International Journal of Food Science

International Journal of Food Science / 2021 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6696856 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6696856

Noelia Zulema Palavecino Prpich, Germán Edgardo Camprubí, María Elisa Cayré, Marcela Paola Castro, "Indigenous Microbiota to Leverage Traditional Dry Sausage Production", International Journal of Food Science, vol. 2021, Article ID 6696856, 15 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6696856

Indigenous Microbiota to Leverage Traditional Dry Sausage Production

Academic Editor: James Owusu-Kwarteng
Received30 Dec 2020
Accepted19 Jan 2021
Published31 Jan 2021

Abstract

The main issue addressed in this review is the need for innovation in the artisanal production of dry fermented sausages—leveraging rather than discarding tradition, together with some practical strategies available to achieve it. Throughout the text, emphasis is placed on the autochthonous microbiota responsible for the identity and unique sensory characteristics of these products. The available strategies to introduce innovation in this manufacturing process rely on metabolic flexibility of microbial strains. In this sense, this review evaluates the application of several tools aimed at improving the quality and safety of artisanal dry fermented sausages focusing on the microbial community role. The most studied alternatives to enhance dry sausage production comprise the use of autochthonous starter cultures—including functional and/or probiotic strains, the production of bacteriocins, and the generation of bioactive peptides, which have been thoroughly covered herein. The purpose of this work is to review recent research about novel different strategies available for food technologists to improve safety and quality in the manufacture of dry fermented sausages. Additional support strategies—quality product registers and innovation through tradition—have been suggested as complementary actions towards a successful introduction of indigenous microbial communities into traditional dry sausage production.

1. Introduction

Fermented meat products have been consumed for centuries throughout the world and constitute one of the most important types of food [1]. Their tradition has originated in the Mediterranean countries during Roman times [2], and their production was later extended to Germany, Hungary, and other countries, including the United States, Argentina, and Australia [3, 4]. There is a wide variety of dry fermented products on the global market as a consequence of variations in the raw materials, formulations, and manufacturing processes, which come from the habits and customs of the different countries and regions. They are closely connected to the culture, heritage, and local identity of a given population, having a strong symbolic value. Regardless of their origin, fermented sausages can be defined as meat products that comprise a stuffed mixture of pork and/or beef, fat, salt, and nitrate and/or nitrite, including eventually sugar and different spices. Albeit less frequently, formulations can include poultry, lamb, goat, horse, camel, ostrich, and game meats [59].

In Europe, fermented sausages can be divided into Northern and Mediterranean types [10]. Northern products are generally semidry sausages with pH below 5, while Mediterranean products are dry sausages with long ripening and drying processes,and pH values of 5.3–6.2 [4]. On the other hand, traditional sausages found in the American market are semidry sausages, fermented rapidly at relatively high temperatures, with a short drying period leading to pH values below 5 and very different organoleptic characteristics [4]. Latin American countries also produce fermented sausages; their manufacture has a long history in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay, mainly due to Spanish and Italian traditions, as well as to the quality and availability of beef meat. Asian and African countries also provide different types of fermented sausages, with ingredients and procedures that differ substantially with those described above [11].

The stability of fermented meat products is mainly determined by acidification—brought about by lactic acid bacteria—and water activity () reduction in the course of curing and drying. In addition, biochemical and physicochemical changes occur as a result of the interactions among microorganisms, meat, fat, and processing technology; the combined effect of these factors is what produces the wide range of available fermented sausages. The development of the characteristic flavor, aroma, and texture relies on biochemical and physicochemical reactions in which several types of bacteria, yeast, and fungi species interact within the meat matrix and its surface. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and coagulase-negative cocci (CNC)—including both micrococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS)—are the most predominant groups in meat spontaneous fermentation [12]. Besides, filamentous fungi and yeasts exert a protective-like effect due to the formation of a superficial film preventing from excessive dehydration and oxidation of the lipid fraction due to oxygen and light [13].

Small-scale facilities persist on traditional production methods where spontaneous fermentation is the leading process. When fermentation depends on the in-house flora, microorganisms come from the meat itself and the surrounding environment supplying particular—yet heterogeneous—characteristics to the product. Industrial development has led to the use of commercial starter cultures to standardize and control sausage manufacturing; however, these cultures are not always able to reproduce especial flavors and features of artisanal dry sausages. A half-way between standardization and traditional methods could be the introduction of starter cultures especially designed using autochthonous strains isolated from the facilities [14].

Artisanal and traditional products have grown in popularity, with a return to food consumption with local identity [15]. Traditional products became more attractive largely because consumers considered them more “natural.” That perception gives the food an identity that, in turn, engenders a certain familiarity [16]. In this sense, traditional fermented dry sausages are closely connected to the culture, heritage, and local identity of a given population. They also have a strong symbolic value and contribute to the sustainability and development of rural areas [17]. Thus, this trend could be used as a development strategy for regional economies.

Within the current global economic framework, the need to add value to food products—while preserving authenticity and traditional features—is a must. Regarding dry fermented sausages, it involves not only those attributes related to their general appearance and taste but also the ones pertaining to nutritional aspects. Nowadays, health-related issues are the cornerstone of public concern about food. Consequently, salt and fat reductions have also been reviewed in this study—outside the microbial scope—in order to attend this need. The extraction of certain meat proteins by salt, leading to the emulsification of fat globules, depends on the bacterial acidification process that causes protein denaturation; consequently, variations in salt or fat concentrations would concomitantly affect microbial interactions within the meat matrix.

In addition, several technological innovations are being introduced into what are considered traditional meats. These innovations are meant to reduce production time, energy, waste, and costs as well as to meet standards of production and safety [15]. Raising the standards of local products entails quality improvement. It is noteworthy that quality is a complex concept not only based on sensory properties but also on less tangible factors, such as “traditional” and “natural” characteristics. Innovations based on the reemergence of tradition require quality guarantees and careful labelling and contribute thereby to meet legal requirements, to indicate differentiation, and to orientate and reassure consumers.

2. Indigenous Microbiota and Starter Cultures

In traditional sausages, the fermentation is known to rely on natural contamination by environmental microbiota occurring during slaughtering and manufacturing, being the specific composition of the “house microbiota” responsible for the distinctive qualities of artisanal products from small-scale facilities [18, 19]. Although this autochthonous microbiota plays a major role on flavor, texture, quality, and safety of the final product, the high variability in bacterial amount and species may induce quality problems due to lack of normalization and/or homogenization.

Consequently, the introduction of starter cultures in the manufacture of fermented meat products turns into a necessary implementation in order to guarantee food safety and to standardize the final product attributes [20]. Commercial starter cultures do not offer much flexibility for product differentiation [21] and are not always able to compete well with the house flora colonizing meat plants, whereby their use often results in losses of desirable sensory characteristics [22]. A culture that performs well in one type of fermented sausage is not necessarily efficient in another type. The use of indigenous strains isolated from spontaneously fermented meats could accentuate artisan-like flavors [21]. Therefore, appropriate cultures have to be selected according to the specific formulation of the batter and technology of fermentation since environmental factors will interact to select a limited number of strains that are competitive enough to dominate the process. The most promising microorganisms for starter cultures are those selected from indigenous microbiota, which are competitive enough to dominate during fermentation, well adapted to the particular product and to the specific production technology, and with high metabolic capacities which can beneficially affect product quality and safety, preserving their typicity [23]. Autochthonous meat starter cultures mainly comprise lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and coagulase-negative cocci (CNC).

2.1. Lactic Acid Bacteria

Lactic acid bacteria have a leading role in dry sausage manufacture by acid production and its concomitant pH decrease, affecting both technological properties and microbial stability of the final product. The pH reduction leads to coagulation of fibrillar proteins, which improves the firmness and cohesiveness of final products, enabling slicing [24]; simultaneously, pH drop accelerates the ripening process, which positively affects the moisture of fermented meat products. Along with the production of lactic acid, LAB have a specific enzymatic profile that impacts the taste, aroma, and texture of meat products. They exert lipolytic and proteolytic activity through the action of lipases and proteases which hydrolyze lipids and peptide bonds in proteins, respectively. Lipolysis contributes directly to the typical sensory characteristics of fermented meat sausages while proteolysis enhances their texture and favors the drying process [25]. Some meat LAB have been shown to possess significant nitrate and nitrite reductase activity, even though these activities are more intense in CNC than in LAB [26]. For further reading, Palavecino et al. [27] had extensively reviewed LAB technological properties and safety features.

In keeping with the reclassification of lactobacilli published by Zheng et al. [28], LAB species mainly used as commercial starter cultures are Latilactobacillus (L.) sakei, L. curvatus, Lactiplantibacillus (Lc.) plantarum, Lc. pentosus, Lacticaseibacillus (Lcc.) casei, Pediococcus (Pd.) pentosaceus, and Pd. acidilactici [26], while L. sakei, L. curvatus, and Lc. plantarum are the principal species of LAB usually found in spontaneously fermented sausages [2931]. Members of other LAB genera, such as Weissella, Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, and Pediococcus are generally found as minority species [12].

2.2. Coagulase-Negative Cocci

The main technological function of CNC is their nitrate reductase activity exerting a definitive effect on typical color development and stabilization of dry sausages. This enzymatic activity relies on the ability of these cocci to reduce nitrate (NO3) to nitrite (NO2). Red coloration is formed in dry sausages by means of nitrite reduction that leads to nitric oxide (NO), which reacts with myoglobin to form nitrosomyoglobin (MbFeIINO), the compound responsible for the color [32]. Staphylococci can also synthesize nitric oxide from arginine via nitric oxide synthase [33]. Proteolytic and lipolytic activities are among the desirable metabolic characteristics in CNC species [34, 35], releasing several compounds that contribute to the characteristic flavor and texture of fermented meat products, i.e., peptides, amino acids, carbonyls, and volatile substances [34]. Despite being lipolysis mostly performed by endogenous enzymes, CNC lipases can be involved in this process and help to release fatty acids through incomplete β-oxidation. Besides, CNC enzymes are able to hydrolyze ester compounds; they also have catalase and superoxide dismutase activity which act as natural antioxidants providing safety [21]. Further technological and safety properties have been extensively described by Palavecino et al. [27].

Staphylococcus (S.) carnosus and S. xylosus are two CNC species commonly used as commercial starter cultures to assist in color and flavor formation [23]. Many other CNC species prevail in spontaneously fermented sausages, either as dominant: S. xylosus, S. saprophyticus, and S. equorum, or as subdominant: S. carnosus, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. pasteuri, S. sciuri, S. succinus, S. vitulinus, and S. warneri, depending on the type of product [21]. Kocuria (K.) species are ubiquitous and are highly adapted to the niche of meat fermentation; the species K. varians and K. kristinae were mainly found in fermented sausage [13].

2.3. Yeasts and Molds

The surface of fermented meat sausages is colonized by several yeasts and molds. These microorganisms can play an important role in the quality of the products through the formation of a superficial film which exerts a protective action against both excessive dehydration and the oxidation of the lipid fraction due to oxygen and light [36, 37]. They participate in flavor and aroma development due to the enzymatic activities of their lipases and proteinases [38, 39] and the stabilization of red color of fermented sausages as a result of oxygen depletion [40, 41]. In addition, they may contribute to increased product safety by antagonistic activity against toxigenic molds [42].

Among yeast, there is a clear predominance of the Debaryomyces genus on a diverse group comprising Candida, Yarrowia, Rhodotorula, Pichia, and Trichosporon [43, 44]. Debaryomyces (D.) hansenii is the species most frequently and abundantly isolated [36, 39, 45]. The fungal population comprises mainly Penicillium and Aspergillus genera [46] while other genera such as Mucor, Cladosporium, Scopulariopsis, Geotrichum, and Alternaria have been found less frequently. Penicillium is the most emblematic microbiota of fermented meat sausage surfaces [38], with the prevalence of Penicillium (P.) nalgiovense, followed by P. olsonii, P. chrysogenum, P. commune, P. solitum, and P. salamii [47].

Species such as D. hansenii, P. chrysogenum, and P. nalgiovense are currently used as standard starter cultures. They help to improve and standardize the quality and safety of the final products [43, 46].

3. Strain Selection and Design of an Indigenous Starter Culture

Native species that present attractive technological properties can be used to design autochthonous starter cultures that ensure safety and quality of traditional products without altering their typicity. Thus, the introduction of an indigenous starter culture into the production line constitutes an excellent example of the concept “innovation through tradition” (ITT).

The first stage in the designing process of starter culture endogenous to small-scale facilities consists of isolating microorganisms from the niche in which the culture will subsequently be applied. Strains should be selected from the pool of isolates based on technological properties and safety characteristics. Once picked, these isolates should be genetically identified.

General technological properties of interest regarding BAL and CNC were summarized by [48], whereas selection criteria for yeasts and toxicologically safe molds can be found in the literature [43, 46, 49]. Modern approaches for selection of the best strain(s) for autochthonous starter cultures have integrated technical, safety, and health-promoting features [25, 26, 50, 51]. New molecular techniques introduced into the Food Microbiology field complement the studies carried out so far and allow scientists to overcome the limitations of traditional methods [13, 25]. Albeit these advances are helpful for the understanding of meat fermentation, these new technologies are not easily accessible to researchers from emerging countries.

Several authors, around the world, have selected indigenous microbiota to apply as starter cultures in traditional dry sausages; some examples are listed in Table 1. As shown in the table, the species of microorganisms used in different products are the same; however, the variability at strain level is relevant. Therefore, a case-by-case evaluation of a potential bacterial strain to be used as a starter culture must be carried out. Once microorganisms are selected, their compatibility must be checked to determine whether their viability, metabolic activities, and technological features are kept. The desirable scenario is the one where the selected microbes contribute together to the final product without compromising any of their attributes or, even better, when they act additively or synergistically [52, 53]. Furthermore, the selected strains that comprise the designed starter culture should improve the quality and safety whereas keeping or enhancing typical sensory attributes of regional products [20, 21, 50, 54]. Hence, it is advisory to evaluate the sensory profile of the final products, being color, aroma, taste, texture, and overall appearance, the attributes more frequently investigated [20, 53, 55]. Another important aspect to revise is the consistency or robustness of the fermented sausages throughout different production batches, i.e., along a year or a prolonged period, which could guarantee the homogeneity of the product and a good performance of the starter culture [14]. Microbiological and physicochemical characteristics of the products must be monitored throughout the manufacturing process. Regarding the microbiological characteristics, changes in population dynamics and hygienic quality of the products at the end of the ripening stage must be monitored, according to the legislation established in each country or geographical area. Among the physicochemical parameters, pH and can be evaluated along the process, while salt content, color, texture, fatty acid profile, and volatile compounds can be determined in the final product [14, 20, 22, 53, 56, 57]. Even though these parameters are indeed descriptive, a thorough assessment of the autochthonous starter culture performance can only be achieved when sensory attributes are also examined.


ProductStrains or combinations of strainsInoculum (cfu/g)Processing placeReferences

Traditional dry fermented sausageL. sakei F08F202+S. equorum F08bF15+S. succinus F08bF19French traditional processing unit[152]
Greek fermented sausageL. sakei 8416
L. sakei 4413
L. sakei 8426
Lc. plantarum 7423
L. curvatus 8427
N.E.[20]
Basilicata fermented sausageL. sakei DBPZ0062+S. equorum DBPZ0241Artisanal industry[22]
Iberian dry fermented sausagePd. acidilactici MC184+S. vitulinus RS34
Pd. acidilactici MS198+S. vitulinus RS34
Pd. acidilactici MS200+S. vitulinus RS34
Two different industries[153]
Galician chorizoL. sakei LS131+S. equorum SA25
L. sakei LS131+S. epidermidis SA49
L. sakei LS131+S. saprophyticus SB12
N.E.[154]
Slow dry-cured fermented sausagesD. hansenii M4+C-P-77S bactoferm1
D. hansenii P2+C-P-77S bactoferm
N.E.[155]
Traditional dry sausage from ChacoL. sakei 487+S. vitulinus C2
L. sakei 442+S. xylosus C8
Small-scale facility[14, 53]
Chinese fermented dry sausageLc. plantarum CMRC6
L. sakei CMRC15
Food pilot plant[128]
SalamiP. nalgiovense ITEM 15292+Startec TCSD12
P. salamii ITEM 15302+Startec TCSD1 (surface inoculation for fungi)
1.48 log cfu/cm2
1.93 log cfu/cm2
Two different industries[156]
Fermented camel sausageLc. plantarum+S. xylosus
Lc. pentosus+S. xylosus
N.E.[125]
Horse meat sausageL. sakei 121Small-scale facility[8]
Sardinian fermented sausages(Lc. plantarum PC23+S. xylosus SA23)+D. hansenii Ca3
D. hansenii Ca3 (surface inoculation for yeast)

5.9-8.3 log cfu/g
Farm scale[45]
Chinese dry fermented sausageLc. plantarum R2
Lc. plantarum R2+S. xylosus A2
N.E.[157]

1C-P-77S bactoferm: starter culture containing Lc. pentosus and S. carnosus (Chr. Inc., Hansen, Denmark). 2Startec TCSD1: commercial starter culture, Tec-Al S.R.L. N.E.: not specified.

Ferrocino et al. [58] presented a novel work introducing an advance in the understanding of meat fermentation by coupling DNA sequencing metagenomics and metabolomics approaches to describe the microbial function during this process. They proved that a starter culture drastically affected the organoleptic properties of the products by the correlation between the volatilome profile, microbiota, gene content, and consumer acceptability. This evidence highlights the importance of selecting a starter culture to optimize production efficiency and product quality. In addition, metagenomics can be a useful tool when it is integrated to metabolic and sensory analyses giving a better understanding of the functions of starter cultures in situ [25]. These authors suggested that it might be probable—in the near future—to know which composition of starter cultures to use in certain technological conditions according to the sensory attributes desired for the product.

An autochthonous starter culture that improves the quality, safety, and homogeneity in traditional sausage manufacture represents a beneficial tool to add value to these products. For fermented foods, microorganisms that are considered autochthonous are often associated with a given area and should be reported as a typical food ingredient. These microorganisms represent a direct link between food and historical and environmental conditions from their original habitat [16]. Narratives about such quality-enhancing functionalities are increasingly being used by starter culture producers, which promote self-styled cultures for “traditional” meat fermentation [59, 60].

4. Probiotics

Over the recent decades, the meat industry has focused on enhancing potential health benefits of its products. In this sense, the incorporation of probiotic cultures in traditional meat products could represent an alternative to improve their functional profile. The use of probiotic strains in association with the traditional starter culture has been recognized as a technologically feasible and effective strategy for the development of innovative products [61].

Probiotic cultures are “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [62] and comprise both bacteria and yeast. The main genus used as probiotic in meat products is Lactobacillus, although other related genera have also been reported, such as Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus [63, 64]. Among yeasts, D. hansenii has been shown to have probiotic traits, so it could be considered in future innovative developments [65]. The probiotic mechanisms are considered strain-specific and species-specific and some mechanisms might be widespread among commonly studied probiotic genera [66].

Fermented meat products are adequate for the carriage of probiotic bacteria since they do not undergo heat treatment, or else, it is very mild [26, 67]. In addition, it has been postulated that meat matrix protects the survival of probiotic lactobacilli through the gastrointestinal tract [68]. However, the viability of probiotics can be affected by high content of curing salt, low pH, and low water activity of fermented meat products. In this case, technologies such as microencapsulation, which have demonstrated their potential to maintain probiotic viability during processing, storage, and passage through the gastrointestinal tract, can be used [69].

Probiotic cultures in fermented sausages could be autochthonous bacteria with probiotic properties or commercial probiotic strains with documented health-promoting properties. In the first case, the potential probiotic strains can be obtained from fermented sausages by screening microorganisms that possess appropriate physiological requirements and health-promoting properties [7073]. Even though these potential probiotic strains might be well adapted to the fermentation meat niche, their benefits must be demonstrated in randomized, controlled, or equivalent human trials, either in a heterogeneous or stratified population (based on defined characteristics of host or microbial genomics). Furthermore, dose and genome strain characterization should also be considered [74].

On the other hand, commercial probiotic strains and cultures isolated from human intestinal systems, with documented health-promoting properties, can be used [75]. In this case, the performance of these cultures in the fermentation niche should be evaluated [76]. Regardless of the origin of the probiotic culture, it should not affect the sensory characteristics of the traditional product.

In this sense, the potential use of lactobacillus strains (Lcc. casei, Lcc. paracasei paracasei, Lcc. rhamnosus, and L. sakei sakei) isolated from a traditional Italian dry fermented sausage as probiotics was evaluated for Rebucci et al. [77]. Klingberg et al. [78] found that strains Lc. plantarum and Lc. pentosus originated from fermented meat products were in agreement with the definition of probiotics and their application in the fermented sausages was a success without affecting the flavor of the product. De Pisco and Mauriello [69] reported that some probiotic strains such as Limosilactobacillus (Lm.) reuteri ATCC 55730 suffered from the harsh conditions of meat fermented matrix. Rubio et al. [79] found a good performance of the Lcc. rhamnosus CTC1679 strain, isolated from the human intestine and with potential probiotic properties, in the manufacture of low-acid fermented sausages “fuets.” Subsequent studies showed that Lcc. rhamnosus CTC1679 colonized the gastrointestinal tract of healthy volunteers, confirming that it could be delivered as a probiotic in fermented sausages [80]. Ayyash et al. [81] evaluated Lc. plantarum KX881772, a new probiotic isolated from camel milk, in semidry fermented camel sausages, finding that this probiotic has promising characteristics for the meat industry.

Regarding microencapsulated probiotic microorganisms, Muthukumarasamy and Holley [82] reported that Lm. reuteri ATCC 55730—encapsulated in sodium alginate—was used in fermented meat products. Technological characteristics were not affected, and pH and values were similar in sausages with encapsulated probiotics and control sausages (free cells), while bacterial viability was also suitable. Sidira et al. [83] evaluated immobilized Lcc. casei ATCC 393 on wheat grains in probiotic dry fermented sausages containing reduced or negligible amounts of curing salts. Microbiological and strain-specific multiplex PCR analyses confirmed the levels of Lcc. casei ATCC 393 in all samples after 71 days of ripening ranged above the minimum concentration to render a probiotic effect (6 log cfu/g). Ünal Turhan et al. [84] evaluated the production of sucuk with Lc. plantarum as starter culture, together with microencapsulated or free cells of Lcc. rhamnosus (probiotics strains). Textural, physicochemical, and sensorial properties of sucuk with microencapsulated microorganism were found to be similar to traditional sucuk.

Recently, various studies showed strong evidence that bacterial viability is not an essential requirement to confer health benefits; hence, terms such as paraprobiotics and postbiotics were created to denote health benefits beyond the inherent viability of probiotics. These terms represent new categories of biological response modifier agents [85]. The scientific evidence supports that postbiotics and paraprobiotics possess diverse functional/bioactive properties such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, antihipertensive, and immunomodulatory activities, although mechanisms implicated in most bioactivities of postbiotics and paraprobiotics are not fully understood [66]. Fermented meat products could naturally contain postbiotics and paraprobiotics, but they cannot be controlled, and the amount produced may be insufficient to generate a physiological response in vivo [86].

5. Antimicrobial and Functional Metabolites

New findings and sophisticated technology applied to the study of microbial metabolites have blurred the line between several definitions. Among the most recent literature, the abovementioned term “postbiotic” is still wide open, mainly when it is referred to as an adjunct substance for food production. According to Moradi et al. [87], any soluble factor (products/metabolic by-products of microbial metabolisms or substances produced by the action of microorganisms on culture/food ingredients) secreted by food-grade microorganisms, or released after cell lysis, during the growth and fermentation in complex microbiological cultures, food or gut, can be considered as such. In the light of this definition, bioactive peptides, exopolysaccharides, bacteriocins, and organic acids could be ascribed to the term postbiotic. These metabolites can exert some benefits to the food or host [88] and could add value to traditional fermented products, applied as an adjunct to living microorganisms—which play a technological role in the manufacture of these products—since postbiotics are more stable and safer for food applications than their producing microorganisms and their viability is not required either during consumption or production [85].

The examples hereafter comprise the most studied bioactive metabolites in fermented meat products. Albeit these metabolites are currently generated in situ, this field could be further expanded through the use of cell-free supernatant, from the producing strains, as adjunct agents to indigenous starter cultures.

5.1. Antimicrobial Compounds

The main antimicrobial effect responsible for safety of dry sausage is evidently the rate of acidification of the raw meat [89]. Lactic acid bacteria present in the matrix can exert antagonism through competition for nutrients and/or production of several antimicrobial substances such as organic acids (lactic and acetic), carbon dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, ethanol, and bacteriocins. Production of bacteriocins during fermentation of meat plays an important role in enhancing the functional value of meat products, but production of other antimicrobial compounds by specific starter cultures can also be used in fermented sausages.

The role of bacteriocin-producing cultures used as starter cultures—or as adjunct cultures—is twofold: they can contribute to both flavor and food safety, providing fermentation and preservation at the same time. As an illustration, there are commercial cultures such as Bactoferm™ (Chr. Hansen, Denmark), containing pediocin-producing and sakacin-producing strains, used in the manufacture of fermented sausages and dry-cured meat and Holdbac® protective cultures (DuPont Nutrition and Biosciences, USA), containing a mix of bacteriocin-producing strains, used to protect meat, seafood, and dairy products from Listeria, yeasts, and molds [90]. Beyond their role as biopreservatives, bacteriocins are gaining credibility as health modulators, due to their ability to regulate the gut microbiota, which is strongly associated with human wellbeing [91].

Several strains of L. sakei [70, 92], L. curvatus [9396], Lc. plantarum [9799], and Pd. acidilactis [100] isolated from traditional fermented sausages have been reported to produce different bacteriocins, among which curvacins and sakacins are the best known. These bacteriocins are of particular interest due to their high inhibitory activity against Listeria (Li.) monocytogenes even though other pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms could also be affected. Extended data regarding the successful use of several bioprotective cultures used in fermented meat products can be found in Aymerich et al. [101] and Oliveira et al. [4].

On the other hand, some authors have reported CNS with antimicrobial activity in preliminary studies, although the bacteriocin production has been mainly described in LAB. In this sense, Lauková et al. [102] found that S. xylosus SX S03 1M/1/2 produced a thermostable bacteriocin which could be used as starter culture or meat additive. Sánchez Mainar et al. [103] reported that S. sciuri I20-1 exhibited activity against S. aureus and Clostridium (Cl.) botulinum, owing to the release of its bacteriocin-like substance in a meat model system. The production of bacteriocins by potential CNS starter cultures to fight against S. aureus and Cl. botulinum in fermented meats could represent a complement to existing antilisterial LAB cultures for the production of safer meat products, in particular when curing agent concentrations are lowered [21].

The use of antagonic microorganisms isolated from traditional meat products may be an important strategy to adequately control toxigenic fungi and protect consumer health from the hazard of exposure to mycotoxins such as ochratoxin A (OTA), aflatoxins (AFs), and cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) [42].

Lactic acid bacteria produce several metabolites able to inhibit fungal growth, which can also participate in mycotoxin degradation and/or removal from contaminated food [104, 105]. Lactobacilli isolated from pork meat and salami showed the ability to inhibit the growth of several molds in vitro [106, 107]. Recently, Álvarez et al. [108] reported that Enterococcus (E.) faecium SE920, isolated from dry fermented sausages, could be a good candidate to reduce mycotoxin production in dry fermented sausages. In fact, the presence of these strains significantly reduced OTA production of P. nordicum in a dry fermented sausage-based medium under conditions simulating sausage ripening.

Antifungal activity was observed in CNS as well. Cebrián et al. [109] reported that meat-borne S. xylosus Sx8 exhibited antifungal activity against toxigenic fungi such as P. nordicum, Aspergillus (A.) flavus, A. parasiticus, and P. griseofulvum, triggering a significant decrease on mycotoxin accumulation in ham-based medium. However, S. xylosus Sx8 antifungal mechanism has not been elucidated yet.

Among yeasts, D. hansenii is the most studied species as potential protective culture in fermented sausages because of its predominance in these products [39, 43, 45]. This yeast species has several mechanisms that can tackle fungal growth and mycotoxin production in foods [65] and has been incorporated in the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) of the European Food Safety Authority [110]. The use of autochthonous D. hansenii strains provided a positive contribution to control the development of spontaneous mold population on fermented Sardinian sausage surface [45] and decrease the growth of ochratoxigenic P. verrucosum in dry fermented sausage as a result of the combination of competition for space and nutrients and production of volatile compounds [49]. In addition to the inhibition of the toxigenic mold growth, D. hansenii isolated from dry-cured meat has also shown the ability to reduce OTA and AF content in dry fermented sausages against P. verrucosum and A. parasiticus at transcriptional level [111, 112].

Competition for nutrients and space, together with the production of peptides and proteins with antifungal properties—including a group of small, basic, and cysteine-rich antifungal proteins (AFPs)—is the main mechanism by which some nontoxigenic molds could collaborate in the control of undesirable fungi and improve product safety [113115]. Penicillium chrysogenum isolated from dry-cured meat [116] produces the antifungal protein PgAFP [117] and has shown potential as protective culture by inhibition of P. griseofulvum CPA production on dry fermented sausage during ripening [118]. On the other hand, the antifungal protein PgAFP produced ex situ was effective in reducing growth of toxigenic A. flavus and P. restrictum in dry fermented sausages, but its effect was time limited [113]. However, Delgado et al. [119] indicated that the combination of PgAFP and D. hansenii could be used as a preventive measure against aflatoxigenic A. parasiticus or as a corrective action when this mold has been detected in fermented sausages.

5.2. Bioactive Peptides

Bioactive peptides (BP) have been defined as specific protein fragments that have a positive impact on body functions and may influence health. They are encrypted within the sequence of the parent protein and can be released through hydrolysis by proteolytic enzymes. In ripened foods, as dry fermented sausages, hydrolysis can be performed either by endogenous enzymes or by the combined action of endogenous and microbial enzymes [120]. Health benefits of BP are continuously being explored and discovered; hence, there are still controversies regarding their magnitude and significance. Lafarga and Hayes [121] indicated that BP have antimicrobial, antioxidative, antithrombotic, antihypertensive, anticancerogenic, satiety-regulating, and immunomodulatory activities and may affect the cardiovascular, immune, nervous, and digestive systems. Peptides may also be effective in the treatment of mental health diseases, cancer, diabetes, and obesity. Furthermore, many known BP are multifunctional and can present two or more health-promoting activities which may or may not be related [122]. Antioxidant and antihypertensive peptides have been observed in meat products such as Spanish dry-cured ham and dry fermented sausages [123, 124] and Tunisian dry fermented camel sausages [125]. Throughout the manufacturing process, LAB exert an exhaustive proteolysis on the meat matrix. This proteolytic system comprises a cell wall-bound proteinase, peptide transporters, and various intracellular peptidases, including endopeptidases, aminopeptidases, tripeptidases, and dipeptidases [126], which contribute to the generation of small peptides and free amino acids [127]. Although it is known that the degradation of main myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic proteins took place in meat products [128, 129], peptides generated in dry fermented meat products have been less studied. Recently, a study from Mora et al. [124] reported that intense proteolysis occurred during processing due to the action of peptidases from muscle and LAB using a peptidomic approach.

Regarding what concerns this review, the use of autochthonous strains as potential bioactive peptide releasers has been assessed by few authors. Among three strains isolated from a camel meat sausage obtained by fermentation with endogenous microflora, Mejri et al. [125] found that the batch inoculated with S. xylosus and Lc. plantarum (107 cfu/g) had higher antioxidant and antihypertensive capacities than the noninoculated sausages. Fractions with molecular weights below 3 kDa showed the highest antioxidant and antihypertensive capabilities in comparison with fractions above 3 kDa, which were observed at the end of ripening. Analysis of these fractions by RP-HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS/MS allowed the identification of 13–22 peptides with a number of amino acids that ranged from 4 to 23. These peptides shared many common features with other antioxidant and antihypertensive peptides. Escudero et al. [123] and Mora et al. [124] stated that low molecular weight peptides (<3 kDa), contributing to the development of flavor in dry fermented meat products, could also exert antihypertensive activity.

A study focused on health-promoting benefits of fermented camel sausages conducted by Ayyash et al. [81] showed that the probiotic bacteria Lc. plantarum KX881772—isolated from camel milk—played a promising role at imparting functional characteristics to these sausages. The release of bioactive peptides with greater antioxidant capacities, ACE inhibition, and cytotoxicity (antitumoral) activity than the control was due to a high degree of hydrolysis achieved with the addition of the probiotic strain to the camel sausage.

Fernández et al. [130] presented the joint use of an autochthonous starter culture composed by the strains Pd. acidilactici MS200 and S. vitulus RS34, together with the protease EPg222 (purified from P. chrysogenum Pg222, which was isolated from dry-cured meat products). Their study showed that angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory and antioxidant compounds were released during the ripening process of dry fermented sausages. Even though the main proteolytic effect had been attributed to the enzyme, they suggested the combined use of the autochthonous starter and the enzyme since both had proved to give the best organoleptic and hygienic profiles in previous studies [56].

6. Reduction of Salt and Fat

Sodium chloride is an important ingredient in processed meat due to its preservative properties, its capacity to affect taste and improve product flavor, and its functional capacity to solubilize myofibrillar proteins, which is necessary in order to enhance adhesion and cohesiveness in processed meat products [131]. Granulated fat contributes to the continuous release of moisture—a process necessary for the fermentation and flavor development [132]. Fat contributes to the texture, mouthfeel, juiciness, and lubricity and constitutes a source of essential fatty acids and fat soluble vitamins [133].

In recent years, increased concerns about the potential health risks associated with the consumption of food with high content of sodium and fat have led the meat industry to develop new formulations or modify traditional food products to contain less sodium and fat [131, 133135]. These new formulations confer functionality to fermented meat products that could be boosted with the use of indigenous starter cultures.

Several strategies to reduce salt content could be applied to small manufacturing industries; the simplest is the direct reduction of salt content, which is only possible in small proportions due to technological contributions of NaCl. Another strategy consists of the partial substitution of NaCl for salts such as KCl, CaCl2, or MgCl2. In this sense, KCl is the most used substitute in fermented meat products and exerts an inhibitory effect on muscle proteases similar to NaCl; but their main limitation is the metallic flavor [136]. Another alternative is to modify the salt size; however, the salt size manipulation in meat products has not been shown yet [131].

Laranjo et al. [135] analysed the effect of salt reduction on Portuguese traditional dry-cured sausages. They found that a reduction of 50% of salt did not affect the safety of the product but the flavor and the texture. Later, they evaluated the same salt reduction in traditional blood dry-cured sausages, which in this case had a positive effect on product acceptance by the panelists without compromising the microbiological stability or fatty acid profile of dry-cured sausages, but biogenic amine levels increased [137]. Therefore, they propose to complement the reduction of salt with the use of starter cultures to minimize the levels of biogenic amines and promote the development of flavor.

De Almeida et al. [138] evaluated the performance of autochthonous starter cultures in a low-sodium fermented sausage model, containing 1% NaCl, 0.25% KCl, and 0.25% CaCl2. They found a combination of strains with peptidogenic potential (E. mundtii CRL35+S. vitulinus GV318) and another combination with influence on the production of amino acids (L. sakei CRL1862+S. vitulinus GV318). This release of amino acids and small peptides is frequently related to the taste of processed meat.

Dry fermented sausages are one of the most difficult meat products as far as fat reduction is concerned since excessive fat reduction leads to unacceptable appearance and undesirable changes in texture [133]. While removing back fat from the batter is a simple way to perform this reformulation, limitations are given by the reduction of sensory and technological quality of product [76]. The replacement of animal fats with plant oil sources in processed meat products affects the drying process and presents problems such as inadequate drying, binding, and retention of liquid oils [139, 140].

Olivares et al. [141] reported that with a reduction of fat in the raw material of around 15%, using controlled ripening conditions and slow fermentation process, they obtained fermented sausages with high consumer acceptability. Then, they studied the effect of fat content (10, 20, and 30%) and ripening time and found that fat reduction decreased lipolysis, lipid oxidation, and lipid-derived volatile compounds during processing while the volatile compounds generated from bacterial metabolism increased, although only in the first stages of processing. The consumer preference in aroma and overall quality of high (30%) and medium (20%) fat sausages was related to the aroma compounds, and these contents of fat were not differentiated by consumers [140].

In terms of salt and fat reductions together, Rubio et al. [142] evaluated potential starter lactobacilli strains in low-acid fermented sausages (fuets), with reduced salt and fat content. In this study, 25% of NaCl was substituted with KCl; and the fat pork was reduced a lower proportion than usual. They achieved a reduction in salt and fat (25% and 52%, respectively) without detrimental effects on the sensory quality of the fuets. Mora-Gallego et al. [143] have shown that even a reduction of 70% of fat in nonacid fermented sausages resulted in satisfactory overall sensory quality of fuet-type sausages. Mora-Gallego et al. [133] found that the reduction of fat proportion (from 20% to 10%) and salt (from 2.5% to 1.5%) had good consumer acceptability in dry fermented sausage type fuet, but these simultaneous reductions led to an increase in . The increase of was compensated by an addition of 0.64% KCl, which does not negatively affect the consumer acceptability. D. hansenii P2—isolated from naturally fermented sausages—was used as starter in the production of dry fermented sausages manufactured varying salt and/or pork back fat content and sensory analysis showed that yeast inoculation improved the aroma and taste quality when fat or salt reductions were done [144]. The contribution of inoculation to the reformulated dry sausages was attributed to the increase in aroma compounds derived from amino acid degradation and ester activities which increased the perception of fruity and cured aroma [145]. Nevertheless, yeast inoculation did not show a clear effect when salt and fat reduction was carried out together.

