Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Hypertension
Volume 2019, Article ID 7809216, 7 pages
Review Article

PPARδ: A Potential Therapeutic Target for the Treatment of Metabolic Hypertension

Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology, Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing Institute of Hypertension, Chongqing 400042, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhencheng Yan; moc.anis@naygnehcnehz

Received 29 September 2018; Accepted 17 March 2019; Published 3 April 2019

Academic Editor: Masayoshi Soma

Copyright © 2019 Yanli Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


High blood pressure and its associated cardiovascular diseases have been major risks for public health. Multiple metabolic risk factors can cause the vascular dysfunction and vascular lesion, and the hypertension due to metabolic disturbances was defined as metabolic hypertension. The members of a subfamily of the nuclear receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), were found to be key regulators of metabolism and vascular function. We provide up-to-date knowledge on the role of subtype PPARδ in the regulation of metabolism and vascular function and the effect of its intervention on the metabolic hypertension management. We hope to give some insights into the development of more effective treatments of metabolic hypertension and its main complications.

1. Introduction

Hypertension has been a major risk for public health, which is responsible for at least 9.4 million deaths worldwide every year [1]. Although multifactors, including genetic and secondary etiology, play important roles in the development of hypertension, roughly 60% of the risk factors for hypertension are associated with metabolic disorders [2]. Furthermore, multiple metabolic risk factors can cause the vascular dysfunction and vascular lesion. Metabolic abnormalities can directly lead to high blood pressure, and the hypertension due to metabolic disturbances was defined as metabolic hypertension [3]. According to the types of metabolic abnormalities, metabolic hypertension mainly includes obesity-related hypertension, diabetic hypertension, familial dyslipidemia-associated hypertension, metabolic syndrome, hypertension with hyperhomocysteinemia, hypertension with hyperuricemia, and salt-sensitive hypertension [3, 4].

The association between metabolic risk factors and hypertension raises important attention for the underlying pathological processes, especially for focusing intervention target. The members of a subfamily of the nuclear receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), were found to be key regulators of metabolism and vascular function. Three subtypes including PPARα, γ, and β/δ have been described. PPARδ is ubiquitously expressed, which can be activated by long-chain fatty acids and thus acted as fatty acid sensors regulating a variety of genes implicated in lipid metabolism [5]. Next to fatty acids, it has been shown that prostacyclin [6] and retinoic acid [7] efficiently activate PPARδ-mediated transcription and thus participated in the blastocyst implantation and enhanced the transcriptional activity of PPARδ. Synthetic compounds of PPARδ agonists have been developed, GW501516 and GW0742, with a 1000-fold selectivity over the other PPAR isotypes [8]. When activated, PPARδ promotes fatty acid oxidation, thermogenesis, insulin sensitivity, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) levels in plasma, and overall energy expenditure [9]. The reports about the influence of PPARδ on vascular diseases and thereby blood pressure regulation in recent years have attracted much attention.

This review suggests that PPARδ might be a potential important regulator in the pathogenesis of metabolic hypertension. We provide up-to-date knowledge on the role of PPARδ in the regulation of metabolism and vascular function, and the effect of PPARδ intervention on metabolic hypertension management.

2. The Effects of PPAR on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Regulation

Among three subtypes of PPARs, PPARα and PPARγ have been widely applied in clinic because the related drugs are already available for treating metabolic disease including type II diabetes and dyslipidemia (such as PPARα agonist fibrates and PPARγ agonist thiazolidinediones) [10]. However, the physiology characteristics of PPARδ are less investigated. In recent years, with the discovery of high potent and selective agonists [11, 12], the fact that PPARδ is playing an important role in glucose and lipid metabolism, inflammatory response, cell survival, wound healing, embryo transplantation, and the development of central nervous system has been confirmed.

PPARδ is expressed almost ubiquitously, with the highest level of expression found in colon, small intestine, liver, and keratinocyte. PPARδ is a general regulator of fatty acid oxidation in many tissues. The involvement of PPARδ in the regulation of lipid metabolism has been well established based on knockout and overexpression studies in transgenic mice [13]. Activation of PPARδ in adipose tissue could improve lipid profiles and reduce adiposity because of the expression of genes involved in fatty acid oxidation and energy dissipation [14]. Overexpression of a constitutive active PPARδ in white adipose tissue reduced adiposity, most probably leading to the increased level of fatty acid oxidation and therefore inducing fatty acid metabolism, mitochondrial respiration, and programming of the muscle fiber type by PPARδ metabolic pathways. All the above metabolic effects improved by activation of PPARδ play a crucial role in the prevention of metabolic hypertension.

3. The Effects of PPAR on Vascular Pathophysiological Mechanism

Vascular endothelial cells play important roles in regulating vascular permeability and maintaining the normal blood dynamics. PPARδ is expressed in both human umbilical artery endothelial cells and aorta endothelial cells. Sandra Suarez et al. found that PPARδ antagonism has a protective effect on vascular permeability through reducing the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). The VEGFR can decrease the expression of signaling pathways downstream of receptors in ERK1/2 and Akt signaling pathways [15, 16]. In addition, PPARδ also can inhibit the generation of actin cytoskeleton and thus the high permeability of blood vessel induced by VEGFR is suppressed [17]. PPARδ agonist GW501516 plays a positive role in the development of angiogenesis by activating nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 3 (NF-ATc3), and HIF-1α [18]. GW501516 also can stimulate the proliferation of endothelial cells and induce angiogenesis through the expression of VEGF or other angiogenic molecules, thereby promoting the growth of capillaries and increasing the blood flux [19]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that VEGF-C is an osmosensitive, hypertonicity-driven gene intimately involved in salt-induced hypertension, since the TonEBP–VEGF-C signaling in mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) cells is a major determinant of extracellular volume and blood pressure homeostasis [20]. Besides, PPARδ plays an instrumental role in protecting endothelial cells from oxidant stress mediated apoptosis because of the upregulation of 14-3-3-α protein and promotion of proliferation and angiogenesis [21]. Hence, PPARδ has the ability to (i) regulate certain signaling molecules such as VEGF associated with proliferation and angiogenesis of endothelial cells and (ii) control the form and function of endothelial cells and the formation of new blood vessels. Meanwhile, with a genomic and proteomic analysis of PPARδ endothelial cells from Matrigel plugs, an abundance of potential proangiogenic genes for PPARδ is discovered. These candidates can increase the expression of CDKN1C (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1c), which has the ability to encode cell cycle inhibitor [22]. In addition, for PPARδ gene knockout mice, the expression of CLIC4 (Cl intracellular channel protein-4) which performs important functions during angiogenesis is decreased, whereas the expression of CRBP1 (cellular retinol binding protein-1) is increased, which inhibits the Akt survival pathway [2325].

Vasodilatation is closely related to endothelial cells, namely, endothelium-dependent relaxation. PPARδ has been implicated in the modulation of vascular homeostasis. In the aorta, PPARδ agonist of high selectivity can significantly improve the diastolic function of damaged blood vessels. This effect is established by activation of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), rather than by induction of gene expression. With an acute transcription-independent regulation of eNOS phosphorylation, the eNOS activity and NO content are both enhanced [26]. Paeonol reversed the impaired endothelium-dependent relaxations by inhibition of ER stress and oxidative stress, thus elevating NO bioavailability via the AMPK/PPARδ signaling pathway, while these beneficial effects of paeonol were diminished in PPARδ knockout mouse aortas [27]. PPARδ can promote proliferation, angiogenesis, and vasodilatation of vascular endothelial cell as well as reducing harmful inflammation.

The increased blood pressure is associated with the changes in the vascular structure and function. The vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) directly drive the contraction of the vascular wall and hence regulate the blood pressure. The activation of PPARδ had been shown to suppress both the proliferation and the inflammation of VSMCs, which thereby exerted beneficial effects in preventing vascular remodeling [28, 29]. A selective ligand for PPARδ, L-165041, was shown to inhibit the proliferation and migration of VSMCs through causing the cell cycle arrest by upregulating and downregulating cyclin D1 and CDK4 [30]. Angiotensin II (Ang II) was known to have a key role in the pathogenesis of hypertension through vascular remodeling, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response [31]. PPARδ activation by GW0742 was found to inhibit Ang II signaling and thereby lowering blood pressure through upregulating G-protein coupled signaling (RGS) proteins 5 (RGS5) [32]. Previous study shows that the balance between the protein kinase B (Akt) and the ERK pathways may determine the differentiated phenotype of VSMCs. Zarzuelo MJ et al. found that activation of PPARδ by GW0742 may reduce the vascular remodeling through increasing Akt phosphorylation while reducing ERK1/2 phosphorylation in SHR aortas [33]. Apoptosis of VSMCs was another important factor influencing vasculature function. The oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), which is the component of atherosclerotic lesions, has been shown to induce ROS modulated cell death in VSMCs via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [34]. Hwang JS et al. found that PPARδ could modulate oxLDL-induced apoptosis of VSMCs via a TGF-β/FAK signaling axis, which thus participated in the progression of atherosclerosis and restenosis [35]. Furthermore, PPARδ had also been found protecting brain and renal function through regulating vascular function. Yin K-J et al. studied the potential role of vascular PPARδ in ischemic brain injury, and they found that the PPARδ deletion could result in the increase of cerebrovascular permeability and brain infarction in mice after middle cerebral artery occlusion [36]. Kirkby NS et al. found that renal blood flow is regulated by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) activity through PPARδ-mediated renal vasodilator pathway involving prostacyclin, indicating the potential of COX-2/prostacyclin/PPARδ axis as a therapeutic target in renal disease [37].

4. Activation of PPAR Attenuates Metabolic Hypertension

4.1. PPARδ Activation Prevents Obesity

The incidence of obesity increases dramatically in the past decades. High levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL-c) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), and lower level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), are major factors in metabolic abnormalities associated with obesity and cardiovascular mortality [38]. William R. Oliver et al. found that GW501516 belonging to PPARδ agonists could enhance the expression of HDL-c with 79% and decrease the expression of LDL-c with 29% and the degree of triglyceride with 56% [39]. PPARδ was highly expressed in the intestinal tract. In mice with an intestinal epithelial cell-specific deletion of PPARδ, intestinal PPARδ protected against diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia. Furthermore, absence of intestinal PPARδ abolished the ability of PPARδ agonist GW501516 to increase plasma levels of HDL-cholesterol. Besides, the increase in cholesterol transport by inducing the upregulation of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) is also related to PPARδ in macrophages, fibroblasts, and intestinal cells [40].

Our study reported that high-fat diet-induced hypertrophy of adipocytes was associated with increased expression of CB1 receptor, which was directly regulated by PPARδ [41]. Obesity is also a main cause of renal disease, which has obvious distinctions from primary glomerulosclerosis because of its special pathologic characteristics. The renal disease associated with obesity includes hypertrophy and glomerulosclerosis with a series of metabolic comorbidities [42]. Our novel finding suggested that glomerular hypertrophy was associated with decreasing PPARδ expression and elevating phosphorylation of p38 MAPK in rats on HFD-induced metabolic syndrome. During exploring the potential drugs for obesity-related hypertension treatment, we found several metabolic regulation effects of telmisartan, kind of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) being commonly utilized in the therapy of lower blood pressure. Long-term administration of telmisartan significantly reduced visceral fat and prevented high-fat diet-induced obesity in wild-type mice and hypertensive rats but not in PPARδ knockout mice [43].

4.2. PPARδ Activation Improves Insulin Resistance and Glucose Homeostasis

Previous studies have demonstrated a potential insulin sensitizing activity of PPARδ agonists. Use of GW501516 could reverse pancreatic islet hypertrophy and increase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in ob/ob mice [44]. However, subsequent study did not find proinsulin secretion effect of GW501516 in isolated islets [45]. It was proposed that the improvement of glucose metabolism by PPARδ activation was mediated by increasing fatty acid catabolism in muscle. Mice were fed a high fat diet to manifest an improvement in insulin sensitivity in response to activation of PPARδ. Interestingly, this effect was not found in PPARδ-null mice [46]. Similarly, PPARδ activation for three months in db/db mice decreases glucose level in association with improving insulin sensitivity and islet function [47]. In vivo experiments in mice with upregulated PPARδ expression and activity by adenovirus mediated gene delivery further demonstrated the key role of PPARδ in glucose homeostasis [48]. Meanwhile, Li and her colleagues investigated the effects of telmisartan on insulin signaling and glucose uptake in culturing myotubes and skeletal muscle from wild-type and muscle-specific PPARδ knockout mice [49]. They found that telmisartan treatment could reverse high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in WT but not in muscle-specific PPARδ knockout mice. And the suppressed protein levels of PPARδ, phospho-Akt, phospho-AS160, and Glut4 translocation to the plasma membrane in the skeletal muscle on insulin stimulation were also restored by telmisartan administration.

4.3. PPARδ Activation Antagonizes Metabolic Vascular Dysfunction

Atherosclerosis progression is intimately linked with impaired endothelial-dependent diastolic function induced by dyslipidemia and inflammation. Macrophages played an important role in atherosclerosis, which could mediate inflammatory reaction in the control of PPARδ. And the expressions of PPARδ were significantly higher in the process of macrophages differentiation; thus PPARδ has been thought as the target of atherosclerosis therapy [50]. The mechanism of inflammatory macrophages regulated and controlled by PPARδ was special. In fact, the level of inflammatory mediators was lower in gene missing macrophages, and higher in PPARδ overexpressed macrophages. However, PPARδ agonist could reduce the expression of inflammatory gene in macrophages [39]. The further research showed that inflammatory enhancement or anti-inflammatory effect of PPARδ mainly depended on the binding between receptor and ligand binding. With lack of ligand in the environment, PPARδ isolated inflammatory reactions transcribe inhibitor BCL-6, which made BCL-6 become useless and therefore led to inflammatory enhancement. Once activated by the ligand, the BCL-6 was released and presented an anti-inflammatory effect [50]. So PPARδ agonists might become an effective atherosclerosis treatment drug by inhibiting macrophage inflammatory reaction. Besides, the anti-inflammatory effects of PPARδ have been clearly demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. There were reports that PPARδ agonists significantly enhanced the activities of antioxidant kinase, glutathione peroxidase, and hemeoxygease-1 and developed several defense mechanisms to remove reactive oxygen species (ROS). So PPARδ could prevent endothelial cells from free radicals damage by increasing antioxidant capacity [51, 52]. Toral M et al. also found that chronic activation of PPAR by GW0742 to mice fed with high fat diet (HFD) could prevent the gain of body weight and fat accumulation. Moreover, GW0742 administration increased both aortic Akt and endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation in the HFD fed mice. Thus, PPARδ might be a potential target for treating obesity-related hypertension [51].

In recent years, the role of PPARδ in the vasculature has attracted much attention. The current studies verified that PPARδ in endothelial cells played a role in the regulation of oxidative injury, inflammation, blood coagulation, cell proliferation, and apoptosis [53, 54]. One study revealed that PPARδ agonists acutely caused vasodilatation, which was partially dependent on endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) activation through the Akt pathway [55]. PPARδ activation in ECs produced an acute transcription-independent regulation of eNOS phosphorylation. Our study showed that the impaired vasorelaxation in MS rats was improved by incubating arteries with rosiglitazone. Importantly, this effect was blocked by inhibition of either PPARγ or PPARδ. In cultured endothelial cells, acute treatment with rosiglitazone increased the phosphorylation of Akt and eNOS and the production of NO. These effects were also abolished by inhibition of PPARγ, PPARδ, or PI3K. In conclusion, rosiglitazone improved endothelial function through both PPARγ- and PPARδ-mediated phosphorylation of Akt and eNOS, which might help to reconsider the complex effects and clinical applications of rosiglitazone [56].

Both sodium and glucose metabolism have been suggested to participate in the pathogenesis of hypertension and increase the risk of cardiovascular events [57, 58]. However, whether there were shared common regulatory mechanisms between sodium and glucose homeostasis was not clear [59]. Our previous study found that PPARδ may regulate both natriuresis and glucose homeostasis through the inhibition of the renal sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) by adiponectin [60]. Adiponectin downregulated renal SGLT2 expression and function, which in turn reduces the reabsorption of sodium and glucose. However, this mechanism is dampened by hyperglycemia in diabetes. Gordish KL et al. also found that 20% fructose diet could cause salt-sensitive hypertension, leading to the sodium retention when accompanied with high salt diet. As a result, the blood pressure was raised and renal nitric oxide availability was impaired [61]. A most recent study demonstrated that hyperglycemia induced by chronic intraperitoneal and oral glucose loading can increase the expression and activity of Na+-K+-ATPase in renal cortex, which is responsible for increased sodium reabsorption, leading to the increased blood volume and eventual blood pressure [62].

