McKee, and M. Berrang, “Control of Listeria monocytogenes in turkey deli loaves using organic acids as formulation ingredients,” Poultry Science, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 2235–2239, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Lianou, I. Geornaras, P. A. Kendall, J. A. Scanga, and J. N. Sofos, “Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes at 7°C in commercial turkey breast, with or without antimicrobials, after simulated contamination for manufacturing, retail and consumer settings,” Food Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 433–443, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Z. Jiang, H. Neetoo, and H. Chen, “Efficacy of freezing, frozen storage and edible antimicrobial coatings used in combination for control of Listeria monocytogenes on roasted turkey stored at chiller temperatures,” Food Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1394–1401, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Samelis, G. K. Bedie, J. N. Sofos, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, and G. C. Smith, “Control of Listeria monocytogenes with combined antimicrobials after postprocess contamination and extended storage of frankfurters at 4 degrees C in vacuum packages,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 299–307, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. A. Palumbo and A. C. Williams, “Control of Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of frankfurters by acid treatments,” Food Microbiology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 293–300, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. L. Brandt, A. Castillo, K. B. Harris, J. T. Keeton, M. D. Hardin, and T. M. Taylor, “Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by food antimicrobials applied singly and in combination,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. M557–M563, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Cheng, Y. Yang, Z. Dong et al., “Listeria monocytogenes varies among strains to maintain intracellular pH homeostasis under stresses by different acids as analyzed by a high-throughput microplate-based fluorometry,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, pp. 1–10, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. Formato, I. Geornaras, I. M. Barmpalia et al., “Effect of acid adaptation on growth during storage at 10 degrees C and resistance to simulated gastric fluid of Listeria monocytogenes inoculated onto bologna formulated with or without antimicrobials,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2007. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Gerardo Casco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1621
Downloads809
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.