Research Article
Global Alignment of Pairwise Protein Interaction Networks for Maximal Common Conserved Patterns
Table 3
A comparison of NetworkBLAST and HopeMap for yeast/fly.
| Methods | Specificity (%) in GO | Specificity (%) in KO | Specificity (%) in INPARANOID | Number of GO categories enriched | Total conserved regions | Unique proteins in alignment graph |
| 1. NetworkBLAST [15] | | | | | | | S. cerevisiae | 94.87 | N/A | 100 | 54 | 117 | 348 | D. melanogaster | 84.62 | N/A | 100 | 43 | 117 | 256 | 2. HopeMap-bestPairs | | | | | | | S. cerevisiae | 97.18 | N/A | 100 | 51 | 71 | 1314 | D. melanogaster | 76.06 | N/A | 100 | 34 | 71 | 1314 | 3. HopeMap—data from 1 | | | | | | | S. cerevisiae | 98.73 | N/A | 100 | 54 | 79 | 1645 | D. melanogaster | 78.48 | N/A | 100 | 39 | 79 | 1913 | 4. HopeMap-KO | | | | | | | S. cerevisiae | 100.00 | 100 | N/A | 20 | 26 | 747 | D. melanogaster | 92.31 | 100 | N/A | 19 | 26 | 753 |
|
|