International Journal of Genomics

International Journal of Genomics / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 7658910 |

Jianli Wang, Zhenying Wu, Zhongbao Shen, Zetao Bai, Peng Zhong, Lichao Ma, Duofeng Pan, Ruibo Zhang, Daoming Li, Hailing Zhang, Chunxiang Fu, Guiqing Han, Changhong Guo, "Genome-Wide Identification, Phylogeny, and Expression Analysis of ARF Genes Involved in Vegetative Organs Development in Switchgrass", International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2018, Article ID 7658910, 13 pages, 2018.

Genome-Wide Identification, Phylogeny, and Expression Analysis of ARF Genes Involved in Vegetative Organs Development in Switchgrass

Academic Editor: Graziano Pesole
Received16 Oct 2017
Accepted11 Apr 2018
Published29 Apr 2018


Auxin response factors (ARFs) have been reported to play vital roles during plant growth and development. In order to reveal specific functions related to vegetative organs in grasses, an in-depth study of the ARF gene family was carried out in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), a warm-season C4 perennial grass that is mostly used as bioenergy and animal feedstock. A total of 47 putative ARF genes (PvARFs) were identified in the switchgrass genome (2n = 4x = 36), 42 of which were anchored to the seven pairs of chromosomes and found to be unevenly distributed. Sixteen PvARFs were predicted to be potential targets of small RNAs (microRNA160 and 167). Phylogenetically speaking, PvARFs were divided into seven distinct subgroups based on the phylogeny, exon/intron arrangement, and conserved motif distribution. Moreover, 15 pairs of PvARFs have different temporal-spatial expression profiles in vegetative organs (2nd, 3rd, and 4th internode and leaves), which implies that different PvARFs have specific functions in switchgrass growth and development. In addition, at least 14 pairs of PvARFs respond to naphthylacetic acid (NAA) treatment, which might be helpful for us to study on auxin response in switchgrass. The comprehensive analysis, described here, will facilitate the future functional analysis of ARF genes in grasses.

1. Introduction

Auxin, an essential plant hormone, plays vital roles in various aspects of plant growth and development, such as embryogenesis, organogenesis, tropic growth, shoot elongation, root architecture, flower and fruit development, tissue and organ patterning, and vascular development [19]. Most of these processes are controlled by auxin response genes, which are regulated at transcriptional level by cis-acting DNA elements in their promoter regions, including the auxin response element (AuxRE, TGTCTC), core of auxin response region (AuxRR-core, GGTCCAT), and TGA-element (AACGAC). Of these, AuxREs are reported to be specifically bound and regulated by a class of transcription factors, called auxin response factors (ARFs) [10, 11]. ARF proteins generally contain a DNA-binding domain (DBD) in the amino (N)-terminal region, a central region that functions as an activation domain (AD) or a repression domain (RD) [12, 13], and a carboxyl (C)-terminal dimerization domain (CTD), which is a protein-protein interaction domain that mediates ARF homo- and heterodimerization and also the heterodimerization of ARF and Aux/IAA proteins, another category of auxin response regulators [1216].

Because of their important roles in auxin signaling pathways, which are indispensable to plant growth and development, ARF gene families have been studied in many plant species. For example, there are 23 ARF transcription factors in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) [17], 25 in rice (Oryza sativa) [18], 39 in poplar (Populus trichocarpa) [19], 24 in Medicago truncatula [20], and 36 in maize (Zea mays) [21]. In previous studies, ARF proteins were split into three clades (clades A, B, and C) based on phylogenic relationships, which could be traced back to the origin of land plants [22]. In particular, phylogenetic analysis of the ARF gene family in many species has been widely reported. Arabidopsis ARFs were divided into four subgroups, which is in accordance with the phylogenetic classifications of ARFs in rice [18], banana (Musa acuminata L.) [23] and Salvia miltiorrhiza [24]. Maize and poplar ARFs are classified to six subgroups [25], whereas Medicago ARFs were divided into eight subgroups [20]. In general, the wide variety of ARF phylogenetic grouping patterns are based on the diversification of its gene structure and motif locations, which may be the result of gene truncation or alternative splicing [22].

Biochemical and genetic analyses have established the crucial roles of ARF genes in plant growth and development. In Arabidopsis thaliana, AtARF2 regulates floral organ abscission, leaf senescence, and seed size and weight [2628]. AtARF5 affects vascular development and early embryo formation [29]. AtARF8 controls the uncoupling of fruit development from pollination and fertilization, and loss-of-function mutations in these genes result in seedless fruit [30]. AtARF7 and AtARF19 redundantly regulate auxin-mediated lateral root development [31]. In rice, OsARF1 is required for vegetative and reproductive development [32]. OsARF16 is essential for iron and phosphate deficiency responses in rice [33]. In addition, some ARF genes are involved in the response to abiotic stresses, such as drought, salt, or cold stress [34, 35]. Taken together, these studies have shown that the ARF gene family function in multiple signal transduction pathways to regulate multiple aspects of plant growth and development.

