International Journal of Genomics

International Journal of Genomics / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 3236461 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3236461

Jongsun Park, Hong Xi, Yongsung Kim, "The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Arabidopsis thaliana Isolated in Korea (Brassicaceae): An Investigation of Intraspecific Variations of the Chloroplast Genome of Korean A. thaliana", International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2020, Article ID 3236461, 18 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3236461

The Complete Chloroplast Genome of Arabidopsis thaliana Isolated in Korea (Brassicaceae): An Investigation of Intraspecific Variations of the Chloroplast Genome of Korean A. thaliana

Academic Editor: Antonio Ferrante
Received16 Jun 2020
Revised02 Aug 2020
Accepted17 Aug 2020
Published07 Sep 2020

Abstract

Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. is a model organism of plant molecular biology. More than 1,700 whole genome sequences have been sequenced, but no Korean isolate genomes have been sequenced thus far despite the fact that many A. thaliana isolated in Japan and China have been sequenced. To understand the genetic background of Korean natural A. thaliana (named as 180404IB4), we presented its complete chloroplast genome, which is 154,464 bp long and has four subregions: 85,164 bp of large single copy (LSC) and 17,781 bp of small single copy (SSC) regions are separated by 26,257 bp of inverted repeat (IRs) regions including 130 genes (85 protein-coding genes, eight rRNAs, and 37 tRNAs). Fifty single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 14 insertion and deletions (INDELs) are identified between 180404IB4 and Col0. In addition, 101 SSRs and 42 extendedSSRs were identified on the Korean A. thaliana chloroplast genome, indicating a similar number of SSRs on the rest five chloroplast genomes with a preference of sequence variations toward the SSR region. A nucleotide diversity analysis revealed two highly variable regions on A. thaliana chloroplast genomes. Phylogenetic trees with three more chloroplast genomes of East Asian natural isolates show that Korean and Chinese natural isolates are clustered together, whereas two Japanese isolates are not clustered, suggesting the need for additional investigations of the chloroplast genomes of East Asian isolates.

1. Introduction

Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. is a well-known species familiar to those who study plant molecular biology as well as genetic engineering. It was considered to be a weedy species before being used as a model organism [1], representing a good example of the usefulness of weeds. Owing to its importance as a model plant organism, its complete chloroplast genome of Col0 strain was deciphered in 1999 [2]. Its length is 154,478 bp, with a large single copy (LSC) region of 84,170 bp and a small single copy (SSC) region of 17,780 bp separated by inverted repeat (IR; 26,624 bp) regions. It was also found to have 128 genes consisting of 87 protein-coding, 37 tRNA, and four rRNA genes.

Consequently, the whole genome sequences of A. thaliana were released in 2000, presenting a 115.4 Mb genome with 25,498 genes [3]. Owing to the rapid development of sequencing technologies, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, more than 1,750 A. thaliana whole genome sequences have been sequenced and analyzed; whole genomes of the Bur-0 and Tsu-1 strains were sequenced with an early version of the Illumina sequencer [4]. The genomes of ebi-1 and Ws-2, which are clock mutants, were also sequenced [5]. Whole genomes of 80 strains isolated from eight regions were also sequenced [6]. In addition, whole genomes of 18 Arabidopsis ecotypes were sequenced along with providing assembled sequences for each ecotype, which can be used in further comparative genomic analyses [7]. However, the organelle genomes of 1the 8 ecotype genomes were not correctly assembled, though these can be rectified using raw sequences. With additional improvements in NGS technologies that have lowered the costs of sequencing, the number of sequenced A. thaliana isolates has been increased over time. Specifically, genomes of 180 Arabidopsis lines isolated from Sweden were sequenced [8]. 217 Arabidopsis individual genomes to uncover genome-wide methylation patterns were also sequenced [9], and the genomes of 118 Chinese Arabidopsis strains were sequenced showing that the Yangtze River population in China can be considered as an independent lineage on the same level of Central Asian and European isolates [10], and 1,135 natural isolates from all over the world were sequenced and analyzed [11]. Interestingly, except for one study on the sequencing Chinese A. thaliana strains [10], only two Arabidopsis strains originated from East Asia have been sequenced (Kyoto and Tsu0 from Japan) [11]. Therefore, once any genome sequences of Arabidopsis isolated in Korea are available, they can serve as a bridge connecting between China and Japan as part of the effort to construct the evolution history of natural isolates of A. thaliana in East Asia.

Although more than 1,750 Arabidopsis genomes have been sequenced, chloroplast genomes from these strains have not been assembled to ascertain the sequence variations of the chloroplast genome except for Ler-0 [12]. This is likely to be due to the fact that the chloroplast genome does not contain enough information to attract researchers comparing with whole genome sequences. However, chloroplast genomes are occasionally useful for unravelling corresponding phylogenetic relationships based on the maternal lineage: e.g., Lindera genus [13], Fagopyrum genus [14], Potentilla genus [1521], Pseudostellaria genus [2226], and Dysphania genus [2730]. Moreover, several studies that described assembled organelle genomes from NGS raw sequences generated with different purposes have been conducted [31, 32].

To understand characteristics of A. thaliana isolated in Korea (termed 180404IB4) based on chloroplast genome sequences, we completed its chloroplast genome, presenting the third chloroplast genome of A. thaliana based on the NCBI database and related publications [2, 12]. The chloroplast genome of A. thaliana 180404IB4 presented the shortest total length and the shortest inverted repeat (IR) region length, caused by a 6 bp deletion on ycf2. Due to the limitation of available chloroplast genomes of A. thaliana (only two are available in NCBI: Col0 and Ler-0), we assembled three additional chloroplast genomes of East Asian isolates of A. thaliana from raw sequences downloaded from the Short Read Archive (SRA) in NCBI, indicating that Tsu0 (Japanese isolate) had the longest length due to an approximately 500 bp insertion. Numbers of sequence variations calculated based on the 180404IB4 chloroplast genome are in the middle of the numbers of intraspecific variations of many plant chloroplast genomes. Phylogenetic analyses of these chloroplast genomes indicate that 180404IB4 (Korea) and 11-15 (Chinese) are clustered, whereas two Japanese isolates (Kyoto and Tsu0) are scattered. These results will provide a glimpse of the evolutionary history of A. thaliana in the East Asian area region together with upcoming research results.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. DNA Extraction of Korean A. thaliana Natural Isolate

The Korean A. thaliana natural isolate was collected in Yeonggwang-gun, Junranam Province, South Korea (35.242862N, 126.508987E; 180404IB4; Y. Kim, IB-00583, InfoBoss Cyber Herbarium (IN)) in 2018. Its total DNA was extracted from fresh leaves using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).

2.2. Genome Sequencing and De Novo Assembly of the Korean Natural Isolate A. thaliana Chloroplast Genome

Genome sequencing was performed using HiSeqX at Macrogen Inc., Korea, from the extracted DNA of the Korean A. thaliana de novo assembly, with confirmation accomplished with Velvet 1.2.10 [33] after filtering raw reads using Trimmomatic 0.33 [34]. After obtaining the first draft of the chloroplast genome sequences, gaps were filled with GapCloser 1.12 [35] and all bases from the assembled sequences were confirmed by checking each base in the alignment (tview mode in SAMtools 1.9 [36]) against the assembled chloroplast genome generated with BWA 0.7.17 [37]. All these bioinformatic processes were conducted under the environment of Genome Information System (GeIS; http://geis.infoboss.co.kr/; Park et al., in preparation).

2.3. De Novo Assembly of the Japanese and Chinese Natural Isolates A. thaliana Chloroplast Genomes

Raw sequences downloaded from NCBI SRA (SRR492307; Kyoto (Japan), ERR031555; Tsu0 (Japan) and SRR2204166; 15-11 (China)) [7, 9, 10] were used for chloroplast de novo genome assembly with Velvet 1.2.10 [33] after filtering raw reads using Trimmomatic 0.33 [34] under the environment of Genome Information System (GeIS; http://geis.infoboss.co.kr/; Park et al., in preparation). The remaining steps for finalizing the chloroplast genomes are identical to those used in the assembly process of the Korean A. thaliana.

.

2.4. Chloroplast Genome Annotation

Geneious R11 11.0.5 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) was used for chloroplast genome annotation based on the A. thaliana chloroplast genome (NC_000921) [2] by transferring annotations while correcting exceptional cases, including missing start or stop codons. tRNA was predicted and confirmed using tRNAScan-SE [38].

2.5. Identification of Sequence Variations on Arabidopsis Complete Chloroplast Genomes

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions and deletions (INDELs) were identified from the pairwise alignment of two chloroplast genomes conducted by MAFFT 7.450 [39] in the environment of the Plant Chloroplast Database (PCD; http://www.cp-genome.net/).

2.6. Identification of Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs)

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified on the chloroplast genome sequence using the pipeline of the SSR database (SSRDB; http://ssr.pe.kr/; Park et al., in preparation). Based on the conventional definition of a SSR on a chloroplast genome, monoSSR (1 bp) to hexaSSR (6 bp), the total length of SSRs on the chloroplast genome exceeds 10 bp. Owing to the different criteria of SSRs on chloroplast genomes [26, 4045], we adopted the criteria used in chloroplast genome of Dysphania ambrosioides [30], as follows: the monoSSR (unit sequence length of 1 bp) to hexaSSR (6 bp) are used as normal SSRs, and heptaSSR (7 bp) to decaSSR (10 bp) are defined as extendedSSRs. Among the normal SSRs, pentaSSRs and hexaSSRs for which the number of unit sequences is 2 are classified as potentialSSRs.

2.7. Comparison of SSRs Identified from Six A. thaliana Chloroplast Genomes

SSRs identified from six A. thaliana chloroplast genomes were compared based on their flanking sequences under the environment of the SSRDB (http://ssr.pe.kr; Park et al., in preparation). The pipeline of the SSR comparison implemented in the SSRDB was used with the following conditions: a cut-off value of and a maximum flanking sequence for the comparison of 60 bp. This comparison was utilized in a comparative analysis of Chenopodium chloroplast genomes (Park et al., in preparation) and Stegobium paniceum (Park et al., under revision) and Figulus binodulus (Lee et al., [46]) mitochondrial genomes.

2.8. Nucleotide Diversity Analysis

Nucleotide diversity was calculated using the method proposed by Nei and Li [47] based on the multiple sequence alignment of Arabidopsis chloroplast genomes using a Perl script. The window size was set to 500 bp and the step size was 200 bp when using the sliding window method. Genomic coordination of each window was compared to the gene annotation of the chloroplast genome under the environment of PCD environment for further analyses.

2.9. Construction of Phylogenetic Trees

Whole chloroplast genomes of seventeen Arabidopsis genomes and one Arabis chloroplast genome were aligned by MAFFT 7.450 [39], and alignment quality was checked manually. The neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum likelihood (ML) trees were reconstructed in MEGA X [48]. In the ML analysis, a heuristic search was used with nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) branch swapping, Tamura-Nei model, and uniform rates among sites. All other options used the default settings. Bootstrap analyses with 1,000 pseudoreplicates were conducted with the same options. The posterior probability of each node was estimated by Bayesian inference (BI) using the Mr. Bayes 3.2.6 [49] plug-in implemented in Geneious R11 11.0.5. The HKY85 model with gamma rates was used as a molecular model. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm was employed for 1,100,000 generations, sampling trees every 200 generations, with four chains running simultaneously. Trees from the first 100,000 generations were discarded as burn-in.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Complete Chloroplast Genome of the First Korean Isolate of A. thaliana and Comparison with A. thaliana Chloroplast Genomes Assembled from NGS Raw Reads

The chloroplast genome of A. thaliana 180404IB4 (GenBank accession number is MK353213) is 154,464 bp and has four subregions with 85,164 bp of large single copy (LSC) and 17,781 bp of small single copy (SSC) regions separated by 26,257 bp of inverted repeat (IR; Figure 1). It contains 130 genes (85 protein-coding genes, eight rRNAs, and 37 tRNAs), with 19 genes (8 protein-coding genes, 4 rRNAs, and 7 tRNAs) that are duplicated in IR regions (Figure 1). The overall GC content is 36.3%, and those contents in the LSC, SSC, and IR regions are 34.0%, 29.3%, and 42.3%, respectively.

To determine the characteristics of A. thaliana chloroplast genomes from East Asia, we also completed three chloroplast genomes of A. thaliana, two from Japan (Tokyo and Tsu0) and one from China (11-15; Table 1). In addition, two available chloroplast genomes (Col0 and Ler-0) were used for comparative analyses. Their lengths range from 154,464 bp (180404IB4) to 154,938 bp (Tsu0) and the IR length ranges from 26,257 bp to 26,264 bp (Table 1). The chloroplast genome of the Korean isolate, 180404IB4, is the shortest, and its IR is also the shortest among four East Asian A. thaliana chloroplasts (Table 1). It is caused by 6 bp deletion on ycf2 located in the IR region compared to the rest five A. thaliana chloroplast genomes. Interestingly, Tsu0 shows the longest length of chloroplast genome, caused by an insertion of approximately 500 bp between trnL and trnF, which is similar to the cases of Coffea arabica with one continuous insertion region [50], Duchesnea chrysantha showing three continuous insertion regions [21], Viburnum amplificatum showing two continuous insertion regions [32], and mitochondrial genomes of Populus tremula x Populus glandulosa and Liriodendron tulipifera with four and thirty-three continuous insertion regions, respectively [51, 52].


Strain nameCountryGenBank accessionLength (bp)GC contents
WholeLSCSSCIRWholeLSCSSCIR

180404IB4KoreaMK353213154,46484,17017,78126,25736.3%34.0%29.3%42.3%
KyotoJapanMK380720154,47084,16217,78126,26436.3%34.0%29.3%42.3%
Tsu0JapanMK380721154,93884,63017,78126,26436.3%34.1%29.3%42.3%
11-15ChinaMK380719154,48784,17917,78126,26436.3%34.0%29.3%42.3%
Col0USANC_000932154,47884,17017,78126,26436.3%34.0%29.3%42.3%
Ler-0GermanyKX551970154,51584,21317,78026,26136.3%34.0%29.3%42.3%

The GC content of the six complete chloroplast genomes of the Arabidopsis isolates is 36.3% and those of LSC, SSC, and IR are 34.0%, 29.3%, and 42.0%, respectively. An exception is GC content of the LSC of Tsu0, which is 34.1% (Table 1). This is also caused by the inserted region of the Tsu0 chloroplast genome. Other plant chloroplasts of which intraspecific variations of the GC contents are identical to those of A. thaliana are Goodyera schlechtendaliana (37.1% and 37.2%) [5355] and Gastrodia elata (26.7% and 26.8%) [5658] which are same to those of Arabidopsis thaliana, while Coffea arabica [50, 5963], Viburnum erosum [64, 65], Duchesnea chrysantha [20, 21], Salix koriyanagi [66, 67], Pseudostellaria palibiniana [23, 25], and Pyrus ussuriensis [68, 69] present no difference in the intraspecific GC contents.

3.2. Identification and Evaluation of Sequence Variations of the A. thaliana 180404IB4 Chloroplast Genome against the Col0 Chloroplast Genome

Based on the pairwise alignment with the A. thaliana Col0 chloroplast genome (GenBank accession is NC_000932), 50 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 14 insertion and deletions (INDELs) are identified. Two SNPs on rpoC2 and one SNP each on the ycf2 and ndhF genes are nonsynonymous SNPs, while for rpoC2, rpoB, rbcL, rpl20, and psbB, one SNP in each case is synonymous (Table 2). Specifically, the ycf2 has a 6 bp deletion on the 180404IB4 chloroplast; this does not cause frameshift but is a critical variation making the 180404IB4 chloroplast shortest among the six chloroplast genomes (Tables 1 and 2). Except for this deletion, all INDELs exist in the intergenic space. These INDELs cause the 180404IB4 chloroplast genome to be shorter than the chloroplast genome of Col0 by 14 bp.


NoTypeGenomic coordinationGene nameBase changesAmino acid changes

1SNP4,370Intergenic spaceT to A-
2SNP5,705Intron of rps16C to A-
3SNP5,943Intron of rps16G to A-
4SNP8,502IntergenicT to A-
5SNP12,673Exon of atpFG to ASynonymous SNPs
6SNP14,825IntergenicT to A
7SNP16,380Exon of rpoC2G to CC to S
8SNP17,801Exon of rpoC2T to CSynonymous SNP
9SNP17,823Exon of rpoC2T to GK to T
10SNP23,915Exon of rpoBT to GSynonymous SNP
11SNP26,817Exon of rpoBG to CSynonymous SNP
12SNP26,999IntergenicT to G
13SNP27,538IntergenicC to A
14SNP28,360IntergenicT to G
15SNP31,912IntergenicA to C
16SNP35,167IntergenicG to A
17SNP36,798IntergenicT to C
18SNP45,107IntergenicG to A
19SNP47,760IntergenicT to G
20SNP49,938IntergenicT to A
21SNP50,606IntergenicT to A
22SNP50,688IntergenicT to A
23SNP56,373Exon of rbcLC to TSynonymous SNP
24SNP58,860IntergenicG to C
25SNP65,250IntergenicT to C
26SNP65,545IntergenicT to G
27SNP66,114IntergenicC to A
28SNP66,810IntergenicT to C
29SNP67,142IntergenicT to A
30SNP67,143IntergenicG to A
31SNP67,145IntergenicT to A
32SNP67,146IntergenicG to C
33SNP67,147IntergenicT to A
34SNP67,149IntergenicT to C
35SNP67,150IntergenicT to A
36SNP68,722Exon of rpl20T to CSynonymous SNP
37SNP69,347IntergenicG to A
38SNP73,507Exon of psbBT to GSynonymous SNP
39SNP75,386IntergenicG to A
40SNP77,830IntergenicG to A
41SNP80,688IntergenicT to G
42SNP91,824Exon of ycf2G to CR to T
43SNP96,023Intron of ndhBT to G
44SNP111,048Exon of ndhFT to CG to R
45SNP113,690IntergenicT to G
46SNP113,770IntergenicT to G
47SNP113,957IntergenicC to A
48SNP115,487IntergenicT to G
49SNP142,626Intron of ndhBT to G
50SNP146,825Exon of ndhFT to CG to R
51INDEL92,548Exon of ycf2T to -DN to -
52INDEL92,549Exon of ycf2G to -
53INDEL92,550Exon of ycf2A to -
54INDEL92,551Exon of ycf2T to -
55INDEL92,552Exon of ycf2A to -
56INDEL92,553Exon of ycf2A to -
57INDEL108,115IntergenicA to -
58INDEL130,525IntergenicT to -
59INDEL146,092Exon of ycf2A to -DN to -
60INDEL146,093Exon of ycf2T to -
61INDEL146,094Exon of ycf2C to -
62INDEL146,095Exon of ycf2A to -
63INDEL146,096Exon of ycf2T to -
64INDEL146,097Exon of ycf2T to -

To evaluate the degree of these sequence variations including SNPs and INDELs, we investigated studies of intraspecific variations on chloroplast genomes that checked numbers of SNPs and INDELs (Table 3). Some of these studies are compared chloroplast genomes of natural isolates (e.g., Duchesnea chrysantha [21]) and some compared among cultivars to find useful molecular markers (e.g., Chenopodium quinoa [70]; Table 3). These studies cover 23 families showing relatively large coverage, so that we expected that some characteristics of these sequence variations on chloroplast genomes can be rescued. In addition, we used number of SNPs and INDELs directly during comparison of sequence variations for better understanding intuitively because their complete chloroplast genome lengths are around 150 kb except genera Marchantia, Selaginella, Gastrodia, Illicium, Pseudostellaria, and Daphne (Table 3).


FamilySpeciesTotal length (bp)# of SNPs# of INDELsComparison samplesRef.

MarchantiaceaeMarchantia polymorpha120,288~120,30440Samples isolated in KoreaKitashirakawa-2 (Japan)[71]
00Takaragaike-1 (Japan)Kitashirakawa-2 (Japan)
69660MG762001 (Poland)Kitashirakawa-2 (Japan)
SelaginellaceaeSelaginella tamariscina126,368~126,7001,2131,641Sample isolate in KoreaSample isolate in China[74]
Selaginella uncinate144,161~144,710525602Sample isolate in JapanSample isolate in China
MagnoliaceaeMagnolia kobus159,411~159,4435050Sample isolate in Korea (Jeju Island)Sample isolate in Korea (Jeju Island)In prep.
Liriodendron tulifipera159,886120Sample isolate in KoreaSample isolate in China[52]
NymphaeaceaeNymphaea alba159,25~159,930116Sample imported in KoreaSample isolated in Germany[16]
SchisandraceaeIllicium anisatum142,723~142,74721114Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in USA[102]
RubiaceaeCoffea arabica155,186~155,27722Cold hardness coffee tree (CH3) planted in Jeju IslandNC_008535[62]
02Coffee tree showing high productivity (HP1) in Jeju IslandNC_008535[61]
084Coffee tree imported to Korea from Indonesia in near to 30 years ago (IN1)NC_008535[50]
38NC_008535Coffea arabica “Typica”[59]
03KY085909
04MK342634, CH3 isolate
04HP1 isolate
090IN1 isolate
36NC_008535Coffea arabica “Typica Bluemoutain”[60]
01KY085909
06MK342634, CH3 isolate
06HP1 isolate
088IN1 isolate
02Coffea arabica “Typica”
00CH1 isolateCH2 isolate[63]
TheaceaeCamellia japonica156,606~157,047252Sample isolated in Soyeonpyeong-do, Incheon, KoreaWimi-ri in Jeju, Korea[72]
78643Sample isolated in Soyeonpyeong-do, Incheon, KoreaSample isolated in China
11Sample isolated in Seogwang-ri, Jeju, KoreaSample isolated in Soyeonpyeong-do, Incheon, Korea[105]
CaryophyllaceaePseudostellaria longipedicellata149,66800Sample isolate in Mt. Taebak, KoreaSample isolate in Mt. Taebak, KoreaUnpub.
Pseudostellaria palibiniana149,639~149,66884125Sample isolated in Mt. Taebaek, KoreaSample isolated in Mt. Gwangdeok, Korea[25]
SalicaceaeSalix koriyanagi155,54800Male sample in Seoul, KoreaFemale sample in Seoul, Korea[67]
RosaceaeAgrimonia pilosa155,125258542Samples isolated in KoreaSamples isolated in China[110]
Duchesnea indica156,05045273Samples isolated in KoreaSamples isolated in China[19]
Duchesnea chrysantha156,29~156,3874858Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in Japan[21]
Pyrus ussuriensis159,986~160,157121781Sample isolated in Bonghwa-gun, KoreaSample isolated in Mt. Hambeak, Korea[68]
FagaceaeFagus multinervis158,34922Sample isolated in Ulleungdo Island, KoreaSample isolated in Ulleungdo Island, Korea[111]
OrobanchaceaeRehmannia glutinosa153,622~153,68014787Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in China[73]
CucurbitaceaeCucumis melo155,815~156,01720Cultivar TopmarkCultivar DHL92[76]
10Cultivar MR-1Cultivar DHL92
20Cultivar M4-Cultivar DHL92
10Cultivar M4Cultivar DHL92
550Cultivar M1-1Cultivar DHL92
560Cultivar M1-3Cultivar DHL92
600Cultivar M1-7Cultivar DHL92
AmaranthaceaeChenopodium quinoa6928Cultivar 0654 (Peru)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)[70]
3323Cultivar Cherry Vanilla (Oregon, USA)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
1637Cultivar Chucapaca (Bolivia)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
3623Cultivar CICA-17 (Peru)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
00Cultivar G-205-95DK (Denmark)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
00Cultivar Ku-2 (Chile)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
3624Cultivar Kurmi (Bolivia)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
3523Cultivar Ollague (Chile)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
2513Cultivar Pasankalla (Peru)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
1736Cultivar PI 634921 (Chile)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
3724Cultivar Real (Bolivia)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
30Cultivar Regalona (Chile)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
3323Cultivar Salcedo INIA (Peru)Cultivar PI 614886 (Chile)
Dysphania pumilio151,960~151,962252Sample isolated in Anyang, KoreaSample isolated in Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Korea[28]
Suaeda japonica152,10933Sample isolated in Ganghwa, KoreaSample isolated in Julpo, Korea[112]
EucommiaceaeEucommia ulmoides163,341~163,5867580Sample isolated in ChinaSample isolated in China[75]
DioscoreaceaeDioscorea polystachya153,243~153,292990FLW genotypeBJXS genotype[77]
980TSW genotypeBJXS genotype
1100YTW genotypeBJXS genotype
990XSW genotypeBJXS genotype
1060NJW genotypeBJXS genotype
990MHW genotypeBJXS genotype
AsteraceaeArtemisia fukudo151,011~151,021711Sample isolated in Aphaedo, KoreaSample isolated in Jeungdo, Korea[113]
OleaceaeAbeliophyllum distichum155,982~156,0199356Sample isolated in Jincheon-gun, KoreaCultivar “Okhwang 1-ho”[90]
911Cultivar “Okhwang 1-ho”Cultivar candidate “Dae Ryun”[91]
10263Sample isolated in Jincheon-gun, KoreaCultivar candidate “Dae Ryun”
911Cultivar candidate “Dae Ryun”Cultivar candidate “Sang Jae”[92]
9356Sample isolated in Jincheon-gun, KoreaCultivar candidate “Sang Jae”
10MF407183Cultivar candidate “Sang Jae”
OrchidaceaeGoodyera schlechtendaliana153,661~154,438200511Sample isolated in Korea (MK144665)Sample isolated in Korea with different morphology (MK134679)[53]
2821,060Sample isolated in Korea (MK144665)Sample isolated in China (AB893949)
8271,794Sample isolated in Korea (MK144665)Sample isolated in China (NC_029364)
7001,066Sample isolated in Korea (MK144665)Sample isolated in China (LC085346)
163651Sample isolated in Korea with different morphology (MK134679)Sample isolated in China (AB893949)
7401,470Sample isolated in Korea with different morphology (MK134679)Sample isolated in China (NC_029364)
5971,065Sample isolated in Korea with different morphology (MK134679)Sample isolated in China (LC085346)
8442,045Sample isolated in China (AB893949)Sample isolated in China (NC_029364)
445414Sample isolated in China (AB893949)Sample isolated in China (LC085346)
7002,133Sample isolated in China (LC085346)Sample isolated in China (LC085346)
Gastrodia elata35,066~35,304457670Sample isolated in Korea (MN296709)Sample isolated in China[56]
493650Sample isolated in Korea (MN296709)Sample isolated in China[57]
324630Sample isolated in Korea (MN026874)Sample isolated in Korea (MN296709)
AdoxaceaeViburnum erosum158,587~158,6241649Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in Korea (MN218778)[64]
RanunculaceaeAconitum coreanum157,024~157,040517Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in Korea (NC_031421)[89]
2362Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in Korea (KU318669)
StaphyleaceaeEuscaphis japonica160,467~160,606424809Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in China(Oh et al., under review)
ThymelaeaceaeDaphne genkwa132,741~132,86969650Sample isolated in KoreaSample isolated in China(Oh et al., under review)

indicates that the numbers of SNPs and INDELs were inferred only from LSC, SSC, and IRb regions because one of chloroplast genomes used for comparison is partial genome.

The numbers of SNPs and INDELs, 50 and 14, respectively, between 180404IB4 and Col0 are smaller than those of Marchantia polymorpha between Korea and Poland (69 SNPs and 660 INDELs) [71], Camellia japonica (78 SNPs and 643 INDELs) [72], Rehmannia glutinosa (147 SNPs and 87 INDELs) [73], and Selaginella tamariscina (1,213 SNPs and 1,641 INDELs) [74] between Chinese and Korean isolates, Pseudostellaria palibiniana (84 SNPs and 125 INDELs) [25] and Pyrus ussuriensis inside Korea (121 SNPs and 781 INDELs) [68], Eucommia ulmoides inside China (75 SNPs and 80 INDELs) [75], some cases of Cucumis melo [76] and Chenopodium quinoa [70], all of Dioscorea polystachya [77], Oryza sativa among cultivars [78], G. schlechtendaliana [53], and G. elata [56] (Table 2). Some of species, such as Potentilla (49 SNPs and 17 INDELs are identified from Potentilla stolonifera var. quelpaertensis and Potentilla stolonifera var. chejuensis) [16, 18], present numbers of sequence variations similar to that of A. thaliana between 180404IB4 and Col0. Considering other cases involving the number of intraspecific variations on the chloroplast genome, including Salix (40 SNPs and 139 INDELs between Salix koriyangai and Salix gracilistyla) [66, 79], Ilex (55 SNPs and 429 INDELs between Ilex cornuta and Ilex integra) [15, 80], and Nymphaea (586 SNPs and 1,150 INDELs between Nymphaea capensis and Nymphaea ampla) [21], no clear levels pertaining to the number of intraspecific or interspecific variations exist. However, the numbers of SNPs and INDELs between 180404IB4 and Col0 are relatively small considering the intercontinental distance between two samples of the same plant species.

3.3. Comparison and Evaluation of Sequence Variations of Chloroplast Genomes of the Six A. thaliana in East Asia

Based on 15 pairwise alignments of the six A. thaliana chloroplast genomes, the numbers of SNPs and INDELs between two A. thaliana chloroplast genomes range from 10 to 116 and from 22 to 570, respectively (Figure 2). The Tsu0, Japanese natural isolate, chloroplast genome contains large insertions compared to the remaining five chloroplast genomes of A. thaliana, supported by the largest Tsu0 chloroplast genome (Table 1). The number of INDELs compared to the Tsu0 chloroplast genome (GenBank accession number is MK380721) ranges from 470 to 570, much higher than those of other combinations (Figure 2). This case is similar to those of C. arabica, showing one 84 bp insertion region [50] and D. chrysantha, presenting three insertion regions [21]. In terms of the number of INDELs, it is also in relation to high intraspecific variations that only P. ussuriensis [68], G. schlechtendaliana [53], and G. elata [56] present higher numbers of INDELs (Table 3). In addition, two out of the three Orchidaceae species shows high rates of divergence in terms of flower morphologies as well as the number of species [8183]. This indicates that the Tsu0 insertion is an exceptional case of intraspecific variation. Consequently, Kyoto (GenBank accession number is MK380720), which was also isolated in Japan, and Tsu0 correspondingly present 97 SNPs and 482 INDELs (Figure 2), suggesting that Tsu0 has a different genomic configuration compared to the remaining five strains.

The numbers of sequence variations on six Arabidopsis chloroplast genomes were plotted together with the numbers of intraspecific variations identified from 90 comparisons of 31 species (Table 3), resulting in three groups; one shows that the number of SNPs is less than 80 and that the number of INDELs is less than 100, the second indicates that the number of SNPs is less than 80 and number of INDELs is between 100 and 200, and the third shows that the number of SNPs exceeds 80 and that the number of INDELs is approximately 500 (Figure 3). The third group is caused by the long insertion of the Tsu0 chloroplast genome. The third group is positioned with a relatively high number of variations areas, while the remaining groups are similar to the most of intraspecific variations on chloroplast genomes (green thick dotted circles in Figure 3).

3.4. Comparative Analysis of Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) Polymorphisms on Chloroplast Genomes inside East Asian A. thaliana

One hundred and one simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and 42 extendedSSRs on the chloroplast genome sequences of the Korean isolate of A. thaliana were identified (Supplementary Table 1). One hundred and four (72.72%), 18 (12.59%), and 21 (14.69%) SSRs and extendedSSRs were found in the LSC, IR, and SSC regions, respectively. This distribution is similar to that of Dysphania ambrosioides, but not to those of Dysphania pumilio or Dysphania botrys [30]. Eighteen SSRs and four extendedSSRs (15.38%) are located in the exonic regions of ten protein-coding genes, matK, trnK, trnR, rpoC2, rpoB, atpB, accD, psbB, rps12, rpoA, ycf1, and ndhF, and two tRNA genes, which is higher proportion than that of D. ambrosioides [30]. In addition, the number of genes on the A. thaliana chloroplast genome exceeds that of D. ambrosioides by one, while five out of ten protein-coding genes are shared between two species. 25 SSRs and 13 extendedSSRs (26.57%) are in intronic regions of five protein-coding genes and three tRNAs: ycf3, rps12, clpP, rps16, and ndhA and trnK, trnR, and trnA, respectively. Compared to previous findings that identified SSRs in 12 chloroplast genomes of Brassicaceae, the numbers of SSRs found on the genes are similar to each other, ranging from 40 to 60 [45], which is similar to that of the A. thaliana Korean isolate.

We also applied the same method to identify SSRs of the other five chloroplast genomes of A. thaliana used in this study (Table 4). The total numbers of SSRs and extendedSSRs range from 143 to 145, showing that the Korean isolate of A. thaliana has the fewest, at 143 (Table 4). Based on the number of sequence variations among the six chloroplast genomes (Figure 2), the numbers of SSRs and extendedSSRs along with the motif length are expected to be nearly identical; however, only the triSSRs, nonaSSRs, and decaSSRs show identical numbers across the six chloroplast genomes (Table 4).


SSR type180404IB415-11KyotoTsu0Ler0Col0

MonoSSR676968706769
DiSSR171718161818
TriSSR666666
TetraSSR889899
PentaSSR232132
HexaSSR111101
HeptaSSR272525252625
OctaSSR8891087
NonaSSR666666
DecaSSR111111
Total143144145144144144

Using the SSR comparison pipeline implemented in SSRDB, 117 groups of SSRs or extendedSSRs containing six SSRs from the six A. thaliana chloroplast genomes are identified, accounting for 702 out of 864 SSRs or extendedSSRs (81.25%; Figure 4). There is one interesting SSR group (named as SSR Group 2) containing six SSRs from the six A. thaliana chloroplasts: two are octaSSRs (TATCTATA2) and four are diSSRs (TA5). Twenty-one SSR groups contain five SSRs or extendedSSRs from five chloroplast genomes, explaining 105 out of 864 SSRs or extendedSSRs (12.15%; Figure 4). Five SSR groups containing four SSRs or extendedSSRs from four chloroplast genomes and three SSR groups covering three SSRs or extendedSSRs from three chloroplasts, four SSR groups having two SSRs or extendedSSRs from two chloroplast, and 20 singletons, indicating unique SSRs, among the six chloroplast genomes are identified (Figure 4). Considering the coverage of the SSRs and extendedSSRs on Korean isolate of the A. thaliana chloroplast genome (in total, 1,825 bp out of 154,464 bp; 1.18%), the expected number of sequence variations of the SSR and extendedSSR regions is 0.75; however, the number of common SSRs or extendedSSRs is 117 (81.82%), indicating that the numbers of sequence variations located in SSR or extendedSSR regions are lower than expected number (107.25 sequence variations for SSR or extendedSSR regions). These variations can be used to develop molecular markers [41].

3.5. Comparison of Nucleotide Diversity among the Six A. thaliana Chloroplast Genomes

Nucleotide diversity among six Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast genomes was calculated, indicating that the average nucleotide diversity is 0.00017 (Figure 5(a)), which is at least ten times lower than those of Dysphania (0.0068; Chenopodiaceae) [27] and Viburnum (0.00176; Adoxaceae) [32]. This is a justifiable result because sequence diversity within species is usually lower than interspecific nucleotide diversity.

There are two significant peaks identified in the sliding window analysis of nucleotide diversity: one is trnL/trnF (pi value is 0.0147) and the other is trnP/psaJ (pi value is 0.00441). There are fewer peaks than in other studies, including those focusing on Dysphania [27] and Viburnum [32], stemming from the low level of nucleotide diversity throughout the chloroplast genome. The first peak, trnL/trnF, appeared due to one large insertion of the Tsu0 chloroplast genome (Figure 5(b)). The second peak, trnP/psaI, reflects the sequence variations occurring in 180404IB4 (Korea), 15-11 (China), Tsu0 (Japan), and Ler0 (Germany; Figure 5(c)). Specifically, SNPs located between 67,670 and 67,680 in both 180404IB4 and the 15-10 isolates mainly contribute to this peak (Figure 5(c)).

3.6. Comparison of the IR Junction among Arabidopsis thaliana Chloroplast Genomes

The IR region on the plant chloroplast genome is the major origin at which to expand or to shrink the chloroplast genome sequences [8488]. An investigation of the IR junctions of A. thaliana chloroplast genomes shows that there are no differences among six A. thaliana chloroplast genomes, in agreement with the finding of no structural variations (Figure 6), identical to the case of D. ambrosioides [30]. In addition, all Arabidopsis chloroplast genomes used in this study present the same structure in the IR junctions.

3.7. Phylogenetic Analysis of Korean A. thaliana Chloroplast Genome Sequence

Bootstrapped neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum parsimony (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic trees of seventeen Arabidopsis chloroplast genomes including six A. thaliana chloroplasts and one Arabis chloroplast genome as outgroup species indicate that 180404IB4 is clustered with the 15-11 (Chinese natural isolate) with high bootstrap support, while two Japanese isolates are not clustered together in contrast to what was expected here (Figure 7), as Tsu0 has an approximate 500 bp insertion compared to all other A. thaliana chloroplast genomes. This indicates that more chloroplast genomes of East Asian A. thaliana natural isolates should be investigated to find exceptional sequence variations, such as a Tsu0 insertion. Practically, it is possible to utilize currently available NGS raw read datasets of A. thaliana natural isolates by adding an effort to assemble them. In addition, we must consider the possibility of leaking Col0 strains from many molecular laboratories in Korea, which will affect their genetic diversity in some ways. Based on the phylogenetic trees, there appears to be no contamination in Korea.

Several intraspecific phylogenetic relations of plant species using whole chloroplast genomes have been studied, including Aconitum coreanum, showing small branches of three individuals with high bootstrap values from both ML and NJ methods from mid-level of sequence variations [89]; G. schlechtendaliana, displaying branches of each samples caused by a sufficient number of sequence variations with high bootstraps in both methods [53, 54]; Abeliophyllum distichum, indicating partial support of intraspecific individuals from both methods [9092]; and Coffea arabica, showing high bootstrap values from both methods with no branch of either individual sequences due to the low level of sequence variations [50, 5963]. All these results differ from that of A. thaliana, presenting a different clade structure from the phylogenetic trees constructed by three methods (Figure 7). Instead, this phenomenon was found in genome studies focusing on intraspecific variations of insect, fungal, and marine invertebrate mitochondria. These include Laodelphax striatellus [93, 94] and Nilaparvata lugens [9597] belonging to the Delphacidae family; Fusarium oxysporum which is a fungal plant pathogen [98, 99] and Apostichopus japonicus [100]. Because A. thaliana has a sufficient amount of sequencing data to construct chloroplast genomes, additional studies with more complete chloroplast genomes will provide a clear answer as to whether or not this phenomenon remains.

In addition, A. thaliana and Arabidopsis suecica are clustered because the maternal origin of A. suecica is A. thaliana [101] (Figure 7). Moreover, the topology of BI tree for the remaining Arabidopsis species, except for A. thaliana and A. suecica, is somewhat inconsistent to those of NJ and ML trees (Figure 7), which has also been found in various plant chloroplast genomes [15, 20, 28, 51, 67, 69, 72, 79, 91, 92, 102109]. This suggests that detailed investigations of phylogenetic relationships among Arabidopsis species with various methods should be done in near future.

4. Conclusions

We sequenced and assembled the chloroplast genome of the Korean isolate of A. thaliana and compared this with the other East Asian A. thaliana chloroplast genomes assembled from NGS raw reads available to the public. Based on the numbers of sequence variations of the six A. thaliana chloroplast genomes, three groups with low, medium, and high levels of sequence variations were found, particularly due to the large insertion identified on the Tsu0 chloroplast genome. Here, 101 SSRs and 42 extendedSSRs were identified on the Korean A. thaliana chloroplast genome, with similar numbers of SSRs on the remaining five chloroplast genomes with a preference of sequence variations of the SSR region. Nucleotide diversity on the six A. thaliana chloroplast genomes indicates only two regions that are highly variable, an outcome that is less dynamic than those of interspecific comparisons of chloroplast genomes. As expected, the IR borders of the six chloroplast genomes are conserved. Phylogenetic analyses of the six A. thaliana chloroplast genomes with those of other Arabidopsis species revealed that the geographical distribution is not congruent with the phylogenetic relationships; however, more complete chloroplast genomes are required for further analysis. Additional whole chloroplast genomes of A. thaliana strains based on a large amount of genomic resources of A. thaliana can describe the detailed evolutionary history of the natural isolates of A. thaliana in East Asia, especially for Korea, China, and Japan.

Data Availability

Chloroplast genome sequence of Korean A. thaliana can be accessed via accession number MK353213 in NCBI GenBank. In addition, three more chloroplast genomes of A. thaliana, Kyoto, Tsu0, and 11-15, based on SRA datasets are accessible through MK380720, MK380721, and MK380719, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was fully supported by the InfoBoss Research Grant (IBG-0023).

Supplementary Materials

List of SSRs identified from A. thaliana 180404IB4 chloroplast genome. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. E. M. Meyerowitz, “Arabidopsis, a useful weed,” Cell, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Sato, Y. Nakamura, T. Kaneko, E. Asamizu, and S. Tabata, “Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana,” DNA Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 283–290, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, “Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana,” Nature, vol. 408, no. 6814, pp. 796–815, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Ossowski, K. Schneeberger, R. M. Clark, C. Lanz, N. Warthmann, and D. Weigel, “Sequencing of natural strains of Arabidopsis thaliana with short reads,” Genome Research, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2024–2033, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Ashelford, M. E. Eriksson, C. M. Allen et al., “Full genome re-sequencing reveals a novel circadian clock mutation in Arabidopsis,” Genome Biology, vol. 12, no. 3, p. R28, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Cao, K. Schneeberger, S. Ossowski et al., “Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 956–963, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. X. Gan, O. Stegle, J. Behr et al., “Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana,” Nature, vol. 477, no. 7365, pp. 419–423, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Q. Long, F. A. Rabanal, D. Meng et al., “Massive genomic variation and strong selection in Arabidopsis thaliana lines from Sweden,” Nature Genetics, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 884–890, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. J. Schmitz, M. D. Schultz, M. A. Urich et al., “Patterns of population epigenomic diversity,” Nature, vol. 495, no. 7440, pp. 193–198, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y.-P. Zou, X.-H. Hou, Q. Wu et al., “Adaptation of Arabidopsis thaliana to the Yangtze River basin,” Genome Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 239, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Alonso-Blanco, J. Andrade, C. Becker et al., “1, 135 genomes reveal the global pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Cell, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 481–491, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. B. Stadermann, D. Holtgräwe, and B. Weisshaar, “Chloroplast genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana Landsbergerecta, assembled from single-molecule, real-time sequencing data,” Genome Announcements, vol. 4, no. 5, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M.-L. Zhao, Y. Song, J. Ni, X. Yao, Y.-H. Tan, and Z.-F. Xu, “Comparative chloroplast genomics and phylogenetics of nine Lindera species (Lauraceae),” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 8844, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. X. Wang, T. Zhou, G. Bai, and Y. Zhao, “Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Fagopyrum dibotrys: genome features, comparative analysis and phylogenetic relationships,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 12379, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Park, K.-I. Heo, Y. Kim, and W. Kwon, “The complete chloroplast genome of Potentilla centigrana Maxim. (Rosaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 688-689, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K.-I. Heo, J. Park, Y. Kim, and W. Kwon, “The complete chloroplast genome of Potentilla stolonifera var.quelpaertensis Nakai,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1289–1291, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Park, K.-I. Heo, Y. Kim, and W. Kwon, “The complete chloroplast genome of Potentilla fragarioides var. major Maxim,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1265-1266, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K.-I. Heo, J. Park, and Y. Kim, “The complete chloroplast genome of new variety candidate in Korea, Potentilla freyniana var. chejuensis (Rosoideae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1354–1356, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K.-I. Heo, Y. Kim, M. Maki, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of mock strawberry, Duchesnea indica (Andrews) Th. Wolf (Rosoideae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 560–562, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Park, K.-I. Heo, Y. Kim, M. Maki, and S. Lee, “The complete chloroplast genome, Duchesnea chrysantha (Zoll. & Moritzi) Miq. (Rosoideae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 951-952, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Park, Y. Kim, and K. Lee, “The complete chloroplast genome of Korean mock strawberry, Duchesnea chrysantha (Zoll. & Moritzi) Miq. (Rosoideae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 864-865, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Kim, K.-I. Heo, S. Lee, and J. Park, “Complete chloroplast genome sequence of the Pseudostellaria longipedicellata S. Lee, K. Heo & S. C. Kim (Caryophyllaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1296-1297, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Kim, K.-I. Heo, S. Lee, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pseudostellaria palibiniana (Takeda) Ohwi (Caryophyllaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 973-974, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Kim and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the Pseudostellaria okamotoi Ohwi (Caryophyllaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 174-175, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Kim, K.-I. Heo, and J. Park, “The second complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pseudostellaria palibiniana (Takeda) Ohwi (Caryophyllaceae): intraspecies variations based on geographical distribution,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1310-1311, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Kim, Hong Xi, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of Prince Ginseng, Pseudostellaria heterophylla (Miq.) Pax (Caryophyllaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2251–2253, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Kim, Y. Chung, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Dysphania pumilio (R.Br.) Mosyakin & Clemants (Amaranthaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 403-404, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Park and Y. Kim, “The second complete chloroplast genome of Dysphania pumilio (R.Br.) Mosyakin & Clemants (Amranthaceae): intraspecies variation of invasive weeds,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1428-1429, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. Chen and Z. Yang, “Characterization of the complete plastome of Dysphania botrys, a candidate plant for cancer treatment,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1214-1215, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Kim, J. Park, and Y. Chung, “Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome of Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants understanding phylogenetic relationship in genus Dysphania R. Br,” Korean Journal of Plant Resources, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 644–668, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  31. Y. Kim, K.-I. Heo, S. Nam, H. Xi, S. Lee, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of candidate new species from Rosa rugosa in Korea (Rosaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2433–2435, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Park, H. Xi, and S. OH, “Comparative chloroplast genomics and phylogenetic analysis of the Viburnum dilatatum complex (Adoxaceae) in Korea,” Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. R. Zerbino and E. Birney, “Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs,” Genome Research, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 821–829, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. M. Bolger, M. Lohse, and B. Usadel, “Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 30, no. 15, pp. 2114–2120, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Q.-Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, Y.-M. Kong, D. Luo, X. Li, and P. Hao, “Optimizing de novo transcriptome assembly from short-read RNA-Seq data: a comparative study,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 12, Suppl 14, p. S2, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Li, B. Handsaker, A. Wysoker et al., “The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools,” Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 2078-2079, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Li, “Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM,” 2013, http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997. View at: Google Scholar
  38. P. Schattner, A. N. Brooks, and T. M. Lowe, “The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, suppl_2, no. Web Server, pp. W686–W689, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. Katoh and D. M. Standley, “MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 772–780, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Chen, Z. Hao, H. Xu et al., “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the relict woody plant Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. N. Shukla, H. Kuntal, A. Shanker, and S. N. Sharma, “Mining and analysis of simple sequence repeats in the chloroplast genomes of genus Vigna,” Biotechnology Research and Innovation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. Li, C. Zhang, X. Guo, Q. Liu, and K. Wang, “Complete chloroplast genome of Camellia japonica genome structures, comparative and phylogenetic analysis,” PLOS One, vol. 14, no. 5, article e0216645, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J.-H. Jeon and S.-C. Kim, “Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome sequences of three closely related East-Asian wild roses (Rosa sect. Synstylae; Rosaceae),” Genes, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 23, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Cheng, Z. Zhao, B. Li et al., “A comprehensive characterization of simple sequence repeats in pepper genomes provides valuable resources for marker development in Capsicum,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. G. Gandhi, P. Awasthi, and Y. S. Bedi, “Analysis of SSR dynamics in chloroplast genomes of Brassicaceae family,” Bioinformation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Lee, J. Park, W. Kwon, H. Xi, and J. Park, “The complete mitochondrial genome of Figulus binodulus Waterhouse, 1873 (Coleoptera: Lucanidae),” Journal of Insect Science, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  47. M. Nei and W.-H. Li, “Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 76, no. 10, pp. 5269–5273, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Kumar, G. Stecher, M. Li, C. Knyaz, and K. Tamura, “MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1547–1549, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. P. Huelsenbeck and F. Ronquist, “MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees,” Bioinformatics, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 754-755, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi, and K.-I. Heo, “The complete chloroplast genome of ornamental coffee tree, Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1059-1060, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi, W. Kwon, and M. Kwon, “The complete chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of Hyunsasi tree, Populus alba x Populus glandulosa (Salicaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2521-2522, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. J. Park, Y. Kim, W. Kwon, H. Xi, and M. Kwon, “The complete chloroplast genome of tulip tree, Liriodendron tulifipera L. (Magnoliaceae): investigation of intra-species chloroplast variations,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2523-2524, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S.-H. Oh, H. J. Suh, J. Park, Y. Kim, and S. Kim, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Goodyera schlechtendaliana in Korea (Orchidaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2692-2693, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. S.-H. Oh, H. J. Suh, J. Park, Y. Kim, and S. Kim, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of a morphotype of Goodyera schlechtendaliana (Orchidaceae) with the column appendages,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 626-627, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Z. Niu, Q. Xue, S. Zhu, J. Sun, W. Liu, and X. Ding, “The complete plastome sequences of four orchid species: insights into the evolution of the Orchidaceae and the utility of plastomic mutational hotspots,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, p. 715, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Park, Y. Suh, and S. Kim, “A complete chloroplast genome sequence of Gastrodia elata (Orchidaceae) represents high sequence variation in the species,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 517–519, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M.-J. Kang, S.-C. Kim, H.-R. Lee et al., “The complete chloroplast genome of Korean Gastrodia elata Blume,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1015-1016, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. Y. Yuan, X. Jin, J. Liu et al., “The Gastrodia elata genome provides insights into plant adaptation to heterotrophy,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1615, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. Min, Y. Kim, H. Xi, K.-I. Heo, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of coffee tree, Coffea arabica L. ‘Typica’ (Rubiaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2240-2241, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi, and K.-I. Heo, “The complete chloroplast genome of coffee tree, Coffea arabica L. ‘Blue Mountain’ (Rubiaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2436-2437, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi, M. Nho, J. Woo, and Y. Seo, “The complete chloroplast genome of high production individual tree of Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1541-1542, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. Park, H. Xi, Y. Kim et al., “The complete chloroplast genome of cold hardiness individual of Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1083-1084, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi et al., “The complete chloroplast genomes of two cold hardness coffee trees, Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1619–1621, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. Y. G. Choi, N. Yun, J. Park et al., “The second complete chloroplast genome sequence of the Viburnum erosum (Adoxaceae) showed a low level of intra-species variations,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 271-272, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. Park, Y. G. Choi, N. Yun et al., “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Viburnum erosum (Adoxaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3278-3279, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. J. Kim, Y. Kim, and J. Park, “Complete chloroplast genome sequence of the Salix koriyanagi Kimura ex Goerz (Salicaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 549-550, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. Park, Y. Kim, and H. Xi, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of male individual of Korean endemic willow, Salix koriyanagi Kimura ex Goerz (Salicaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1619–1621, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M.-S. Cho, Y. Kim, S.-C. Kim, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of Korean Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. (Rosaceae): providing genetic background of two types of P. ussuriensis,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2424-2425, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. H.-Y. Gil, Y. Kim, S.-H. Kim et al., “The complete chloroplast genome of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. (Rosaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1000-1001, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. P. J. Maughan, L. Chaney, D. J. Lightfoot et al., “Mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes provide insights into the evolutionary origins of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.),” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 185, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. W. Kwon, Y. Kim, and J. Park, “The complete mitochondrial genome of Korean Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalis Bischl. & Boisselier: inverted repeats on mitochondrial genome between Korean and Japanese isolates,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 769-770, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi, Y. J. Oh, K. M. Hahm, and J. Ko, “The complete chloroplast genome of common camellia tree, Camellia japonica L. (Theaceae), adapted to cold environment in Korea,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1038–1040, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. J.-H. Jeon, H.-S. Park, J. Y. Park et al., “Two complete chloroplast genome sequences and intra-species diversity for Rehmannia glutinosa (Orobanchaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 176-177, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. J. Park, Y. Kim, G.-H. Lee, and C.-H. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of Selaginella tamariscina (Beauv.) Spring (Selaginellaceae) isolated in Korea,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1654–1656, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. W. Wang, S. Chen, and X. Zhang, “Whole-genome comparison reveals heterogeneous divergence and mutation hotspots in chloroplast genome of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 1037, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. Q. Zhu, P. Gao, S. Liu, S. Amanullah, and F. Luan, “Comparative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genomes in identification of phylogenetic association among seven melon (Cucumis melo L.) cultivars,” Breeding Science, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 711–719, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. J. Cao, D. Jiang, Z. Zhao et al., “Development of chloroplast genomic resources in Chinese Yam (Dioscorea polystachya),” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, 11 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. J. Tang, H.'. Xia, M. Cao et al., “A comparison of rice chloroplast genomes,” Plant Physiology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 412–420, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. H. Xi, J. Park, and Y. Kim, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of rose-gold pussy willow, Salix gracilistyla Miq. (Salicaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2118–2120, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. Park, Y. Kim, W. Kwon, S. Nam, and H. Xi, “The complete chloroplast genome of Nepal Holly, Ilex integra Thunb. (Aquifoliaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1257-1258, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. D. L. Roberts and K. W. Dixon, “Orchids,” Current Biology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. R325–R329, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. T. J. Givnish, D. Spalink, M. Ames et al., “Orchid phylogenomics and multiple drivers of their extraordinary diversification,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 282, no. 1814, p. 20151553, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. T. J. Givnish, D. Spalink, M. Ames et al., “Orchid historical biogeography, diversification, Antarctica and the paradox of orchid dispersal,” Journal of Biogeography, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1905–1916, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. W. Dong, C. Xu, D. Li et al., “Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome sequences in psammophytic Haloxylon species (Amaranthaceae),” PeerJ, vol. 4, article e2699, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. Y. Yang, T. Zhou, D. Duan, J. Yang, L. Feng, and G. Zhao, “Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of five Quercus species,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 7, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. Asaf, A. L. Khan, A. R. Khan et al., “Complete chloroplast genome of Nicotiana otophora and its comparison with related species,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 7, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Z.-Z. Li, J. Saina, A. Gichira, C. Kyalo, Q.-F. Wang, and J.-M. Chen, “Comparative genomics of the balsaminaceae sister genera Hydrocera triflora and Impatiens pinfanensis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 319, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S.-H. Kim, J. Y. Yang, J. Park, T. Yamada, M. Maki, and S.-C. Kim, “Comparison of whole plastome sequences between thermogenic skunk cabbage Symplocarpus renifolius and nonthermogenic S. nipponicus (Orontioideae; Araceae) in East Asia,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 19, p. 4678, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. Y. Kim, J.-S. Yi, J. Min et al., “The complete chloroplast genome of Aconitum coreanum (H. Lév.) Rapaics (Ranunculaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3404–3406, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi, T. Jang, and J.-H. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai (Oleaceae), cultivar Ok Hwang 1ho: insights of cultivar specific variations of A. distichum,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1640–1642, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. J. Park, J. Min, Y. Kim et al., “The complete chloroplast genome of a new candidate cultivar, Dae Ryun, of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai (Oleaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3713–3715, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. J. Min, Y. Kim, H. Xi et al., “The complete chloroplast genome of a new candidate cultivar, Sang Jae, of Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai (Oleaceae): initial step of A. distichum intraspecies variations atlas,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3716–3718, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. J. Park, J. K. Jung, Y. Ho Koh, J. Park, and B. Y. Seo, “The complete mitochondrial genome of Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén, 1826) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) collected in a mid-Western part of Korean peninsula,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2229-2230, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. B. Y. Seo, J. K. Jung, Y. Ho Koh, and J. Park, “The complete mitochondrial genome of Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén, 1826) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) collected in a southern part of Korean peninsula,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2242-2243, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. N. J. Choi, B.-C. Lee, J. Park, and J. Park, “The complete mitochondrial genome of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål, 1854) captured in China (Hemiptera: Delphacidae): investigation of intraspecies variations between countries,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1677-1678, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. J. Park, W. Kwon, J. Park et al., “The complete mitochondrial genome of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål, 1854) captured in Korea (Hemiptera: Delphacidae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1674–1676, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. N. J. Choi, B.-C. Lee, J. Park, and J. Park, “The complete mitochondrial genome of Nilaparvata lugens (Stål, 1854) captured in Guangxi Province, China (Hemiptera: Delphacidae): identification of the origin of N. lugens migrated to Korea,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1960-1961, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. W. Kwon, J. Park, J.-B. Kim, M.-J. Park, and T.-S. Kim, “Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of lettuce pathogenic fungus, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae 16-086,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3227-3228, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. J. Park, W. Kwon, J.-B. Kim, M.-J. Park, and T.-S. Kim, “Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of lettuce pathogenic fungus, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae 09-002,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3434–3436, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. J. Park, H. Xi, and C. Park, “The complete mitochondrial genomes from three body color variants of sea cucumbers, Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka, 1867),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 836-837, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. K. Mummenhoff and H. Hurka, “Allopolyploid origin of Arabidopsis suecica (Fries) Norrlin: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear genome markers,” Botanica Acta, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 449–456, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. J. Park, Y. Kim, and H. Xi, “The complete chloroplast genome of aniseed tree, Illicium anisatum L. (Schisandraceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1023-1024, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. W. Kwon, J. Min, Y. Kim, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of Reboulia hemisphaerica (L.) Raddi (Aytoniaceae, Marchantiophyta),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1459-1460, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. N. Yun, J. Park, and S.-H. Oh, “The complete chloroplast genome of the traditional medicinal plant Stellera chamaejasme L. (Thymelaeaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1796-1797, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. J. Park, Y. Kim, H. Xi, Y. J. Oh, K. M. Hahm, and J. Ko, “The complete chloroplast genome of common camellia tree in Jeju Island, Korea, Camellia japonica L. (Theaceae): intraspecies variations on common camellia chloroplast genomes,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1292-1293, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. W. Kwon, J. Min, H. Xi, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of Riccia fluitans L. (Ricciaceae, Marchantiophyta),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1895-1896, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. Y. Kim, J. Min, W. Kwon, M. J. Song, S. Nam, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the Nymphaea capensis Thunb. (Nymphaeaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 401-402, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. Y. Kim, J. Park, and Y. Chung, “The complete chloroplast genome of Suaeda japonica Makino (Amaranthaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1505–1507, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. S. S. Choi, W. Kwon, and J. Park, “The complete chloroplast genome of Scapania ampliata Steph., 1897 (Scapaniaceae, Jungermanniales),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2908–2910, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. K.-I. Heo, J. Park, H. Xi, and J. Min, “The complete chloroplast genome of Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. isolated in Korea (Rosaceae): investigation of intraspecific variations on its chloroplast genomes,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2264–2266, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. J. Park and S.-H. Oh, “A second complete chloroplast genome sequence of Fagus multinervis Nakai (Fagaceae): intraspecific variations on chloroplast genome,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1868-1869, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. Y. Kim, J. Park, and Y. Chung, “The comparison of the complete chloroplast genome of Suaeda japonica Makino presenting different external morphology (Amaranthaceae),” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1616–1618, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. J. Min, J. Park, Y. Kim, and W. Kwon, “The complete chloroplast genome of Artemisia fukudo Makino (Asteraceae): providing insight of intraspecies variations,” Mitochondrial DNA Part B, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1510–1512, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Jongsun Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1671
Downloads675
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.