Prevention and Management of Bacterial Infections in Cirrhosis

Taneja, Sunil K.; Dhiman, Radha K.

doi:https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/784540

International Journal of Hepatology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Improving the Survival in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 784540 | https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/784540

Prevention and Management of Bacterial Infections in Cirrhosis

Sunil K. Taneja¹and Radha K. Dhiman¹

Academic Editor: Deepak Amarapurkar

Received20 Apr 2011

Accepted03 Jun 2011

Published28 Aug 2011

Abstract

Patients with cirrhosis of liver are at risk of developing serious bacterial infections due to altered immune defenses. Despite the widespread use of broad spectrum antibiotics, bacterial infection is responsible for up to a quarter of the deaths of patients with liver disease. Cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleed have a considerably higher incidence of bacterial infections particularly spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. High index of suspicion is required to identify infections at an early stage in the absence of classical signs and symptoms. Energetic use of antibacterial treatment and supportive care has decreased the morbidity and mortality over the years; however, use of antibiotics has to be judicious, as their indiscriminate use can lead to antibiotic resistance with potentially disastrous consequences. Preventive strategies are still in evolution and involve use of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and spontaneous bacterial infections and selective decontamination of the gut and oropharynx.

1. Introduction

Bacterial infections are a common, recurrent complication of cirrhosis associated with poor outcome [1]. Decompensated cirrhosis has more frequent episodes of infections than compensated cirrhosis. Once infection develops, renal failure, shock, and encephalopathy may follow, which adversely affect survival. Recent prospective studies have shown that 32–34% of cirrhotic patients develop a bacterial infection either at the time of admission or later during their hospitalization [2]. Among cirrhotic patients being admitted for gastrointestinal hemorrhage, the rate of infection is even higher at an estimated 45% and has been shown to be associated with failure to control bleeding and with early variceal rebleeding [3–7]. These numbers contrast sharply with the 5–7% overall infection rates for the general population and emphasize the concept of cirrhosis as an acquired immunodeficient state. The development of infection in cirrhosis is associated with a significantly higher mortality that has been shown to be independent of the severity of liver disease [2, 8–10]. In fact, the in-hospital mortality of cirrhotic patients with infection is approximately 15%, more than twice that of patients without infection. More importantly, infection is directly responsible for 30–50% of deaths in cirrhosis [11].

The mechanisms of increased susceptibility to infections in cirrhosis are unclear. Numerous mechanisms implicated in altered and diminished immunity include increased shunting of blood away from the liver, qualitative dysfunction of the reticuloendothelial system, decreased opsonisation capacity of the ascitic fluid, and increased intestinal permeability of bacteria and associated endotoxins [12]. It has been suggested that there is a role for deficiencies in C3 and C4, downregulation of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression (and subsequent impaired antigen presentation ability), and impairment of macrophage Fcγ-receptor-mediated clearance of antibody-coated bacteria. Patients with alcoholic cirrhosis have depressed neutrophil phagocytic and intracellular killing of microorganisms [13, 14].

The most common infections in cirrhotics are spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) (25%), followed by urinary tract infection (20%), pneumonia (15%), bacteremia following a therapeutic procedure, cellulitis, and spontaneous bacteremia [1]. Infections are culture positive in 50%–70% of cases. The causative organisms of community-acquired infection are Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), especially Escherichia coli, in about 60%, Gram-positive cocci (GPC) in about 30%–35%, and mixed in the last 5%–10%. Nosocomial infections behave differently with 60% GPC and 30%–35% positive for GNB, as a result of the use of therapeutic procedures and previous antibiotic therapies [15]. Beside Escherichia coli, the most frequently isolated bacteria are Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. In cirrhotics less virulent organisms cause infections suggesting that, in advanced cirrhosis, bacteria do not need to develop strategies to circumvent host defenses and invade the host [16]. While GNB notably Escherichia coli are the causative agents in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and urinary tract infections, Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) predominate in pneumonia (Streptococcus pneumoniae) and procedure-associated bacteremia (Staphylococcus aureus). Fungal infections especially Candida species are involved in up to 15% of severe sepsis in cirrhosis [17].

Most of the available information on bacterial infections in cirrhosis refers to SBP, an entity that is essentially unique to the cirrhotic patient and shares its pathogenesis and management with spontaneous bacteremia and spontaneous bacterial empyema. Gram-positive infections in cirrhosis such as pneumonia or secondary bacteremia are managed according to conventional criteria.

2. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), that is, spontaneous infection of ascitic fluid without any apparent intra-abdominal source of infection, is the most characteristic infective complication in cirrhosis [18]. The one-year probability of development of the first SBP in cirrhotic patients with ascites is approximately 10%. This probability is higher in cirrhotic patients with coexisting gastrointestinal bleed, low ascitic fluid protein concentration (<1 g/dl), and/or severe hepatic insufficiency [19–21]. When first described, the mortality of SBP exceeded 90%; however, with early recognition of the disease and prompt and appropriate antibiotic therapy, mortality has been reduced to around 30% [22].

As SBP may pass unrecognized, diagnostic paracentesis should be done in all cirrhotics with ascites on admission to hospital, in-patients with ascites who develop signs of sepsis, hepatic encephalopathy, renal impairment, or altered gastrointestinal motility, and all ascitic patients with a gastrointestinal bleed [23]. SBP is diagnosed with an ascites polymorphonuclear cell count >250/mm³, independent of ascites bacteriological culture results [24]. The use of reagent strips may provide a rapid bedside diagnosis of SBP. The test is a quick, safe, and relatively inexpensive screening tool that can be employed at the bedside while awaiting formal cell count and culture analysis. The reagent strip checks for leukocyte esterase activity of activated granulocytes. High numbers of activated leukocytes result in increased hydrolysis of the tested compound and generate a color change on the strip. The results of 8 trials using different types of strips are available [25–32]. Most trials include a very small number of ascites samples with a PMN count >250/mm³, and, therefore, although median sensitivity results are ~85%, there is lack of sufficient data for its use in clinical practice unless larger trials validate these observations.

2.1. Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Cefotaxime is the most widely studied cephalosporin in patients with SBP and is suitable for empirical therapy for this condition. Prior to 1985, treatment of the condition was suboptimal. A landmark study comparing the combination ampicillin/tobramycin with cefotaxime showed that cefotaxime significantly increased the resolution of bacterial infections, including SBP in cirrhotic patients [33]. Following this study, cefotaxime is considered as one of the first-choice antibiotic therapies in the empirical treatment of SBP in patients with cirrhosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that ceftriaxone is highly effective in the treatment of SBP, with a resolution rate of 100% and a hospital mortality rate of 30% [34, 35]. The combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid has also shown to be as effective and safe as cefotaxime in the treatment of SBP [36]. The use of fluoroquinolones for treatment of SBP has shown similar efficacy. Oral ofloxacin has been shown to be as effective as intravenous cefotaxime in the treatment of patients with “uncomplicated” SBP, defined by the absence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, severe encephalopathy, ileus or septic shock, and a creatinine <3 mg/dL [37].

2.2. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis

The gut appears to be the main source of bacteria that cause SBP and other Gram-negative infections in cirrhosis. Given that SBP is thought to result from the translocation of enteric GNB, the ideal agent should be safe, affordable, and effective at eliminating GNB from the gut while preserving the protective anaerobic flora. Bacterial translocation, the phenomenon by which viable microorganisms from the intestinal lumen migrate to mesenteric lymph nodes and other extraintestinal sites, has been postulated as one of the main mechanisms in the pathogenesis of these infections. Therefore, prophylaxis has been based on the oral administration of nonabsorbable or poorly absorbed antibiotics that will eliminate or reduce the concentration of Gram-negative gut bacteria without affecting Gram-positive organisms or anaerobes, the so-called selective intestinal decontamination. Given the high cost and inevitable risk of developing resistant organisms, the use of prophylactic antibiotics must be strictly restricted to those at highest risk of SBP.

Long-term administration of orally administered norfloxacin, a poorly absorbed quinolone, has been shown to produce a marked reduction of GNB from the fecal flora of cirrhotic patients with no significant effects on GPC or anaerobic bacteria [38]. The development of infections by quinolone-resistant organisms is the main complication of long-term norfloxacin prophylaxis. A recent study showed clear differences in the type of bacteria causing infections in cirrhotic patients on chronic quinolone prophylaxis: while 67% of infections in untreated cirrhotic patients were due to Gram-negative organisms, infections in patients receiving quinolone prophylaxis were mostly due to Gram-positive organisms (79%). This study also showed the emergence of severe nosocomial Staphylococcal infections due to methicillin-resistant strains [39]. Therefore, SBP prophylaxis should be considered only in high-risk populations or the patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Three patient populations considered at high risk and in whom prophylactic antibiotic therapy has been recommended are patients with prior history of SBP, patients admitted with gastrointestinal bleed, and patients with low total protein content in ascitic fluid.

2.2.1. Prophylaxis in Patients with a Previous Episode of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

The 1-year and 2-year probabilities of survival after an episode of SBP are of 30–50% and 25–30%, respectively, [18]. Therefore, patients recovering from an episode of SBP should be considered as potential candidates for liver transplantation. As such, it is imperative to initiate long-term prophylactic therapy in all patients with prior history of SBP. Norfloxacin, a poorly absorbed quinolone selective to GNB, was shown to decrease the 1-year probability of SBP from 68% to 20% when dosed at 400 mg daily. In this study, the probability of developing SBP specifically from GNB was reduced from 60% to 3% [40]. Subsequently economic analysis studies have shown substantial cost savings in initiating prophylactic therapy in patients with a prior episode of SBP rather than treating at time of diagnosis [41, 42]. Another trial using oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole also showed efficacy in the prevention of SBP. It can be used as an alternative in patients who are unable to take or develop resistance to quinolones [43]. Prophylactic therapy should be instituted after the completion of antibiotics for acute SBP and continued until death, transplant, or resolution of ascites [44].

2.2.2. Prophylaxis in the Setting of Gastrointestinal Bleeding

All cirrhotic patients who develop an upper gastrointestinal bleed are at risk of a variety of bacterial infections, including SBP, within the first few days following the bleed. Bacteria of enteric origin are most commonly implicated, and the development of infection is associated with a poor prognosis [45–47]. Among all hospitalized cirrhotic patients, those admitted specifically with a gastrointestinal hemorrhage have a higher rate of infection than cirrhotic patients hospitalized for other reasons (45% versus 33%). Furthermore those with gastrointestinal hemorrhage complicated by an uncontrolled infection are at substantial risk of rebleeding, difficult to control bleed, and underlying sepsis-associated coagulopathy [48]. A meta-analyses of trials in patients with variceal hemorrhage has shown that antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the incidence of severe infection and decreased mortality [49]. There has been a decrease in mortality from variceal hemorrhage from 43% to 15% over a 20-year period, and antibiotic prophylaxis is independently associated with improved survival [50]. Oral norfoxacin, 400 mg b.d. for at least 7 days, is recommended by the International Ascites Club [44] and oral ciprofoxacin, 500 mg b.d. for 7 days, by the recent British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines [51]. The benefit is greatest in those patients with more advanced liver disease. A recent RCT has shown that intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/day for 7 days) was more effective than oral norfloxacin to prevent severe infections in patients with advanced cirrhosis (characterized by at least two of the following: ascites, severe malnutrition, encephalopathy, or bilirubin >3 mg/dL) and variceal bleeding [52].

2.2.3. Prophylaxis in Patients with Low Ascitic Fluid Total Protein

Ascitic fluid total protein has been shown to be an independent predictor of SBP. The risk of developing SBP in these patients depends largely on ascites protein content. Patients with an ascites protein >1.0 g/dL will not develop SBP in a follow-up period of 2 years, while patients with a low (<1.0 g/dL) ascites protein have a 1-year probability of developing SBP of around 20%. A prospective study in cirrhotic patients during hospitalization found that 15% of patients with ascitic protein <1.0 g/dL developed SBP compared to 2% of those with ascitic protein >1.0 g/dL. The incidence was greatest in those with Child C liver disease and in those who did not receive short-term prophylaxis if admitted with a gastrointestinal bleed. Two non-placebo-controlled studies, which showed a benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with low ascites protein, included patients with and without prior episodes of SBP and cannot be considered as reliable determinants of primary prophylaxis [43, 53]. Oral norfloxacin administration (400 mg/day) in patients with low protein ascitic levels (<1.5 g/dL) and advanced cirrhosis or impaired renal function without prior SBP episode reduces the probability of SBP and HRS and improved the 3-month survival [54]. Similarly, oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg/day) reduces the 1-year mortality rate in patients with ascitic protein levels <1.5 g/dL and without prior SBP episode [55].

2.3. Role of Albumin in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

In patients with SBP, there is a risk that their systemic hemodynamic parameters can deteriorate, with further arterial and splanchnic vasodilatation. These patients are, therefore, at high risk of developing renal insufficiency [56]. The development of renal failure is the most important indicator of reduced survival in patients with SBP compared with patients without SBP [57]. Renal impairment develops in approximately one-third of patients with SBP and is postulated to arise as a result of a further reduction in effective arterial blood volume, mediated by vasoactive cytokines, with a resultant increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity [58, 59]. In a multicentre randomized study, 126 patients with SBP were assigned to receive treatment with cefotaxime alone (2 g intravenously every six hours) or cefotaxime plus intravenous albumin. The albumin was given at a dose of 1.5 g/kg in the first 6 h after diagnosis, followed by a further infusion of 1 g/kg on the third day. With the standard treatment, renal impairment developed in 33% of patients, whereas with the combination therapy it occurred in only 10%. The in-hospital mortality rates were 28% and 10%, respectively, [60]. As the development of renal failure in cirrhotic patient with SBP carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality, the use of albumin infusion as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with SBP will continue until further studies are available.

2.4. Role of Probiotics in Prevention of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Recent research in the use of certain probiotic agents has shown promise in decreasing cytokine release and improving neutrophil function in cirrhotic patients [61, 62]. The use of probiotics in this setting is attractive not only because of its ability to modulate gut flora in favor of protective anaerobic organisms but also because of its effects in promoting gut barrier function. However, there is no data to support decreasing infection rates or improved outcomes with probiotics in this population. Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus has been reported to correct bacterial overgrowth, stabilize mucosal barrier function, and decrease bacterial translocation in rat models of acute liver injury and failure. However, the administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus- and Lactobacillus GG-fermented diets to animals with portal hypertension and cirrhosis failed to show any reduction in bacterial translocation or in ascites infection rates [63, 64].

Two prospective randomized studies demonstrated the efficacy of probiotics in reducing postorthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) infections [65, 66]. In the first study, OLT patients receiving Lactobacillus plantarum 299 and fiber had less posttransplant infections than groups receiving selective bowel decontamination. The second study used Synbiotic 2000 in post-OLT patients for 14 days and also found a lower 30-day infection rate. Importantly, no serious adverse effects were noted in either study. As it is a cheap and feasible alternative to selective intestinal decontamination, further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of this combination in other cirrhotic populations.

3. Urinary Tract Infections

Urinary tract infections are the most frequent infective complications in cirrhosis. As in the noncirrhotic population, cirrhotics with indwelling catheters are highly predisposed to develop urinary tract infections. The incidence is markedly higher in female than in male cirrhotics [67]. Urinary tract infections in cirrhosis are usually asymptomatic, and bacteriuria alone is found in a high proportion of urinary tract infections episodes in cirrhotics [68]. The majority of infections are caused by Gram-negative bacilli, and, although urine cultures for identification and in vitro sensitivity testing of causative organisms are always recommended, cases requiring immediate therapy should be empirically started on a quinolone or the older but effective cotrimoxazole. These agents are very active against Gram-negative bacteria and reach high concentrations in urine. Other antibiotic regimes might include amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid or an oral cephalosporin [18, 69].

4. Pneumonias

Pneumonias are the third most common infections in patients of cirrhosis after SBP and urinary tract infections. Community-acquired infections are the most frequent, although hospitalized patients admitted to intensive care units have high incidence of nosocomial pneumonias due to predisposing factors such as tracheal intubation, esophageal tamponade, or hepatic encephalopathy. Alcoholics are predisposed to chest infections, Streptococcus pneumonia being the causative organism in most lower respiratory tract infections [70]. A significant number of cases of pneumonia are caused by other pathogens normally present in the oropharyngeal area, especially anaerobic bacteria or Haemophilus influenzae, or by Gram-negative bacilli, particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae, mycoplasma and legionella species [70–72]. Antibiotic regimes combining macrolides and one of the following: cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, are the initial treatment of choice although piperacillin-tazobactam or imipenem may also be used in critically ill patients.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia is predominantly caused by Gram-negative bacilli and staphylococci [71, 72]. Although the identification of the responsible organism in hospital-acquired pneumonia is important for selection of antibiotic treatment, the empiric administration of third-generation cephalosporins (i.e., cefotaxime) should be considered as the first choice of antibiotic. Cirrhotic patients with hydrothorax can develop spontaneous bacterial empyema, which is thought to have the same pathogenesis as SBP, since their isolated bacteria are the same [73]. Therefore, patients with spontaneous bacterial empyema may be treated with the same antibiotic regimens.

5. Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Soft tissue infections, particularly lymphangitis of the lower extremities and abdominal wall, are relatively frequent in cirrhotic patients with ankle edema or ascites. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes are the most frequent causative organisms [74]. Empirical antibiotic with Cloxacillin has been considered the first-choice antibiotic, but, considering these causative organisms, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and ceftazidime may be a more adequate empiric antibiotic treatment. Clindamycin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin are the other antibiotics with broad-spectrum Gram-positive coverage.

6. Meningitis

More commonly reported in alcoholic cirrhosis with high overall is one month case fatality rate exceeding 50%. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Listeria are the commonest pathogens implicated. Signs of meningeal irritation including nuchal rigidity may be a delayed or even absent clinical sign. Mortality is significantly high and may reach up to 80% in Child-Pugh stage C [75, 76].

7. Bacteremia and Sepsis

Patients with hepatic dysfunction have an increased risk for bacteremia and sepsis [77]. Bacteria may enter the bloodstream by multiple mechanisms and may quickly progress to sepsis and multiorgan failure due to the immune dysfunctions occurring in cirrhotic patients. Although bacteremia may occur secondary to a preexisting infection or recent instrumentation, this group of patients often develops spontaneous bacteremia. Many of these cases may be incited by occult or overt gastrointestinal bleeding, which is known to greatly increase the risk of bacterial infections [78]. A recent Cochrane Database review found that the accumulated data in eight trials demonstrated that antibiotic prophylaxis at time of gastrointestinal hemorrhage had a significant benefit by decreasing mortality and the incidence of bacterial infections [79]. Despite general adoption of bacterial prophylaxis, cirrhotic patients still have a high rate of bacterial diseases, which often progress to sepsis and severe sepsis.

Given the degree of immune dysfunction and the morbidity of infections, patients with significant cirrhosis who present with, or with probable, bacteremia or sepsis should undergo rapid diagnostic testing and should receive intravenous antibiotics that treat the likely organisms as soon as possible. In septic patients, early antibiotic initiation with the appropriate agents significantly improves outcomes, and this effect is especially important in immune-compromised patients [80, 81].

These infections are common in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. These patients may benefit from appropriate hand hygiene, use of chlorhexidine for skin preparation, use of full-barrier precautions during the insertion of central venous catheters, use of the subclavian vein as the preferred site for insertion of the catheter, and the removal of unnecessary central venous catheters [82].

9. Conclusion

Patients with chronic liver diseases sustain impairment to their immune systems, which worsens over time and with disease progression. These defects in their host defense lead to augmented risks of bacterial infections and increased morbidity when they are incurred. Providers caring for patients with hepatic dysfunction should have a heightened surveillance for infectious diseases and suspect that one is present with any acute change in a patient’s status. With early diagnosis and proper antibiotic treatment, the mortality of bacterial infections has decreased significantly over the years.

References

J. Fernandez, M. Navasa, J. Gómez et al., “Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: epidemiological changes with invasive procedures and norfloxacin prophylaxis,” Hepatology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 140–148, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Borzio, F. Salerno, L. Piantoni et al., “Bacterial infection in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a multicentre prospective study,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Bernard, J. D. Grange, E. N. Khac, X. Amiot, P. Opolon, and T. Poynard, “Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis,” Hepatology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1655–1661, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Goulis, A. Armonis, D. Patch, C. Sabin, L. Greenslade, and A. K. Burroughs, “Bacterial infection is independently associated with failure to control bleeding in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage,” Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1207–1212, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Vivas, M. Rodriguez, M. A. Palacio, A. Linares, J. L. Alonso, and L. Rodrigo, “Presence of bacterial infection in bleeding cirrhotic patients is independently associated with early mortality and failure to control bleeding,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 2752–2757, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bernard, J. F. Cadranel, D. Valla, S. Escolano, V. Jarlier, and P. Opolon, “Prognostic significance of bacterial infection in bleeding cirrhotic patients: a prospective study,” Gastroenterology, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1828–1834, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Hou, H. C. Lin, T. T. Liu et al., “Antibiotic prophylaxis after endoscopic therapy prevents rebleeding in acute variceal hemorrhage: a randomized trial,” Hepatology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 746–753, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rimola, F. Bory, R. Planas, A. Xaubet, M. Bruguera, and J. Rodes, “Infecciones bacterianas agudas en la cirrosis hepatica,” Gastroenterología y Hepatología, vol. 4, pp. 453–458, 1981.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Bleichner, R. Boulanger, P. Squara, J. P. Sollet, and A. Parent, “Frequency of infections in cirrhotic patients presenting with acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 724–726, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
W. R. Caly and E. Strauss, “A prospective study of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 353–358, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Wong, M. Bernardi, R. Balk et al., “Sepsis in cirrhosis: report on the 7th meeting of the International Ascites Club,” Gut, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 718–725, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Garcia-Tsao and R. Wiest, “Gut microflora in the pathogenesis of the complications of cirrhosis,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 353–372, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. E. Wasmuth, D. Kunz, E. Yagmur et al., “Patients with acute on chronic liver failure display "sepsis-like" immune paralysis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 195–201, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Rajkovic and R. Williams, “Abnormalities of neutrophil phagocytosis, intracellular killing and metabolic activity in alcoholic cirrhosis and hepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 252–262, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Gustot, F. Durand, D. Lebrec, J. L. Vincent, and R. Moreau, “Severe sepsis in cirrhosis,” Hepatology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 2022–2033, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Bert, X. Panhard, J. Johnson et al., “Genetic background of Escherichia coli isolates from patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: relationship with host factors and prognosis,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1034–1040, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Plessier, M. H. Denninger, Y. Consigny et al., “Coagulation disorders in patients with cirrhosis and severe sepsis,” Liver International, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 440–448, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Rimola and M. Navasa, “Infections in liver disease,” in Oxford Textbook of Clinical Hepatology, J. Bircher, J. P. Benhamou, N. McIntyre, M. Rizzetto, and J. Rode’s, Eds., pp. 1861–1876, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2nd edition, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Guarner and B. A. Runyon, “Macrophage function in cirrhosis and the risk of bacterial infection,” Hepatology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 367–369, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Runyon, “Patients with deficient ascitic fluid opsonic activity are predisposed to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” Hepatology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 632–635, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Llach, A. Rimola, M. Navasa et al., “Incidence and predictive factors of first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis with ascites: relevance of ascitic fluid protein concentration,” Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 724–727, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Garcia-Tsao, “Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a historical perspective,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 522–527, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Segarra-Newnham and A. Henneman, “Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients without gastrointestinal bleeding,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1946–1954, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rimola, G. García-Tsao, M. Navasa et al., “Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 142–153, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Vanbiervliet, C. Rakotoarisoa, J. Filippi et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid urine-screening test (Multistix8SG) in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1257–1260, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Castellote, C. Lopez, J. Gornals et al., “Rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis by use of reagent strips,” Hepatology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 893–896, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Butani, R. T. Shaffer, R. D. Szyjkowski, B. E. Weeks, L. G. Speights, and S. C. Kadakia, “Rapid diagnosis of infected ascitic fluid Using leukocyte esterase dipstick testing,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 532–537, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Thevenot, J. F. Cadranel, E. Nguyen-Khac et al., “Diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients by use of two reagent strips,” European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 579–583, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sapey, D. Kabisa, E. Fort, C. Laurin, and M. H. Mendler, “Instant diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis using leukocyte esterase reagent strips: Nephur-Test vs. MultistixSG,” Liver International, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 343–348, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Y. Kim, J. H. Kim, C. Y. Chon et al., “Usefulness of urine strip test in the rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” Liver International, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1197–1201, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Castellote, C. Lopez, J. Gornals, A. Domingo, and X. Xiol, “Use of reagent strips for the rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial empyema,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 278–281, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Campillo, J. P. Richardet, and C. Dupeyron, “Diagnostic value of two reagent strips (Multistix 8 SG and Combur 2 LN) in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and symptomatic bacterascites,” Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 446–452, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Felisart, A. Rimola, V. Arroyo et al., “Cefotaxime is more effective than is ampicillin-tobramycin in cirrhotics with severe infections,” Hepatology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 457–462, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Mercader, J. Gomez, J. Ruiz, M. C. Garre, and M. Valdes, “Use of ceftriaxone in the treatment of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients,” Chemotherapy, vol. 35, no. 2, supplement, pp. 23–26, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Gomez-Jimenez, E. Ribera, I. Gasser et al., “Randomized trial comparing ceftriaxone with cefonicid for treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1587–1592, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Ricart, G. Soriano, M. T. Novella et al., “Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid versus cefotaxime in the therapy of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 596–602, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Navasa, A. Follo, J. M. Llovet et al., “Randomized, comparative study of oral ofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1011–1017, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Gines, A. Rimola, R. Planas et al., “Norfloxacin prevents spontaneous bacterial peritonitis recurrence in cirrhosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Hepatology, vol. 12, no. 4 I, pp. 716–724, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Ortiz, M. C. Vila, G. Soriano et al., “Infections caused by Escherichia coli resistant to norfloxacin in hospitalized cirrhotic patients,” Hepatology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1064–1069, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Gines, A. Rimola, R. Planas et al., “Norfloxacin prevents spontaneous bacterial peritonitis recurrence in cirrhosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Hepatology, vol. 12, no. 4 I, pp. 716–724, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Inadomi and A. Sonnenberg, “Cost-analysis of prophylactic antibiotics in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 1289–1294, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. M. Younossi, J. G. McHutchison, and T. G. Ganiats, “An economic analysis of norfloxacin prophylaxis against spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 295–298, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Singh, T. Gayowski, V. L. Yu, and M. M. Wagener, “Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: a randomized trial,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 122, no. 8, pp. 595–598, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Rimola, G. García-Tsao, M. Navasa et al., “Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 142–153, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
P. F. Barnes, C. Arevalo, L. S. Chan, S. F. Wong, and T. B. Reynolds, “A prospective evaluation of bacteremic patients with chronic liver disease,” Hepatology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1099–1103, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Bleichner, R. Boulanger, P. Squara, J. P. Sollet , and A. Parent, “Frequency of infections in cirrhotic patients presenting with acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 724–726, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Bernard, J. F. Cadranel, D. Valla, S. Escolano, V. Jarlier, and P. Opolon, “Prognostic significance of bacterial infection in bleeding cirrhotic patients: a prospective study,” Gastroenterology, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1828–1834, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Garcia-Tsao, “Bacterial infections in cirrhosis: treatment and prophylaxis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. S85–S92, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bernard, J. D. Grange, E. N. Khac, X. Amiot, P. Opolon, and T. Poynard, “Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis,” Hepatology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1655–1661, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Carbonell, A. Pauwels, L. Serfaty, O. Fourdan, V. G. Lévy, and R. Poupon, “Improved survival after variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis over the past two decades,” Hepatology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 652–659, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jalan and P. C. Hayes, “BSG guidelines on variceal bleeding,” Gut, vol. 46, no. 4, supplement 3-4, pp. III1–III15, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Fernández, L. R. del Arbol, C. Gómez et al., “Norfloxacin vs Ceftriaxone in the prophylaxis of infections in patients with advanced cirrhosis and hemorrhage,” Gastroenterology, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 1049–1056, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rolachon, L. Cordier, Y. Bacq et al., “Ciprofloxacin and long-term prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: results of a prospective controlled trial,” Hepatology, vol. 22, no. 4 I, pp. 1171–1174, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fernández, M. Navasa, R. Planas et al., “Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 818–824, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Terg, E. Fassio, M. Guevara et al., “Ciprofloxacin in primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 774–779, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Follo, J. M. Llovet, M. Navasa et al., “Renal impairment after spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: incidence, clinical course, predictive factors and prognosis,” Hepatology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1495–1501, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Hoefs et