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a warm-season C4 perennial grass used as a bioenergy and animal feedstock [36, 37]. To avoid competing with food crops for arable fields, a large proportion of switchgrass fields will be located on marginal lands where various abiotic stresses, such as salt, drought, and extreme temperatures. The genome sequence of switchgrass has been published recently [38] and provides a powerful resource to identify ARF gene family members. Considering the value of switchgrass as a bioenergy and animal feedstock, we mainly focused on vegetative organs in this study.

Here, we identified 47 switchgrass ARF genes and comprehensively characterized the physical location, conserved motif architecture, and expression profile of the PvARFs. We also subdivided these 47 PvARF genes based on phylogenetic relationships based on the well-studied ARF genes in other species. To determine which ARF genes potentially work on different developmental processes, the temporal-spatial expression pattern in vegetative organs (2nd, 3rd, and 4th internode and leaves) and expression response to auxin treatment in seedlings were determined by real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Our works provide preliminary information about ARF genes in switchgrass and lays the foundation for the further elucidation of the biological roles of ARF genes in grasses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

A widely used and highly productive lowland-type switchgrass cultivar, Alamo, was grown in the greenhouse at 28 ± 1°C with 16 h lighting, followed by 8 h darkness. Switchgrass development in our greenhouse was divided into three vegetative stages (V1, V2, and V3), five elongation stages (E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5), and three reproductive stages (R1, R2, and R3). Six different tissues, including the second internode (I2), the third internode (I3), the fourth internode (I4), the second leaf (L2), the third leaf (L3), and the fourth leaf (L4), were collected at the R2 stage [39].

For auxin treatments, plantlets grown in tissue culture until 20 days after rooting were incubated for 1, 2, and 3 h in hormone-supplemented 5 μM naphthylacetic acid (NAA) medium [18]. Control plants were grown in hormone-free medium. Whole seedlings were sampled from NAA-treated and control plants at the same time points. All experiments included three biological replicates. All of the samples were stored at −80°C.

2.2. Sequence Retrieval and Identification

The conserved ARF domain based on the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) (Pfam06507) was obtained from the Pfam protein family database ( and used as a query to search against the switchgrass genome database in Phytozome v11 ( Sequences were selected for further analysis if the E value was less than 1e-10. Several coding sequences (CDS) were corrected based on the switchgrass unique transcript sequence database [38]. Peptide length, molecular weight, and isoelectric point of each PvARF were calculated using the online ExPASy program (

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The putative PvARF proteins from another fifteen species were used to construct a phylogenetic tree. ARF protein sequences were obtained from the public genome database Phytozome. The BlastP program was used to identify putative ARF proteins from the genomic databases of well-sequenced species, including Arabidopsis, sweet orange (Citrus sinensis), Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa), poplar, Medicago (Medicago truncatula), cotton (Gossypium raimondii), Grandis (Eucalyptus grandis), soybean, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), grape (Vitis vinifera), maize, rice, foxtail millet (Setaria italica), sorghum (Sorghum vulgare), and Brachypodium distachyon. Multiple sequence alignments of the full-length ARF sequences were performed using Clustal X1.83, and the edges of the alignments were manually trimmed. An unrooted neighbor-joining (bootstrap value = 1000) tree was constructed using MEGA5 and then manually improved by online program EvolView (

2.4. Chromosomal Locations of PvARF Genes

The lowland switchgrass cultivars are allotetraploid (2n = 4x = 36) and consist of two highly homologous subgenomes, designated as Chr.a and Chr.b [40]. Specific physical locations of each PvARF were obtained from the Phytozome database. Chromosome locations were then determined using MapChart 2.2 based on the genetic linkage map [41, 42]. Tandem gene duplicates were defined as paralogous genes located within 50 kb and separated by fewer than five nonhomologous spacer genes [43].

2.5. Gene Structure, Conserved Motif, and Cis-Acting DNA Element Analysis

A comparison of each CDS with the corresponding genomic DNA sequence was made to determine the positions and numbers of introns and exons of each PvARF gene using the Gene Structure Display Server ( Conserved motifs were analyzed using the MEME program ( Putative microRNA target sites in PvARFs were identified using the miRanda online software ( Cis-acting DNA elements were analyzed using the PLACE online program ( [44]. Ka/Ks calculation was analyzed by PAL2NAL [45].

