Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Inflammation
Volume 2013, Article ID 434586, 11 pages
Research Article

Statin Modulation of Human T-Cell Proliferation, IL-1 and IL-17 Production, and IFN- T Cell Expression: Synergy with Conventional Immunosuppressive Agents

1UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, 11-43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK
2Moorfields Eye Hospital, London EC1V 2PD, UK

Received 15 March 2013; Accepted 9 July 2013

Academic Editor: David A. Hart

Copyright © 2013 Ashmal Jameel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been demonstrated to be immunomodulatory for human immune-mediated disease and in experimental models. The aim of this study was to compare statin-mediated immunosuppressive effects on human T-cell responses in vitro with those of conventional immunosuppressives (dexamethasone, cyclosporin A (CsA), mycophenolate, and rapamycin). Statins (atorvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin) were investigated for their modulatory effects on human PBMC viability, cytokine profiles, and T-cell proliferation. At concentrations that inhibited anti-CD3/28-stimulated T-cell proliferation ( ), simvastatin significantly decreased intracellular CD4+ T-cell expression of IFN- ( ) to levels similar to those induced by conventional immunosuppressives. Atorvastatin and lovastatin also decreased IFN- expression, although to a lesser degree ( ). All three statins reduced levels of IL-17 production ( ). However, in response to anti-CD3/28 stimulation, simvastatin significantly upregulated IL-1 production ( ). The profile of cytokines produced in response to anti-CD3/28 stimulation was similar when both atorvastatin and dexamethasone were added as compared with dexamethasone alone, suggesting that atorvastatin can synergise with dexamethasone with respect to immunomodulation of cytokines. This data supports the hypothesis of selective statin-mediated immunomodulatory effects on human immune cells.

1. Introduction

As a therapy for hypercholesterolaemia, statins have been used clinically for over two decades. However, over the last decade, immunosuppressive effects have also been demonstrated which are independent of their cholesterol-lowering properties [1]. Statins in vitro modulate cell adhesion through effects on endothelial cells and leukocytes, via blocking activation of LFA-1 and decreasing ICAM-1 and MCP-1 expression on activated leukocytes and endothelium [24]. Statins have been shown in vitro and in vivo to reduce leukocyte motility, migration, and infiltration [5]. As compared to cyclosporine, statins were effective in reducing leukocyte infiltration in a rat model of allograft rejection [6]. They also inhibit the NF- B pathway, involved in transcriptional regulation of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules [7]. Statins have been shown to upregulate suppressor of cytokine secretion (SOCS) 3 and SOCS 7 which, in turn, downregulate IL-23 and IL-6 production, thus decreasing IL-17 production [8]. Clinical studies of statins in patients with immune-mediated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), multiple sclerosis, and organ rejection following transplantation have shown conflicting results due to different statins being used in those studies and often open or retrospective studies involving small patient numbers [9, 10].

Immunomodulatory effects in experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE) have been observed with atorvastatin attenuating murine EAE [11], and it was found that atorvastatin upregulated IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 and downregulated IL-2, IL-12, IFN- , and TNF- . However, in another study investigating atorvastatin in murine experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU), atorvastatin was found not to modulate the immune response despite histological grading suggesting mildly decreased inflammation [12], whereas in murine EAU attenuated by lovastatin, there was a decrease in IFN- production but no effect on Th2 cytokines [13]. In a Lewis rat model, EAU was decreased in severity by both atorvastatin and lovastatin, even when given after disease onset. With both of these statins, there were decreases in clinical and histological disease scores, antigen responsiveness, and IFN- production [14]. Simvastatin was reported to decrease cytokine production, including IL-10, in a murine model of collagen-induced arthritis [15] and in a murine lupus model, it decreased serum TNF- and IFN- levels but increased transcription of IL-4 and IL-10 [16]. Overall, there appear to be a range of immune-related effects by statins depending on species, model, and cell type investigated.

Anti-inflammatory therapy for intraocular inflammation often requires use of corticosteroids, yet these can have severe side effects in the eye including raising intraocular pressure, cataracts, and glaucoma. To reduce these effects, steroid-sparing agents are also used including cyclosporin A (CsA), mycophenolate, and rapamycin. However, these drugs all have systemic side effects which limit their use in the long-term management of chronic disease. In chronic immune-mediated conditions such as RA and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), there is an associated increased premature atherogenesis and cardiovascular disease risk secondary to inflammatory processes [1719]. In addition, patients with uveitis who are treated with steroids and immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine and mycophenolate have an increased risk of developing cardiac disease. Therefore, in these cases, the combined cholesterol-lowering and anti-inflammatory properties of statins may be clinically very useful.

The aim of this study was to determine whether individual statins exert immunosuppressive effects on T cells equivalent to those of conventional immunosuppressive agents in vitro. The effects of atorvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin on normal human whole blood-derived T-cell viability, proliferation, and cytokine responses were studied and compared to dexamethasone, CsA, mycophenolate, and rapamycin. The effects of combining atorvastatin with dexamethasone were also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

All drugs were dissolved in either dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO), RPMI 1640 (Dutch Modification), and/or 100% ethanol. Atorvastatin (Parke-Davis, Pfizer Inc., NY, USA) was prepared as a 1 mM stock solution; lovastatin (Calbiochem, Nottingham, UK) at 40 mM; simvastatin (MSD, NJ, USA) at 10 μM; dexamethasone (Chauvin, KingstonUpon-Thames, UK) at 400 μg/L.; mevalonate (Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd, Dorset, UK) at 0.5 M; mycophenolate mofetil (Roche Products Limited, Hertfordshire, UK) at 10 mM; rapamycin (Wyeth, Pfizer, Berkshire, UK) at 0.1 mg/mL; cyclosporin A (Sandoz, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Surrey, UK) at 1 mg/mL.

2.1. Donors

Peripheral blood was obtained from 16 healthy donors (all working at the Institute/Moorfields) with informed consent (mean age (range), 34.3 (22.5–46.7) years; six males). Exclusion criteria included a history of autoimmune disease, atopy, haematological disorder, or current usage of systemic medication.

The protocols used in this study were reviewed and approved by the Local Ethics Committee. All studies involving human subjects were conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Reagents

All tissue culture reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified. All assays were performed in RPMI 1640 (Dutch Modification) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 μg/mL gentamycin, 20 μM 2-ME, nonessential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, and 10% human AB+ serum.

2.3. Proliferation and Viability Assays

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated as previously described [20]. Viability and proliferation assays were performed in triplicate. Cells were incubated for 10 min in a 37°C water bath with 7.5 μM CFSE (Molecular Probes, UK) in serum-free medium. 1 mL cold stop buffer (10% FCS in RPMI) was then added before incubation at room temperature for 30 min. Cells were washed once with RPMI before being resuspended at 2 × 105/mL in T-cell medium for 5 days with or without atorvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin, rapamycin, mycophenolate, CsA, and dexamethasone. The reversibility of statin function was tested by addition of mevalonate [13]. T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 (10 ng/mL; clone HIT3a) and anti-CD28 (5 ng/mL; clone CD28.2) antibodies (Pharmingen). All drugs or vehicle controls were added at start of culture, except CsA, which was added 2 h prior to stimulation since no effect was seen with CsA if added at time 0.

Two-color flow cytometry was performed (FACScan; Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK; BD). Gates were set on viable lymphocytes according to forward (FSC) and side scatter (SSC). Listmode data was generated using CellQuest acquisition software on 15–25,000 events (BD). For viability assays, all lymphocytes were gated to assess level of nonviable propidium iodide expressing (PI+) cells. For proliferation, nonviable PI+ cells were excluded.

Data were analysed using WinList (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME). The total numbers of events were determined by analyzing the data using dot plots and rectangular regions to define the cell populations. Histograms were used to track the divisions of CFSE-labeled cells enabling identification of the percentage of divided (proliferated) cells. All data presented are from analyses of live (PI negative) cells only.

2.4. Cytokine Detection

Concentrations of statins required to achieve maximal inhibition of proliferation whilst maintaining viability were identified and used in a multiplex bead array to determine the effects of three statins on cytokine production. 100 μL of heparinised whole blood was cultured with or without simvastatin, lovastatin, atorvastatin, dexamethasone, CsA, mycophenolate, and rapamycin and stimulated with PMA (50 ng/mL) and ionomycin (1 μg/mL). Combinations of dexamethasone and atorvastatin were also included. Supernatants were harvested at 18 h, centrifuged to remove cells, and stored at −70°C. Multiplex bead cytokine arrays were conducted with a 10-plex kit (Bender Medsystems, Ebiosciences, Hatfield, UK) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Supernatants were analyzed simultaneously for IFN- , IL-1 , IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF- . The lowest levels of detection were IL-1 (6.2 pg/mL); IL-2 (6.3 pg/mL); IL-4 (5 pg/mL); IL-5 (5.8 pg/mL); IL-6 (14.8 pg/mL), IL-8 (58.6 pg/mL); IL-10 (7.3 pg/mL); IFN- (5.7 pg/mL), and TNF- (8.1 pg/mL). IL-17A was assayed by ELISA (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), with a minimum level of detection of 62.5 pg/mL.

2.5. Intracellular Cytokine Expression

Whole blood cells were stimulated with PMA/ionomycin, and 10 μg/mL Brefeldin A was added prior to culture for 18 h in the presence or absence of drugs. CD3+ T cells were stained intracellularly with mouse anti-human IFN- -FITC (clone 4S.B3) and rat anti-human IL-10-PE (clone JES3-9D7; both BD) as previously described [20].

2.6. Statistics

All intra-assay comparisons of means were analysed using Student’s -tests and for inter-assay data by Mann-Whitney tests. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for multiplex cytokine detection analysis for 6 donors, with nonparametric post hoc comparisons. In experiments with CsA, only 5 donors were included due to lack of available donors. Significance was reached when , and this was achieved for several assays, despite relatively small sample sizes.

3. Results

3.1. Effect on T-Cell Viability

To determine whether the drugs had any effect on T-cell viability, cells were cultured in the presence of drugs, mevalonate, and vehicle controls for 72 h prior to staining for PI (Figure 1). A range of concentrations were investigated, and viability was generally high with the lowest viability observed at the highest concentrations of lovastatin and atorvastatin. This was reversed with the addition of mevalonate, a downstream product of HMG-CoA reductase ( ) relative to lovastatin alone, suggesting that these higher drug concentrations reduced cell viability by inhibiting the mevalonate pathway and not via direct toxicity.

Figure 1: Cell viability was assessed at all concentrations of statins. The percentage viability is compared in the presence (filled bars) or absence of mevalonate (clear bars). * denotes a statistical difference between viability of cells in different concentrations of statins ( ), and ⌀ indicates a difference in viability with and without mevalonate ( ).
3.2. Effect on T-Cell Proliferation

There was a dose-dependent inhibition of T-cell proliferation with all statins, with maximal inhibition at 50 μM atorvastatin and lovastatin and 100 μM simvastatin ( ; Figure 2 ). The addition of mevalonate, fully restored proliferation (Figures 2 2 insert) confirming that these modulatory effects were statin-mediated.

Figure 2: (A)–(F). Effect of statins on CD3/ CD28-stimulated T-cell proliferation. Each data point represents the mean % T-cell proliferation ± SD. Due to intersample variation, data from each experiment ( ) were normalized against the positive control of % proliferated T cells without drug, allowing experiments to be pooled ( ). * and ** as compared to control. Insert: one representative FACS analysis is shown. (A), Control histogram showing % divided T cells (M1) in the absence of stimulation or statin. (B), % divided T cells after stimulation but no statin. (C), % divided T cells with the addition of atorvastatin (50 μM) as compared to stimulated control. (D), % divided T cells with the addition of atorvastatin (50 μM) and mevalonate (200 μM). (F), Effect of rapamycin and mycophenolate on CD3/ CD28-stimulated T-cell proliferation. Each data point represents the mean % change in T-cell proliferation ± SD. Due to intersample variation, data from each experiment ( ) were normalized against the positive control of % proliferated T cells without drug, allowing experiments to be pooled ( ). * and ** as compared to control.

A dose-dependent inhibition of anti-CD3/28-induced T-cell proliferation was also seen for the standard immunosuppressive agents with maximal inhibition at 100 μM mycophenolate mofetil, 100 μM rapamycin, (Figure 2(F)), 100 μg/mL dexamethasone, and 100 ng/mL CsA (data not shown).

3.3. Effects of Statins on Cytokine Production

The three statins demonstrated heterogeneous effects on cytokine production. Six human donors’ PBMC were included in this study, and the responses were highly variable. The mean background levels of cytokines secreted by unstimulated cells were subtracted from all wells. The levels secreted by stimulated cells in the absence of exogenous drugs were as follows: TNF- (30.31 ± 13.74 pg/mL), IFN- (0.66 ± 0.47 pg/mL), IL-10 (337.04 ± 374.8 pg/mL), IL-4 (4.47 ± 6.64 pg/mL), IL-1 (447.46 ± 236.07 pg/mL), IL-6 (2086.01 ± 489.49 pg/mL), IL-5 (14.53 ± 13.66 pg/mL), IL-17 (1186.50 ± 599.27), and IL-2 (1.50 ± 2.45 pg/mL). Following stimulation, there was variability in the cytokines produced among the donors, not unexpected in a mixed donor population. Nevertheless, for all six donors, simvastatin significantly increased IL-1 (Figure 3; ), and all three statins inhibited IL-17 production ( ). Since not all donors’ cells exhibited the same cytokine response profile, trends were observed although these failed to reach significance. All three statins caused decreases in levels of IFN- and IL-6. Atorvastatin reduced IL-1 , IL-4, IL-5, and IFN- and increased IL-10, TNF- , and IL-2. Lovastatin increased IL-1 and IL-5 production and decreased IL-10, TNF- , and IFN- production. Simvastatin was shown to decrease IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 production. Mean levels of IFN- were relatively low, suggesting a low frequency of IFN- secreting cells in the normal donor population.

Figure 3: Graphs showing percentage changes in cytokine production by cells cultured with PMA/ionomycin ± statins. These studies show a multitude of varied responses indicating that the different statins have slightly different profiles of action.
3.4. Differential Effects of Statins on Cytokine Responses

Due to the variable cytokine response profiles seen in individual donors, we investigated whether there were any correlations between the cytokines that were common to the drugs in comparison with cells stimulated in the absence of drug (PMA/ionomycin alone). Table 1 summarizes the effects on cytokine profiles of the different drugs. All of the correlations included were statistically significant ( ). Stimulation in the absence of statins induced a strong correlation between IL-2 and IFN- and between IL-6 and TNF- . In contrast, following atorvastatin treatment, IL-6 showed a good correlation with IL-2, IFN- , and TNF- , and IL-2 correlated strongly with IFN- and TNF- , as did IFN- with TNF- . In the simvastatin-treated group, IL-6 correlated with IL-2, IFN- , and IL-1 and IL-2 with IFN- . Finally, the lovastatin-treated group showed correlations of IL-6 with IFN- , IL-5 with TNF- , and IFN- with TNF- .

Table 1: Spearman rank analysis of correlations in cytokines produced by cells cultured with PMA/ionomycin ± statins ± dexamethasone. The values represent the strength of the correlation of cytokines, with +1.00 being the maximum, and their changes in expression according to exposure to each statins. All results were statistically significant ( ).
3.5. Effects of Atorvastatin Combinations with Dexamethasone on Cytokine Responses

Atorvastatin was selected to investigate its effects on cytokine responses in combination with dexamethasone. In the presence of either drug alone or when added in combination, IL-6, IL-8, IFN- , and IL-1 levels were all decreased although these did not reach significance, suggesting that the immunosuppressive effects of each of the drugs were maintained when added in combination (Figure 4). Interestingly, the level of IL-10 production was enhanced in the presence of dexamethasone, although this failed to reach significance. For the production of IL-2, IL-5, and TNF- , the effects of atorvastatin were reversed upon addition of dexamethasone, or with dexamethasone alone, suggesting that this drug combination was antagonistic with respect to some cytokine responses. For the cytokine correlations (Table 1), there was a baseline correlation between IL-6 and TNF- following addition of atorvastatin but not in the presence of dexamethasone alone or combined with atorvastatin. In contrast, the correlation of IL-2 with IFN-γ was maintained in the presence of either atorvastatin or dexamethasone alone but was lost when the drugs were added in combination. This suggests differential modulatory effects, with the combination of dexamethasone and atorvastatin exerting a distinct pattern of cytokine responses.

Figure 4: Graphs showing percentage changes in cytokine production in cells stimulated with PMA/ionomycin ± atorvastatin/dexamethasone.
3.6. Effect of Immunosuppressive Drugs and Statins on Intracellular IFN- Expression

For a more sensitive method of detecting IFN- , intracellular cytokine staining was performed. There was a significant decrease in intracellular expression of IFN- in CD3+ T cells in the presence of the statins ( for atorvastatin and lovastatin; for simvastatin). Dexamethasone, CsA, mycophenolate, and rapamycin also demonstrated significant decreases in intracellular IFN- expression as compared to stimulated controls ( ; Figure 5). Dexamethasone exerted the most significant reduction in expression of intracellular IFN- , whilst the combination of dexamethasone with atorvastatin also significantly reduced IFN- ( ).

Figure 5: Percentage of IFN- expression in PMA/ionomycin stimulated whole blood with or without addition of drugs. Each bar represents the means ± SEM from 6 experiments, each performed in triplicate, subtracting basal cytokine expression. Drug concentrations: atorvastatin (50 μM), lovastatin (50 μM), simvastatin (100 μM), rapamycin (100 μM), mycophenolate (100 μM), CsA (100 ng/mL), and dexamethasone (400 μg/mL). * ; ** . One representative FACS analysis is shown. (A), Unstimulated CD3+ T cells showing basal IFN- expression. (B), Stimulated CD3+ T cells to demonstrate baseline levels of IFN- expression. (C), Stimulated CD3+ T cells treated with atorvastatin (50 μM) demonstrating a decreased level of IFN- expression as compared to control. (D), Stimulated CD3+ T cells treated with dexamethasone (400 µg/mL), showing a decreased level of IFN- as compared to group (C).

4. Discussion

Statins have been demonstrated to exert anti-inflammatory effects in vitro: reduction in CD11b expression [21]; inhibition of IFN- -induced MHC-II expression on endothelial cells, macrophages, and therefore T-cell activation [22]; disruption of lipid rafts essential for T-cell activation [23]. Considering the use of statins as an adjunctive therapy for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, the 2010 Cochrane review on “Statins for multiple sclerosis” concluded that data from double-blinded randomized trials would be needed before licensing for treatment of multiple sclerosis [24]. In spite of the large amount of in vitro data indicating a potential anti-inflammatory role of statins, there is little evidence for their direct role in modulating human T-cell cytokines.

The concentrations of statins required to inhibit T-cell responses to anti-CD3/28 stimulation used for this in vitro study were selected from titration experiments, and these concentrations have been used in other in vitro studies [2527]. Due to the potency of the in vitro stimulants, higher, nonphysiological concentrations of statins were required, and therefore, we cannot extrapolate the data to statin doses used clinically [28]. Nevertheless, these studies can inform on the effects of statins on human T-cell responses. Comparing the effects of drugs on T-cell proliferation, the statins inhibited proliferation to a comparable level to that achieved with conventional immunosuppressive drugs. The viability of the cells in our study was reduced in the presence of these statin concentrations, but, following the addition of mevalonate, there was a recovery both in viability and in proliferation, confirming that the inhibitory effect was reversible, and a direct result of statin-mediated inhibition of the HMG-CoA pathway.

Of the conventional immunosuppressive drugs investigated, dexamethasone exerted the most potent immunomodulatory effect, and its ability to decrease production of IL-1 , IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IFN- , and TNF- is in agreement with previous studies [29, 30]. Interestingly, dexamethasone treatment upregulated IL-10 production, as reported by others [31]. Of course the study design does not permit us to determine the cellular source of the cytokines, and monocytes, which were likely to be present at low numbers, have previously been observed to respond to simvastatin by upregulating IFN- production which, in turn, led to a decrease in IL-17 production [8]. The downregulatory effect of other immunosuppressive drugs (CsA, rapamycin, and mycophenolate) on IFN- expression is in agreement with other studies [29, 3234].

These drugs also differentially inhibited other cytokines, with CsA significantly decreasing levels of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-5 IFN- but not IL-10 production (data not shown). In contrast, a decrease in IL-10 mRNA expression has been reported in a study on CsA-treated normal human whole blood following anti-CD3/CD28 T cell costimulation [29]. However, changes in IL-10 mRNA expression do not necessarily correlate with the level of protein production, which could explain the contradictory findings. Mycophenolate has recently been demonstrated to have a profound inhibitory effect on Th17 cells [35], and we have not yet investigated this drug for its effects on Th17 cells in our model (in progress). Other discrepancies in cytokine responses observed across the literature are easily explained by the different genetic backgrounds of donors used in different studies.

All three statins in this study significantly reduced intracellular IFN- expression, as previously reported for mouse and human T cells [15, 36, 37]. For the other cytokines investigated in this study, there were no effects common to all three statins. Intracellular expression levels of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 were not significantly altered (data not shown) due to the variable responses between the individual donors and very low levels of IL-4 and IL-10 expression.

Atorvastatin, when given to hypercholesterolemic patients, has been found to decrease PBMC production of TNF- IL-1, IL-6 [38], IL-2, and IFN-γ  in vitro [39]. Decreased serum IL-8 and IL-6 levels have been observed with atorvastatin postcoronary artery bypass grafts [40, 41]. More recently, atorvastatin has been reported to reduce the pathogenic production of IL-6 and IL-10 by activated T cells from SLE patients thereby readjusting them toward a more tolerant phenotype [42]. In our study, atorvastatin decreased production of IL-17 and intracellular expression of IFN- , in agreement with data from a Lewis rat model of experiment autoimmune neuritis [37] and in Balb/c mice with experimental colitis, in which TNF- was also downregulated [43].

In murine EAE treated with lovastatin, reduced levels of IL-6, TNF- , and IFN- with upregulation of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 were found, suggesting a Th2 polarization [44, 45]. We detected significant decreases in production of IL-17 and in IFN- expression in response to lovastatin.

Simvastatin decreased IL-17 and IFN- expression and increased IL-1 . It has previously been found that simvastatin decreased TNF- in hypercholesterolemic patients [46] but had inconsistent effects on plasma IL-6 levels [47]. Simvastatin was not found to influence TNF- , IL-6, and IL-1 receptor antagonist levels in an endotox in induced human in vivo model of low-grade inflammation [48] but decreased IL-8 production by PBMCs of CAD patients after 6 months of systemic treatment [49]. This contrasts with in vitro effects of simvastatin on anti-CD3/anti-CD28-stimulated PBMCs from RA patients with decreased IFN- and IL-10 unaffected [15]. Simvastatin also decreased levels of serum IL-6 in mouse collagen-induced arthritis [15] and IL-17 gene expression in human MS patients CD4+ T cells [8].

Due to the clinical use of atorvastatin for controlling cholesterol levels, it was selected in this study for possible combinatory effects when added with dexamethasone. However, by comparing atorvastatin, dexamethasone, and dexamethasone/atorvastatin together, no significant differences were found in overall levels of cytokines produced. However, the combination did affect cytokine correlations, suggesting that there might be an additive anti-inflammatory effect. There is little in the literature to suggest contraindications in terms of side effects, and the combination has been used experimentally in a rat model to reverse dexamethasone-induced hypertension [50].

In conclusion, different statins, with their distinct effects on cytokine responses, could have clinical applications in specifically targeting those key cytokines relevant to each inflammatory disease process, perhaps as a corticosteroid-sparing therapy, while providing effective disease control.


CsA: Cyclosporine A
HMG Co-A: 3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A
EAE: Experimental autoimmune encephalitis
EAU: Experimental autoimmune uveitis
PI: Propidium iodide.

Conflict of Interests

This is to confirm that none of the authors had any conflict of interests during the undertaking of this research study and during the preparation of this paper. Where it was necessary to purchase reagents from commercial sources for this study, those companies are named herein.


This work was partly funded by the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia (KO).


  1. L. M. Blanco-Colio, J. Tuñón, J. L. Martín-Ventura, and J. Egido, “Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of statins,” Kidney International, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Weitz-Schmidt, “Statins as anti-inflammatory agents,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 482–486, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Niwa, T. Totsuka, and S. Hayashi, “Inhibitory effect of fluvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, on the expression of adhesion molecules on human monocyte cell line,” International Journal of Immunopharmacology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 669–675, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. V. Lewis, A. M. Dart, and J. P. F. Chin-Dusting, “Endothelium-dependent relaxation by acetylcholine is impaired in hypertriglyceridemic humans with normal levels of plasma LDL cholesterol,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 805–812, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Greenwood, L. Steinman, and S. S. Zamvil, “Statin therapy and autoimmune disease: from protein prenylation to immunomodulation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 358–370, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Nie, D. Yang, G. Liu et al., “Statins induce immunosuppressive effect on heterotopic limb allografts in rat through inhibiting T cell activation and proliferation,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 602, no. 1, pp. 168–175, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. L. Pahl, “Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-κB transcription factors,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 49, pp. 6853–6866, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. X. Zhang, J. Jin, X. Peng, V. S. Ramgolam, and S. Markovic-Plese, “Simvastatin inhibits IL-17 secretion by targeting multiple IL-17-regulatory cytokines and by inhibiting the expression of IL-17 transcription factor RORC in CD4+ lymphocytes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 10, pp. 6988–6996, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Vollmer, L. Key, V. Durkalski et al., “Oral simvastatin treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis,” Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9421, pp. 1607–1608, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Sena, R. Pedrosa, and M. G. Morais, “Therapeutic potential of lovastatin in multiple sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 250, no. 6, pp. 754–755, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Youssef, O. Stüve, J. O. Patarroyo et al., “The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, promotes a Th2 bias and reverses paralysis in central nervous system autoimmune disease,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6911, pp. 78–84, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. B. Thomas, T. Albini, R. K. Giri, R. F. See, M. Evans, and N. A. Rao, “The effects of atorvastatin in experimental autoimmune uveitis,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 275–279, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. E. Gegg, R. Harry, D. Hankey et al., “Suppression of autoimmune retinal disease by lovastatin does not require Th2 cytokine induction,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 4, pp. 2327–2335, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Kohno, T. Sakai, S. Saito, K. Okano, and K. Kitahara, “Treatment of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis with atorvastatin and lovastatin,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 569–576, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. P. Leung, N. Sattar, A. Crilly et al., “A novel anti-inflammatory role for simvastatin in inflammatory arthritis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 3, pp. 1524–1530, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Aprahamian, R. Bonegio, J. Rizzo et al., “Simvastatin treatment ameliorates autoimmune disease associated with accelerated atherosclerosis in a murine lupus model,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 3028–3034, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Koshy, D. Berger, and M. K. Crow, “Increased expression of CD40 ligand on systemic lupus erythematosus lymphocytes,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 826–837, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. Pasceri and E. T. H. Yeh, “A tale of two diseases: atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis,” Circulation, vol. 100, no. 21, pp. 2124–2126, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Abou-Raya and S. Abou-Raya, “Inflammation: a pivotal link between autoimmune diseases and atherosclerosis,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 331–337, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Hill, G. Galatowicz, T. Akerele, C. H. Lau, V. Calder, and S. Lightman, “Intracellular T lymphocyte cytokine profiles in the aqueous humour of patients with uveitis and correlation with clinical phenotype,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Weber, W. Erl, K. S. C. Weber, and P. C. Weber, “HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors decrease CD11b expression and CD11b- dependent adhesion of monocytes to endothelium and reduce increased adhesiveness of monocytes isolated from patients with hypercholesterolemia,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1212–1219, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Kwak, F. Mulhaupt, S. Myit, and F. Mach, “Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator,” Nature Medicine, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1399–1402, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. C. Jury and M. R. Ehrenstein, “Statins: immunomodulators for autoimmune rheumatic disease?” Lupus, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 192–196, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Wang, Y. Xiao, M. Luo, X. Zhang, and H. Luo, “Statins for multiple sclerosis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 12, Article ID CD008386, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D.-X. Bu, M. Tarrio, N. Grabie et al., “Statin-induced Kruppel-like factor 2 expression in human and mouse T cells reduces inflammatory and pathogenic responses,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 1961–1970, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Bergman, H. Salman, M. Djaldetti, and H. Bessler, “Statins as modulators of colon cancer cells induced cytokine secretion by human PBMC,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 54, no. 3–6, pp. 88–92, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. Weitz-Schmidt, K. Welzenbach, V. Brinkmann et al., “Statins selectively inhibit leukocyte function antigen-1 by binding to a novel regulatory integrin site,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 687–692, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Björkhem-Bergman, J. D. Lindh, and P. Bergman, “What is a relevant statin concentration in cell experiments claiming pleiotropic effects?” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 164–165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Härtel, H.-J. Hammers, P. Schlenke et al., “Individual variability in cyclosporin A sensitivity: the assessment of functional measures on CD28-mediated costimulation of human whole blood T lymphocytes,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 91–99, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Franchimont, E. Louis, W. Dewe et al., “Effects of dexamethasone on the profile of cytokine secretion in human whole blood cell cultures,” Regulatory Peptides, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. Brinkmann and C. Kristofic, “Regulation by corticosteroids of Th1 and Th2 cytokine production in human CD4+ effector T cells generated from CD45RO and CD45RO+ subsets,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 3322–3328, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Moed, T. J. Stoof, D. M. Boorsma et al., “Identification of anti-inflammatory drugs according to their capacity to suppress type-1 and type-2 T cell profiles,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1868–1875, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. N. Sehgal, “Sirolimus: its discovery, biological properties, and mechanism of action,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. S7–S14, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. W.-Y. Huang, Z. Cai, W.-J. Sun, and G.-H. Lu, “The effects of mycophenolic acid on the maturation and immunologic function of murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells,” Journal of Experimental Hematology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 207–212, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Abadja, S. Atemkeng, E. Alamartine, F. Berthoux, and C. Mariat, “Impact of mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus on Th17-related immune response,” Transplantation, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 396–403, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. O. Aktas, S. Waiczies, A. Smorodchenko et al., “Treatment of relapsing paralysis in experimental encephalomyelitis by targeting Th1 cells through atorvastatin,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 197, no. 6, pp. 725–733, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. H. Li, X. W. Li, H. Li, and L. Duan, “Effects of lovastatin combined with cyclosporine A on cultured human peripheral blood mononuclear cells proliferation, cytokines expression and cytotoxicity,” Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 614–618, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. Ascer, M. C. Bertolami, M. L. Venturinelli et al., “Atorvastatin reduces proinflammatory markers in hypercholesterolemic patients,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 161–166, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. Kwak, F. Mulhaupt, N. Veillard, G. Pelli, and F. Mach, “The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin inhibits IFN-γ induced MHC class II expression in human vascular endothelial cells,” Swiss Medical Weekly, vol. 131, no. 3-4, pp. 41–46, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Chello, G. Patti, D. Candura et al., “Effects of atorvastatin on systemic inflammatory response after coronary bypass surgery,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 660–667, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. I. Zineh, X. Luo, G. J. Welder et al., “Modulatory effects of atorvastatin on endothelial cell-derived chemokines, cytokines, and angiogenic factors,” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 333–340, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. E. C. Jury, D. A. Isenberg, C. Mauri, and M. R. Ehrenstein, “Atorvastatin restores Lck expression and lipid raft-associated signaling in T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 10, pp. 7416–7422, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. E. Aktunc, B. Kayhan, M. Arasli, B. D. Gun, and F. Barut, “The effect of atorvastatin and its role on systemic cytokine network in treatment of acute experimental colitis,” Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 667–675, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. Stanislaus, A. G. Gilg, A. K. Singh, and I. Singh, “Immunomodulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the Lewis rats by Lovastatin,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 333, no. 3, pp. 167–170, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. N. Nath, S. Giri, R. Prasad, A. K. Singh, and I. Singh, “Potential targets of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor for multiple sclerosis therapy,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 1273–1286, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Musial, A. Undas, P. Gajewski, M. Jankowski, W. Sydor, and A. Szczeklik, “Anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin in subjects with hypercholesterolemia,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 77, no. 2-3, pp. 247–253, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. O. Wiklund, L. Mattsson-Hultén, E. Hurt-Camejo, and J. Oscarsson, “Effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on inflammation markers in plasma,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 251, no. 4, pp. 338–347, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. Erikstrup, H. Ullum, and B. K. Pedersen, “Short-term simvastatin treatment has no effect on plasma cytokine response in a human in vivo model of low-grade inflammation,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 94–100, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. T. Wæhre, J. K. Damås, L. Gullestad et al., “Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors down-regulate chemokines and chemokine receptors in patients with coronary artery disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1460–1467, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. K. Mondo, W.-S. Yang, J.-Z. Su, and T.-G. Huang, “Atorvastatin prevented and reversed dexamethasone-induced hypertension in the rat,” Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 499–509, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus