Research Article

Machine Learning: A Novel Approach to Predicting Slope Instabilities

Table 3

Results of the comparison between minimum inverse velocity (MIV) and machine learning (ML) method from 22 different failure examples.

#Actual time of failurePrediction:
MIV
Delta time (hr)Prediction:
ML
Delta time (hr)MIV – ML (hr)

(1)3/10/09 7:123/10/09 7:420.523/10/09 6:17−0.92−0.40
(2)3/13/13 9:483/13/13 8:45−1.043/13/13 9:520.070.97
(3)3/5/12 4:093/5/12 4:310.383/5/12 3:24−0.75−0.37
(4)8/3/13 22:068/3/13 22:150.168/3/13 21:56−0.17−0.01
(5)7/27/12 18:507/27/12 19:000.187/27/12 18:510.020.16
(6)10/24/13 22:3910/24/13 20:58−1.6810/24/13 22:400.021.66
(7)5/5/14 5:045/4/14 20:23−8.675/5/14 4:13−0.857.82
(8)6/16/14 6:586/16/14 4:01−2.956/16/14 6:57−0.022.93
(9)1/28/12 9:141/28/12 9:08−0.101/28/12 8:19−0.92−0.82
(10)10/29/12 12:1510/29/12 11:58−0.2810/29/12 11:59−0.270.01
(11)9/25/12 8:409/25/12 4:33−4.129/25/12 8:440.074.05
(12)3/26/13 21:033/26/13 23:582.923/25/13 19:40−1.381.54
(13)2/24/12 11:272/24/12 13:422.262/24/12 11:25−0.032.23
(14)3/2/14 4:233/2/14 5:481.423/2/14 4:22−0.021.40
(15)10/25/12 16:1710/25/12 15:35−0.6910/25/12 15:24−0.88−0.19
(16)4/22/13 13:274/22/13 10:02−3.404/22/13 13:310.073.33
(17)3/14/10 4:013/14/10 4:020.033/14/10 3:50−0.18−0.15
(18)7/11/13 0:207/11/13 0:13−0.117/11/13 0:19−0.020.09
(19)7/21/11 15:017/21/11 14:35−0.427/21/11 15:00−0.020.40
(20)6/20/09 22:246/20/09 23:581.576/20/09 22:23−0.021.55
(21)2/9/10 12:382/9/10 13:200.712/9/10 12:30−0.130.58
(22)1/30/15 18:251/30/15 21:112.781/30/15 16:34−1.850.93