Research Article
Machine Learning: A Novel Approach to Predicting Slope Instabilities
Table 3
Results of the comparison between minimum inverse velocity (MIV) and machine learning (ML) method from 22 different failure examples.
| # | Actual time of failure | Prediction: MIV | Delta time (hr) | Prediction: ML | Delta time (hr) | MIV – ML (hr) |
| (1) | 3/10/09 7:12 | 3/10/09 7:42 | 0.52 | 3/10/09 6:17 | −0.92 | −0.40 | (2) | 3/13/13 9:48 | 3/13/13 8:45 | −1.04 | 3/13/13 9:52 | 0.07 | 0.97 | (3) | 3/5/12 4:09 | 3/5/12 4:31 | 0.38 | 3/5/12 3:24 | −0.75 | −0.37 | (4) | 8/3/13 22:06 | 8/3/13 22:15 | 0.16 | 8/3/13 21:56 | −0.17 | −0.01 | (5) | 7/27/12 18:50 | 7/27/12 19:00 | 0.18 | 7/27/12 18:51 | 0.02 | 0.16 | (6) | 10/24/13 22:39 | 10/24/13 20:58 | −1.68 | 10/24/13 22:40 | 0.02 | 1.66 | (7) | 5/5/14 5:04 | 5/4/14 20:23 | −8.67 | 5/5/14 4:13 | −0.85 | 7.82 | (8) | 6/16/14 6:58 | 6/16/14 4:01 | −2.95 | 6/16/14 6:57 | −0.02 | 2.93 | (9) | 1/28/12 9:14 | 1/28/12 9:08 | −0.10 | 1/28/12 8:19 | −0.92 | −0.82 | (10) | 10/29/12 12:15 | 10/29/12 11:58 | −0.28 | 10/29/12 11:59 | −0.27 | 0.01 | (11) | 9/25/12 8:40 | 9/25/12 4:33 | −4.12 | 9/25/12 8:44 | 0.07 | 4.05 | (12) | 3/26/13 21:03 | 3/26/13 23:58 | 2.92 | 3/25/13 19:40 | −1.38 | 1.54 | (13) | 2/24/12 11:27 | 2/24/12 13:42 | 2.26 | 2/24/12 11:25 | −0.03 | 2.23 | (14) | 3/2/14 4:23 | 3/2/14 5:48 | 1.42 | 3/2/14 4:22 | −0.02 | 1.40 | (15) | 10/25/12 16:17 | 10/25/12 15:35 | −0.69 | 10/25/12 15:24 | −0.88 | −0.19 | (16) | 4/22/13 13:27 | 4/22/13 10:02 | −3.40 | 4/22/13 13:31 | 0.07 | 3.33 | (17) | 3/14/10 4:01 | 3/14/10 4:02 | 0.03 | 3/14/10 3:50 | −0.18 | −0.15 | (18) | 7/11/13 0:20 | 7/11/13 0:13 | −0.11 | 7/11/13 0:19 | −0.02 | 0.09 | (19) | 7/21/11 15:01 | 7/21/11 14:35 | −0.42 | 7/21/11 15:00 | −0.02 | 0.40 | (20) | 6/20/09 22:24 | 6/20/09 23:58 | 1.57 | 6/20/09 22:23 | −0.02 | 1.55 | (21) | 2/9/10 12:38 | 2/9/10 13:20 | 0.71 | 2/9/10 12:30 | −0.13 | 0.58 | (22) | 1/30/15 18:25 | 1/30/15 21:11 | 2.78 | 1/30/15 16:34 | −1.85 | 0.93 |
|
|