7. Additional Support Strategies

7.1. Quality Product Registers

In many economic regions, there exist quality policies aimed at protecting the names of specific products to promote their unique characteristics, linked to their geographical origin as well as traditional know-how [146]. Fermented meat products, namely, dry sausages, fall into this set of products. The geographical indication (GI) is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin [147]. In the case of foodstuffs and wine, GI comprised Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI). As stated by the WIPO: “In order to function as a GI, a sign must identify a product as originating in a given place. In addition, the qualities, characteristics, or reputation of the product should be essentially due to the place of origin. Since the qualities depend on the geographical place of production, there is a clear link between the product and its original place of production.” From a wider perspective, these quality schemes can play a special role in promoting sustainable rural development, improving farm income and opening new export potential.

Geographical indications have to be requested to the corresponding national or international authorities; this bureaucratic paperwork could be time-consuming; there are legal aspects to be fulfilled; and some extra taxes might be applied on the products depending on the legislation. However, the benefits associated with these concepts justify these actions. Having a GI could broaden the marketing boundaries of artisanal dry sausages. Fermented meat products can be added as local craft elements on touristic routes, embracing the current tendency of synergy between tourism, culture, and gastronomy. Furthermore, GIs comprise knowledge and skills passed on from generation to generation, helping to protect local heritage.

7.2. Innovation through Tradition

De Massis et al. [148] conceptualize a new strategic approach, called “innovation through tradition,” which identifies the elements that enterprises possess to profit from leveraging the past, thus combining tradition and innovation into new products. Within the food sector, consumers’ needs tend to be satisfied by offering products being able to balance tradition and innovation [149]. The need for innovation in dry sausages, mainly in traditional small-scale manufacture, appears as a big challenge.

Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) need to find ways to maintain and increase their niche markets under the pressure of rapid technological changes while the production rationale remains as an art. On the one hand, there is a significant development of codified knowledge and on the other traditional manufacturing practices and skilled sausage makers with a colorful history. Codified knowledge is explicit and consists of facts, theories, and principles that are codified in research journals, taught in universities and recorded in industries [150]. Tacit knowledge is widely held by individuals and not able to be readily expressed as it is skill, know-how, and expertise [151]. Traditional recipes which connected early European immigrants with their homeland are very common in this target segment, mainly in those countries known as the “new world” (e.g., Canada, Australia, USA, and Latin American communities). Particular raw ingredient compositions are processed according to these recipes that have been passed down from one generation to another. Although certain problems of product quality variations are recorded, unique flavors from small artisanal firms producing dry sausages are very popular among local consumers.

At this point, one of the critical issues in the heart of leveraging traditional sausage manufacturing with scientific developments consists of finding the ways for doing so successfully. Building on this reasoning, merging tacit and codified knowledge seems to be an imperative for scholars if they aim to leverage the potential of small artisanal dry sausage local firms. Science, technology, economy, culture, ecosystem, and interorganizational synergies are, at least, main aspects for strategies related to territorial networks, production, and innovation. Promoting multilevel connection among firms, university, and government appears as a master hint for leveraging sausage manufacturing clusters which are not only sectoral but also geographical. In this sense, there is a need for a change in focus to multidimensional and specific-context knowledge based on firm-by-firm analysis. Moreover, this new innovation perspective needs a broader picture than a microeconomic level; only a micro-meso-macro approach may lead to local development as a collective and cooperation-based learning process.

8. Conclusions

Microbial cultures specifically chosen for any meat fermented product should help to control undesirable native flora and give a uniform quality to food in every batch. Technological support to incorporate these cultures into the production process might become an indispensable part of innovation and creativeness for small-scale facilities. A great combination of selected microbial cultures could be designed to offer improved and/or preserved sensorial attributes among which flavor, overall appearance, texture, and stability of the final product are of paramount importance. Even though the introduction of biotechnology could represent a competitive advantage for small-scale facilities, typical sensory properties need to be preserved, particularly when the product is perceived as rooted in a cultural past that has been dominated by craftsmanship and it is valued as such.

Besides safety and health, the meat industry aims at innovation by generating a superior perceived quality while focusing on traditional flavors. Consumers’ acceptability is the master key for successful product innovation. Herein, several technological processes associated to indigenous microbial cultures aimed at improving the quality of artisanal fermented meat products were presented as potential strategies for small-scale facilities. The authors are aware of the challenge that these implementations would entail considering that microbial strains should be isolated from each facility. Nonetheless, it might be a reasonable enterprise in the light of the benefits that may be gained from these “microscopic factories.” Facing the next decade and beyond implies moving forward to a more healthy, sustainable, and fair food system. Within this context, traditional foods should be used to valorize niche productions, uphold small-scale producers, and deepen the ties between food and places, thereby safeguarding the territories and the biodiversity of autochthonous cultures and raw matter.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina (CONICET) (PIP No. 112-201301-00078CO), Agencia Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina (ANPCyT) (PICT-2018-0290), and Universidad Nacional del Chaco Austral (UNCAus) (PI No. 69-97).

References

  1. F. Leroy and L. De Vuyst, “Fermented foods: fermented meat products,” in Encyclopedia of Food and Health, B. Caballero, P. M. Finglas, and F. Todrá, Eds., pp. 656–660, Academic Press, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. Comi, R. Urso, L. Iacumin et al., “Characterisation of naturally fermented sausages produced in the north east of Italy,” Meat Science, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 381–392, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Talon, S. Leroy, and I. Lebert, “Microbial ecosystems of traditional fermented meat products: the importance of indigenous starters,” Meat Science, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Oliveira, V. Ferreira, R. Magalhães, and P. Teixeira, “Biocontrol strategies for Mediterranean-style fermented sausages,” Food Research International, vol. 103, pp. 438–449, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. Arief, Z. Wulandari, E. Aditia, M. Baihaqi, Noraimah, and Hendrawan, “Physicochemical and microbiological properties of fermented lamb sausages using probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum IIA-2C12 as starter culture,” Procedia Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 352–356, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. Rivas, M. Castro, M. Cayré, and C. Campos, “Bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria of caprine products from Chaco – Argentina,” International Journal of Food Processing Technology, vol. 1, pp. 32–40, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. Amaral, C. G. Santos, V. S. Melo, J. Costa, M. B. P. Oliveira, and I. Mafra, “Identification of duck, partridge, pheasant, quail, chicken and turkey meats by species-specific PCR assays to assess the authenticity of traditional game meat _Alheira_ sausages,” Food Control, vol. 47, pp. 190–195, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. Coloretti, C. Chiavari, A. Poeta, M. Succi, P. Tremonte, and L. Grazia, “Hidden sugars in the mixture: effects on microbiota and the sensory characteristics of horse meat sausage,” LWT- Food Science and Technology, vol. 106, pp. 22–28, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Ayyash, A. Olaimat, A. al-Nabulsi, and S. Q. Liu, “Bioactive properties of novel probiotic Lactococcus lactis fermented camel sausages: cytotoxicity, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, antioxidant capacity, and antidiabetic activity,” Food Science of Animal Resources, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 155–171, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. Demeyer, M. Raemaekers, A. Rizzo et al., “Control of bioflavour and safety in fermented sausages: first results of a European project,” Food Research International, vol. 33, no. 3-4, pp. 171–180, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Vignolo, C. Fontana, and S. Fadda, “Semidry and dry fermented sausages,” in Handbook of meat processing, F. Toldr, Ed., pp. 379–398, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Aquilanti, C. Garofalo, A. Osimani, and F. Clementi, “Ecology of lactic acid bacteria and coagulase negative cocci in fermented dry sausages manufactured in Italy and other Mediterranean countries: an overview,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 429–445, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  13. I. Franciosa, V. Alessandria, P. Dolci, K. Rantsiou, and L. Cocolin, “Sausage fermentation and starter cultures in the era of molecular biology methods,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 279, pp. 26–32, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Palavecino Prpich, O. Garro, M. Romero, M. Judis, M. Cayré, and M. Castro, “Evaluation of an autochthonous starter culture on the production of a traditional dry fermented sausage from Chaco (Argentina) at a small-scale facility,” Meat Science, vol. 115, pp. 41–44, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Leroy, P. Scholliers, and V. Amilien, “Elements of innovation and tradition in meat fermentation: conflicts and synergies,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 212, pp. 2–8, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Settanni and G. Moschetti, “New trends in technology and identity of traditional dairy and fermented meat production processes: preservation of typicality and hygiene,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Leroy, A. Geyzen, M. Janssens, L. De Vuyst, and P. Scholliers, “Meat fermentation at the crossroads of innovation and tradition: a historical outlook,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Ammor, E. Dufour, M. Zagorec, S. Chaillou, and I. Chevallier, “Characterization and selection of Lactobacillus sakei strains isolated from traditional dry sausage for their potential use as starter cultures,” Food Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 529–538, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. I. Lebert, S. Leroy, and R. Talon, “Microorganisms in traditional fermented meats,” in Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry, F. Toldrá, W.-K. Nip, J. G. Sebranek et al., Eds., pp. 113–124, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. M. Baka, E. J. Papavergou, T. Pragalaki, J. G. Bloukas, and P. Kotzekidou, “Effect of selected autochthonous starter cultures on processing and quality characteristics of Greek fermented sausages,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Sánchez Mainar, D. Stavropoulou, and F. Leroy, “Exploring the metabolic heterogeneity of coagulase-negative staphylococci to improve the quality and safety of fermented meats: a review,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 247, pp. 24–37, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. G. Bonomo, A. Ricciardi, and G. Salzano, “Influence of autochthonous starter cultures on microbial dynamics and chemical-physical features of traditional fermented sausages of Basilicata region,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 137–146, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. F. Leroy, J. Verluyten, and L. de Vuyst, “Functional meat starter cultures for improved sausage fermentation,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 270–285, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E. H. Drosinos, S. Paramithiotis, G. Kolovos, I. Tsikouras, and I. Metaxopoulos, “Phenotypic and technological diversity of lactic acid bacteria and staphylococci isolated from traditionally fermented sausages in southern Greece,” Food Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 260–270, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. E. . S. Cruxen, G. D. Funck, L. Haubert et al., “Selection of native bacterial starter culture in the production of fermented meat sausages: application potential, safety aspects, and emerging technologies,” Food Research International, vol. 122, pp. 371–382, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Ammor and B. Mayo, “Selection criteria for lactic acid bacteria to be used as functional starter cultures in dry sausage production: an update,” Meat Science, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 138–146, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. Palavecino Prpich, M. Castro, M. Cayré, N. Galante, and E. Sanabria, “Relevance of microbial cultures on the safety of fermented sausage,” in Meat Products. Chemistry, consumption and health aspects, M. Castro and M. E. Cayré, Eds., pp. 89–157, Nova Science Publisher, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. Zheng, S. Wittouck, E. Salvetti et al., “A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2782–2858, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Hugas, M. Garriga, T. Aymerich, and J. Monfort, “Biochemical characterization of lactobacilli from dry fermented sausages,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Pisacane, M. L. Callegari, E. Puglisi, G. Dallolio, and A. Rebecchi, “Microbial analyses of traditional Italian salami reveal microorganisms transfer from the natural casing to the meat matrix,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 207, pp. 57–65, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Kittisakulnam, D. Saetae, and W. Suntornsuk, “Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of spices traditionally used in fermented meat products,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, vol. 41, no. 4, article e13004, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Gøtterup, K. Olsen, S. Knöchel, K. Tjener, L. H. Stahnke, and J. K. S. Møller, “Relationship between nitrate/nitrite reductase activities in meat associated staphylococci and nitrosylmyoglobin formation in a cured meat model system,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 303–310, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. M. Sapp, A. B. Mogen, E. A. Almand et al., “Contribution of the nos-pdt operon to virulence phenotypes in methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, article e108868, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Casaburi, R. Di Monaco, S. Cavella, F. Toldrá, D. Ercolini, and F. Villani, “Proteolytic and lipolytic starter cultures and their effect on traditional fermented sausages ripening and sensory traits,” Food Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 335–347, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Müller, G. Fogarassy, A. Bajac, J. Weiss, A. Weiss, and H. Schmidt, “Selection of Staphylococcus carnosus strains based on in vitro analysis of technologically relevant physiological activities,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 479–487, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Gardini, G. Suzzi, A. Lombardi et al., “A survey of yeasts in traditional sausages of southern Italy,” FEMS Yeast Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Cocolin, R. Urso, K. Rantsiou, C. Cantoni, and G. Comi, “Dynamics and characterization of yeasts during natural fermentation of Italian sausages,” FEMS Yeast Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 692–701, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Sonjak, M. Ličen, J. C. Frisvad, and N. Gunde-Cimerman, “The mycobiota of three dry-cured meat products from Slovenia,” Food Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 373–376, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. C. Mendonça, D. M. Gouvêa, H. M. Hungaro, A. D. F. Sodré, and A. Querol-Simon, “Dynamics of the yeast flora in artisanal country style and industrial dry cured sausage (yeast in fermented sausage),” Food Control, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 143–148, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. P. Encinas, T. M.́. López-Dı́az, M.́. L. Garcı́a-López, A. Otero, and B. Moreno, “Yeast populations on Spanish fermented sausages,” Meat Science, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 203–208, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. M. Visagie, J. Houbraken, J. C. Frisvad et al., “Identification and nomenclature of the genus Penicillium,” Studies in Mycology, vol. 78, pp. 343–371, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Delgado, B. Peromingo, F. Núñez, and M. A. Asensio, “Use of molds and their antifungal proteins for biocontrol of toxigenic molds on dry-ripened cheese and meats,” Current Opinion in Food Science, vol. 11, pp. 40–45, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Flores, S. Corral, L. Cano-García, A. Salvador, and C. Belloch, “Yeast strains as potential aroma enhancers in dry fermented sausages,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 212, pp. 16–24, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Laranjo, M. Elias, and M. J. Fraqueza, “The use of starter cultures in traditional meat products,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 2017, Article ID 9546026, 18 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. A. Murgia, A. Marongiu, M. Aponte, G. Blaiotta, P. Deiana, and N. P. Mangia, “Impact of a selected Debaryomyces hansenii strain’s inoculation on the quality of Sardinian fermented sausages,” Food Research International, vol. 121, pp. 144–150, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. O. Sunesen and L. H. Stahnke, “Mould starter cultures for dry sausages--selection, application and effects,” Meat Science, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 935–948, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. Magista, A. Susca, M. Ferrara, A. F. Logrieco, and G. Perrone, “Penicillium species: crossroad between quality and safety of cured meat production,” Current Opinion in Food Science, vol. 17, pp. 36–40, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. W. H. Holzapfel, “Use of starter cultures in fermentation on a household scale,” Food Control, vol. 8, no. 5-6, pp. 241–258, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. F. Núñez, M. S. Lara, B. Peromingo, J. Delgado, L. Sánchez-Montero, and M. J. Andrade, “Selection and evaluation of Debaryomyces hansenii isolates as potential bioprotective agents against toxigenic penicillia in dry-fermented sausages,” Food Microbiology, vol. 46, pp. 114–120, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. W. F. Holzapfel, “Appropriate starter culture technologies for small-scale fermentation in developing countries,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 197–212, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. Martín, B. Colín, E. Aranda, M. Benito, and M. Córdoba, “Characterization of Micrococcaceae isolated from Iberian dry-cured sausages,” Meat Science, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 696–708, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. P. Tremonte, A. Reale, T. di Renzo et al., “Interactions between Lactobacillus sakei and CNC (Staphylococcus xylosus and Kocuria varians) and their influence on proteolytic activity,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 586–594, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. N. Palavecino Prpich, M. Castro, M. Cayré, O. Garro, and G. Vignolo, “Indigenous starter cultures to improve quality of artisanal dry fermented sausages from Chaco (Argentina),” International Journal of Food Science, vol. 2015, Article ID 931970, 9 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. P. Kęska and J. Stadnik, “Stability of antiradical activity of protein extracts and hydrolysates from dry-cured pork loins with probiotic strains of LAB,” Nutrients, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 521, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. C. E. . S. Cruxen, C. L. Braun, M. B. Fagundes et al., “Development of fermented sausage produced with mutton and native starter cultures,” LWT- Food Science and Technology, vol. 95, pp. 23–31, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. R. Casquete, M. J. Benito, A. Martín, S. Ruiz-Moyano, A. Hernández, and M. G. Córdoba, “Effect of autochthonous starter cultures in the production of “salchichon”, a traditional Iberian dry-fermented sausage, with different ripening processes,” LWT- Food Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1562–1571, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. G. Tabanelli, F. Coloretti, C. Chiavari, L. Grazia, R. Lanciotti, and F. Gardini, “Effects of starter cultures and fermentation climate on the properties of two types of typical Italian dry fermented sausages produced under industrial conditions,” Food Control, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 416–426, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. I. Ferrocino, A. Bellio, M. Giordano et al., “Shotgun metagenomics and volatilome profile of the microbiota of fermented sausages,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 84, no. 3, article e02120, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Chr Hansen, “Meat cultures,” https://www.chr-hansen.com/en/food-cultures-and-enzymes/meat-and-seafood. View at: Google Scholar