2.6. Gene Expression Analysis by qRT-PCR

Probesets of PvARF genes were retrieved from public database of switchgrass ( qRT-PCR was performed to analyze the transcript abundance of PvARFs in different switchgrass tissue samples. Plant tissue samples were ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Total RNA was isolated using the TRIZOL reagent according to the manufacturer’s supplied protocol (Transgen, China) and subjected to reverse transcription with Superscript PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, China) after treatment with TURBO DNase I (TaKaRa, China). The qRT-PCR primers were designed using Primer Premier 5 (Table S1), and their specificity was verified by PCR. qRT-PCR analysis was conducted in triplicate using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa, Japan), with PvUBQ as a reference gene, with a Light Cycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche, Switzerland). The qRT-PCR reactions and data analyses were performed according to previously published methods [46].

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Chromosomal Localization of Switchgrass ARFs

To identify ARF proteins in switchgrass, the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of the conserved ARF domain (Pfam06507) was used as a query to search against the publicly available switchgrass genome database (Phytozome v11) by BlastP and tBlastN program. A total of 47 putative ARF proteins were found, and Pfam analysis confirmed that all of these proteins contain the ARF domain. The putative candidates were designated as PvARF1 to PvARF47, based on the alignments of predicted amino acid sequences. The predicted PvARF proteins ranged from 243 (PvARF34) to 1182 (PvARF13) amino acids (aa) in length and from 27.4 kDa to 130.9 kDa in molecular weight (Table 1). The isoelectric points (pI) ranged from 5.33 (PvARF8) to 9.52 (PvARF25) (Table 1), suggesting that different PvARFs might have roles in specific subcellular environments.

Gene nameaGene IDbORF length (bp)cDeduced polypeptidedNumber of introneChrfChr locationsg
Length (aa)MW (kDa)pl


aNames referred to the identified PvARF genes in switchgrass in this work. bThe alias of each ARF gene in iTAG 2.30 genome annotation. cLength of open reading frame in base pairs. dThe number of amino acids, molecular weight (kilodaltons), and isoelectric point of deduced polypeptide calculated by DNASTAR. eThe number of intron. f,gChromosome location from Phytozome (

To examine the chromosomal distribution of PvARFs, the physical locations of the PvARFs on chromosomes (Chrs) were obtained through BlastN searches against the switchgrass genome database in Phytozome. Due to the allotetraploidization of switchgrass (2n = 4x = 36), the PvARF genes exist as paralogous gene pairs in the genome with only one exception, PvARF39, which might be lost in the evolutionary process. Of the 47 PvARFs, 42 were putatively anchored onto seven of the nine switchgrass chromosomes (Figure 1), while the other five PvARFs (PvARF19, 20, 39, 42, and 43) are located on unmapped scaffolds. The chromosomal distribution and density of PvARF genes are not uniform. Chr 1, 4, 5, and 7 contain four PvARF gene pairs, respectively. Chr 3 has three pairs, Chr 6 and 9 have only one pair of PvARFs, and no gene is located on Chr 2 and 8. Consistent with expectations, 14 gene pairs obviously exist on the two set of chromosomes (Figure 1), while the other 7 gene pairs were putatively located on the chromosomes based on their sequence similarity. The indeed relationships among these PvARFs need to be explained by phylogenetic analysis.

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of Switchgrass ARFs

To profoundly characterize the phylogenetic relationships of ARF proteins among switchgrass and other land plants, we selected ARFs from another 15 species, which have public genome database in Phytozome, to construct a phylogenetic tree together with PvARFs. These species include five monocots (foxtail millet, maize, sorghum, Brachypodium, and rice) and ten dicots (Arabidopsis, sweet orange, Chinese cabbage, poplar, cotton, soybean, Medicago, tomato, Grandis, and grape). Seven separate clusters of ARF proteins were defined based on the NJ tree topology and bootstrap values (higher than 50%) (Figure 2). As previously reported by Finet et al., three large groups of ARF proteins were classified as clades A, B, and C. In detail, clusters I and II in our study together make up clade C, and clusters III, IV, and V make up clade A. ARF members in these two clades are considered to be more ancient than those in clade B [22], which comprises clusters VI and VII in our study.

Considering that switchgrass is an allotetraploid plant, the gene number of PvARFs in each cluster should be approximately twice than the other monocots, especially in foxtail millet, the most closely relatives to switchgrass among the selected species (Table S2). Cluster VII, which has the largest number (11 out of 47) of PvARFs, contains six foxtail millet ARFs. Cluster I, III, IV, and VI also contain eight switchgrass and four foxtail millet ARFs, and clusters II and V have only two PvARFs, respectively (Table S2). PvARF39 in cluster VII is most closely related to the foxtail millet ARF protein Seita.8G135700.1, which indicates that the paralog of PvARF39 has been lost or mutated gradually during the evolutionary process of switchgrass genome.

In order to comprehensively clarify the evolutionary process of the PvARFs, we carried out the tandem repeat duplication analysis based on the chromosomal location and phylogenetic analysis of the PvARFs. The results showed that no tandem repeat duplication events were found in PvARFs. In addition, we calculated the Ka/Ks analysis between PvARFs and OsARFs. Compared with rice ARF genes, 18 pairs of orthologs originated from positive selection (Ka/Ks ratio was larger than 1), while 6 orthologs showed purifying selection (Ka/Ks ratio was less than 1) (Table 2).

OthologsKa/Ks ratioSelection pattern

PvARF1 (2) versus OsARF251.61Positive selection
PvARF3 (4) versus OsARF698.11Positive selection
PvARF5 (6) versus OsARF172.19Positive selection
PvARF8 (7) versus OsARF1276.96Positive selection
PvARF10 (9) versus OsARF1699.00Positive selection
PvARF11 (12) versus OsARF210.54Purifying selection
PvARF14 (13) versus OsARF197.51Positive selection
PvARF15 (16) versus OsARF59.13Positive selection
PvARF17 (18) versus OsARF110.44Purifying selection
PvARF19 (20) versus OsARF133.91Positive selection
PvARF21 (22) versus OsARF2214.81Positive selection
PvARF23 (24) versus OsARF180.93Purifying selection
PvARF25 (26) versus OsARF82.14Positive selection
PvARF27 (28) versus OsARF100.06Purifying selection
PvARF30 (29) versus OsARF152.81Positive selection
PvARF31 (32) versus OsARF23.32Positive selection
PvARF33 (34) versus OsARF143.81Positive selection
PvARF36 (35) versus OsARF33.99Positive selection
PvARF38 (37) versus OsARF240.29Purifying selection
PvARF39 versus OsARF231.22Positive selection
PvARF40 (41) versus OsARF40.61Purifying selection
PvARF42 (43) versus OsARF11.75Positive selection
PvARF45 (44) versus OsARF799.00Positive selection
PvARF47 (46) versus OsARF92.38Positive selection

3.3. PvARF Gene Structures and Locations of Conserved Motif

To better understand the phylogenetic relationships of the PvARFs, the exon/intron arrangements were determined by aligning cDNA sequences to genomic sequences. Another phylogenetic tree was firstly constructed only using switchgrass ARF protein sequences. The PvARF genes were clearly displayed in the form of gene pairs (Figure 3(a)), which confirmed the previous speculation in the chromosomal distribution (Figure 1). All PvARFs have introns in the coding sequence (CDS), and the number of introns ranges from 2 to 14 (Table 1, Figure 3(b)). In particular, members belonging to clade C (clusters I and II) contain relatively fewer introns (two to four). In contrast, PvARFs in clade A (clusters III, IV, and V) have much more introns (11 to 14), with the exception of PvARF2, which might have lost the exons in N-terminus. The number of introns in clade B (clusters VI and VII) were ranging from 5 to 13. This variability of intron number might be correlated to the multiple functions of clade B ARFs in higher plants. Additionally, we further identified the putative microRNA target sites of ARF genes in switchgrass. 16 out of 47 PvARFs were found to contain the potential microRNA target sites. Eight PvARFs were predicted to be the targets of miR160 and miR167, respectively (Figure 3(b), Figure 4).

Analysis of motif locations in PvARF proteins was performed to explore structural diversity and to predict their functions. A total of 12 conserved motifs were identified using the MEME program (Figure 3(c), Figure S1). The DNA-binding domain (DBD) (motifs 1, 2, and 9 corresponding to Pfam02362) was lost in four members (PvARF22, 25, 25, and 38). The ARF domain (motifs 3, 5, 8, and 11 corresponding to Pfam06507) exists in all PvARFs. The AUX/IAA domain (motifs 4 and 10 corresponding to cl03528) has been lost in almost all of the PvARFs in clusters I, II, and VI. These results confirm the phylogenetic relationship between the PvARFs in clades A/C and B and indicate that there has been functional differentiation among PvARFs in different clusters.

3.4. Expression Patterns of PvARFs in Different Organs of Switchgrass

To analyze the expression levels of PvARFs, we firstly acquired the probesets of the PvARFs in switchgrass expression atlas from the public database [38]. The results showed that PvARFs were expressed in root, node, internode, leaf, leaf sheath, flower, and seed but with different expression profile of each PvARF gene. For example, PvARF3/4, 11/12, and 46/47 were highly expressed in all tested organs, while PvARF1/2, 9/10, 19/20, and 33/34 were extremely lowly expressed in switchgrass (Figure 5).

Biomass yield is one of the most important criteria used to evaluate the quality of switchgrass. Vegetative organs, especially internodes and leaves, are the primary sources of biomass. Auxin is one of the most important phytohormone, which regulate the plant growth and development. To investigate whether and how PvARFs work on vegetative organs, we selected the second, the third, and the fourth internode and the corresponding leaves at the second reproductive (R2) stage to test the expression profile of the PvARFs by qRT-PCR analysis. Eight pairs of PvARF genes and PvARF39 are not expressed or are extremely lowly expressed in the tested tissues, whereas the other 15 pairs of PvARF genes show substantial expression in internodes and leaves. In internodes, 14 pairs of PvARFs have higher expression levels in the upper internode (I4) than the other two internodes (I2 and I3), with one exception (PvARF17/18) having no obvious difference in the expression level in the three internodes (Figure 6). In leaves, ten pairs of PvARF genes (PvARF3/4, 15/16, 21/22, 23/24, 29/30, 35/36, 37/38, 40/41, 44/45, and 46/47) show no significant changes in expression level in the three tested leaves. There was lower expression of PvARF5/6, 7/8, and 17/18 in the upper leaf (L4) than in the bottom leaves (L2 or L3), whereas PvARF11/12 and 42/43 are more highly expressed in L4 compared to L2, and even lower expression is observed in L3 (Figure 6). These results suggest that the biosynthesis and transport of endogenous auxin in switchgrass might affect the expression profile of PvARF genes, especially in the internode.

3.5. Expression Analysis of PvARFs in Response to Auxin Treatment

In order to clarify the biofunctions of PvARF proteins, cis-acting DNA elements were analyzed using 2 kb promoter sequence of PvARFs. The results showed that PvARFs in different clades were putatively involved in specific process. For example, PvARFs in clade A might participate in nodule formation, while clade B genes function on wounding response (Table S3). However, all of the PvARF proteins mostly tended to be involved in plant growth and development, such as phytohormone signaling, abiotic stress response, carbon metabolism, pollen development, and so on (Table S3).

As a key component of the auxin signaling pathway, ARF proteins play vital roles in auxin response. It has been reported that auxin induces or represses the expression of some ARF genes in Arabidopsis [31], rice [18], and maize [21]. To examine the response of PvARF genes to the exogenous auxin, one-month-old switchgrass seedlings were treated with 5 μM NAA for 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours, and the expression patterns of the PvARFs were determined. The qRT-PCR results revealed that auxin repressed the expression of eleven pairs of genes (PvARF5/6, 7/8, 11/12, 15/16, 29/30, 35/36, 37/38, 40/41, 42/43, 44/45, and 46/47) at all three time points, whereas it induced the expression of three pairs of genes (PvARF3/4, 23/24, and 25/26) at 1 hour and then reduced at the latter two time points. In contrast, PvARF21/22 expression was not significantly affected by auxin (Figure 7). These results suggest that exogenous auxin could induce or repress the expression of most PvARF genes to regulate switchgrass growth and development.

4. Discussion

Extensive studies have shown that ARFs play crucial roles in plant growth and developmental processes [10]. However, a systematic analysis of ARF gene members in switchgrass has not been done. In this study, we identified 47 PvARF genes, almost twice than Arabidopsis (23) and rice (25) [18, 31], for the reason of allopolyploidization in switchgrass evolutionary process [41]. Gene structure analysis showed that the number of exons in PvARF genes ranged from 3 to 14, while similar results were found in Arabidopsis [31], rice [18], and tomato [9], which indicates that the plant ARF gene family has highly conserved structures and potentially similar functions across dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plant species.

Based on phylogenetic analysis, 47 switchgrass ARF genes were assigned to seven separate clusters, which was similar to the previous studies [22]. The number of ARFs of switchgrass in each cluster was about twice than those of five other monocots (maize, rice, sorghum, foxtail millet, and Brachypodium) but not consistent with the number of ARFs in ten dicot species (Arabidopsis, citrus, Chinese cabbage, poplar, cotton, soybean, Medicago, tomato, Grandis, and grape), which indicates that differences in the evolution of ARF genes in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. According to the phylogenetic tree of ARFs from different species, the orthologous relationship was found to dramatically divorce. In cluster V (PvARF17/18-AtARF5-CiARF5-BrARF5-1/5-3-PoptrARF5.1/5.2-GrARF5a/5b-EgrARF5-GmARF40/47-Sl-AF5-VvARF18-ZmARF4/29-OsARF11-Seita.3G028100.1-Sobic.006G255300.1-Bradi5g25157.1), the ratio of orthologous gene number between species is 1 : 1 which suggests that the functions might be well-conserved across species. Orthologous clusters with ratios greater or smaller than 1 : 1 were also found, indicating the functional diversity of ARF genes in switchgrass.

In general, the members of a subgroup are characterized by the presence of conserved domains. According to previous studies, the ARF genes contain several conserved domains, such as motifs 1, 2, and 9 made up the DNA-binding domain, motifs 3, 5, 8, and 11, which correspond to the ARF domain, and motifs 4 and 10, which are located in the C-terminus and correspond to the AUX/IAA super family domain [10]. The high level of conservation of the various motifs among different species indicates that they are involved in similar regulatory pathway. In our study, the C-terminal AUX/IAA super family domain was missing in several gene members, including PvARF9, 19, 20, 27, 29–36, 39, and 44, which is consistent with the lack of this domain in AtARF3, 13, and 17 and MdARF6, 8, 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, and 28 as well as in SlARF2, 3, 7, and 13 [2, 3, 47]. In addition, PvARF genes which are present in the same clade and possess similar motifs might function redundantly and have similar expression patterns. For example, PvARF5/6 and 7/8 which are members of cluster III and PvARF37/38, 40/41, 42/43, 44/45, and 46/47, which are members of cluster VII exhibit similar expression patterns at the R2 stage.

Switchgrass is an important resource for bioenergy and feedstock materials, and biomass yield is the most important target in molecular breeding of switchgrass. Comprehensive analysis of PvARF gene expression patterns helped us screen for candidate PvARF genes with potentially distinct functions in regulating vegetative organ growth and development. Taken together, 15 pairs of PvARF genes were detected to have high levels of expression in vegetative organs. Similar patterns of expression were also found in tea plants [48], apple [47], and tomato [9]. 13 of the 15 CsARF genes were expressed in root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit [24]. Eight of the 31 MdARF genes were expressed in stem, leaf, flower, and fruit [46], and 17 SlARF genes were expressed in root, stem, leaf, flower bud, and ovary [9]. In our study, 14 pairs of PvARFs were more highly expressed in the I4 than in the I2 and I3, which suggests that these genes might play vital roles during the formation of young stems, and these results are consistent with the reported function of their homologous genes in Arabidopsis [26, 49]. However, in leaves, the expression level of most PvARFs did not change significantly in different developmental stages. PvARF11/12 is most highly expressed in the fourth leaf, suggesting that these genes may play roles in leaf development like their Arabidopsis homologs, ARF7 and 19 [31]. Of the 47 PvARF genes, 17 were not expressed in the tested tissues, which indicates that they might not function in these organs, or that the functions of these genes may have been lost during evolution. In general, most PvARF genes have different expression profiles in the internodes and leaves, indicating that they might be regulated by the distribution and concentration of endogenous auxin. The in-depth studies will be needed to confirm these results in future.

Because ARF proteins are transcription factors that regulate the expression of auxin response genes, we determined the response of PvARF genes to NAA treatment. The regulation of gene expression in response to auxin has been reported in Arabidopsis [3, 31], rice [20, 32, 34], maize [21], tomato [2], Medicago [20], and so on. In this study, we found that at least 14 pairs of PvARF genes were responsive to NAA treatment in seedlings but showed diverse expression patterns. Eleven pairs of PvARF genes (PvARF5/6, 7/8, 11/12, 15/16, 29/30, 35/36, 37/38, 40/41, 42/43, 44/45, and 46/47) were downregulated by exogenous auxin treatment across all time points, indicating that their expression was negatively regulated by NAA, similar to their homologs in rice and maize (OsARF5, 14, and 21 and ZmARF5 and 18), of which expression levels decreased marginally in response to auxin [21, 32]. In contrast, the other three pairs of PvARF genes (PvARF3/4, 23/24, and 25/26) were upregulated by auxin treatment at 1 hour point and then downregulation at later time points, indicating that NAA significantly induced the target gene in a short period of time, as their homologs in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize (AtARF4, 19; OsARF1, 23; and ZmARF3, 8, 13, 15, 21, 27, and 30). In brief, expression of these ARF genes increased slightly in response to auxin [21, 31, 32], implying that these genes are potential primary auxin responsive genes. Generally, the expression level of the ARF genes was directly regulated by auxin. Considering that the endogenous auxin concentration is sufficient for plant growth and development, the extra auxin (NAA) applied exogenously might act as inhibitor of auxin response genes in our study, and the further study will be carried out in the future to clarify the mechanism of auxin response in grasses.

5. Conclusions

We identified 47 switchgrass ARF genes and established the evolutionary relationship between these genes using phylogenic, gene structure, and conserved protein motif analyses. Expression analyses revealed the potential role of PvARF genes involved in growth and development of switchgrass internodes and leaves and in response to NAA treatment in seedlings. These data provide a solid foundation for future functional characterization of ARF genes and ARF-mediated signal transduction pathway in switchgrass.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Authors’ Contributions

Jianli Wang, Changhong Guo, and Guiqing Han conceived and designed the study. Jianli Wang and Zhenying Wu performed the laboratory experiments and the data analysis. Chunxiang Fu, Zhongbao Shen, Dequan Sun, Peng Zhong, Lichao Ma, Zetao Bai, Duofeng Pan, Ruibo Zhang, Daoming Li, and Hailing Zhang assisted in the data analysis. Jianli Wang and Zhenying Wu wrote the manuscript with assistance from Guiqing Han. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Jianli Wang and Zhenying Wu contributed equally to this work.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 31601365), the major research project of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Germplasm Resource Renewal of Frozen Crops in Heilongjiang Province).

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: twelve conserved motifs in PvARF analyzed by MEME search tool. The height of each box represents the specific amino acid conservation in each motif. Table S1: primer sequences used for gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR. Table S2: phylogenetic relationships of ARFs. Table S3: putative cis-acting DNA elements in the promoter of PvARF genes. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. J. W. Chandler, “Auxin response factors,” Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1014–1028, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Kumar, A. K. Tyagi, and A. K. Sharma, “Genome-wide analysis of auxin response factor (ARF) gene family from tomato and analysis of their role in flower and fruit development,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 285, no. 3, pp. 245–260, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. S. Li, X. H. Dai, and Y. D. Zhao, “A role for auxin response factor 19 in auxin and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 899–908, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Ljung, “Auxin metabolism and homeostasis during plant development,” Development, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 943–950, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Mockaitis and M. Estelle, “Auxin receptors and plant development: a new signaling paradigm,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 55–80, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Santner and M. Estelle, “Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling,” Nature, vol. 459, no. 7250, pp. 1071–1078, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. H. Su, Y. B. Liu, B. Bai, and X. S. Zhang, “Establishment of embryonic shoot–root axis is involved in auxin and cytokinin response during Arabidopsis somatic embryogenesis,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 5, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. W. Woodward and B. Bartel, “Auxin: Regulation, action, and interaction,” Annals of Botany, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 707–735, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Wu, F. Y. Wang, L. Cheng et al., “Identification, isolation and expression analysis of auxin response factor (ARF) genes in Solanum lycopersicum,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2059–2073, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. J. Guilfoyle and G. Hagen, “Auxin response factors,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 453–460, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Liscum and J. W. Reed, “Genetics of Aux/IAA and ARF action in plant growth and development,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 49, no. 3/4, pp. 387–400, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Ulmasov, G. Hagen, and T. J. Guilfoyle, “ARF1, a transcription factor that binds to auxin response elements,” Science, vol. 276, no. 5320, pp. 1865–1868, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Ulmasov, G. Hagen, and T. J. Guilfoyle, “Activation and repression of transcription by auxin-response factors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 5844–5849, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Kim, K. Harter, and A. Theologis, “Protein-protein interactions among the Aux/IAA proteins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 94, no. 22, pp. 11786–11791, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Ouellet, P. J. Overvoorde, and A. Theologis, “IAA17/AXR3: biochemical insight into an auxin mutant phenotype,” The Plant Cell Online, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 829–842, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Shin, A. Y. Burch, K. A. Huppert et al., “The Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB77 modulates auxin signal transduction,” The Plant Cell Online, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2440–2453, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. Hagen and T. Guilfoyle, “Auxin-responsive gene expression: genes, promoters and regulatory factors,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 49, no. 3/4, pp. 373–385, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. K. Wang, K. M. Pei, Y. P. Fu et al., “Genome-wide analysis of the auxin response factors (ARF) gene family in rice (Oryza sativa),” Gene, vol. 394, no. 1-2, pp. 13–24, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. U. C. Kalluri, S. P. Difazio, A. M. Brunner, and G. A. Tuskan, “Genome-wide analysis of Aux/IAA and ARF gene families in Populus trichocarpa,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 59, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. J. Shen, R. Q. Yue, T. Sun et al., “Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of auxin response factor gene family in Medicago truncatula,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. J. Wang, D. X. Deng, Y. T. Shi, N. Miao, Y. L. Bian, and Z. T. Yin, “Diversification, phylogeny and evolution of auxin response factor (ARF) family: insights gained from analyzing maize ARF genes,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2401–2415, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Finet, A. Berne-Dedieu, C. P. Scutt, and F. Marletaz, “Evolution of the ARF gene family in land plants: old domains, new tricks,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. Hu, J. Zuo, X. W. Hou et al., “The auxin response factor gene family in banana: genome-wide identification and expression analyses during development, ripening, and abiotic stress,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Z. C. Xu, A. J. Ji, J. Y. Song, and S. L. Chen, “Genome-wide analysis of auxin response factor gene family members in medicinal model plant Salvia miltiorrhiza,” Biology Open, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 848–857, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. X. Yang, M. Xu, L. Xuan, X. M. Jiang, and M. R. Huang, “Identification and expression analysis of twenty ARF genes in Populus,” Gene, vol. 544, no. 2, pp. 134–144, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. M. Ellis, P. Nagpal, J. C. Young, G. Hagen, T. J. Guilfoyle, and J. W. Reed, “Auxin Response Factor1 and Auxin Response Factor2 regulate senescence and floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Development, vol. 132, no. 20, pp. 4563–4574, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. O. Lim, I. C. Lee, J. Kim et al., “Auxin response factor 2 (ARF2) plays a major role in regulating auxin-mediated leaf longevity,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1419–1430, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. C. Schruff, M. Spielman, S. Tiwari, S. Adams, N. Fenby, and R. J. Scott, “The AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 gene of Arabidopsis links auxin signalling, cell division, and the size of seeds and other organs,” Development, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 251–261, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. S. Hardtke and T. Berleth, “The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1405–1411, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Goetz, A. Vivian-Smith, S. D. Johnson, and A. M. Koltunow, “AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR8 is a negative regulator of fruit initiation in Arabidopsis,” The Plant Cell Online, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1873–1886, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Okushima, H. Fukaki, M. Onoda, A. Theologis, and M. Tasaka, “ARF7 and ARF19 regulate lateral root formation via direct activation of LBD/ASL genes in Arabidopsis,” The Plant Cell Online, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 118–130, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. A. Attia, A. F. Abdelkhalik, M. H. Ammar et al., “Antisense phenotypes reveal a functional expression of OsARF1, an auxin response factor, in transgenic rice,” Current Issues in Molecular Biology, vol. 11, Supplement 1, pp. i29–i34, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  33. C. J. Shen, R. Q. Yue, T. Sun, L. Zhang, Y. J. Yang, and H. Z. Wang, “OsARF16, a transcription factor regulating auxin redistribution, is required for iron deficiency response in rice (Oryza sativa L.),” Plant Science, vol. 231, pp. 148–158, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Jain and J. P. Khurana, “Transcript profiling reveals diverse roles of auxin-responsive genes during reproductive development and abiotic stress in rice,” FEBS Journal, vol. 276, no. 11, pp. 3148–3162, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. K. Wang, Y. H. Bai, C. J. Shen et al., “Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor,” Functional & Integrative Genomics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 533–546, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. Anderson, J. K. Ward, K. P. Vogel, M. G. Ward, H. J. Gorz, and F. A. Haskins, “Forage quality and performance of yearlings grazing switchgrass strains selected for differing digestibility,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 2239–2244, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. B. McLaughlin and L. Adams Kszos, “Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 515–535, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Y. Zhang, Y. C. Lee, I. Torres-Jerez et al., “Development of an integrated transcript sequence database and a gene expression atlas for gene discovery and analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.),” The Plant Journal, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 160–173, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Z. Wu, Y. Cao, R. Yang et al., “Switchgrass SBP-box transcription factors PvSPL1 and 2 function redundantly to initiate side tillers and affect biomass yield of energy crop,” Biotechnology for Biofuels, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 101, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Yuan, B. Xu, J. Zhang et al., “Comprehensive analysis of CCCH-type zinc finger family genes facilitates functional gene discovery and reflects recent allopolyploidization event in tetraploid switchgrass,” BMC Genomics, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 129, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. E. Voorrips, “MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 77-78, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Okada, C. Lanzatella, M. C. Saha, J. Bouton, R. L. Wu, and C. M. Tobias, “Complete switchgrass genetic maps reveal subgenome collinearity, preferential pairing and multilocus interactions,” Genetics, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 745–760, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. B. Cannon, A. Mitra, A. Baumgarten, N. D. Young, and G. May, “The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 10, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. Higo, Y. Ugawa, M. Iwamoto, and T. Korenaga, “Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 297–300, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. N. Goldman and Z. Yang, “A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 725–736, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Z. Y. Wu, X. Q. Xu, W. D. Xiong et al., “Genome-wide analysis of the NAC gene family in physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.),” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 6, article e0131890, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. C. Luo, M. H. Sun, R. R. Xu, H. R. Shu, J. W. Wang, and S. Z. Zhang, “Genomewide identification and expression analysis of the ARF gene family in apple,” Journal of Genetics, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 785–797, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Y. X. Xu, J. Mao, W. Chen et al., “Identification and expression profiling of the auxin response factors (ARFs) in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) under various abiotic stresses,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 98, pp. 46–56, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Fahlgren, T. A. Montgomery, M. D. Howell et al., “Regulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 by TAS3 ta-siRNA affects developmental timing and patterning in Arabidopsis,” Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 939–944, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Jianli Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.