Proteome Analysis for Understanding Abiotic Stress (Salinity and Drought) Tolerance in Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
Table 3
Identified proteins (when the protein was found in several spots only the most intensively changed spot is listed; the exception is RubisCO fragments). (A) Spots with higher abundance in stress compared to control. (B) Spots with lower abundance. The spots written in bold were significantly changed in both stresses. The rest of the spots changed significantly only in salt stress.
Spot number
Average ratio SS
Average ratio DS
Protein name (organism)
Molecular weight (kDa)
Protein score
Number of peptides
(A) Spots with higher abundance in stress compared to control
2021
3.32
2.02
ATP synthase alpha subunit (Phoenix dactylifera)
18618
99
1
1788
3.3
2.03
ATP synthase CF1 beta chain (Phoenix dactylifera)
53847
1339
18
4041
2.45
1.12
Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn], chloroplastic OS = Vitis vinifera GN = SODCP PE = 2 SV = 1
21.7
117
2
(B) Spots with lower abundance in stress compared to control
3061
Chlorophyll A-B binding protein (CAB), putative (Musa acuminata)
28055
152
2
3765
Light-harvesting complex I protein Lhca1 (Populus trichocarpa)
26532
136
2
2919
Unknown protein 18
1393
125
2
2796
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large Subunit-fragment (Phoenix dactylifera)