al., “Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” Hepatology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 399–407, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Billiau and F. Vandekerckhove, “Cytokines and their interactions with other inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 559–573, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Giron-Gonzalez, C. Rodriguez-Ramos, J. Elvira et al., “Serial analysis of serum and ascitic fluid levels of soluble adhesion molecules and chemokines in patients with SBP,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 56–61, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sort, M. Navasa, V. Arroyo et al., “Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 6, pp. 403–409, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Loguercio, A. Federico, C. Tuccillo et al., “Beneficial effects of a probiotic VSL#3 on parameters of liver dysfunction in chronic liver diseases,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 540–543, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Stadlbauer, R. P. Mookerjee, S. Hodges, G. A. K. Wright, N. A. Davies, and R. Jalan, “Effect of probiotic treatment on deranged neutrophil function and cytokine responses in patients with compensated alcoholic cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 945–951, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Bauer, J. Fernandez, M. Navasa, J. Vila, and J. Rodes, “Failure of Lactobacillus spp. to prevent bacterial translocation in a rat model of experimental cirrhosis,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 501–506, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wiest, F. Chen, G. Cadelina, R. J. Groszmann, and G. Garcia-Tsao, “Effect of Lactobacillus-fermented diets on bacterial translocation and intestinal flora in experimental prehepatic portal hypertension,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1136–1141, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Rayes, D. Seehofer, A. R. Muller, S. Hansen, S. Bengmark, and P. Neuhaus, “Influence of probiotics and fibre on the incidence of bacterial infections following major abdominal surgery—results of a prospective trial,” Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 869–876, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Rayes, D. Seehofer, T. Theruvath et al., “Supply of pre and probiotics reduces bacterial infection rates after liver transplantation—arandomized, double-blind trial,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 125–130, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Burroughs, I. J. Rosenstein, and O. Epstein, “Bacteriuria and primary biliary cirrhosis,” Gut, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 133–137, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
B. A. Lipsky, “Urinary tract infections in men. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 138–150, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Westphal, F. Jehl, and D. Vetter, “Pharmacological, toxicologic, and microbiological considerations in the choice of initial antibiotic therapy for serious infections in patients with cirrhosis of the liver,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 324–335, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
H. G. Adams and C. Jordan, “Infections in the alcoholic,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 179–200, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
R. W. Bradsher, “Overwhelming pneumonia,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1233–1250, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Levy, F. Dromer, N. Brion, F. Leturdu, and C. Carbon, “Community-acquired pneumonia. Importance of initial noninvasive bacteriologic and radiographic investigations,” Chest, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Flaum, “Spontaneous bacterial empyema in cirrhosis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 416–417, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
M. N. Swartz, “Cellulitis and superficial infections,” in Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, G. L. Mandell, R. G. Douglas Jr., and J. E. Bennett, Eds., vol. 88, pp. 34–37, Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Molle, A. M. Thulstrup, N. Svendsen, H. C. Schonheyder, and H. T. Sorensen, “Risk and case fatality rate of meningitis in patients with liver cirrhosis,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 407–410, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Pauwels, E. Pines, M. Abboura, I. Chiche, and V. G. Lévy, “Bacterial meningitis in cirrhosis: review of 16 cases,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 830–834, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tandon and G. Garcia-Tsao, “Bacterial infections, sepsis, and multiorgan failure in cirrhosis,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 26–42, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Deschenes and J. P. Villeneuve, “Risk factors for the development of bacterial infections in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 2193–2197, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Soares-Weiser, M. Brezis, R. Tur-Kaspa, and L. Leibovici, “Antibiotic prophylaxis for cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, Article ID CD002907, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Kumar, D. M. Roberts, K. E. D. Wood et al., “Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1589–1596, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. H. Ibrahim, G. Sherman, S. Ward, V. J. Fraser, and M. H. Kollef, “The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting,” Chest, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 146–155, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Pronovost, D. Needham, S. Berenholtz et al., “An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 26, pp. 2725–2732, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Sunil K. Taneja and Radha K. Dhiman. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

41506

Downloads

4125

Citations

International Journal of Hepatology

Improving the Survival in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

Prevention and Management of Bacterial Infections in Cirrhosis

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

2.1. Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

2.2. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Prophylaxis

2.2.1. Prophylaxis in Patients with a Previous Episode of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

2.2.2. Prophylaxis in the Setting of Gastrointestinal Bleeding

2.2.3. Prophylaxis in Patients with Low Ascitic Fluid Total Protein

2.3. Role of Albumin in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

2.4. Role of Probiotics in Prevention of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

3. Urinary Tract Infections

4. Pneumonias

5. Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

6. Meningitis

7. Bacteremia and Sepsis

8. Catheter-Related Infections

9. Conclusion

References

Copyright