Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Genomics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2152847, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2152847
Research Article

Novel Graphical Analyses of Runs of Homozygosity among Species and Livestock Breeds

1Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Section of Biology and Environmental Engineering, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
2Aalborg Zoo, Mølleparkvej 63, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
3Mammal Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences, Ul. Waszkiewicza 1, 17-230 Białowieża, Poland
4Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, C/Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
5Department of Animal Genetics, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
6Animal & Biosciences Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland

Received 14 December 2015; Accepted 28 September 2016

Academic Editor: Graziano Pesole

Copyright © 2016 Laura Iacolina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. W. Bjelland, K. A. Weigel, N. Vukasinovic, and J. D. Nkrumah, “Evaluation of inbreeding depression in Holstein cattle using whole-genome SNP markers and alternative measures of genomic inbreeding,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 4697–4706, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Wright, “Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship,” The American Naturalist, vol. 56, no. 645, pp. 330–338, 1922. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. O. González-Recio, E. López de Maturana, and J. P. Gutiérrez, “Inbreeding depression on female fertility and calving ease in spanish dairy cattle,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 5744–5752, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Sommer, “The importance of immune gene variability (MHC) in evolutionary ecology and conservation,” Frontiers in Zoology, vol. 2, article 16, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Gandini, A. Stella, M. Del Corvo, and G. B. Jansen, “Selection with inbreeding control in simulated young bull schemes for local dairy cattle breeds,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 1790–1798, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. McQuillan, A.-L. Leutenegger, R. Abdel-Rahman et al., “Runs of homozygosity in European populations,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 359–372, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Gibson, N. E. Morton, and A. Collins, “Extended tracts of homozygosity in outbred human populations,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 789–795, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Bosse, H.-J. Megens, O. Madsen et al., “Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e1003100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. C. Purfield, D. P. Berry, S. McParland, and D. G. Bradley, “Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle,” BMC Genetics, vol. 13, article 70, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Ferencakovic, E. Hamzic, B. Gredler, I. Curik, and J. Sölkner, “Runs of homozygosity reveal genomewide autozygosity in the Austrian Fleckvieh cattle,” Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 325–328, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Ferenčaković, E. Hamzić, B. Gredler et al., “Estimates of autozygosity derived from runs of homozygosity: empirical evidence from selected cattle populations,” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 286–293, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Ferenčaković, J. Sölkner, and I. Curik, “Estimating autozygosity from high-throughput information: effects of SNP density and genotyping errors,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 45, no. 1, article 42, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Iacolina, M. Scandura, D. J. Goedbloed et al., “Genomic diversity and differentiation of a managed island wild boar population,” Heredity, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. M. Slatis, “An analysis of inbreeding in the European bison,” Genetics, vol. 45, pp. 275–287, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Purcell, B. Neale, K. Todd-Brown et al., “Plink: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 559–575, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Kirin, R. McQuillan, C. S. Franklin, H. Campbell, P. M. McKeigue, and J. F. Wilson, “Genomic runs of homozygosity record population history and consanguinity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 11, Article ID e13996, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Oleński, M. Tokarska, D. M. Hering et al., “Genome-wide association study for posthitis in the free-living population of European bison (Bison bonasus),” Biology Direct, vol. 10, no. 2, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Tokarska, C. Pertoldi, R. Kowalczyk, and K. Perzanowski, “Genetic status of the European bison Bison bonasus after extinction in the wild and subsequent recovery,” Mammal Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. E. Pryce, M. Haile-Mariam, M. E. Goddard, and B. J. Hayes, “Identification of genomic regions associated with inbreeding depression in Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle,” Genetics Selection Evolution, vol. 46, article 71, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. J. McTavish, J. E. Decker, R. D. Schnabel, J. F. Taylor, and D. M. Hillis, “New World cattle show ancestry from multiple independent domestication events,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 15, pp. E1398–E1406, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. The Bovine HapMap Consortium, “Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds,” Science, vol. 324, no. 5926, pp. 528–532, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. W. M. Muir, H.-W. Cheng, and C. Croney, “Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 5, article 407, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. M. Rauw and L. Gomez-Raya, “Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 6, article 310, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Canu, S. Costa, L. Iacolina, P. Piatti, M. Apollonio, and M. Scandura, “Are captive wild boar more introgressed than free-ranging wild boar? Two case studies in Italy,” European Journal of Wildlife Research, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 459–467, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. R. Kharzinova, A. A. Sermyagin, E. A. Gladyr, I. M. Okhlopkov, G. Brem, and N. A. Zinovieva, “A study of applicability of SNP chips developed for bovine and ovine species to whole-genome analysis of reindeer Rangifer tarandus,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 758–761, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. F. Alpay, Y. Zare, M. H. Kamalludin et al., “Genome-wide association study of susceptibility to infection by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Holstein cattle,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, Article ID e111704, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. R. Porto-Neto, A. Reverter, K. C. Prayaga et al., “The genetic architecture of climatic adaptation of tropical cattle,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 11, Article ID e113284, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. N. Kristensen, A. A. Hoffmann, C. Pertoldi, and A. V. Stronen, “What can livestock breeders learn from conservation genetics and vice versa?” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 5, article 38, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Holló, K. Nuernberg, T. Somogyi, I. Anton, and I. Holló, “Comparison of fattening performance and slaughter value of local Hungarian cattle breeds to international breeds,” Archiv für Tierzucht, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. P. Howrigan, M. A. Simonson, and M. C. Keller, “Detecting autozygosity through runs of homozygosity: a comparison of three autozygosity detection algorithms,” BMC Genomics, vol. 12, article 460, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. B. Andrews, J. E. Fullarton, N. A. Holtzman, and A. G. Motulsky, Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  32. I. Medugorac, C. E. Veit-Kensch, J. Ramljak et al., “Conservation priorities of genetic diversity in domesticated metapopulations: a study in taurine cattle breeds,” Ecology and Evolution, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 408–420, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. S. Agerholm, C. Bendixen, O. Andersen, and J. Arnbjerg, “Complex vertebral malformation in Holstein calves,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 283–289, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. M. VanRaden, K. M. Olson, D. J. Null, and J. L. Hutchison, “Harmful recessive effects on fertility detected by absence of homozygous haplotypes,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 6153–6161, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Charlier, J. S. Agerholm, W. Coppieters et al., “A deletion in the bovine FANCI gene compromises fertility by causing fetal death and brachyspina,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 8, Article ID e43085, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Hoffmann, “Climate change and the characterization, breeding and conservation of animal genetic resources,” Animal Genetics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 32–46, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. K. Matukumalli, C. T. Lawley, R. D. Schnabel et al., “Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID e5350, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus