Research Article

Machine Learning: A Novel Approach to Predicting Slope Instabilities

Table 1

Results of the comparison between inverse velocity (IV) method and minimum inverse velocity (MIV) method from 22 different failure examples. For the analysis demonstrated below, all calculations are based on a 60-minute averaging window.

#Actual time of failurePrediction:
IV
Delta time (hr)Prediction: MIVDelta time (hr)IV – MIV (hr)

(1)3/10/09 7:123/10/09 7:510.653/10/09 7:420.520.13
(2)3/13/13 9:483/13/13 9:19−0.483/13/13 8:45−1.04−1.51
(3)3/5/12 4:093/5/12 4:340.433/5/12 4:310.380.05
(4)8/3/13 22:068/3/13 23:531.798/3/13 22:150.161.63
(5)7/27/12 18:507/27/12 19:380.817/27/12 19:000.180.64
(6)10/24/13 22:3910/24/13 22:400.0310/24/13 20:58−1.68−1.65
(7)5/5/14 5:045/6/14 2:4121.625/4/14 20:23−8.6712.96
(8)6/16/14 6:586/16/14 7:100.216/16/14 4:01−2.95−2.74
(9)1/28/12 9:141/28/12 12:042.841/28/12 9:08−0.102.74
(10)10/29/12 12:1510/31/12 18:5854.7310/29/12 11:58−0.2854.45
(11)9/25/12 8:409/26/12 18:1633.619/25/12 4:33−4.1229.49
(12)3/26/13 21:034/10/13 23:08362.103/26/13 23:582.92359.18
(13)2/24/12 11:272/24/12 17:035.612/24/12 13:422.263.36
(14)3/2/14 4:233/2/14 5:551.543/2/14 5:481.420.12
(15)10/25/12 16:1710/25/12 16:470.5110/25/12 15:35−0.69−0.18
(16)4/22/13 13:274/22/13 13:580.524/22/13 10:02−3.40−2.88
(17)3/14/10 4:013/14/10 4:160.263/14/10 4:020.030.24
(18)7/11/13 0:207/11/13 0:250.107/11/13 0:13−0.11−0.01
(19)7/21/11 15:017/21/11 15:170.287/21/11 14:35−0.42−0.14
(20)6/20/09 22:246/21/09 1:092.766/20/09 23:581.571.20
(21)2/9/10 12:382/9/10 14:051.472/9/10 13:200.710.75
(22)1/30/15 18:251/30/15 21:553.511/30/15 21:112.780.74