Cell-Phone Use and Self-Reported Hypertension: National Health Interview Survey 2008

Suresh, Sivaranjani; Sabanayagam, Charumathi; Kalidindi, Sita; Shankar, Anoop

doi:https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/360415

International Journal of Hypertension

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 360415 | https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/360415

Cell-Phone Use and Self-Reported Hypertension: National Health Interview Survey 2008

Sivaranjani Suresh,¹Charumathi Sabanayagam,²Sita Kalidindi,^2,3and Anoop Shankar^2,4

Academic Editor: B. Waeber

Received29 Nov 2010

Revised14 Jan 2011

Accepted29 Jan 2011

Published11 Apr 2011

Abstract

Background. Cell-phone usage has increased dramatically over the last decade, along with a rising public concern over the health effects of using this device. The association between cell-phone usage and hypertension has not been examined before. Methods. We analysed data from 21,135 adults aged ≥18 years who participated in the 2008 National Health Interview Survey. Based on reported cell-phone use, participants were categorized as cell-phone nonusers, predominantly landline users, dual users of cell phone and landline, and predominantly cell-phone users. The main outcome of interest was self-reported physician-diagnosed hypertension (). Results. 43.5% of the participants were cell-phone nonusers, while 13.8% were predominantly cell-phone users. We found that cell-phone use was inversely associated with hypertension, independent of age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, alcohol consumption, education, body mass index (BMI), and physical activity. Compared to cell-phone nonusers, the multivariable odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of hypertension was 0.86 (0.75–0.98, P trend = .005) among predominantly cell-phone users. This inverse association between cell-phone use and hypertension was stronger in women, those aged <60 years, whites, and those with BMI <25 kg/m². Conclusion. We found that cell-phone usage was protectively associated with self-reported hypertension in a nationally representative sample of US adults.

1. Introduction

It has been reported that there are more than 285 million subscribers to cell-phone services in the US in 2009, which is more than a twofold increase from 110 million in 2000 [1]. This dramatic rise of cell-phone usage has also led to concerns over their possible adverse effects on human health. While cell phones may exert both thermal and nonthermal influences on the user, the latter has been under particular scrutiny. Cell phones transmit pulsed, radiofrequency radiation from their antennas and from circuit elements inside [2, 3]. Because cell phones are held against the head, many studies have examined the risk that these phones pose on the brain, including cognitive function [4, 5] and sleep [6]. Concerns over microwave radiation effects have mainly spurred research into the relation between cell-phone usage and brain tumours, including acoustic neuroma, glioma, and meningioma. While some results have shown significant associations with several types of brain tumours [7, 8], most have shown a null association [9–11].

However, it is not clear if cell-phone usage is related to cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Some occupational studies have shown that chronic exposure to low-intensity electromagnetic field (EMF) is associated with increased risk of cardiac arrhythmias, acute myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality [12], and alteration of diurnal variation of blood pressure [13, 14], but others have not found such an association [15–18].

Hypertension is a common vascular condition [19] that is a strong and independent risk factor for CVD [20]. A German study in 1998 found that cell-phone usage was associated with an increase in resting blood pressure [21]. The independent expert group on mobile phones hypothesized that radiation from the cell phone may possibly affect the cardiovascular centers of the brainstem or the carotid body receptors involved in the control of blood pressure [3]. In contrast, studies from former Soviet Union reported that exposure to radiofrequency radiation might reduce blood pressure and heart rate alterations and low-dose EMF therapy might be beneficial in treating hypertension and angina pectoris [22]. Given the dramatic increase in cell-phone usage in the past decade, it would be of interest to further investigate the effect of using cell phones on hypertension. In this context, we examined the association between mobile-phone usage and occurrence of hypertension in a large, representative sample of US adults.

2. Methods

The data for this study is derived from the 2008 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The details of the study design, questionnaire, and methods are available online [23]. In brief, NHIS is a multistage probability sample of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of US adults. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians were oversampled to provide stable estimates of these groups. Information on household telephone status was obtained for 12,597 households that include one civilian adult or child. The current study is based on the sample adult core component of the NHIS survey, administered by in-person interview to randomly selected civilian adults, aged ≥18 years. Of the 21,781 adults interviewed, after excluding participants who were pregnant (), those with missing information on cell-phone status (), and on certain other variables included in the multivariable analysis (), 21,135 were available for the current analysis.

The main outcome of interest in the current study was physician-diagnosed hypertension ascertained by an affirmative response to the question, “have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you had hypertension, also called high blood pressure?” Cell-phone use was assessed from the following question asked to the survey respondent from each family: “do you or anyone in your family have a working cell phone?” Participants who had no working cell phone in the family were classified as cell-phone nonusers. Of those living in a household with both landline and cell phone, those who received very few or no calls on cell phones and mostly on landlines, were classified as predominantly landline users; those who received some on cell phone and some on landline phones were classified as dual users of cell phone and landline; those who received all or almost all calls on cell phones were classified as predominantly cell-phone users. Information on demographic factors, socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle characteristics, and health status were obtained through a standardized questionnaire.

We examined the association between cell-phone use and hypertension in two logistic regression models: (1) the age- (years) sex-adjusted model and (2) the multivariable-adjusted model, additionally adjusting for race/ethnicity, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, education, and landline use. We then examined the association between cell-phone use and hypertension in subgroups of age, gender, race/ethnicity and BMI categories. Linear trends were tested using categories of cell phone use as an ordinal variable in the corresponding logistic regression model. Interactions between cell-phone use and other covariates including age, gender, race/ethnicity, BMI were examined by introducing cross-product interaction terms between cell-phone use and the covariate examined, one at a time, in the corresponding multivariable model. Likelihood ratio tests were used to assess the statistical significance of an interaction between cell phone use and a covariate. All analyses were weighted to account for the complex survey design and survey nonresponse using SUDAAN (version 8.0; Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) and SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) software.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study participants by cell-phone usage status. 43.5% of the participants were cell-phone nonusers and 13.8% were predominantly cell-phone users. Compared to subjects who were cell-phone nonusers, predominantly cell-phone users were younger, more likely to be current drinkers, or to be educated at a level higher than high school, less likely to be current smokers or physically active. Further, predominantly landline users were older, more likely to be females or non-Hispanic whites.

Figure 1 shows the prevalence of hypertension by categories of cell-phone use. The group with the highest prevalence was the predominantly landline users followed by cell-phone nonusers, dual users, and predominantly cell-phone users respectively. Table 2 shows the association between cell phone use and hypertension. Increasing categories of cell-phone usage was found to be inversely associated with hypertension in both the age- , sex-adjusted model (P trend <.0001), and the multivariable-adjusted model (P trend =.005).

Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6 show the association between cell-phone use and hypertension in subgroups of age, gender, race/ethnicity, and BMI categories. Similar to the main findings in Table 2, an inverse association was observed between cell-phone use and hypertension within subgroups of age, gender, race/ethnicity, and BMI. Although there was no statistically significant interaction by age (P interaction = .99), gender (P interaction = .98), race/ethnicity (P interaction = .24), and BMI (P interaction = .07), the association was stronger in women, those aged <60 years, whites, and those with BMI < 25 kg/m².

4. Discussion

In a contemporary sample of US adults, we found that cell-phone usage was inversely associated with self-reported hypertension independent of age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, alcohol consumption, BMI, education, physical activity, and landline use. This inverse association between cell-phone usage and hypertension was found to be stronger in women, those aged <60 years, whites, and those with BMI < 25 kg/m². This is the first study to examine the association between cell-phone use and hypertension in a population-based sample of US adults.

In the current study, we used self-reported hypertension to define the presence of hypertension, since NHIS did not have measured blood pressure. We believe that this is an important study limitation, since recent estimates from the US National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys suggest that nearly 22% of truly hypertensive subjects are unaware of their condition [24]. This lack of blood pressure measurement may have resulted in outcome misclassification. Since hypertension status was assessed independently of a person’s cell-phone use, we believe that this misclassification is more likely to be nondifferential and likely to underestimate a true association. However, we cannot entirely rule out the possibility that our findings are overestimate; that is, there is actually no protective association between cell-phone use and hypertension if there were no bias.

Few experimental studies have examined the association between cell-phone usage and blood pressure [21, 25]. Braune et al. noted a significant increase in systolic and diastolic BP in a small group of ten healthy volunteers exposed to EMF from a global system for satellite communications (GSM) cell phone compared with placebo exposure [21]. Vangelova et al. reported significantly higher levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in a group of 100 broadcasting and TV station operators exposed to EMF [25]. Previous studies examining the relation between occupational EMF exposure and cardiovascular diseases have shown mixed results. While majority of the studies have shown a null association [11, 15–18], some have shown a positive association [12, 26], and one has shown a protective association [27]. Savitz et al. reported a positive association between occupational EMF exposure and cardiovascular mortality in a large cohort of 138,903 male electric utility workers from five US companies [12]. Sastre et al. found that exposure to intermittent 60-Hz magnetic fields reversibly reduces the normal variability of the heart rate in laboratory studies of volunteers [26]. Solenova et al. reported lower levels of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in TV workers exposed to EMF [27].

In the current study, cell-phone usage was found to be protectively associated with hypertension. It is possible that the effects of cell-phone usage could reduce BP due to an increase in parasympathetic activity and reduction in sympathetic activity originating in the brainstem [28]. Another possibility is that cell phones increase and sustain the social networks of the users, reducing stress and establishing greater connectedness of the users with their communities. This has been previously reported to be protectively associated with cardiovascular disease mortality [29, 30], and following this, we hypothesize that it may reduce the risk of hypertension as well. Finally, it is possible that our findings are due to chance. There is a need for longitudinal studies to examine the effect of cell-phone usage on longitudinal changes in blood pressure and hypertension development to refute or validate our findings. Future studies should also examine if there are differential effects for different mobile technologies such as GSM and code division multiple access (CDMA) phones.

The strengths of our study include a large sample size and availability of information on potential confounders. Our study has several limitations. First, as discussed above, our assessment of cell-phone usage and hypertension though self-reported questionnaire data may have resulted in misclassification bias. Second, a measure of blood pressure as a continuous variable would have greatly increased the impact of this study. We recommend that future studies examining the association between cell-phone use and hypertension should include measured blood pressure in addition to self-reported hypertension diagnosis to confirm if our findings are true. Third, we do not have information on EMF exposure from other sources (including cordless phones, radio, television, and microwave oven) that could potentially confound the association between cell phone and hypertension. Fourth, the lack of information on frequency and duration of calls limits any “dose response” to be evaluated. Fifth, while the large sample size allows for correction of potential confounders, it is possible that cell-phone use is different in categories of age, gender, race/ethnicity, and physical activity all of which are known to influence the prevalence of hypertension. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of the study limits any temporal relationship to be ascertained.

In conclusion, we found that cell-phone usage was inversely associated with self-reported hypertension in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Future research should investigate this relationship in prospective studies to provide more insight into the association.

Conflict of Interests

There are no conflict of interests related to this paper.

Guarantor Statement

“The guarantor, A. Shankar, accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish”.

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by an American Heart Association national Clinical Research program grant (A. Shankar).

References

“CTIA semi-annual wireless industry survey,” July 2010, http://www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/AID/10316.
View at: Google Scholar
K. J. Rothman, “Health effects of mobile telephones,” Epidemiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 653–655, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“Report of the independent expert group on mobile phones,” 2001, http://www.iegmp.org.uk.
View at: Google Scholar
A. W. Preece, G. Iwi, A. Davies-Smith et al., “Effect of a 915-MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive function in man,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 447–456, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Koivisto, A. Revonsuo, C. Krause et al., “Effects of 902 MHz electromagnetic field emitted by cellular telephones on response times in humans,” NeuroReport, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 413–415, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Huber, V. Treyer, A. A. Borbély et al., “Electromagnetic fields, such as those from mobile phones, alter regional cerebral blood flow and sleep and waking EEG,” Journal of Sleep Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 289–295, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. G. Khurana, C. Teo, M. Kundi, L. Hardell, and M. Carlberg, “Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including the long-term epidemiologic data,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hardell and M. Carlberg, “Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schüz, E. Böhler, G. Berg et al., “Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany),” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 512–520, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Inskip, R. N. Hoover, and S. S. Devesa, “Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1147–1151, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Johansen, “Electromagnetic fields and health effects—epidemiologic studies of cancer, disease of the central nervous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, vol. 30, supplement 1, pp. 1–80, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
D. A. Savitz, D. Liao, A. Sastre, R. C. Kleckner, and R. Kavet, “Magnetic field exposure and cardiovascular disease mortality among electric utility workers,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 135–142, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Tabor, J. Michalski, and E. Rokita, “Influence of 50 Hz magnetic field on human heart rate variablilty: linear and nonlinear analysis,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 474–480, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Szmigielski, A. Bortkiewicz, E. Gadzicka, M. Zmyslony, and R. Kubacki, “Alteration of diurnal rhythms of blood pressure and heart rate in workers exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields,” Blood Pressure Monitoring, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 323–330, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Sahl, G. Mezei, R. Kavet et al., “Occupational magnetic field exposure and cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of electric utility workers,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 156, no. 10, pp. 913–918, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Sorahan and L. Nichols, “Mortality from cardiovascular disease in relation to magnetic field exposure: findings from a study of UK electricity generation and transmission workers, 1973–1997,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 93–102, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Cooper, E. van Wijngaarden, S. G. Fisher, M. J. Adams, M. G. Yost, and J. D. Bowman, “A population-based cohort study of occupational exposure to magnetic fields and cardiovascular disease mortality,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Mezei, D. Cher, M. Kelsh, C. Edinboro, P. Chapman, and R. Kavet, “Occupational magnetic field exposure, cardiovascular disease mortality, and potential confounding by smoking,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 622–629, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Feihl, L. Liaudet, and B. Waeber, “The macrocirculation and microcirculation of hypertension,” Current Hypertension Reports, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 182–189, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Chobanian, G. L. Bakris, H. R. Black et al., “The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 289, no. 19, pp. 2560–2572, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Braune, C. Wrocklage, J. Raczek, T. Gailus, and C. H. Lücking, “Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to a radio-frequency electromagnetic field,” Lancet, vol. 351, no. 9119, pp. 1857–1858, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Magnussen, “EMF: when it is beneficial, when it is adverse,” January 2011, http://www.icswebsite.com/emf/emfissues/emfissuessummary.html.
View at: Google Scholar
National Health Interview Survey, “Questionnaires, Datasets, and Related Documentation,” 2010, http://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Survey_Questionnaires/NHIS/2008/English/QADULT.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Ostchega, S. S. Yoon, J. Hughes, and T. Louis, “Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control—continued disparities in adults: United States, 2005-2006,” NCHS Data Brief, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Vangelova, C. Deyanov, and M. Israel, “Cardiovascular risk in operators under radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation,” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sastre, M. R. Cook, and C. Graham, “Nocturnal exposure to intermittent 60 Hz magnetic fields alters human cardiac rhythm,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 98–106, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
L. G. Solenova, E. G. Dymova, and N. Fir, “General and oncologic mortality in TV workers,” Meditsina Truda I Promyshlennaya Ekologiya, no. 5, pp. 20–24, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Reid, “Hypertension and the brain,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 50, pp. 371–380, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Kawachi, G. A. Colditz, A. Ascherio et al., “A prospective study of social networks in relation to total mortality and cardiovascular disease in men in the USA,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
P. M. Eng, E. B. Rimm, G. Fitzmaurice, and I. Kawachi, “Social ties and change in social ties in relation to subsequent total and cause-specific mortality and coronary heart disease incidence in men,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 155, no. 8, pp. 700–709, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Sivaranjani Suresh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4182

Downloads

1410

Citations