International Journal of Genomics

International Journal of Genomics / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9939403 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9939403

Linchan Yu, Ding Huang, Jinyuan Gu, Dongjin Pan, Yong Tan, Rongshao Huang, Shaochang Yao, "Identification of Isoflavonoid Biosynthesis-Related R2R3-MYB Transcription Factors in Callerya speciosa (Champ. ex Benth.) Schot Using Transcriptome-Based Gene Coexpression Analysis", International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2021, Article ID 9939403, 13 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9939403

Identification of Isoflavonoid Biosynthesis-Related R2R3-MYB Transcription Factors in Callerya speciosa (Champ. ex Benth.) Schot Using Transcriptome-Based Gene Coexpression Analysis

Academic Editor: Ertugrul Filiz
Received17 Mar 2021
Revised30 Apr 2021
Accepted08 May 2021
Published26 May 2021

Abstract

The R2R3-MYB family is one of the largest plant transcription factor (TF) families playing vital roles in defense, plant growth, and secondary metabolism biosynthesis. Although this gene family has been studied in many species, isoflavonoid biosynthesis-related R2R3-MYB TFs in Callerya speciosa (Champ. ex Benth.) Schot, a traditional Chinese medicinal herb, are poorly understood. Here, a total of 101 R2R3-MYB TFs were identified from C. speciosa transcriptome dataset. 25 clades divided into five functional groups were clustered based on the sequence similarity and phylogenetic tree. Conserved motifs and domain distribution, expression patterns, and coexpression networks were also employed to identify the potential R2R3-MYB TFs in the regulation of isoflavonoid biosynthesis. In silico evaluation showed that the deduced R2R3-CsMYB proteins contain highly conserved R2R3 repeat domain at the N-terminal region, that is the signature motif of R2R3-type MYB TFs. Eight potential TFs (CsMYB17, CsMYB36, CsMYB41, CsMYB44, CsMYB45, CsMYB46, CsMYB72, and CsMYB81) had high degrees of coexpression with four key isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes (CsIFS, CsCHS7, CsHID-1, and CsCHI3), in which CsMYB36 as a potential regulator possessed the highest degree. HPLC analysis showed that formononetin and maackiain contents were significantly increased during the development of tuberous roots, which might be controlled by both related R2R3-CsMYBs and structural genes involved in the isoflavonoid biosynthesis pathway. The transcriptome data were further validated by reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis, and similar expression profiles between TFs and key structural genes were identified. This study was the first step toward the understanding of the R2R3-MYB TFs regulating isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa. The results will provide information for further functional analysis and quality improvement through genetic manipulation of these potential R2R3-CsMYB genes in C. speciosa.

1. Introduction

Callerya speciosa (Champ. ex Benth.) Schot, a medicinal plant of the Fabaceae family, has a long cultivation history in south China and is traditionally used as a medicine for enriching weakness, as well as strengthening bones and muscles. Modern pharmacological research has shown that C. speciosa can strengthen immunity, nourish lungs, exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-asthmatic effects [1]. Isoflavonoids are specialized metabolites produced from the tuberous roots of C. speciosa, including the index compounds maackiain and formononetin [2, 3].

Isoflavonoids are reported to be regulated by several structural genes in the (iso) flavonoid biosynthetic pathway, and those structural genes isolated and characterized to date are conserved in higher plants [4, 5]. The isoflavonoid C6–C3–C6 carbon skeletons are derived from p-coumaroyl-CoA, which is produced with the coordinated reaction of three key enzymes in the phenylpropanoid pathway: phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), and 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL). Chalcone synthase (CHS) can catalyze p-coumaroyl-CoA to naringenin chalcone alone, or it functions with chalcone reductase (CHR) to synthesize isoliquiritigenin chalcone. The products are further catalyzed by chalcone isomerase (CHI) to yield liquiritigenin [6]. Then, some of the downstream key enzymes of the isoflavonoid pathway are 2-hydroxyisoflavanone dehydratase (HID), isoflavone synthase (IFS), isoflavone 4-O-methyltransferase (HI4OMT), and vestitone reductase (VR), under the reactions of hydroxylation, dehydration, methylation, and glycosylation to form various isoflavonoid derivatives [7]. Recently, the coordinated expression of structural genes in the (iso) flavonoid biosynthetic pathway has been analyzed via the transcriptome data in several legume plant species, such as soybean, Pueraria candollei, and Pueraria lobata [6, 8, 9]. In C. speciosa, we have previously reported that 15 key genes might be involved in the isoflavonoid biosynthesis pathway, including IFSs, CHSs, and VRs [10].

In general, metabolite accumulation can be better controlled by coordinated regulation of key regulatory genes (i.e., TFs) in multiple steps, rather than modifying a single structural gene [11, 12]. More potential TFs and their target genes need to be characterized. The myeloblastosis (MYB) TFs are widespread in plants and are characterized by a conserved MYB DNA-binding domain at the N-terminus, which form a helix-turn-helix (HTH) structure of approximately 53 amino acid residues [13]. The R2R3-MYB IFs, which are the largest subfamily of MYB family TFs, contain two imperfect repeats in the MYB DNA-binding domain. They act by directly binding to the promoters of structural genes in the biosynthetic pathway or generally forming a ternary complex with basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) and WD-repeat proteins [14]. They were reported to play essential roles in secondary metabolism, hormonal signaling, and response to stress during plant growth and development [15]. For example, several R2R3-MYB IFs were identified to regulate the biosynthesis of flavonoids, including anthocyanins, flavonol, proanthocyanidins, and isoflavonoids. AtMYB11 and AtMYB12 positively regulated the biosynthesis of flavonol [16], while AtMYB111 played a vital role in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis [17]. Several R2R3-MYB proteins (GmMYB29, GmMYB12B2, GmMYB176, GmMYB133, GmMYB58, and GmMYB205) in Glycine max were identified as activators of isoflavonoid biosynthesis by up-regulating the expression of key structural genes [11, 12, 1820]. LjMYB14, which encoded R2R3-MYB protein in L. japonicas, positively modulated the structural genes in the phenylpropanoid and isoflavonoid biosynthetic pathways [21]. PmMYB18 and PmMYB75 might be positive regulators of isoflavonoid biosynthesis in P. candollei var. mirifica [9]. GbMYBFL was involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, which played a critical role in flavonoids and anthocyanin accumulation in Ginkgo biloba [22]. Considering the vital roles of R2R3-MYB TFs in secondary metabolism, identification and characterization of the R2R3-MYB TFs in C. speciosa can help further research on the regulation of isoflavonoid biosynthesis. To date, none of R2R3-MYB TFs has been genetically studied for their involvement in regulating isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa.

In the present study, a transcriptome-wide identification of R2R3-MYB TFs in C. speciosa was performed using the transcriptomic data. The characteristics of homologous domains and motif composition of R2R3-MYB members were investigated. We further analyzed the coexpression relationship between isoflavonoid biosynthesis-related genes and the putative R2R3-MYB TFs, which might be involved in the regulation of isoflavonoid biosynthesis. Finally, we validated the expression patterns of potential R2R3-MYB TFs and key structural genes in the isoflavonoid biosynthesis pathway by RT-qPCR analysis. Thus, a starting point for further functional analysis of R2R3-MYB TFs was performed in this study, which can offer candidate R2R3-MYB TFs for further studies to identify the roles of these genes for isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of R2R3-MYB Subfamily Genes in C. speciosa

After removing short sequences and redundant sequences, a comprehensive comparison analysis identified 101 genes encoding R2R3-MYB proteins in the MYB subfamily from the transcriptome dataset of C. speciosa, named CsMYB1–CsMYB101. The length of the translated putative protein sequences ranged from 105 to 1050 amino acids. The calculated molecular weight (MW) of R2R3-CsMYBs ranged from 12.16 kDa to 116.22 kDa. The calculated theoretical isoelectric points (pIs) ranged from 4.77 to 9.77. CsMYB11 possessed the longest sequence with 1050 amino acids and the largest MW of 116.22 kDa, while the shortest protein (105 amino acids) was CsMYB60 with the smallest MW of 12.16 kDa. Alpha-helix and random coil were the main secondary structures of R2R3-CsMYBs. Subcellular localization prediction results indicated that all R3R3-MYB proteins localized in the nucleus (ESM_1).

Multiple sequence alignment was also performed by Clustal X 2.0 to identify the characteristics of homologous domains in 101 R2R3-CsMYBs. As shown in ESM_2, the R2R3-CsMYBs contained typical R2 repeat, with basic R2 structures of [-W-(X19)-W-(X18)-W-]. A highly conserved triplet of tryptophan (W) was included in R2 repeat residues, and each tryptophan was separated by 18 or 19 amino acids. Besides the highly conserved W, several conserved positions were also identified in the R2 repeat, such as glutamic (E), aspartic (D), and arginine (R). In the R3 repeat, the majority of R2R3-CsMYBs had the basic R3 structure of [-F-(X18)-W-(X18)-W-], in which the first conservative W was substituted by other amino acids, such as phenylalanine (F), isoleucine (I), and leucine (L). The highly conservative sequences in the MYB DNA-binding domain were mainly located at the helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif (between the second and third tryptophan of the two R repeats), which functioned in identifying target sequences.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis and Putative Function of R2R3-MYB TFs

Eighteen R2R3-MYB proteins, which have been previously identified to regulate flavonoid biosynthesis as activators/inhibitors (ESM_3) in several plants, and the complete R2R3-MYB subfamily members in Arabidopsis (ESM_4) were collected. A neighbor-joining (NJ) unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using 101 R2R3-CsMYBs, 126 R2R3-AtMYBs, and 18 function-defined R2R3-MYBs in various plant species (Figure 1). The results showed that 25 clades were subdivided among the 101 CsMYBs based on the topology of the tree (ESM_5). These clades were designated C1 to C25 and separated with different colors, including 7 specific clades (30 proteins) of A. thaliana and 18 common clades (213 proteins) between C. speciosa and A. thaliana.

Homologous proteins that cluster in the same clade presumably possess similar functions. According to the function-annotated R2R3-MYBs from A. thaliana, the function of 101 R2R3-CsMYB proteins, belonging to 18 common clades, was predicted. These proteins were mainly divided into five functional groups (ESM_5). Group 1, including 24 proteins in two clades (C5 and C13), was mainly participated in embryogenesis (such as seed, endosperm, and cell differentiation) and development of epidermal cells. Group 2, including 37 proteins in five clades (C2, C15, C18, C21, and C22), was involved in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Group 3, including 20 proteins in five clades (C8, C10, C11, C19, and C25), was responsible for the regulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis, such as anthocyanins, glucosinolates, and flavonoids. Interestingly, most (75%) function-defined R2R3-MYB proteins in various plant species were classified to group 3. Group 4, including 9 proteins in three clades (C4, C12, and C14), played important roles in regulating the deposition and regulation of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose. Group 5 included 11 proteins in three clades (C3, C7, and C16), whose function was unknown yet. Therefore, these results indicated that R2R3-CsMYBs might play diverse roles in the growth and development, response to stress, and secondary metabolism biosynthesis of C. speciosa, in which R2R3-MYB proteins classified to group 3 might be involved in isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa.

2.3. Domain and Motif Composition of C. speciosa R2R3-MYB Family Proteins

To further investigate the characteristics of the homologous domains among the members of R2R3-CsMYBs (101 proteins), the online MEME tool was applied to analyze the motif distribution regions and the frequencies of the most prevalent amino acids at each position. A maximum of 10 motifs shared by 101 R2R3-CsMYB sequences were selected, and the logo pictures were downloaded from the MEME website (ESM_6). The results suggested that three categories were divided in all R2R3-CsMYB-translated putative protein sequences according to the logo compositions, including I, II, and III. Proteins in category III contained a DNA-binding protein REB1 residue (red), while the others had PLN03091 (green) or PLN03212 (yellow) residues. Among them, motif 3 (pink), motif 1 (green), and motif 2 (yellow) in order appeared in all sequences. Slightly different from the members in categories II and III, and the members in category I harbored motif 9 (purple) in front of motif 3, which belonged to the clades C6–C16 and C19–C25, suggesting that motif 9 might be associated with the DNA-binding site functioned regulation of secondary metabolism. Similarly, 12 out of 101 R2R3-MYB translated putative protein sequences in category III possessed highly conserved motifs 10, 3, 1, 2, 6, 4, 5, 7, and 8 in order, which might be involved in the regulation of embryogenesis (Figure 2). In these R2R3-CsMYBs, motif 3 and the front part of motif 1 were composed of the typical R2 repeat, while the latter part of motif 1 and the entire motif 2 were composed of the typical R3 repeat. Except for the triplet of tryptophan, the R2 and R3 repeats also contained several other conserved residues, such as glutamic acid (E)-aspartic acid (D) residues (ED), leucine (L) residues, and glycine (G) residues (Figure 3).

2.4. Expression Analysis of R2R3-CsMYB Genes Based on Transcriptome Data

To assess the potential regulatory function of R2R3-CsMYB genes in isoflavonoid biosynthesis, their expression profiles were analyzed by constructing a heat map using the transcriptome data of C. speciosa. The results showed significant differences in the expression profiles of R2R3-CsMYBs among the tuberous roots at four different developmental stages (6, 12, 18, and 30 months after germination (MAG)). Twelve R2R3-CsMYB genes were highly upregulated at both 12 and 18 MAG, such as CsMYB36, CsMYB41, and CsMYB56. Additionally, the expression levels of 23 R2R3-CsMYB genes were specifically upregulated at 18 MAG, whereas 22 genes were highly expressed at 12 MAG. Among the R2R3-CsMYB genes in group 3, fivegenes (CsMYB16, CsMYB40, CsMYB42, CsMYB44, and CsMYB88) showed high expression at 18 MAG, whereas six genes (CsMYB7, CsMYB14, CsMYB45, CsMYB73, CsMYB78, and CsMYB46) are especially high-expressed at 30 MAG. CsMYB36 and CsMYB41 were both highly expressed at 12 and 18 MAG. However, the expression of the other three genes (CsMYB17, CsMYB72, and CsMYB81) was at high levels at 12 MAG (Figure 4). Hence, we speculated that isoflavonoid biosynthesis might be promoted under the complex regulation of these genes during the thickening of C. speciosa tuberous roots.

2.5. Coexpression Pattern between R2R3-CsMYBs and Isoflavonoid Biosynthetic Genes

We have previously reported that 15 putative structural genes were involved in isoflavonoid biosynthesis, including HI4OMT, 2 VRs, 3 CHIs, 2 CHSs, 3 HIDs, 2 IFSs, I3H, and 4CL [10]. These genes had different expression patterns among the four different developmental stages (6, 12, 24, and 30 MAG). Two CHSs (CHS1 and CHS7) were both highly expressed at 12 MAG. However, more genes showed a low expression level at 12 MAG, such as HID-1, IFSs, I3H, VRs, and HI4OMT (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). To determine which TFs may play pivotal roles in isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa, gene coexpression network analysis was performed between 20 TFs in group 3 and 15 key structural genes involved in the isoflavonoid biosynthesis pathway. The results showed that 16 R2R3-CsMYB genes were coexpressed with these structural genes, in which eight CsMYBs had high degrees of coexpression with four isoflavonoid-related genes (CsIFS, CsCHS7, CsHID-1, and CsCHI3), indicating their potential contribution to isoflavonoid biosynthesis (Figure 5(c)). CsMYB36 showed the highest degree of coexpression with isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes, such as CHI1, HID-1, HI4OMT, VR-like, and CHS7. Further analysis of formononetin and maackiain contents indicated that they were both significantly increased during the development of tuberous roots (Figure 5(d)), indicating that isoflavonoid accumulation might be increased by upregulating both R2R3-CsMYBs and structural genes involved in isoflavonoid biosynthesis. The metabolic flux can be better controlled by coordinated regulation of them.

2.6. Validation of Candidate Genes Involved in Isoflavonoid Metabolism

The relative expression levels of key genes associated with isoflavonoid accumulation were analyzed to assess the accuracy of the transcriptome sequencing data. Twelve genes including eight TFs and four isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes were selected in this analysis. The results suggested that the RNA sequencing results (FPKM values) were generally consistent with the values of the selected genes. Significant Pearson correlations between FPKM and values were also identified in all tested genes (; , ) (Figure 6). Therefore, the RT-qPCR analysis confirmed the validity of the transcriptome data. Meanwhile, the RT-qPCR results showed that there were similar expression profiles between TFs and key structural genes, such as CsMYB72, CsCHS7, CsMYB17, and CsCHI3, suggesting that these TFs might activate the promoter activities of key structural genes to regulate isoflavonoid biosynthesis.

3. Discussion

The R2R3-MYB subfamily TFs play important roles in hormonal signaling, stress responses, and secondary metabolite accumulation in plants [14, 23]. Flavonoid metabolite biosynthesis is usually activated by R2R3-MYB proteins, including isoflavonoids in soybean (Glycine max) [11, 12, 1820], anthocyanin in Paeonia suffruticosa [24], and flavonoids in Ginkgo biloba [22]. C. speciosa has been used as a folk medicine for hundreds of years in China. Isoflavonoids are the most important active constituents in C. speciosa [25]. Isoflavonoids determine the quality of the drugs, and isoflavonoid content varies during the development of tuberous roots [10]. However, the molecular mechanism of isoflavonoid biosynthesis and accumulation that causes variation in isoflavonoid content remains largely unexplored. Therefore, research on R2R3-MYB TFs is helpful for understanding the potential transcriptional genes and their regulation networks of isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa.

For non-model plants whose genomes have not been sequenced, transcriptome sequencing is a relatively economic and reliable method, providing a dataset for gene screening and transcriptional profiling [26]. Increasing transcription factors have been isolated from plants using a transcriptome dataset, such as barley with 51 R2R3-MYB genes [27], Ginkgo biloba with 45 GbMYBs [15], and Gynostemma pentaphyllum with 125 GpAP2/ERF [26]. In the present study, 101 R2R3-CsMYBs that harbored conserved domains in C. speciosa were identified through transcriptome sequencing (Figure 1). Previous studies revealed that different numbers of R2R3-MYB genes exist in various species. Genome-wide analysis of Glycine max and Medicago truncatula has identified 244 and 150 R2R3-MYB proteins in legume species, respectively [13, 28]. The number of genes isolated from some plants such as sweet orange (100) [29] and Salvia miltiorrhiza (110) [30] was similar, but lower than that of R2R3-MYB proteins in Arabidopsis (126) [31]. Although we probably have not identified the whole R2R3-CsMYBs from C. speciosa transcriptome data, the identification of these genes can further enrich the resources of C. speciosa in GenBank.

The highly conserved tryptophan (W) residues distributed in the third helix are important for DNA-binding activity of MYB proteins, which may indicate functional conservation among different plant species [17, 32]. The members of R2R3-CsMYBs in C. speciosa contained the same Trp amino acid residues in the third helix, revealing their highly conserved characteristics (ESM_2). In general, all these proteins possess a highly conserved DNA-binding domain in the N-terminus, and the second half of each R structure is particularly conserved [13, 31]. In the present study, motif 3 (pink), motif 1 (green), and motif 2 (yellow) in order, which consisted of the typical R2 and R3 repeats, appeared in the N-terminus of all R2R3-CsMYB sequences (Figures 2 and 3). Besides them, the members in category I harbored motif 9 distributed in front of motif 3, whereas those in category III possessed a highly conserved motif 10 in front of motif 3. These results indicated that high conservation appeared in the R2R3-CsMYB proteins. The third helical structure of R2R3-CsMYBs was more conserved than the other two helical structures, which was consistent with the findings of previous studies [13, 33]. We assumed that the third helical structure might reflect the functional stability of R2R3-CsMYBs. On the other hand, the species-specific function of R2R3-CsMYBs may result from the variation of the key amino acids in this region. For example, the proline (P) (located on 58) in the linker region was substituted by serine (S) for 16 R2R3-CsMYBs, which was reported to decrease the stability of the protein-DNA complex and even lead to the loss of DNA-binding activity [34, 35]. Additionally, similar to the previous studies [23, 33], the species-specific sequence may distribute in the C-terminus (Figure 2) that distinguishes them from other subfamilies and affects their transcriptional activities. This finding further supported the diversity of the R2R3-CsMYB function.

To better classify the R2R3-CsMYB proteins and predict their functions, a comprehensive analysis of phylogenetic relationships was performed by comparing them with homologous proteins in other species (Figure 1). Based on the presence of distinctive motifs outside of the conserved MYB domains, the majority of the Arabidopsis R2R3-type MYBs were classified into 22 subgroups [31]. Due to the function of Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB TFs has been well studied and experimentally verified, we predicted the function of R2R3-CsMYBs according to the R2R3-MYB TFs in A. thaliana. Seven MYB subgroups have been shown to activate one or more branches of phenylpropanoid metabolism according to the function annotated of R2R3-MYB proteins in A. thaliana, including subgroups S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S12, and S13 [33, 36, 37]. In the present study, 25 clades were subdivided among the 101 R2R3-CsMYBs based on the topology of the tree and the classification of R2R3-MYB TFs, including 7 specific clades (30 proteins) of A. thaliana and 18 common clades (213 proteins), indicating a close relationship between A. thaliana and C. speciosa. The diverse gene structure implied a diverse gene function. Five functional groups were scattered according to the similar functions in this study, including growth and development, response to stress, and secondary metabolism (ESM_5). It is noteworthy that twenty proteins in group 3, including five clades (C8, C10, C11, C19, and C25), harbored motif 9 distributed in front of motif 3 in category I and clustered together with AtMYBs belonging to S4, S5, S6, S7, and S12, indicating that motif 9 might be related to the regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis. The phylogenetic relationships of 18 function-reported R2R3-MYB TFs in various plant species also supported our results, suggesting that the R2R3-CsMYB proteins distributed in group 3 might play important roles in isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa. The transcriptional function of R2R3-CsMYB proteins in group 3 warrants more detailed investigation.

Transcription factors are often coexpressed with their downstream structural genes. A similar expression pattern is usually an effective way to identify transcription factors regulating secondary metabolism. Several MYB genes in Pueraria candollei var. Mirifica (PmMYB18, PmMYB23, PmMYB75, and PmMYB76) showed similar expression patterns with the key isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes in tuberous cortices [9]. In potato, StAN1, a R2R3-MYB activator, previously named StAN2 in some studies, was highly expressed in anthocyanin-pigmented tubers and displayed a positive correlation with the transcript levels of structural genes, as well as with anthocyanin content [38]. Our previous studies indicated that IFSs, CHSs, HIDs, CHIs, HI4OMT, and VRs were key isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes [10]. As expected, the expression patterns showed that most R2R3-CsMYBs in group 3 exhibited similar expression patterns with key isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes. Further coexpression analyses identified that eight potential TFs (CsMYB17, CsMYB36, CsMYB41, CsMYB44, CsMYB45, CsMYB46, CsMYB72, and CsMYB81) were highly coexpressed with four key isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes (CsIFS, CsCHS7, CsHID-1, and CsCHI3), consequently promoted formononetin and maackiain accumulation (Figures 4 and 5). The similar expression profile between TFs and key structural genes, such as CsMYB72, CsCHS7, CsMYB17, and CsCHI3 (Figure 6), suggested that these TFs might act as activators in the promotion of isoflavonoid accumulation in C. speciosa roots.

In general, one TF may simultaneously regulate the expression of multiple structural genes and one gene can be simultaneously regulated by multiple TFs [39, 40]. In this study, CsMYB36 showed the highest degree of coexpression with isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes, such as CHI1, HID-1, HI4OMT, VR-like, and CHS7. It is interesting to further study how CsMYB36 interacts with key isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes in C. speciosa. Additionally, the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway is transcriptionally regulated by a MBW complex. The activation or repression role of the MBW complex was primarily determined by the MYB transcription factors through binding to the promoters of structural genes, together with the common bHLH and WD40 factors. No information is currently available on how the MBW complex performs its function and what mechanism occurs in C. speciosa. To increase the level of isoflavonoid biosynthesis in C. speciosa, the MBW complex function should be taken into account in the future.

4. Conclusion

The present study was the first transcriptome-wide detailed analysis of R2R3-MYB subfamily genes in C. speciosa. A total of 101 R2R3-CsMYBs were identified, which were classified into 25 clades based on their phylogenetic relationships. The deduced R2R3-CsMYB proteins contain highly conserved R2R3 repeat domain at the N-terminal region, that is the signature motif of R2R3-type MYB TFs. The conserved motifs and domain distribution, expression patterns, and coexpression networks help in identifying the potential R2R3-CsMYB TFs in the regulation of isoflavonoid biosynthesis. Eight potential TFs (CsMYB17, CsMYB36, CsMYB41, CsMYB44, CsMYB45, CsMYB46, CsMYB72, and CsMYB81) had high degrees of coexpression with four key isoflavonoid biosynthetic genes (CsIFS, CsCHS7, CsHID-1, and CsCHI3), in which CsMYB36 as a potential regulator for further investigation showed the highest degree. Further analysis of formononetin and maackiain contents was significantly increased during the development of tuberous roots, indicating that the metabolic flux might be controlled by both related R2R3-CsMYBs and structural genes involved in isoflavonoid biosynthesis. These findings not only potentially accelerate the process of genetic improvement of new cultivars with high isoflavonoid content but also provide novel insights into the molecular regulatory mechanisms of R2R3-CsMYB underlying isoflavonoid biosynthesis in this Chinese medicinal herb with enlarged roots.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Plant Materials

Seedlings of C. speciosa were incubated in wet perlite under dark conditions at until germination. Two days after germination, seedlings were cultured in a greenhouse equipped with a system for monitoring temperature (), relative humidity (), and natural photoperiod in the Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants (Nanning, China), with the same cultivation technique measure. Tuberous roots at four developmental stages (6, 12, 18, and 30 MAG) of C. speciosa were collected. Three different plants were used as biological replicates. Samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen after collection and stored at -80°C until further use.

5.2. Determination of Formononetin and Maackiain Contents

The content of formononetin and maackiain were detected according to the method described by Chen et al. [2]. In brief, diamonsil C18 (2) column was used as a chromatographic column. The mobile phase was at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min-1. The detection wavelengths were set at 248 and 310 nm. The column temperature was maintained at 35°C with an injection volume of 20 μL. The calibration curve of formononetin was in good linearity over the range of 0.0025−0.0610 μg (). The average recovery was 100.0% with RSD of 2.00% (). The calibration curve of maackiain was in good linearity over the range of 0.0387−1.0152 μg (). The average recovery was 100.6% with RSD of 0.70% ().

5.3. RNA Library Construction and Transcriptome Sequencing

Total RNA from roots was extracted according to the TRIzol method (Catalog No. 15596-018; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) as described in the manufacturer’s instructions. For each sample, an equal amount (20 μg) of total RNA () was applied to construct a cDNA library with the method described by Yao et al. [10]. Finally, twelve libraries (three replicates per sample) were sequenced in pair-end () format BGISEQ-500 sequencing platform, reads were processed and de novo assembled, and the results were analyzed by the BGI Tech Solutions Co., Ltd. (BGI Tech) (BGI, Shenzhen, China).

5.4. Analysis of the Transcriptome Data

Adaptor sequences (reads with ambiguous base “N”) and low-quality reads (reads having more than 20% of bases with ) were filtered. After filtering the raw data, we obtained 153,153 unigenes with a total length of 217.31 Mb and N50 value of 2,167 bp (ESM_7). The filtered clean reads can be found in the NCBI SRA repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/, with the accession No. SRP223620. The de novo assembly, annotation, and enrichment analysis of unigenes were performed according to the method of Yao [10]. The differential expression of unigenes was compared by using the DEGseq R package (1.18.0), with a threshold of in each pairwise comparison, and value < 0.05. In addition, multiple testing corrections were performed by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) to less than 0.05. Finally, the heat map of expression cluster of isoflavonoid-related genes was generated and visualized using TBtools software [41].

5.5. Identification of the R2R3-MYB Genes in C. speciosa

The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile for the MYB binding domain (PF00249) obtained from the Pfam 30.0 database (http://pfam.xfam.org/) [42] was used as a query to search in the C. speciosa transcriptome database using HMMER (http://hmmer.org/) [43] with an initial threshold value of for selecting ID numbers of all sequences containing MYB domains. A total of 142 contigs were found. All these contigs were downloaded from the transcriptome database and inspected to ensure they contained the conserved domains by SMART version 7 [44] (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) and NCBI’s conserved domain database (CDD) [41]. After removing short sequences (<100 bp) and fliting redundant sequences which shared >95% matches [26], the sequences with R2R3-MYB conserved domains were considered to be the R2R3-MYB superfamily members of C. speciosa. Then, we got the full-length CDS of 101 R2R3-CsMYB sequences. The physicochemical parameters of these proteins were then further analyzed. The predicted MWs and pIs of R2R3-CsMYB proteins were predicted with ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/) [33]. The subcellular location of R2R3-CsMYB proteins was predicted with the PSORT online program (http://www.genscript.com/psort.html). In addition, the sequences of the R2 and R3 MYB repeats in all R2R3-MYB proteins were aligned with the Clustal X 2.0 program to visualize their conserved DNA-binding regions. The heat map of the expression cluster of R2R3-MYB genes was visualized using TBtools software [41].

5.6. Phylogenetic Tree and Conserved Motif Analysis of MYB Proteins

The multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of 245 R2R3-MYB proteins was performed including 101 R2R3-MYB proteins of C. speciosa, 126 from A. thaliana, and 18 from other plants. The amino acid sequences of A. thaliana were downloaded from the TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/) database [31] (ESM_4). Eighteen proteins were retrieved from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/guide/protein/), which have been reported to regulate isoflavanoid biosynthesis (ESM_3). The 245 proteins were aligned in MEGA 6.0 for the construction of the phylogenetic tree [45]. The neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the aligned results with the following parameters: Poisson correction, pairwise deletion, and bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. The function of R2R3-CsMYB proteins in C. speciosa was classified and predicted according to the phylogenetic tree. The conserved motifs of R2R3-CsMYB proteins were analyzed using Multiple Expectation Maximization for Motif Elicitation 5.1.1 (MEME5.1.1: http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) [46], with the following parameters: minimum and maximum motif widths 6 and 50, respectively, and the maximum number of motifs 10. Finally, Tbtools software [41] was used to visualize the phylogenetic tree, conserved motifs, and domains of R2R3-CsMYB proteins.

5.7. Construction of Coexpression Network

The expression profiles of transcripts between key structural genes and all R2R3-CsMYBs, which potentially were responsible for the regulation of secondary metabolism, were used to construct the coexpression network. The expression correlation matrix was generated with Cytoscape v3.5.1 to measure the similarity of expression between pairwise genes. Gene pairs with (positive coexpression) or (negative coexpression) were considered significantly coexpressed.

5.8. RT-qPCR Analysis

To validate the expression profiles of candidate TFs and isoflavonoid-related genes in C. speciosa, RT-qPCR experiment was performed with SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). A total of 1 μg of RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent with the gDNA Eraser kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The cDNA was diluted to five-fold before preparing the reaction system. The RT-qPCR analysis was performed by following the MIQE guidelines [47]. The gene-specific primers were designed using Primer 5.0 (ESM_8) and synthesized by BGI-Shenzhen. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was selected as an internal reference gene. For each primer, a single amplification of expected length by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and a sole peak in the dissociation curve by RT-qPCR analysis were verified. The amplicon size ranged between 80 bp and 280 bp. The amplification efficiencies of the genes ranged from 95 to 115%. PCR reactions with no-template controls were also performed for each primer pair. The reactions were prepared in a total volume of 20 μL containing 10 μL SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™, 2 μL cDNA, 1 μL each 10 μM primer, and 6 μL ddH2O. The real-time PCRs were performed employing Light Cycler® 480II Real-Time System (Roche), according to the supplier’s manuals. All the PCRs were performed under the following conditions: one cycle of 15 min at 95°C for activation, followed by 40 cycles of 10 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C, and 30 sec at 72°C. Three technical replicates were conducted for each of the three biological replicates. The relative expression of the candidate gene was calculated by the formula [48]. Pearson correlation analysis between FPKM and 2ΔΔCq was performed using the R package.

5.9. Statistical Analyses

The summary statistics presented in the figures were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 software (Ehningen, Germany) and presented as the of three replicates for each sample. The statistical significance was determined by ANOVA. Values in figures marked with different lowercase and capital letters are significantly different at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively. The figures were drawn using the software GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Data Availability

The dataset generated for this study can be found in the NCBI SRA repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/, with the accession No. SRP223620.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

SY and LY designed the research; SY, LY, and JG performed the sample preparation, total RNA extraction, RT-qPCR analysis, and data collection; SY and DH performed the RNA-seq data, detection of formononetin and maackiain contents, and statistical analysis; SY and DH wrote the manuscript; DP, RH, and YT revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank PhD Qingxiao Li, University of Hawaii, for editing the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 82060685 and 81760689), the National Science Foundation of Guangxi (Nos. 2018GXNSFAA281287 and 2017GXNSFDA198001), the Fund of Guangxi Innovation-Driven Development (No. AA17204056), the Program of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Zhuang and Yao Ethnic Medicine (No. 20-065-14), and the Training Program for 1000 Young and Middle-aged Backbone Teachers of Guangxi Higher Education Institution in 2020.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary 1. ESM_1: physicochemical properties of R2R3-MYB family members in C. speciosa.

Supplementary 2. ESM_2: multiple alignment of the amino acid sequences of 101 R2R3-MYB domains in C. speciosa.

Supplementary 3. ESM_3: list of 18 R2R3 MYB proteins/genes from other plants and their reported functions.

Supplementary 4. ESM_4: list of 126 R2R3-MYB proteins/genes in Arabidopsis.

Supplementary 5. ESM_5: summary of R2R3-MYB superfamily genes and their predicted function in C. speciosa.

Supplementary 6. ESM_6: logo sequences of each motif of 10 conserved motifs shared by proteins of R2R3-MYB subfamilies.

Supplementary 7. ESM_7: summary of the BGISEQ-500 RNA-Seq data analysis.

Supplementary 8. ESM_8: sequences of primers designed for RT-qPCR analysis.

References

  1. S. Yao, L. Bai, Z. Lan et al., “Hairy root induction and polysaccharide production of medicinal plant Callerya speciosa Champ,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 177–186, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Chen, Z. Xie, F. Wu, Y. Wei, S. Lu, and H. Zeng, “Determination of maackiain and formononetin in root of Millettia Speciosa by HPLC,” Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Materia-World Science and Technology, vol. 15, pp. 260–263, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. H. Wang, Y. Wang, G. C. Wang, J. Ya, X. Q. Zhang, and W. C. Ye, “Chemical constituents from roots of Millettia speciosa,” Chinese Traditional & Herbal Drugs, vol. 39, pp. 972–975, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A. H. Naing and C. K. Kim, “Roles of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in horticultural plants,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 98, no. 1-2, pp. 1–18, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Zhou, Q. Zhang, Y. Sun, L. Yang, and Z. Wang, “Genome-wide identification and characterization of R2R3-MYB family in Hypericum perforatum under diverse abiotic stresses,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 145, pp. 341–354, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. X. Wang, S. Li, J. Li, C. Li, and Y. Zhang, “De novo transcriptome sequencing in Pueraria lobata to identify putative genes involved in isoflavones biosynthesis,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 733–743, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. Uchida, T. Akashi, and T. Aoki, “The missing link in Leguminous pterocarpan biosynthesis is a dirigent domain-containing protein with isoflavanol dehydratase activity,” Plant & Cell Physiology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 398–408, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Dastmalchi, P. Chapman, J. Yu, R. S. Austin, and S. Dhaubhadel, “Transcriptomic evidence for the control of soybean root isoflavonoid content by regulation of overlapping phenylpropanoid pathways,” BMC Genomics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 70–85, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Suntichaikamolkul, K. Tantisuwanichkul, P. Prombutara et al., “Transcriptome analysis of Pueraria candollei var. mirifica for gene discovery in the biosyntheses of isoflavones and miroestrol,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 581, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Yao, Z. Lan, R. Huang et al., “Hormonal and transcriptional analyses provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying root thickening and isoflavonoid biosynthesis in Callerya speciosa (Champ. ex Benth.) Schot,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Bian, R. Li, S. Xia et al., “Soybean CCA1-like MYB transcription factor GmMYB133 modulates isoflavonoid biosynthesis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 507, no. 1-4, pp. 324–329, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X. Han, Q. Yin, J. Liu, W. Jiang, S. di, and Y. Pang, “GmMYB58 and GmMYB205 are seed-specific activators for isoflavonoid biosynthesis in Glycine max,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1889–1902, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. du, S. S. Yang, Z. Liang et al., “Genome-wide analysis of the MYB transcription factor superfamily in soybean,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 106, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Wang, Q. Ma, J. Ma et al., “A comparative genome-wide analysis of the R2R3-MYB gene family among four Gossypium species and their sequence variation and association with fiber quality traits in an interspecific G. hirsutum × G. barbadense population,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 10, p. 741, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. X. Liu, W. Yu, X. Zhang, G. Wang, F. Cao, and H. Cheng, “Identification and expression analysis under abiotic stress of the R2R3-MYB genes in Ginkgo biloba L,” Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 503–516, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Stracke, H. Ishihara, G. Huep et al., “Differential regulation of closely related R2R3-MYB transcription factors controls flavonol accumulation in different parts of the Arabidopsis thaliana seedling,” The Plant Journal, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 660–677, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Ogata, S. Morikawa, H. Nakamura et al., “Solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain with cooperative recognition helices,” Cell, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 639–648, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. K. Anguraj Vadivel, J. Renaud, S. Kagale, and S. Dhaubhadel, “GmMYB176 regulates multiple steps in isoflavonoid biosynthesis in soybean,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 10, pp. 562–576, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Chu, J. Wang, Y. Zhu et al., “An R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, GmMYB29, regulates isoflavone biosynthesis in soybean,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 13, no. 5, article e1006770, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. W. Li, J. W. Li, Y. Zhai et al., “A R2R3-MYB transcription factor, GmMYB12B2, affects the expression levels of flavonoid biosynthesis genes encoding key enzymes in transgenic Arabidopsis plants,” Gene, vol. 532, no. 1, pp. 72–79, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. Shelton, M. Stranne, L. Mikkelsen et al., “Transcription factors of Lotus: regulation of isoflavonoid biosynthesis requires coordinated changes in transcription factor activity,” Plant Physiology, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 531–547, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. W. Zhang, F. Xu, S. Cheng, and Y. Liao, “Characterization and functional analysis of a MYB gene (GbMYBFL) related to flavonoid accumulation in Ginkgo biloba,” Genes Genomics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. Hou, Z. Cheng, L. Xie et al., “The R2R3MYB gene family in Phyllostachys edulis: genome-wide analysis and identification of stress or development-related R2R3MYBs,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 9, p. 738, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Zhang, Z. Xu, X. Yu et al., “Identification of two novel R2R3-MYB transcription factors, PsMYB114L and PsMYB12L, related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in Paeonia suffruticosa,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 1055, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Yu and X. Liang, “Characterization and identification of isoflavonoids in the roots of Millettia speciosa Champ. by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS,” Current Pharmaceutical Analysis, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 580–591, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Xu, S. Yao, R. Huang, Y. Tan, and D. Huang, “Transcriptome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF transcription factor gene family involved in the regulation of gypenoside biosynthesis in Gynostemma pentaphyllum,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 154, pp. 238–247, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Tombuloglu, G. Kekec, M. S. Sakcali, and T. Unver, “Transcriptome-wide identification of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in barley with their boron responsive expression analysis,” Molecular Genetics and Genomics, vol. 288, no. 3-4, pp. 141–155, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Li, Y. Liu, J. Zhao, X. Zhen, C. Guo, and Y. Shu, “Genome-wide identification and characterization of R2R3-MYB genes in Medicago truncatula,” Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 611–623, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Xu, X. Deng, and Q. Xu, “Genome-wide analysis of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene family in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis),” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 6769–6785, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Li and S. Lu, “Genome-wide characterization and comparative analysis of R2R3-MYB transcription factors shows the complexity of MYB-associated regulatory networks in Salvia miltiorrhiza,” BMC Genomics, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 277, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Stracke, M. Werber, and B. Weisshaar, “The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 447–456, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. du, B. R. Feng, S. S. Yang, Y. B. Huang, and Y. X. Tang, “The R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene family in maize,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 6, article e37463, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Yang, Y. Li, S. Wang et al., “Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the MYB transcription factor in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis),” PeerJ, vol. 6, article e6242, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. P. Dias, E. L. Braun, M. D. McMullen, and E. Grotewold, “Recently duplicated maize R2R3 Myb genes provide evidence for distinct mechanisms of evolutionary divergence after duplication,” Plant Physiology, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 610–620, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. X. Li, C. Xue, J. Li et al., “Genome-wide identification, evolution and functional divergence of MYB transcription factors in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri),” Plant & Cell Physiology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 824–847, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. R. Chezem and N. K. Clay, “Regulation of plant secondary metabolism and associated specialized cell development by MYBs and bHLHs,” Phytochemistry, vol. 131, pp. 26–43, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Deluc, F. Barrieu, C. Marchive et al., “Characterization of a grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor that regulates the phenylpropanoid pathway,” Plant Physiology, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 499–511, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. S. Payyavula, R. K. Singh, and D. A. Navarre, “Transcription factors, sucrose, and sucrose metabolic genes interact to regulate potato phenylpropanoid metabolism,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 64, no. 16, pp. 5115–5131, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. E. Grotewold, “Transcription factors for predictive plant metabolic engineering: are we there yet?” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 138–144, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. B. Tian, T. Lu, Y. Xu, R. Wang, and G. Chen, “Identification of genes associated with ricinoleic acid accumulation in Hiptage benghalensis via transcriptome analysis,” Biotechnology for Biofuels, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 16, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. C. Chen, H. Chen, Y. Zhang et al., “TBtools - an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data,” Molecular Plant, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1194–1202, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. D. Finn, P. Coggill, R. Y. Eberhardt et al., “The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. D1, pp. D279–D285, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Jiang, Q. J. Shen, B. Wang et al., “Transcriptome analysis of WRKY gene family in Oryza officinalis Wall ex Watt and WRKY genes involved in responses to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae stress,” PloS One, vol. 12, no. 11, article e0188742, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. I. Letunic, T. Doerks, and P. Bork, “SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. D1, pp. D302–D305, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski, and S. Kumar, “MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2725–2729, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. T. L. Bailey, N. Williams, C. Misleh, and W. W. Li, “MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, no. Web Server, pp. W369–W373, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. A. Bustin, V. Benes, J. A. Garson et al., “The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 611–622, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. Kundu, A. Patel, and A. Pal, “Defining reference genes for qPCR normalization to study biotic and abiotic stress responses in Vigna mungo,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1647–1658, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Linchan Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views503
Downloads659
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.