  60. Saccosystem, “Cultures for meat,” https://www.chr-hansen.com/en/food-cultures-and-enzymes/meat-and-seafood. View at: Google Scholar
  61. R. Talon, S. Leroy, I. Lebert et al., “Safety improvement and preservation of typical sensory qualities of traditional dry fermented sausages using autochthonous starter cultures,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 126, no. 1-2, pp. 227–234, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. R. Casquete, M. J. Benito, A. Martín, S. Ruiz-Moyano, E. Aranda, and M. G. Córdoba, “Microbiological quality of salchichon and chorizo, traditional Iberian dry- fermented sausages from two different industries, inoculated with autochthonous starter cultures,” Food Control, vol. 24, no. 1-2, pp. 191–198, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. S. Fonseca, A. Cachaldora, M. Gómez, I. Franco, and J. Carballo, “Effect of different autochthonous starter cultures on the volatile compounds profile and sensory properties of Galician chorizo, a traditional Spanish dry fermented sausage,” Food Control, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. Cano-García, C. Belloch, and M. Flores, “Impact of Debaryomyces hansenii strains inoculation on the quality of slow dry-cured fermented sausages,” Meat Science, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1469–1477, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. X. Chen, J. Li, T. Zhou et al., “Two efficient nitrite-reducing Lactobacillus strains isolated from traditional fermented pork (Nanx Wudl) as competitive starter cultures for Chinese fermented dry sausage,” Meat Science, vol. 121, pp. 302–309, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. Magistà, M. Ferrara, M. A. Del Nobile, D. Gammariello, A. Conte, and G. Perrone, “Penicillium salamii strain ITEM 15302: a new promising fungal starter for salami production,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 231, pp. 33–41, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. Mejri, R. Vásquez-Villanueva, M. Hassouna, M. L. Marina, and M. C. García, “Identification of peptides with antioxidant and antihypertensive capacities by RP-HPLC-Q-TOF-MS in dry fermented camel sausages inoculated with different starter cultures and ripening times,” Food Research International, vol. 100, Part 1, pp. 708–716, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. Y. Xiao, Y. Liu, C. Chen, T. Xie, and P. Li, “Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Staphylococcus xylosus on flavour development and bacterial communities in Chinese dry fermented sausages,” Food Research International, vol. 135, article 109247, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. C. V. Bis-Souza, M. Pateiro, R. Domínguez, A. L. B. Penna, J. M. Lorenzo, and A. C. S. Barretto, “Impact of fructooligosaccharides and probiotic strains on the quality parameters of low-fat Spanish Salchichón,” Meat Science, vol. 159, article 107936, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. C. Hill, F. Guarner, G. Reid et al., “The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic,” Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 506–514, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Rouhi, S. Sohrabvandi, and A. M. Mortazavian, “Probiotic fermented sausage: viability of probiotic microorganisms and sensory characteristics,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 331–348, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. C. Pasqualin Cavalheiro, C. Ruiz-Capillas, A. M. Herrero, F. Jiménez-Colmenero, C. Ragagnin de Menezes, and L. L. Martins Fries, “Application of probiotic delivery systems in meat products,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 120–131, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. N. Medina-Córdova, S. Rosales-Mendoza, L. G. Hernández-Montiel, and C. Angulo, “The potential use of Debaryomyces hansenii for the biological control of pathogenic fungi in food,” Biological Control, vol. 121, pp. 216–222, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. P. F. Cuevas-González, A. M. Liceaga, and J. E. Aguilar-Toalá, “Postbiotics and paraprobiotics: from concepts to applications,” Food Research International, vol. 136, article 109502, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. K. Arihara, “Strategies for designing novel functional meat products,” Meat Science, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 219–229, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. T. Klingberg and B. Budde, “The survival and persistence in the human gastrointestinal tract of five potential probiotic lactobacilli consumed as freeze-dried cultures or as probiotic sausage,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 109, no. 1-2, pp. 157–159, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. De Prisco and G. Mauriello, “Probiotication of foods: a focus on microencapsulation tool,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 48, pp. 27–39, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. E. Papamanoli, N. Tzanetakis, E. Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, and P. Kotzekidou, “Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a Greek dry-fermented sausage in respect of their technological and probiotic properties,” Meat Science, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 859–867, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. S. Ruiz-Moyano, A. Martín, M. J. Benito, F. P. Nevado, and M. de Guía Córdoba, “Screening of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria for potential probiotic use in Iberian dry fermented sausages,” Meat Science, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 715–721, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. R. Zhao and B. H. Kong, “Isolation and of lactic acid bacteria from Chinese-style naturally dry fermented sausages,” Science and Technology of Food Industry, vol. 34, pp. 158–160, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  81. Q. Han, B. Kong, Q. Chen, F. Sun, and H. Zhang, “In vitro comparison of probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Harbin dry sausages and selected probiotics,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 32, pp. 391–400, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. G. Reid, A. A. Gadir, and R. Dhir, “Probiotics: reiterating what they are and what they are not,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, pp. 1–6, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. M. I. Khan, M. S. Arshad, F. M. Anjum, A. Sameen, Aneeq-ur-Rehman, and W. T. Gill, “Meat as a functional food with special reference to probiotic sausages,” Food Research International, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3125–3133, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. A. Holck, L. Axelsson, A. McLeod, T. M. Rode, and E. Heir, “Health and safety considerations of fermented sausages,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 2017, Article ID 9753894, 25 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. R. Rebucci, L. Sangalli, M. Fava, C. Bersani, C. Cantoni, and A. Baldi, “Evaluation of functional aspects in Lactobacillus strains isolated from dry fermented sausages,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 187–201, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. T. Klingberg, L. Axelsson, K. Naterstad, D. Elsser, and B. B. Budde, “Identification of potential probiotic starter cultures for Scandinavian-type fermented sausages,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 419–431, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. R. Rubio, B. Martín, T. Aymerich, and M. Garriga, “The potential probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CTC1679 survives the passage through the gastrointestinal tract and its use as starter culture results in safe nutritionally enhanced fermented sausages,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 186, pp. 55–60, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. A. Jofré, T. Aymerich, and M. Garriga, “Probiotic fermented sausages: myth or reality?” Procedia Food Science, vol. 5, pp. 133–136, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. M. Ayyash, S. Q. Liu, A. al Mheiri et al., “In vitro investigation of health-promoting benefits of fermented camel sausage by novel probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum: a comparative study with beef sausages,” LWT- Food Science and Technology, vol. 99, pp. 346–354, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. P. Muthukumarasamy and R. A. Holley, “Microbiological and sensory quality of dry fermented sausages containing alginate-microencapsulated Lactobacillus reuteri,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. M. Sidira, A. Galanis, A. Nikolaou, M. Kanellaki, and Y. Kourkoutas, “Evaluation of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 protective effect against spoilage of probiotic dry-fermented sausages,” Food Control, vol. 42, pp. 315–320, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. E. Ünal Turhan, Z. Erginkaya, S. Polat, and E. A. Özer, “Design of probiotic dry fermented sausage (sucuk) production withmicroencapsulated and free cells of Lactobacillus rhamnosus,” Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 598–603, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. C. P. Barros, J. T. Guimarães, E. A. Esmerino et al., “Paraprobiotics and postbiotics: concepts and potential applications in dairy products,” Current Opinion in Food Science, vol. 32, pp. 1–8, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. N. Galante, M. Castro, M. Cayré, N. Palavecino Prpich, and C. Herman, “Towards a new generation of meat products,” in Meat Product. Chemistry, consumption and health aspects, M. Castro and M. E. Cayré, Eds., pp. 207–242, Nova Science Publisher, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  95. M. Moradi, R. Molaei, and J. T. Guimarăes, “A review on preparation and chemical analysis of postbiotics from lactic acid bacteria,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 143, article 109722, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. Moradi, S. A. Kousheh, H. Almasi et al., “Postbiotics produced by lactic acid bacteria: the next frontier in food safety,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 3390–3415, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. F. K. Lücke, “Utilization of microbes to process and preserve meat,” Meat Science, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 105–115, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. E. M. Johnson, Y. G. Jung, Y. Y. Jin, R. Jayabalan, S. H. Yang, and J. W. Suh, “Bacteriocins as food preservatives: challenges and emerging horizons,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 58, no. 16, pp. 2743–2767, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. P. M. O’Connor, T. M. Kuniyoshi, R. P. S. Oliveira, C. Hill, R. P. Ross, and P. D. Cotter, “Antimicrobials for food and feed; a bacteriocin perspective,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 61, pp. 160–167, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. R. Urso, K. Rantsiou, C. Cantoni, G. Comi, and L. Cocolin, “Technological characterization of a bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus sakei and its use in fermented sausages production,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 232–239, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. N. Xiraphi, M. Georgalaki, G. Driessche et al., “Purification and characterization of curvaticin L442, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus curvatus L442,” Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. M. P. Castro, N. Z. Palavecino, C. Herman, O. Garro, and C. Campos, “Lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal dry sausages: characterization of antibacterial compounds and study of the factors affecting bacteriocin production,” Meat Science, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 321–329, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. M. de Souza Barbosa, S. D. Todorov, I. Ivanova, J. M. Chobert, T. Haertlé, and B. de Melo Franco, “Improving safety of salami by application of bacteriocins produced by an autochthonous Lactobacillus curvatus isolate,” Food Microbiology, vol. 46, pp. 254–262, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. Mechoud, O. Álvarez, M. Cayré, M. Castro, C. Minahk, and L. Saavedra, “Sakacin G is the main responsible bacteriocin for the anti-listerial activity of meat-borne Lactobacillus curvatus ACU-1,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 67, pp. 615–621, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  105. S. D. Todorov and M. Vaz-Velho, “Isolation and characterization of plantaricin ST8SH, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH, strain isolated from Bulgarian salami,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 136, article S0168165608020178, pp. S735–S742, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. D. M. Müller, M. S. Carrasco, G. G. Tonarelli, and A. C. Simonetta, “Characterization and purification of a new bacteriocin with a broad inhibitory spectrum produced by Lactobacillus plantarum lp 31 strain isolated from dry‐fermented sausage,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 2031–2040, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. A. Kamiloğlu, G. Kaban, and M. Kaya, “Technological properties of autochthonous Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from sucuk (Turkish dry-fermented sausage),” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1279–1287, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. H. Albano, M. Oliveira, R. Aroso, N. Cubero, T. Hogg, and P. Teixeira, “Antilisterial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from “Alheiras” (traditional Portuguese fermented sausages): in situ assays,” Meat Science, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 796–800, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. T. Aymerich, M. Garriga, and J. Monfort, “Applications of protective cultures, bacteriocins and bacteriophages in fermented meat products,” in Protective Cultures, Antimicrobial Metabolites and Bacteriophages for Food and Beverage Biopreservation, C. Lacroix, Ed., pp. 297–323, Woodhead Publishing, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. A. Lauková, M. Simonová, and V. Strompfová, “Staphylococcus xylosus S03/1M/1/2, bacteriocin-producing meat starter culture or additive,” Food Control, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 970–973, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. M. Sánchez Mainar, R. Xhaferi, S. Samapundo, F. Devlieghere, and F. Leroy, “Opportunities and limitations for the production of safe fermented meats without nitrate and nitrite using an antibacterial Staphylococcus sciuri starter culture,” Food Control, vol. 69, pp. 267–274, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. A. Perczak, P. Goliński, M. Bryła, and A. Waśkiewicz, “The efficiency of lactic acid bacteria against pathogenic fungi and mycotoxins,” Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 32–45, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. B. J. Muhialdin, N. Saari, and A. S. Meor Hussin, “Review on the biological detoxification of mycotoxins using lactic acid bacteria to enhance the sustainability of foods supply,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 11, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. F. Coloretti, S. Carri, E. Armaforte, C. Chiavari, L. Grazia, and C. Zambonelli, “Antifungal activity of lactobacilli isolated from salami,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 245–250, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. M. Corbo, A. Bevilacqua, B. Speranza, M. Gallo, D. Campaniello, and M. Sinigaglia, “Selection of wild lactic acid bacteria for sausages: design of a selection protocol combining statistic tools, technological and functional properties,” LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol. 81, pp. 144–152, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. M. Álvarez, A. Rodríguez, B. Peromingo, F. Núñez, and M. Rodríguez, “Enterococcus faecium: a promising protective culture to control growth of ochratoxigenic moulds and mycotoxin production in dry-fermented sausages,” Mycotoxin Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 137–145, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. E. Cebrián, F. Núñez, F. J. Gálvez, J. Delgado, E. Bermúdez, and M. Rodríguez, “Selection and evaluation of Staphylococcus xylosus as a biocontrol agent against toxigenic moulds in a dry-cured ham model system,” Microorganisms, vol. 8, no. 6, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), “Scientific opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2012 update),” EFSA Journal, vol. 10, no. 12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. B. Peromingo, F. Núñez, A. Rodríguez, A. Alía, and M. J. Andrade, “Potential of yeasts isolated from dry-cured ham to control ochratoxin A production in meat models,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 268, pp. 73–80, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. B. Peromingo, M. J. Andrade, J. Delgado, L. Sánchez-Montero, and F. Núñez, “Biocontrol of aflatoxigenic Aspergillus parasiticus by native Debaryomyces hansenii in dry-cured meat products,” Food Microbiology, vol. 82, pp. 269–276, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. J. Delgado, R. Acosta, A. Rodríguez-Martín, E. Bermúdez, F. Núñez, and M. A. Asensio, “Growth inhibition and stability of PgAFP from Penicillium chrysogenum against fungi common on dry-ripened meat products,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 205, pp. 23–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. J. Delgado, F. Núñez, M. A. Asensio, and R. A. Owens, “Quantitative proteomic profiling of ochratoxin A repression in Penicillium nordicum by protective cultures,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 305, article 108243, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. M. Álvarez, F. Núñez, J. Delgado, M. J. Andrade, M. Rodríguez, and A. Rodríguez, “Competitiveness of three biocontrol candidates against ochratoxigenic Penicillium nordicum under dry-cured meat environmental and nutritional conditions,” Fungal Biology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 134–142, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. R. Acosta, A. Rodríguez-Martín, A. Martín, F. Núñez, and M. A. Asensio, “Selection of antifungal protein-producing molds from dry-cured meat products,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. A. Rodríguez-Martín, R. Acosta, S. Liddell, F. Núñez, M. J. Benito, and M. A. Asensio, “Characterization of the novel antifungal protein PgAFP and the encoding gene of Penicillium chrysogenum,” Peptides, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 541–547, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. J. Delgado, B. Peromingo, A. Rodríguez, and M. Rodríguez, “Biocontrol of Penicillium griseofulvum to reduce cyclopiazonic acid contamination in dry-fermented sausages,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 293, pp. 1–6, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. J. Delgado, A. Rodríguez, A. García, F. Núñez, and M. A. Asensio, “Inhibitory effect of PgAFP and protective cultures on Aspergillus parasiticus growth and aflatoxins production on dry-fermented sausage and cheese,” Microorganisms, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. L. Brown, E. V. Pingitore, F. Mozzi, L. Saavedra, J. M. Villegas, and E. M. Hebert, “Lactic acid bacteria as cell factories for the generation of bioactive peptides,” Protein & Peptide Letters, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 146–155, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. T. Lafarga and M. Hayes, “Bioactive peptides from meat muscle and by-products: generation, functionality and application as functional ingredients,” Meat Science, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 227–239, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. R. di Bernardini, P. Harnedy, D. Bolton et al., “Antioxidant and antimicrobial peptidic hydrolysates from muscle protein sources and by-products,” Food Chemistry, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 1296–1307, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. E. Escudero, L. Mora, P. D. Fraser, M. C. Aristoy, and F. Toldrá, “Identification of novel antioxidant peptides generated in Spanish dry-cured ham,” Food Chemistry, vol. 138, no. 2–3, pp. 1282–1288, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. L. Mora, E. Escudero, M. C. Aristoy, and F. Toldrá, “A peptidomic approach to study the contribution of added casein proteins to the peptide profile in Spanish dry-fermented sausages,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 212, pp. 41–48, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. J. E. Christensen, E. G. Dudley, J. A. Pederson, and J. L. Steele, “Peptidases and amino acid catabolism in lactic acid bacteria,” Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 76, no. 1/4, pp. 217–246, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. M. Flores and F. Toldrá, “Microbial enzymatic activities for improved fermented meats,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 2–3, pp. 81–90, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. C. M. López, E. Bru, G. M. Vignolo, and S. G. Fadda, “Identification of small peptides arising from hydrolysis of meat proteins in dry fermented sausages,” Meat Science, vol. 104, pp. 20–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. M. Fernández, M. J. Benito, A. Martín, R. Casquete, J. J. Córdoba, and M. G. Córdoba, “Influence of starter culture and a protease on the generation of ACE-inhibitory and antioxidant bioactive nitrogen compounds in Iberian dry-fermented sausage “salchichón”,” Heliyon, vol. 2, no. 3, article 00093, p. e00093, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. E. S. Inguglia, Z. Zhang, B. K. Tiwari, J. P. Kerry, and C. M. Burgess, “Salt reduction strategies in processed meat products - a review,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 59, pp. 70–78, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. F. Wirth, “Reducing the common salt content of meat products: possible methods and their limitations,” Fleischwirtschaft, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 589–593, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  139. H. Mora-Gallego, M. D. Guàrdia, X. Serra, P. Gou, and J. Arnau, “Sensory characterisation and consumer acceptability of potassium chloride and sunflower oil addition in small-caliber non-acid fermented sausages with a reduced content of sodium chloride and fat,” Meat Science, vol. 112, pp. 9–15, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. H. Mora-Gallego, X. Serra, M. D. Guàrdia, and J. Arnau, “Effect of reducing and replacing pork fat on the physicochemical, instrumental and sensory characteristics throughout storage time of small caliber non-acid fermented sausages with reduced sodium content,” Meat Science, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. M. Laranjo, A. Gomes, A. Agulheiro-Santos et al., “Characterisation of “Catalao” and “Salsichao” Portuguese traditional sausages with salt reduction,” Meat Science, vol. 116, pp. 34–42, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. M. Aliño, R. Grau, F. Toldrá, E. Blesa, M. J. Pagán, and J. M. Barat, “Physicochemical properties and microbiology of dry-cured loins obtained by partial sodium replacement with potassium, calcium and magnesium,” Meat Science, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 580–588, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. M. Laranjo, A. Gomes, A. C. Agulheiro-Santos et al., “Impact of salt reduction on biogenic amines, fatty acids, microbiota, texture and sensory profile in traditional blood dry-cured sausages,” Food Chemistry, vol. 218, pp. 129–136, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. M. A. de Almeida, E. Saldaña, J. S. da Silva Pinto et al., “A peptidomic approach of meat protein degradation in a low-sodium fermented sausage model using autochthonous starter cultures,” Food Research International, vol. 109, pp. 368–379, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. T. Bolumar, S. Toepfl, and V. Heinz, “Fat reduction and replacement in dry-cured fermented sausage by using high pressure processing meat as fat replacer and olive oil,” Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 175–182, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. A. Olivares, J. L. Navarro, and M. Flores, “Effect of fat content on aroma generation during processing of dry fermented sausages,” Meat Science, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 264–273, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. A. Olivares, J. L. Navarro, A. Salvador, and M. Flores, “Sensory acceptability of slow fermented sausages based on fat content and ripening time,” Meat Science, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 251–257, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. R. Rubio, A. Jofré, T. Aymerich, M. D. Guàrdia, and M. Garriga, “Nutritionally enhanced fermented sausages as a vehicle for potential probiotic lactobacilli delivery,” Meat Science, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 937–942, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. H. Mora-Gallego, X. Serra, M. D. Guàrdia, R. Miklos, R. Lametsch, and J. Arnau, “Effect of the type of fat on the physicochemical, instrumental and sensory characteristics of reduced fat non-acid fermented sausages,” Meat Science, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 668–674, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. S. Corral, A. Salvador, C. Belloch, and M. Flores, “Effect of fat and salt reduction on the sensory quality of slow fermented sausages inoculated with Debaryomyces hansenii yeast,” Food Control, vol. 45, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. S. Corral, A. Salvador, C. Belloch, and M. Flores, “Improvement the aroma of reduced fat and salt fermented sausages by Debaromyces hansenii inoculation,” Food Control, vol. 47, pp. 526–535, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. “EC (2020) European Commission,” December 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/food-safety-and-quality/certification/quality-labels/quality-schemes-explained_en. View at: Google Scholar
  153. WIPO, “World Intellectual Property Organization (2020),” December 2020, https://www.wipo.int/geo_indications/en/. View at: Google Scholar
  154. A. de Massis, F. Frattini, J. Kotlar, A. M. Petruzzelli, and M. Wright, “Innovation through tradition: lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research,” Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 93–116, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. A. Messeni Petruzzelli and T. Savino, “Search, recombination, and innovation: lessons from haute cuisine,” Long Range Planning, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 224–238, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. P. Adler, “The dynamic relationship between tacit and codified knowledge: comments on Nonaka’s managing innovation as a knowledge creation process,” in International Handbook of Technology Management, G. Pogorel and J. Allouche, Eds., pp. 110–124, Edward Elgar Publishing, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  157. K. Dampney, P. Busch, and D. Richards, “The meaning of tacit knowledge,” Australian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Noelia Zulema Palavecino Prpich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views236
Downloads242
Citations

Related articles