5. Conclusion

Over the past decade, our knowledge of the physiologic function of PPARδ has increased considerably. More evidences suggest that this nuclear receptor plays an important role in the control of metabolic homeostasis and cardiovascular function. Furthermore, through its HDL-C raising, regulation of sodium-glucose homeostasis, anti-inflammatory effect, and protecting vascular endothelial and smooth muscular activities, PPARδ could be a potential target to control atherogenesis and blood pressure (Figure 1). Future experiments combining the use of tissue-specific PPARδ knockout mice and selective PPARδ modulators with better bioactivities shed more light on the therapeutic potential of PPARδ agonists in treating metabolic-related hypertension.

Figure 1: Potential role of PPARδ in the metabolism regulation and vascular function.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570761 and 31701023).


  1. S. S. Lim, T. Vos, A. D. Flaxman et al., “A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” Lancet, vol. 380, pp. 2224–2260, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  2. S.-R. Lee, M.-J. Cha, D.-Y. Kang, K.-C. Oh, D.-H. Shin, and H.-Y. Lee, “Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome among hypertensive population: ten years' trend of the Korean national health and nutrition examination survey,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 633–639, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Z. M. Zhu, P. J. Wang, and S. T. Ma, “Metabolic hypertension: concept and practice,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 7, pp. 201–206, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  4. Z. Zhu, S. Xiong, and D. Liu, “The gastrointestinal tract: an initial organ of metabolic hypertension?” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1681–1694, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. P. A. Grimaldi, S. M. Knobel, R. R. Whitesell, and N. A. Abumrad, “Induction of aP2 gene expression by nonmetabolized long-chain fatty acids.,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 22, pp. 10930–10934, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. H. Lim and S. K. Dey, “PPAR delta functions as a prostacyclin receptor in blastocyst implantation,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 11, pp. 137–142, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  7. N. Shaw, M. Elholm, and N. Noy, “Retinoic acid is a high affinity selective ligand for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, pp. 278–41589, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Vacca, C. Degirolamo, R. Mariani-Costantini, G. Palasciano, and A. Moschetta, “Lipid-sensing nuclear receptors in the pathophysiology and treatment of the metabolic syndrome,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 562–587, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Vazquez-Carrera, “Unraveling the effects of PPARbeta/delta on insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 27, pp. 319–334, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Benetti, N. S. Patel, and M. Collino, “The role of PPARbeta/delta in the management of metabolic syndrome and its associated cardiovascular complications,” Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets, vol. 11, pp. 273–284, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Kang, B. Hatano, and C. H. Lee, “PPAR delta agonists and metabolic diseases,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 9, pp. 72–77, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. L. Cox, “Rationally designed PPARdelta-specific agonists and their therapeutic potential for metabolic syndrome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, pp. 3284-3285, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  13. Y. Barak, D. Liao, W. He et al., “Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta on placentation, adiposity, and colorectal cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, pp. 303–308, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  14. Y.-X. Wang, C.-H. Lee, S. Tiep et al., “Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor delta activates fat metabolism to prevent obesity,” Cell, vol. 113, pp. 159–170, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  15. L. M. Goddard and M. Luisa Iruela-Arispe, “Cellular and molecular regulation of vascular permeability,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 407–415, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Suarez, G. W. McCollum, C. A. Bretz, R. Yang, M. E. Capozzi, and J. S. Penn, “Modulation of VEGF-induced retinal vascular permeability by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 55, pp. 8232–8240, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Wawrzyniak, C. Pich, B. Gross et al., “Endothelial, but not smooth muscle, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta regulates vascular permeability and anaphylaxis,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 135, pp. 1625.e5–1635.e5, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  18. D. Bishop-Bailey, “PPARs and angiogenesis,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1601–1605, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Piqueras, A. R. Reynolds, K. M. Hodivala-Dilke et al., “Activation of PPARbeta/delta induces endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, pp. 63–69, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  20. A. MacHnik, W. Neuhofer, J. Jantsch et al., “Macrophages regulate salt-dependent volume and blood pressure by a vascular endothelial growth factor-C-dependent buffering mechanism,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 545–552, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J.-Y. Liou, S. Lee, D. Ghelani, N. Matijevic-Aleksic, and K. K. Wu, “Protection of endothelial survival by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta mediated 14-3-3 upregulation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, pp. 1481–1487, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Muller-Brusselbach, M. Komhoff, M. Rieck et al., “Deregulation of tumor angiogenesis and blockade of tumor growth in PPARbeta-deficient mice,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 26, pp. 3686–3698, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. S. Kuppumbatti, B. Rexer, S. Nakajo, K. Nakaya, and R. Mira-y-Lopez, “CRBP suppresses breast cancer cell survival and anchorage-independent growth,” Oncogene, vol. 20, no. 50, pp. 7413–7419, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Bohman, T. Matsumoto, K. Suh et al., “Proteomic analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced endothelial cell differentiation reveals a role for chloride intracellular channel 4 (CLIC4) in tubular morphogenesis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 51, pp. 42397–42404, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Adamkiewicz, K. Kaddatz, M. Rieck et al., “Proteomic profile of mouse fibroblasts with a targeted disruption of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-beta/delta gene,” Proteomics, vol. 7, pp. 1208–1216, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  26. Y. Wu, L. Xue, W. Du et al., “Polydatin restores endothelium-dependent relaxation in rat aorta rings impaired by high glucose: a novel insight into the PPARbeta-NO signaling pathway,” PLoS One, vol. 10, Article ID e0126249, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  27. K. W. Choy, M. R. Mustafa, Y. S. Lau et al., “Paeonol protects against endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced endothelial dysfunction via AMPK/PPAR delta signaling pathway,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 116, pp. 51–62, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  28. G. Liu, X. Li, Y. Li et al., “PPARdelta agonist GW501516 inhibits PDGF-stimulated pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cell function related to pathological vascular remodeling,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 903947, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  29. E. Galatou, T. Kelly, and A. Lazou, “The PPARbeta/delta agonist GW0742 modulates signaling pathways associated with cardiac myocyte growth via a non-genomic redox mechanism,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 395, pp. 145–154, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  30. H. J. Lim, S. Lee, J. H. Park et al., “PPAR delta agonist L-165041 inhibits rat vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration via inhibition of cell cycle,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 202, pp. 446–454, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Virdis, M. F. Neves, F. Amiri, R. M. Touyz, and E. L. Schiffrin, “Role of NAD(P)H oxidase on vascular alterations in angiotensin II-infused mice,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 535–542, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Romero, R. Jimenez, M. Toral et al., “Vascular and central activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- attenuates angiotensin II-induced hypertension: role of RGS-5,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 358, no. 1, pp. 151–163, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. J. Zarzuelo, R. Jimenez, P. Galindo et al., “Antihypertensive effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta activation in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Hypertension, vol. 58, pp. 733–743, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  34. P. Larroque-Cardoso, A. Swiader, C. Ingueneau et al., “Role of protein kinase C δ in ER stress and apoptosis induced by oxidized LDL in human vascular smooth muscle cells,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, no. 2, article e520, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. S. Hwang, S. Y. Eun, S. A. Ham et al., “pp. AR-Adelta modulates oxLDL-induced apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells through a TGF-beta/FAK signaling axis,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 62, pp. 54–61, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  36. K. Yin, Z. Deng, M. Hamblin, J. Zhang, and Y. E. Chen, “Vascular PPARδ protects against stroke-induced brain injury,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 574–581, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. N. S. Kirkby, W. Sampaio, G. Etelvino et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 selectively controls renal blood flow through a novel PPAR beta/delta-dependent vasodilator pathway,” Hypertension, vol. 71, pp. 297–305, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  38. A. R. Tall and N. Wang, “Tangier disease as a test of the reverse cholesterol transport hypothesis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1205–1207, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. W. R. Oliver Jr., J. L. Shenk, M. R. Snaith et al., “A selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta agonist promotes reverse cholesterol transport,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, pp. 5306–5311, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  40. J. N. van der Veen, J. K. Kruit, R. Havinga et al., “Reduced cholesterol absorption upon PPARdelta activation coincides with decreased intestinal expression of NPC1L1,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 46, pp. 526–534, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  41. Z. C. Yan, D. Y. Liu, L. L. Zhang et al., “Exercise reduces adipose tissue via cannabinoid receptor type 1 which is regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 354, pp. 427–433, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  42. Z. Yan, Y. Ni, P. Wang et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta protects against obesity-related glomerulopathy through the P38 MAPK pathway,” Obesity, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 538–545, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. H. B. He, D. C. Yang, L. Q. Ma et al., “Telmisartan prevents weight gain and obesity through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta-dependent pathways,” Hypertension, vol. 55, pp. 869–879, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  44. T. Tanaka, J. Yamamoto, S. Iwasaki et al., “Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta induces fatty acid beta-oxidation in skeletal muscle and attenuates metabolic syndrome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, pp. 15924–15929, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  45. I. Kharroubi, C. H. Lee, P. Hekerman et al., “BCL-6: a possible missing link for anti-inflammatory PPAR-delta signalling in pancreatic beta cells,” Diabetologia, vol. 49, pp. 2350–2358, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  46. C. H. Lee, P. Olson, A. Hevener et al., “PPARdelta regulates glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, pp. 3444–3449, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  47. M. S. Winzell, E. M. Wulff, G. S. Olsen, P. Sauerberg, C. F. Gotfredsen, and B. Ahren, “Improved insulin sensitivity and islet function after PPARdelta activation in diabetic db/db mice,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 626, pp. 297–305, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  48. S. Liu, B. Hatano, M. Zhao et al., “Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta/beta in hepatic metabolic regulation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, pp. 1237–1247, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  49. L. Li, Z. Luo, H. Yu et al., “Telmisartan improves insulin resistance of skeletal muscle through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta activation,” Diabetes, vol. 62, pp. 762–774, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  50. C.-H. Lee, A. Chawla, N. Urbiztondo et al., “Transcriptional repression of atherogenic inflammation: modulation by PPARdelta,” Science, vol. 302, pp. 453–457, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  51. M. Toral, M. Gomez-Guzman, R. Jimenez et al., “Chronic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorbeta/delta agonist GW0742 prevents hypertension, vascular inflammatory and oxidative status, and endothelial dysfunction in diet-induced obesity,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 33, pp. 1831–1844, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  52. W. S. Cheang, X. Fang, and X. Y. Tian, “Pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and delta in vascular diseases,” Circulation Journal, vol. 77, pp. 2664–2671, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  53. H.-Y. Gong, Y. Zhu, Li. Z-H et al., “Embryo-fetus development toxicity of a novel PPAR-delta agonist in rat,” Yao Xue Xue Bao, vol. 49, pp. 1536–1542, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  54. S. M. Reilly and C. H. Lee, “PPAR delta as a therapeutic target in metabolic disease,” FEBS Letters, vol. 582, pp. 26–31, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  55. M. Doktorova, I. Zwarts, T. Zutphen et al., “Intestinal PPARdelta protects against diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, article 846, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  56. Z. Zhao, Z. Luo, P. Wang et al., “Rosiglitazone restores endothelial dysfunction in a rat model of metabolic syndrome through PPARgamma- and PPARdelta-dependent phosphorylation of akt and eNOS,” PPAR Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 291656, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  57. M. O'Donnell, J. F. Mann, A. E. Schutte et al., “Dietary sodium and cardiovascular disease risk,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375, no. 24, pp. 2404–2408, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. J. J. DiNicolantonio and S. C. Lucan, “The wrong white crystals: Not salt but sugar as aetiological in hypertension and cardiometabolic disease,” Open Heart, vol. 1, no. 1, Article ID e000167, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. J. Allison, “Hypertension: PPARdelta: a link between sodium and glucose homeostasis,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 12, article 313, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  60. Y. Zhao, P. Gao, F. Sun et al., “Sodium intake regulates glucose homeostasis through the PPARdelta/adiponectin-mediated sglt2 pathway,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 23, pp. 699–711, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  61. K. L. Gordish, K. M. Kassem, P. A. Ortiz, and W. H. Beierwaltes, “Moderate (20%) fructose-enriched diet stimulates salt-sensitive hypertension with increased salt retention and decreased renal nitric oxide,” Physiological Reports, vol. 5, no. 7, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Fakhruddin, W. A. Alanazi, H. N. Alhamami, K. P. Briski, and K. E. Jackson, “Hyperglycaemia induced by chronic i.p . and oral glucose loading leads to hypertension through increased Na + retention in proximal tubule,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 236–249, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar