Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Genomics
Volume 2018, Article ID 7835637, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7835637
Research Article

Expression Characterization of Six Genes Possibly Involved in Gonad Development for Stellate Sturgeon Individuals (Acipenser stellatus, Pallas 1771)

1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Bucharest 050095, Romania
2S.C. Danube Research-Consulting S.R.L., Isaccea 825200, Romania

Correspondence should be addressed to Sergiu Emil Georgescu; moc.oohay@es_ucsegroeg

Received 11 September 2017; Revised 12 December 2017; Accepted 11 March 2018; Published 29 March 2018

Academic Editor: Lior David

Copyright © 2018 Alexandru Burcea et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Nowadays, in sturgeon’s aquaculture, there is a necessity for sex identification at early stages in order to increase the efficiency of this commercial activity. The basis for a correct identification is studying the different factors that influence the gonad development. The research has been directed towards molecular methods that have been employed with various degrees of success in identifying genes with different expression patterns between male and female sturgeons during their development stages. For the purpose of understanding the sexual development of 4-year-old stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) individuals, we have selected six genes (foxl2, cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, sox9, and star). We analysed the gene expression of the selected genes for gonads, anal fin, liver, body kidney, and white muscle. The cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, and sox9 genes have a significant higher expression in male gonads than in female gonads, while the data shows no significant differences in the expression of the investigated genes in the other organs. We investigate these genes to shed light on aquaculture sturgeon sexual development.

1. Introduction

Sturgeons and paddlefish form the order Acipenseriformes, which is a group of fish that have existed since at least the Lower Jurassic and nowadays are threatened in their entire range of distribution [1].

Caviar is harvested from sturgeons and it has been on high demand, even though they are threatened species, making them economically valuable in world trade [2]. The sevruga caviar is harvested from A. stellatus females and is one of the highest-priced caviar types. For this type of caviar to be harvested naturally, the females must reach maturity, which is at 8–10 years. In contrast, males reach maturity at 5-6 years [3, 4]. There is also a period of more than one year between subsequent spawning [5, 6].

Even though aquaculture can provide a supply of sturgeon-derived products, such as caviar and meat, and can also help in conservation efforts providing offspring for repopulation [7], the early sex identification of individuals could further help the aquaculture efforts through correctly separating the males from more economically profitable females. More affordable sturgeon products could lower the pressure of poaching, sustaining the ex situ conservation efforts. Also, aquaculture could benefit from the knowledge of genetic architecture and sex determination in sturgeons [8]. For distinguishing females from males, a good understanding of the processes of sexual development is needed. Therefore, studies of the possible sex-determining mechanisms are important for identifying a starting point.

In nature, there are different types of conserved patterns of sex-determining mechanisms which range from male heterogamety (XY) found in the majority of mammals and female heterogamety (ZW) found in most birds to environmental sex determination (ESD) expressed most commonly as temperature sex determination (TSD) found in reptiles and some fish species [9]. Fish species have complex patterns of sex determination which range from hermaphroditism, with individuals presenting both female and male gonads, and gonochorism, where each individual presents only female or male gonads, to TSD. There is also the possibility of natural gynogenesis, where the female ovule is penetrated by a sperm cell, but the sperm nucleus does not contribute to embryo formation which in turn inherits only the female chromosomes [10]. Genetic sex determination was described in Oryzias latipes which has an early type of XY genetic system [11]. Cytogenetic studies of fish chromosomes showed that the karyotype can be employed in a low number of fish species for identifying the sex of the individual [12]; furthermore, in the case of sturgeons, this method did not identify any sex-specific chromosomes [13].

The number of fish species that present male heterogamety compared to female heterogamety is higher [12]. One hypothesis is that the XY and ZW systems originated in ancestral species with environmental sex determination in which either the male or the female had the size advantage as an adult; thus, the XY system is present in species where fitness correlates with male size, and the ZW system is found in species where females have the size advantage [14]. It has also been observed that the system of sex determination may depend on reproduction advantage [15]. Wild Acipenser transmontanus individuals have a 1 : 1 sex ratio between males and females [16] which means that the ratio is not influenced by the environment. This creates the hypothesis that the system of sex determination in sturgeons is genetic and not environmental, which is backed up by gynogenesis experiments suggesting sex ratios in conformity with the ZW system where gynogenesis may produce ZZ males, WW superfemales, and ZW females. This is the case of Acipenser baerii [17], Acipenser brevirostrum [18], Acipenser nudiventris [19], A. transmontanus [20], Bester hybrid (Huso female × Acipenser ruthenus male) [21], and Polyodon spathula [22] even though there is no direct evidence from karyotype morphology [23].

Sturgeons do not present sexual dimorphism that could help in the early selection of females from less economically valuable males [13]; therefore, an extensive plethora of methods have been utilized with the objective of identifying the sex of sturgeon individuals, such as biopsy for H. huso [24, 25]; endoscopy for Acipenser gueldenstaedtii [26], H. huso [26], and Acipenser oxyrinchus [27]; and ultrasonography for A. stellatus [6]. Even though these methods have high accuracy, the lowest age at which the sex of an individual could be identified is between 1 and 3 years through invasive methods or ultrasonography. Also, noninvasive molecular methods, such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for A. baerii, Acipenser naccarii, A. ruthenus [28], H. huso [29], and Acipenser fulvescens [30]; amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) for A. baerii and A. gueldenstaedtii [28]; and intersimple sequence repeats (ISSR) for A. naccarii, A. baerii, and A. gueldenstaedtii [28], have been utilized in order to see if any DNA fragments are specific to females or males, because of the high possibility that the sex-determining system is genetic. These methods did not provide any results that could discern between females and males. Because of this, the studies have shifted towards next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies. In the case of sturgeons, which have complex genomes, NGS allows the transcriptome analysis and gives information on possible differences between males and females in expression and presence of various genes (dmrt1, tra-1, wt1, lhx1, cyp19A1, fhl3, fem1a, gsdf, foxl2, ar, emx2, cyp17a1, etc.) that may be involved in the sexual development processes in different sturgeon species [7, 3133]. With NGS laying the groundwork for gene discovery, the next step was the analysis of gene pathways using qPCR studies; therefore, the most-studied genes in vertebrates that are involved in male pathway were sox9, amh, nr5a1, nrob1, and wt1 [3436]. In the case of sturgeons, there have been a series of studies regarding genes involved in male or female sex development: Sertoli cell factors dmrt1 and sox9, Leydig cell factors star and cyp17a1, and other genes such as lh, ar, vtg, foxl2, fsh, and igf1 [3541], showing that the genes are expressed differently in the various tissues investigated. Even if there are studies that investigate sturgeon sex development, the underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood, and no master sex gene has been identified as of yet.

In this study, we investigated the expression of six genes that are known from literature to be steroid-related Leydig cell factors (cyp17a1, ar, and star), male gonad genes that are Sertoli cell factors (dmrt1 and sox9), and a female gene for ovarian differentiation (foxl2). These genes were chosen to investigate if they are involved in the sexual development of specific tissues in A. stellatus. Different organs were analysed alongside gonads in order to showcase if the studied genes are specific to gonad development. This study aims at observing the expression pattern between males and females and between the different organs (gonads, white muscle, body kidney, anal fin, and liver) in order to establish if these genes are involved in the sexual development of A. stellatus and if they are gonad specific. This is the first time that the expression of these genes was investigated through qPCR for this species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Four female and four male A. stellatus 4-year-old individuals from aquaculture, kept in ponds with water recirculation and temperature of 22°C, were anesthetized with clove oil : ethanol (1 : 10) in water; their branchial arches were sectioned, and they died of blood loss. After dissection, the individuals were sexed by observing the presence of lamellae on the female gonads and the relatively smooth male gonads as in Flynn and Benfey [42]. At the age of 4 years, the individuals were at early maturation stage, undergoing gametogenesis. Females had previtellogenic oocytes, while males presented primary spermatocytes. The liver, white muscle, body kidney, gonads, and anal fin fragments were collected in RNAlater Stabilization Reagent (Qiagen).

2.2. RNA Isolation

The isolation of total RNA was performed from 10 mg of tissue using the PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher) for the liver, body kidney, and gonads, while the RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen) was used for the 20 mg of white muscle and anal fin following the manufacturer’s protocol. After isolation, 10 μL of RNA solution was digested with DNase I (Qiagen) for removal of contaminant genomic DNA using 10 μL RDD buffer, 2.5 μL DNase I, and 77.5 μL RNase-free ultrapure water in a 100 μL final volume. The quantity and purity of total RNA samples were determined using the NanoDrop 8000 (Thermo Scientific). RIN values of the RNA samples were determined using Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples with RIN values smaller than 8 were not included in further analysis.

2.3. Reverse Transcription

For cDNA synthesis, 1000 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR (BioRad) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.4. Primer Design

Because of the lack of data regarding genes involved in the sexual development of A. stellatus, GenBank sequences from other sturgeon species were used to design pairs of primers (Table 1). The pairs of primers were designed in silico using Primer BLAST NCBI, tested for annealing temperature using the Primer3 online software, and tested for specificity by using BLAST NCBI. The foxl2, cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, sox9, star, β-actin, gapdh, and 28S rRNA amplicons were sequenced using the primers in Table 1 on the ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems), using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems), and the cDNA sequences were deposited in GenBank with the following accession numbers: KX420678-KX420686 (Table 1).

Table 1: Primers for qPCR analysis.
2.5. qPCR

The qPCR was carried out on the iCycler iQ Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad) using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix Kit (BioRad) in 25 μL final volume with 400 nM of each primer from Table 1, 100 ng of cDNA, 12.5 μL of iQ SYBR Green Supermix 2X, and 10.5 μL of DNase-free ultrapure water. The incubation program was comprised of initial denaturation (95°C for 5 minutes), cycling stages (35 cycles of 95°C denaturation for 30 seconds, 58°C annealing for 30 seconds, and 72°C extension for 30 seconds with data collection after each extension), and a melt curve stage (from 55°C to 97.5°C with an increment of 0.5°C for 10 seconds and data collection at each increment). The raw data points were represented by the quantification cycle (Cq) as stated in “The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments” [43]. The analysis was performed in triplicate for each gene, and the validity of the qPCR was confirmed by analysing the melting curves. The amplification efficiency (E) of the investigated genes was situated between 94% and 105%, while the linear standard curve (r2) was higher than 0.994 for all genes.

2.6. Data Analysis

The reference genes’ (gapdh, β-actin, and 28S rRNA) Cq results for each group were tested for stability using NormFinder 20 [44]. The best single result was observed for β-actin (0.088), while the best result for a combination of genes was for the arithmetic mean of gapdh and β-actin (0.061), the latter combination being used in the subsequent analysis because of the good score.

The relative expression value (2−ΔCq) was obtained by normalization, subtracting the arithmetic mean of the β-actin and gapdh reference genes from each gene of interest [45]. The normal distribution of the dataset groups was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test implemented in IBM SPSS 19.0 [46, 47]. We used the one-way ANOVA test () with Tukey correction for multiple comparisons implemented in GraphPad Prism 6.01 in order to investigate the difference in gene expression between 4-year-old A. stellatus males and females.

3. Results

The β-actin and gapdh arithmetic mean was chosen to normalize the data from the six genes of interest. The expression levels for the genes of interest are presented in Table 2 in the form of means and ±SD, along with one-way ANOVA results for the comparison between 4-year-old A. stellatus males and females.

Table 2: The 2−ΔCq of each gene. The arithmetic mean of gapdh and β-actin reference genes was used for normalization. The values are represented by arithmetic means ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to compare gene expression levels of males versus females for the same organ. NS: not significant.

A statistically significant difference () between females and males was observed only in gonads for the cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, and sox9 genes, for which the males presented higher levels of expression than the females (Figure 1(a)). In the case of body kidney, white muscle, and liver, the expression of cyp17a1 was not observed. The expression of cyp17a1 was observed only in gonads and anal fin (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The expression of the star gene was not detected for white muscle, but it was observed in the rest of the investigated organs (gonads, anal fin, body kidney, and liver) (Figure 1). The foxl2 and star genes did not present any statistically significant difference in expression between the sexes for this organ. The difference in expression between females and males for the investigated genes was not statistically significant for the rest of the organs (anal fin, body kidney, liver, and white muscle) (Figures 1(b)1(e)).

Figure 1: The 2−ΔCq comparison of foxl2, cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, sox9, and star genes between males and females in the gonads (a), anal fin (b), body kidney (c), liver (d), and white muscle (e). The arithmetic mean of gapdh and β-actin reference genes was used for normalization. The data points are represented by arithmetic means ± SD on a logarithmic scale in base two. The statistical significance of the difference in expression was tested with one-way ANOVA using Tukey correction ( and ).

For males, a difference in the expression () for the cyp17a1 gene between the gonad and anal fin was observed, with higher levels in the gonad. For the ar gene, the expression in the male gonad was statistically different from that in the anal fin (), in the body kidney (), and in the white muscle (), the highest levels being found in the gonad but not different from that in liver (Figure 2(a)). Higher levels of dmrt1 gene were found in the testicle than in the anal fin, body kidney, liver, and white muscle (). The sox9 levels were statistically higher () in the gonads than in the anal fin, body kidney, liver, and white muscle (Figure 2(a)). For the foxl2 and star genes, no difference in expression between the testicle and the other organs was observed. For females, no statistically significant difference in expression between the gonads and the other organs was observed (Figure 2(b)).

Figure 2: The 2−ΔCq comparison of foxl2, cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, sox9, and star genes between organs from males (a) and females (b). The arithmetic mean of gapdh and β-actin reference genes was used for normalization. The data points are represented by arithmetic means ± SD on a logarithmic scale in base two. The statistical significance of the expression comparison was tested with one-way ANOVA using Tukey correction (, , and ).

4. Discussion

There could be a difference in expression between males and females for the reference genes that could be explained by the cease in expression that occurs during spermiogenesis because of chromatin construction or transcription factors that inhibit the transcription of certain genes [38, 48, 49]. Therefore, the statistically significant difference in expression between males and females, regarding the cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, and sox9 genes could be due to a difference in expression of the reference genes. But because of prior observed differences reported on various sturgeon species using NGS techniques [7, 3133] alongside our approach of using two reference genes to try and limit this possibility of different expression of reference genes, we consider this a good method for determining the true state of expression of the investigated genes.

It is very likely that the determination and consequent differentiation of sturgeon gonads take place during the first year of life, studies showing gonad surface differentiation at 4 months for A. baerii, at 4 months for A. gueldenstaedtii, at 180 days for A. naccarii, at 6 months for A. brevirostrum, at 8 months for A. ruthenus, and at 6 months for the Bester hybrid [50]. There are no studies regarding the onset of gonadal differentiation in A. stellatus individuals, but because the majority of sturgeons present first year differentiation of gonads, it could be feasible that A. stellatus also presents this characteristic. At 4 years old, the individuals have undergone the onset of differentiation and are in the primary spermatocyte stage, in the case of males (spermatogenesis), and previtellogenic oocytes, in the case of females (oogenesis).

There is no evidence for a master sex-determining gene present only for males or females, observed through NGS in the case of A. fulvescens studies, even though there is evidence of differential gene expression between males and females [7, 31]. On the other hand, dmrt3, igf-1, lhx1, and sox11 genes were found to be specific to the testicle transcriptome, while cyp19A1a, foxl2, gnrhr, and nanos3b were only found in the ovary transcriptome of Acipenser sinensis [33]. For A. naccarii, five genes were found to be specific for male (wt1, lhx1, cyp19A1, fhl3, and fem1a) and two (ar, emx2) for female libraries [32]. Contrary to these studies, we have found an expression of foxl2 and ar in all organs tested from both females and males which rules them out as master sex-determining genes in A. stellatus individuals. Because of the fact that all the genes we investigated were present both in males and females, we consider that they are not master sex-determining genes for A. stellatus individuals.

For the system of sex determination, the lack of dmrt1 expression in females is consistent with an XY system which appears not to be the case in sturgeons [40], where both females and males present the expression of this gene, which is in pattern with the ZW system of sex determination, where in birds, dmrt1 plays the role of master sex-determining gene [9]. It could be feasible that the dmrt1 gene is expressed at higher levels in sturgeon males, independent of the number of copies that are present in the genome due to double dosage which appears for ZZ/ZW species. This has been observed in our study and in other research involving sturgeon species, such as A. fulvescens 13-14-year-old individuals (adolescent female and mature male) [31], A. baerii 3-year-old individuals with immature gonads [36, 39], A. baerii 16–18-month-old juveniles [35, 39], A. gueldenstaedtii 550-day-old and 1600-day-old individuals [40], and A. sinensis 3- and 4-year-old individuals. This could be due to specific targeting of dmrt1 gene by an unknown factor that determines a higher expression in males. It could also be feasible that in females, there are factors that modulate the expression of dmrt1 so that it is lower than in males. One such factor could be a microRNA molecule that specifically targets the dmrt1 gene in females, silencing or reducing its expression as also observed in silkworm where a piRNA molecule can inhibit the masc gene leading to the formation of female individuals [51].

There is a lack of sexual dimorphism regarding the dmrt1 gene in the case of A. gueldenstaedtii 9-month-old juveniles with undifferentiated gonads [7], A. sinensis 3-year-old gametogenetic juveniles [33], and Scaphirhynchus platorynchus above 2-year-old individuals with fully developed gonads [38], which could be due to the developmental stage at which the gonads were sampled. The lack of expression of the dmrt1 gene could be due to incomplete coverage in NGS or the developmental stage at which the 6-month-old A. naccarii individuals were at the time of sampling [32]. The different developmental stages and species that were investigated show a nonspecific time of expression of the dmrt1 gene in the case of sturgeons. Each species may have a specific moment in the development of the gonads at which the expression of dmrt1 occurs in different mRNA levels between females and males. The dmrt1 gene, a candidate for double expression in males, is mostly expressed in higher levels in males than in females, but there are developmental stages of sturgeons in which the dmrt1 gene is not expressed in different levels [7, 33, 38]. Even though this pattern of expression could be species specific, it could be argued that the expression of dmrt1 starts at the onset of differentiation and decreases to a stable level after the gonads are fully developed. This is why no difference in expression could be distinguished for A. gueldenstaedtii 9-month-old individuals with undifferentiated gonads [7] and for adult S. platorynchus individuals with fully developed gonads [38]. The fact that for A. stellatus male individuals the expression of dmrt1 is higher than in females shows that this gene is involved in the development of the male gonads at the spermatogenesis stage.

The sox9 gene has been found in Acipenser sturio and A. fulvescens in the genome of both males and females, through sequencing [31, 52], and is overexpressed in the testicles when compared to ovaries in immature 3-year-old A. baerii individuals [36, 39]. We observed a higher expression of sox9 in male gonads that might indicate that the gene is involved in the development of testicles. In the case of 16-month-old juvenile A. baerii individuals with differentiated gonads, the expression of sox9 in gonads is not different between females and males [35, 39], the same as in A. gueldenstaedtii 9-month-old individuals which indicates that the sox9 gene is not involved in the onset of differentiation of sturgeon gonads. In A. sinensis 3-year-old individuals, the gene was present in both females and males through NGS [33], similar to 6-month-old A. naccarii individuals regarding the same gene [32]. For the A. stellatus individuals, the expression of sox9 at 4 years old shows that this gene is involved in gametogenesis.

The foxl2 gene has a higher expression in females for S. platorynchus individuals [38] and for A. gueldenstaedtii 9-month-old juvenile presumptive females [7]. This is in contrast to our observation that the difference in expression is not statistically significant between males and females. The foxl2 gene is involved in the onset of female gonad differentiation [7], and in the case of S. platorynchus [38], it appears to be involved in female gonad differentiation because of the age of the sturgeons investigated. These results may be due to the different species studied; in our case, the individuals were well past starting differentiation and well into gonadal stages like spermatogenesis and oogenesis; therefore, we rule out the possibility of foxl2 involvement in development at this stage for A. stellatus even though it is in contrast to what was previously described for S. platorynchus.

The cyp17a1 gene is known to be a Leydig cell factor modulating androgen production, and a higher expression in male gonads than in female gonads is to be expected. We have observed this higher expression between males and females, and we also observed that it is not expressed in other tissues except for anal fin. The expression in the anal fin is lower than that of male gonads but not different from that of female gonads. In immature A. baerii gonads (16-month-old and 3-year-old individuals), the expression of cyp17a1 was higher in males; however, different from our discovery is that, in this case, the expression was also detected in the muscle, liver, and kidney [39], which was not observed in our study. This pattern of expression, higher in male gonads than in female gonads, could be due to the need for steroidogenic hormones in males during gametogenesis for which the cyp17a1 gene is responsible. The expression of the cyp17a1 gene, which is involved in converting progestins into androgens in testicles, is correlated with the expression of the ar gene, which encodes for an androgen receptor. Both being in higher levels in males than in females in the case of A. baerii and in our own study, this coupled with the age at which this pattern is observed could indicate that androgens are the main mediators of vertebrate masculinization [39, 53, 54] and in this case sturgeon male gonad development, after testicular differentiation especially for A. stellatus of 4 years of age where the lamellae are clearly visible for female gonads and the surface differentiation already took place. The cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, and sox9 genes have different expression patterns in male gonads than in female gonads, which could indicate that these are probably involved in the development of male gonads. The foxl2 gene is involved in female gonad differentiation in other species, but no significant difference in expression was detected so that we can conclude the same thing for the stage at which the A. stellatus individuals were when sampling took place. The star gene is normally involved in the male developmental pathway; however, the individuals we investigated may be over the age at which the difference in expression occurs.

Besides the cyp17a1 and ar genes that are possibly involved in the male gonad development pathway, we also observed the expression of the star gene. The expression of the star gene in our study proved it was not significantly different between females and males, which is in contrast to the situation of A. baerii individuals [39]. The star gene is involved in steroid synthesis and should have a higher expression after gonadal differentiation. For our samples, this is correlated with reaching gonadal maturity at four years which is near the five-year mark for A. stellatus male maturity [3, 4].

5. Conclusions

We have observed that cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, and sox9 genes are involved in the gonad development of A. stellatus because of the significant difference in expression between males and females. The fact that the cyp17a1, ar, dmrt1, and sox9 genes have a higher expression in male gonads than in the other organs tested could imply that these genes are involved in the male pathway for gonad development.

No significant difference in the expression of the investigated genes was detected in tissues that could be used for noninvasive sex identification in early stages (white muscle and anal fin).

Pinpointing the developmental stage at which these genes start presenting a difference in expression could help in the study of sexual development in sturgeons; the data presented here could be the groundwork for future studies that will focus on younger individuals of the same species. Our results are in agreement with other sturgeon research that has attempted to find a master sex-determining gene which would suggest that it has yet to be discovered.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding project 53PTE/2016 “Technology for selection and genetic improvement in order to increase profitability of sturgeon’s aquaculture” and the European Cooperation in Science and Technology 2016-2020 (CA15219) “Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment of aquatic ecosystems in Europe.”

References

  1. R. Billard and G. Lecointre, “Biology and conservation of sturgeon and paddlefish,” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 355–392, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Ludwig, “A sturgeon view on conservation genetics,” European Journal of Wildlife Research, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. N. Shubina, A. A. Popova, and V. P. Vasil’ev, “Acipenser stellatus Pallas, 1771,” in The Freshwater Fishes of Europe VoL 1, Part 2. General Introduction to Fishes, Acipenseriformes, J. Holčik, Ed., AULA Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  4. V. J. Birstein, “Sturgeons and paddlefishes: threatened fishes in need of conservation,” Conservation Biology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 773–787, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Holčik, The freshwater Fishes of Europe. General Introduction to Fishes, vol. 1-2, AULA Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1989.
  6. M. Moghim, A. R. Vajhi, A. Veshkini, and M. Masoudifard, “Determination of sex and maturity in Acipenser stellatus by using ultrasonography,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 18, no. 4–6, pp. 325–328, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Hagihara, R. Yamashita, S. Yamamoto et al., “Identification of genes involved in gonadal sex differentiation and the dimorphic expression pattern in undifferentiated gonads of Russian sturgeon Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt & Ratzeburg, 1833,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1557–1564, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Martínez, A. M. Viñas, L. Sánchez, N. Díaz, L. Ribas, and F. Piferrer, “Genetic architecture of sex determination in fish: applications to sex ratio control in aquaculture,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 5, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. E. Quinn, S. D. Sarre, T. Ezaz, J. A. Marshall Graves, and A. Georges, “Evolutionary transitions between mechanisms of sex determination in vertebrates,” Biology Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 443–448, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. I. E. Samonte-Padilla, C. Eizaguirre, J. P. Scharsack, T. L. Lenz, and M. Milinski, “Induction of diploid gynogenesis in an evolutionary model organism, the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus),” BMC Developmental Biology, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 55, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Schartl, “A comparative view on sex determination in medaka,” Mechanisms of Development, vol. 121, no. 7-8, pp. 639–645, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. H. Devlin and Y. Nagahama, “Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences,” Aquaculture, vol. 208, no. 3-4, pp. 191–364, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Keyvanshokooh and A. Gharaei, “A review of sex determination and searches for sex-specific markers in sturgeon,” Aquaculture Research, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. e1–e7, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. B. M. Kraak and E. M. A. De Looze, “A new hypothesis on the evolution of sex determination in vertebrates; big females ZW, big males XY,” Netherlands Journal of Zoology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 260–273, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. F. Parnell and J. T. Streelman, “Genetic interactions controlling sex and color establish the potential for sexual conflict in Lake Malawi cichlid fishes,” Heredity, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 239–246, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. A. Chapman, J. P. Van Eenennaam, and S. I. Doroshov, “The reproductive condition of white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus, in San Francisco Bay, California,” Fishery Bulletin, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 628–634, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Fopp-Bayat, “Meiotic gynogenesis revealed not homogametic female sex determination system in Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri Brandt),” Aquaculture, vol. 305, no. 1–4, pp. 174–177, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. R. Flynn, M. Matsuoka, M. Reith, D. J. Martin-Robichaud, and T. J. Benfey, “Gynogenesis and sex determination in shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum Lesuere,” Aquaculture, vol. 253, no. 1-4, pp. 721–727, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. H. Saber and A. Hallajian, “Study of sex determination system in ship sturgeon, Acipenser nudiventris using meiotic gynogenesis,” Aquaculture International, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 273–279, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. L. Van Eenennaam, J. P. Van Eenennaam, J. F. Medrano, and S. I. Doroshov, “Brief communication. Evidence of female heterogametic genetic sex determination in white sturgeon,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 231–233, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Omoto, M. Maebayashi, S. Adachi, K. Arai, and K. Yamauchi, “Sex ratios of triploids and gynogenetic diploids induced in the hybrid sturgeon, the bester (Huso huso female×Acipenser ruthenus male),” Aquaculture, vol. 245, no. 1–4, pp. 39–47, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. L. Shelton and S. D. Mims, “Evidence for female heterogametic sex determination in paddlefish Polyodon spathula based on gynogenesis,” Aquaculture, vol. 356-357, pp. 116–118, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Arai, Fish Karyotypes: a Check List, Publisher Springer, Japan, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Bahmani and R. Kazemi, “Histological study of gonad in young cultured sturgeon,” Shilat Science Magazine, vol. 7, pp. 1–16, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  25. B. Falahatkar, S. R. Akhavan, A. Abbasalizadeh, and M. H. Tolouei, “Sex identification and sexual maturity stages in farmed great sturgeon, Huso huso L. through biopsy,” Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Hurvitz, K. Jackson, G. Degani, and B. Levavi-Sivan, “Use of endoscopy for gender and ovarian stage determinations in Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) grown in aquaculture,” Aquaculture, vol. 270, no. 1–4, pp. 158–166, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. J. Hernandez-Divers, R. S. Bakal, B. H. Hickson et al., “Endoscopic sex determination and gonadal manipulation in Gulf of Mexico sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi),” Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 459–470, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Wuertz, S. Gaillard, F. Barbisan et al., “Extensive screening of sturgeon genomes by random screening techniques revealed no sex-specific marker,” Aquaculture, vol. 258, no. 1–4, pp. 685–688, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Keyvanshokooh, M. Pourkazemi, and M. R. Kalbassi, “The RAPD technique failed to identify sex-specific sequences in beluga (Huso huso),” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-2, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. R. McCormick, D. H. Bos, and J. A. DeWoody, “Multiple molecular approaches yield no evidence for sex-determining genes in lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens),” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 643–645, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. C. Hale, J. R. Jackson, and J. A. DeWoody, “Discovery and evaluation of candidate sex-determining genes and xenobiotics in the gonads of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens),” Genetica, vol. 138, no. 7, pp. 745–756, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Vidotto, A. Grapputo, E. Boscari et al., “Transcriptome sequencing and de novo annotation of the critically endangered Adriatic sturgeon,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 407, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Yue, C. Li, H. Du, S. Zhang, and Q. Wei, “Sequencing and de novo assembly of the gonadal transcriptome of the endangered Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis),” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 6, article e0127332, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. Baron, R. Houlgatte, A. Fostier, and Y. Guiguen, “Large-scale temporal gene expression profiling during gonadal differentiation and early gametogenesis in rainbow trout,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 959–966, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Berbejillo, A. Martinez-Bengochea, G. Bedó, and D. Vizziano-Cantonnet, “Molecular characterization of testis differentiation in the Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baerii,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. S8, pp. 71-72, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Berbejillo, A. Martinez-Bengochea, G. Bedó, and D. Vizziano-Cantonnet, “Expression of dmrt1 and sox9 during gonadal development in the Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii),” Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Hurvitz, G. Degani, D. Goldberg, S. Y. Din, K. Jackson, and B. Levavi-Sivan, “Cloning of FSHβ, LHβ, and glycoprotein α subunits from the Russian sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii), β-subunit mRNA expression, gonad development, and steroid levels in immature fish,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 61–73, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. J. Amberg, R. Goforth, T. Stefanavage, and M. S. Sepúlveda, “Sexually dimorphic gene expression in the gonad and liver of shovelnose sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus),” Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 923–932, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Berbejillo, A. Martinez-Bengochea, G. Bedo, F. Brunet, J. N. Volff, and D. Vizziano-Cantonnet, “Expression and phylogeny of candidate genes for sex differentiation in a primitive fish species, the Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baerii,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 504–516, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Fajkowska, M. Rzepkowska, D. Adamek, T. Ostaszewska, and M. Szczepkowski, “Expression of dmrt1 and vtg genes during gonad formation, differentiation and early maturation in cultured Russian sturgeon Acipenser gueldenstaedtii,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 1441–1449, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. X. Q. Leng, H. J. Du, C. J. Li, and H. Cao, “Molecular characterization and expression pattern of dmrt1 in the immature Chinese sturgeon Acipenser sinensis,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 567–579, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. R. Flynn and T. J. Benfey, “Sex differentiation and aspects of gametogenesis in shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum Lesueur,” Journal of Fish Biology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1027–1044, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. A. Bustin, V. Benes, J. A. Garson et al., “The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 611–622, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. L. Andersen, J. L. Jensen, and T. F. Ørntoft, “Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 5245–5250, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. Levavi-Sivan, H. Safarian, H. Rosenfeld, A. Elizur, and A. Avitan, “Regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor gene expression in tilapia: effect of GnRH and dopamine,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1545–1551, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. S. S. Shapiro and M. B. Wilk, “An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples),” Biometrika, vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 591–611, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. N. M. Razali and Y. B. Wah, “Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests,” Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  48. K. Steger, “Haploid spermatids exhibit translationally repressed mRNAs,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 203, no. 5, pp. 323–334, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. H. Tanaka and T. Baba, “Gene expression in spermiogenesis,” CMLS Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 344–354, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. Rzepkowska and T. Ostaszewska, “Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Vasa protein expression during gonadal development and sexual differentiation in cultured Siberian (Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869) and Russian (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii Brandt & Ratzeburg, 1833) sturgeon,” Reviews in Aquaculture, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 75–88, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. T. Kiuchi, H. Koga, M. Kawamoto et al., “A single female-specific piRNA is the primary determiner of sex in the silkworm,” Nature, vol. 509, no. 7502, pp. 633–636, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. K. Hett, C. Pitra, I. Jenneckens, and A. Ludwig, “Characterization of sox9 in European Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser sturio),” Journal of Heredity, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 150–154, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. B. Borg, “Androgens in teleost fishes,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 219–245, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Brennan and B. Capel, “One tissue, two fates: molecular genetic events that underlie testis versus ovary development,” Nature Reviews. Genetics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 509–521, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus