Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Geophysics
Volume 2016, Article ID 1702164, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1702164
Research Article

3D Gravity Modeling of Complex Salt Features in the Southern Gulf of Mexico

1Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida Universidad No. 3000, CU, Coyoacán, 04510 Ciudad de México, DF, Mexico
2Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Eje Central Lázaro Cárdenas No. 152, San Bartolo Atepehuacan, Gustavo A. Madero, 07730 Ciudad de México, DF, Mexico
3Programa de Perforaciones en Océanos y Continentes, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Ciudad de México, DF, Mexico
4Centro de Desarrollo Aeroespacial, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Belisario Domínguez No. 22, 06010 Ciudad de México, DF, Mexico

Received 30 November 2015; Accepted 3 February 2016

Academic Editor: Robert Tenzer

Copyright © 2016 Mauricio Nava-Flores et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Ortiz-Alemán and J. Urrutia-Fucugauchi, “Aeromagnetic anomaly modeling of central zone structure and magnetic sources in the Chicxulub crater,” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, vol. 179, no. 3-4, pp. 127–138, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Nagihara and S. A. Hall, “Three-dimensional gravity inversion using simulated annealing: constraints on the diapiric roots of allochthonous salt structures,” Geophysics, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1438–1449, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Zhang, C.-Y. Wang, Y. Shi et al., “Three-dimensional crustal structure in central Taiwan from gravity inversion with a parallel genetic algorithm,” Geophysics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 917–924, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Roy, M. K. Sen, D. D. Blankenship, P. L. Stoffa, and T. G. Richter, “Inversion and uncertainty estimation of gravity data using simulated annealing: an application over Lake Vostok, East Antarctica,” Geophysics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. J1–J12, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. A. Krahenbuhl, Binary Inversion of Gravity Data for Salt Imaging, Colorado School of Mines, 2005.
  6. R. M. Rene, “Gravity inversion using open, reject, and ‘shape-of-anomaly’ fill criteria,” Geophysics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 988–994, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Uieda and V. C. F. Barbosa, “Use of the ‘shape-of-anomaly’ data misfit in 3D inversion by planting anomalous densities,” in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, vol. 4, pp. 1–6, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. F. S. Grant and G. F. West, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, vol. 130, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
  9. G. H. F. Gardner, L. W. Gardner, and A. R. Gregory, “Formation velocity and density-the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps,” Geophysics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 770–780, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. L. Carter, S. T. Horseman, J. E. Russell, and J. Handin, “Rheology of rocksalt,” Journal of Structural Geology, vol. 15, no. 9-10, pp. 1257–1271, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Plouff, “Gravity and magnetic fields of polygonal prisms and application to magnetic terrain corrections,” Geophysics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 727–741, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. J. Blakely, Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.
  13. D. Nagy, G. Papp, and J. Benedek, “The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism,” Journal of Geodesy, vol. 74, no. 7-8, pp. 552–560, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. H. Nelson and L. Fairchild, “Emplacement and evolution of salt sills in the northern Gulf of Mexico,” Houston Geological Society Bulletin, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 6–7, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Ortiz-Alemán and R. Martin, “Inversion of electrical capacitance tomography data by simulated annealing: application to real two-phase gas-oil flow imaging,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 16, no. 2-3, pp. 157–162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. R. Hudec and M. P. A. Jackson, “Terra infirma: understanding salt tectonics,” Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 82, no. 1-2, pp. 1–28, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Cordell, “Gravimetric expression of graben faulting in Santa Fe country and the Espanola Basin,” in New Mexico Geological Guidebook, 30th Field Conference, no. 1977, pp. 59–64, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. N. Nabighian, “Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: fundamental relations,” Geophysics, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 780–786, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. K. Hsu, J. C. Sibuet, and C. T. Shyu, “High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potentialfield anomalies: an enhanced analytic signal technique,” Geophysics, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 373–386, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. B. Reid, J. M. Allsop, H. Granser, A. J. Millett, and I. W. Somerton, “Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution,” Geophysics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. J. Blakely and R. W. Simpson, “Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies,” Geophysics, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1494–1498, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Stavrev and A. Reid, “Degrees of homogeneity of potential fields and structural indices of Euler deconvolution,” Geophysics, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. L1–L12, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. L. Rodríguez-Zúñiga, C. Ortiz-Alemán, G. Padilla, and R. Gaulon, “Application of genetic algorithms to constrain shallow elastic parameters using in situ ground inclination measurements,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 223–234, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. G. Orozco-del-Castillo, C. Ortiz-Alemán, J. Urrutia-Fucugauchi, R. Martin, A. Rodriguez-Castellanos, and P. E. Villaseñor-Rojas, “A genetic algorithm for filter design to enhance features in seismic images,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 210–222, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt Jr., and M. P. Vecchi, “Optimization by simulated annealing,” Science, vol. 220, no. 4598, pp. 671–680, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. M. K. Sen and P. L. Stoffa, Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013.
  27. C. Ortiz-Aleman, R. Martin, and J. C. Gamio, “Reconstruction of permittivity images from capacitance tomography data by using very fast simulated annealing,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1382–1390, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. C. Ortiz-Alemán and R. Martin, “Two-phase oil-gas pipe flow imaging by simulated annealing,” Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Corana, M. Marchesi, C. Martini, and S. Ridella, “Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the ‘simulated annealing’ algorithm,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 262–280, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. W. L. Goffe, G. D. Ferrier, and J. Rogers, “Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 65–99, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  31. C. Couder-Castañeda, C. Ortiz-Alemán, M. G. Orozco-del-Castillo, and M. Nava-Flores, “TESLA GPUs versus MPI with OpenMP for the forward modeling of gravity and gravity gradient of large prisms ensemble,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 437357, 15 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Couder-Castañeda, J. C. Ortiz-Alemán, M. G. Orozco-del-Castillo, and M. Nava-Flores, “Forward modeling of gravitational fields on hybrid multi-threaded cluster,” Geofísica Internacional, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Martin, V. Monteiller, D. Komatitsch et al., “Gravity inversion using wavelet-based compression on parallel hybrid CPU/GPU systems: application to southwest Ghana,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 1594–1619, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus