International Journal of Inflammation

International Journal of Inflammation / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 316235 |

Rodrigo G. Rosique, Marina J. Rosique, Jayme A. Farina Junior, "Curbing Inflammation in Skin Wound Healing: A Review", International Journal of Inflammation, vol. 2015, Article ID 316235, 9 pages, 2015.

Curbing Inflammation in Skin Wound Healing: A Review

Academic Editor: B. L. Slomiany
Received15 Mar 2015
Revised24 Jul 2015
Accepted27 Jul 2015
Published18 Aug 2015


Wound healing is a complex regulated process that results in skin scar formation in postnatal mammals. Chronic wounds are major medical problems that can confer devastating consequences. Currently, there are no treatments to prevent scarring. In the early fetus wounds heal without scarring and the healing process is characterized by relatively less inflammation compared to adults; therefore, research aimed at reducing the inflammatory process related to wound healing might speed healing and improve the final scar appearance.

1. Introduction

The skin is the largest organ of the body and acts as the first line of defense against pathogens, toxins, and trauma. It also plays a critical role in fluid homeostasis and provides sensory functions and thermal regulation. Damage or loss of skin integrity resulting from an injury or disease can lead to significant morbidity and even death.

Wound healing is a complex, regulated process in which regulated collagen deposition, in response to tissue injury, results in scar formation. Its mechanisms include inflammation, fibroplasia, and scar maturation.

Sometimes cutaneous wounds do not progress to normal healing with formation of a final mature scar formation but to a continuing inflammatory process, which can lead to a more aggressive carcinogenic transformation in long time of evolution (Marjolin’s Ulcer). Many chronic wounds are the result of chronic inflammation. In contrast to adult wound healing, the early gestation fetus displays a remarkable ability to heal wounds without scarring. Fetal wounds heal rapidly and are characterized by a relative lack of inflammation [1]. The introduction of inflammation into normally scarless wounds produces scarring [2]. Conversely, reduction of inflammation in postnatal wounds can reduce scarring [3].

In this paper, we review how to curb inflammation in cutaneous wound healing; the following lists the main topics discussed in this paper.

Topics about Curbing Inflammation in Wound Healing

General Topics(i)Wet environment.(ii)Primary closure and sutures.(iii)Drugs or supplement:(a)curcumin,(b)protein supplementation,(c)nutraceuticals,(d)neurotensin (NT),(e)photodynamic therapy (PDT),(f)doxycycline,(g)tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antibody.(iv)Technology:(a)transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS),(b)hyperbaric oxygen,(c)silver dressings,(d)negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT).(v)Biomaterials and cellular therapy.

Specific Wounds(i)Diabetic wounds.(ii)Vascular wounds.(iii)Irradiated wounds.

2. Postnatal Wound Healing Process

Repair of the skin consists of three phases: an initial inflammatory phase and then a proliferative/repair phase and it concludes with a remodeling phase, which results in scar formation in postnatal mammals.

In response to tissue injury, inflammatory cells are recruited to wounded tissue. The acute inflammatory response is followed by proliferation of fibroblasts, which are responsible for synthesizing collagen and extracellular matrix. Fibroblasts can differentiate into myofibroblasts, which are responsible for collagen deposition and wound contraction. Ultimately, a scar results from accumulation of extracellular matrix. Despite scar remodeling during maturation, normal architecture is never completely restored [4]; only 70 percent of the tensile strength of normal skin is recovered [5].

The early stage of inflammation is regarded as a critical period of the wound healing process, essential for clearing contaminating bacteria and creating an environment conducive to the succeeding events of tissue repair and regeneration [6]. The injury causes a gap, which is immediately filled by clots in the presence of platelet aggregates. Then, during the inflammatory phase, leukocytes, such as neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages, infiltrate the site, remove the breakdown products of the injured cells and clots, and release various growth factors and cytokines [7]. In response to growth factors and cytokines, the proliferative phase starts. In this phase, epidermal cells migrate, proliferate to fill the wound gap, and displace remnants of the original clots. Thus, it is generally accepted that leukocyte and macrophage infiltration is essential to wound healing.

Cytokines have been widely studied because they are important to wound healing; they regulate the activity of the cells that produce the healing response to tissue injury [8]. Several cytokines, including interleukin- (IL-) 1β and tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α, have been shown to regulate the recruitment and function of neutrophils. In irradiated mice, an investigation of the ability of exogenous IL-1β or transforming growth factor-β to reverse radiation-induced defective wound healing found that IL-1β enhanced wound tensile strength [9]. TNF-α is a major cytokine secreted by macrophages and neutrophils during the inflammation phase of wound healing; it is elevated in early wound healing [10].

In all phases of wound repair, extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins play a key role in directing the fate and activities of progenitor and reparative cells. Immediately after injury, the ECM orchestrates the recruitment of platelets and directs the inflammatory cell response that initiates the hemostatic and the cellular debridement phases [11]. These cells, which migrate into the wound bed of the ECM of the initial hemostatic plug and then migrate into the provisional matrix, respond to individual ECM components and growth factors (which may be bound to this matrix). These cells, in turn, recruit and direct stem/progenitor and reparative cells from both distant and local sites to mediate the proliferative/repair phase of healing. Particularly, in this rebuilding phase of healing, adult stem cells participate critically in replenishing cells that were damaged or lost after injury. In addition to their role after trauma, adult stem cells participate in the maintenance of the skin as well as wound healing [12].

3. General Topics

3.1. Wet Environment

A wet or moist environment in wounds has been shown to promote reepithelialization and result in reduced scar formation more than a dry environment [13]. The inflammatory reaction is reduced in the wet environment, thereby limiting injury progression. Several studies have compared wet, moist, and dry healing. A wet or moist incubator-like microenvironment achieves fastest healing with fewest aberrations and least scar formation.

The modern approach of employing a moist environment for the treatment of wounds was introduced in the early 1960s by Winter [14], who showed in a pig model that the rate of epithelialization after wounding was doubled by using a moist dressing as compared to dry conditions. This was a new concept that opposed the generally accepted idea that a dry environment could best fight wound infection.

Manufacturers responded to Winter’s research findings and provided a wide range of moist dressings, such as hydrocolloids that absorb the wound fluid beneath a semiocclusive dressing [15], foams [16, 17], alginates [18], and hydrogels [19, 20]. Using the Cochrane database, Dumville et al. [2124] performed systematic reviews of the four types of wound dressings to evaluate their contribution to the healing of diabetic ulcers. A systematic review by Wiechula [25] suggests that moist wound healing products have distinct clinical advantages over dry products for the management of split-thickness skin donor sites.

Adult human skin wounds heal with varying degrees of scar formation [26]. Scarring is correlated with the intensity and duration of inflammation during healing [27]. In 2009, Reish et al. [28] published an experimental study of porcine wounds treated either in a moist environment or with gauze: inflammation was compared by evaluating the number of inflammatory cells/high-power field 3 days after wounding. Inflammation was greatly reduced in the wounds treated in the wound chamber, and the number of inflammatory cells on day 3 was very strongly correlated with the amount of scarring at day 28. Compared with dry wounds, wet wounds created under sterile conditions and treated with low concentrations of antibiotics exhibited a significantly smaller macroscopic scar surface area in all experimental wound groups. Wounds with a greater inflammatory cell infiltrate could be predicted to develop more residual scarring.

3.2. Primary Closure and Sutures

Surgical sutures are used universally to achieve proper wound approximation by supporting the strain of closure until sufficient healing has occurred. Approximating the wound wedges with sutures decreases the wound area subjected to the healing process and abbreviates the inflammatory phase, which decreases scarring due to the faster pace of healing. All sutures are foreign bodies; therefore their presence triggers a local immune response. Thereby sutures may, paradoxically, potentiate and extend the inflammatory phase of wound healing, resulting in undesirable outcomes, such as wound breakdown, suture “spitting,” hypertrophic scar, or keloid formation. The degree of inflammation induced varies with suture composition, which ranges from relatively inert polypropylene and nylon to highly inflammatory silk and plain gut suture. As a result, numerous investigations have attempted to alter suture composition with the goal of reducing the inflammatory response; however, no specific composition has gained clinical relevance or widespread practice [29].

3.3. Drugs or Supplement
3.3.1. Curcumin

Kant et al. [30] found that curcumin, an anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agent, caused faster and better wound healing in diabetic rats. This effect was attributed to a decreased expression of inflammatory cytokines and enzymes, TNF-α, IL-1β, and MMP-9, and increased levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and antioxidant enzymes, SOD, catalase, and GPx, at the wound site in diabetic rats. This data allows us to suggest that curcumin could be an additional novel therapeutic agent for the management of impaired wound healing in diabetics and radiated tissues [31, 32].

3.3.2. Protein Supplementation

Abdel-Salam [33] demonstrated that whey (milk serum) protein could contribute to cutaneous wound healing. In this investigation, wound closure was significantly delayed in the diabetic group. Moreover, the results clearly demonstrated that whey protein supplementation of diabetic animals enhanced wound closure and restored proinflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-4 and IL-10) levels nearly to the levels of control animals. These findings support the hypothesis that delayed wound healing in diabetic animals is caused by deregulation of signaling molecules that are critical mediators of the inflammatory response.

3.3.3. Nutraceuticals

Serra et al. [34] evaluated the effects of a new nutraceutical on both clinical and molecular parameters in patients with chronic vascular ulcers, since bioflavonoids were shown to have provessel activities along with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and phlebotonic effects in the treatment of chronic venous disease. They found that it decreases inflammatory cytokine, MMPs and NGAL, levels and both improved symptoms and accelerated wound healing.

3.3.4. Neurotensin (NT)

Based on findings that peripheral nerves and cutaneous neurobiology contribute to correct wound healing [35], Moura et al. [36] studied the effect of neurotensin (NT), a neuropeptide that acts as an inflammatory modulator in wound healing. They prepared a collagen-based dressing as vehicle to deliver NT, applied it to diabetic mice, and found that it can effectively support NT’s release into diabetic wounds, enhancing the healing process. Nevertheless, compared to treatment with NT alone, a more prominent scar was observed in diabetic wounds treated with the collagen-based dressing.

3.3.5. Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)

Reports of animal studies indicate that photodynamic therapy (PDT) improves healing of excisional wounds but the mechanism is uncertain. Mills et al. [37] first reported the effect of PDT on healing of acute excisional wounds in humans. They showed that treatment with methyl aminolevulinate- (MAL-) PDT modulated clinical and microscopic indicators of healing and, ultimately, produced scars with improved dermal matrix architecture. Pivotally, the number of TGF-b3-producing cells was significantly higher in MAL-PDT-treated wounds than in controls after 3 weeks, with an elevated TGF-b3 : b1 ratio. At 9 months, MAL-PDT-treated wounds showed improved deposition and organization of dermal matrix protein at the histological level. Thus, this regimen of PDT of wounds appears to mediate an antiscarring phenotype, with TGF-b3 as a potential key modulator.

3.3.6. Doxycycline

Serra et al. [38] documented that doxycycline improved healing of chronic venous ulcers. In their study, oral low doses of doxycycline 20 mg were administrated for 3 months to a group of patients. The treated patients showed a higher healing rate compared to control group. Doxycycline has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, through the inhibition of metalloproteinases, representing a potential solution to support wound healing.

3.3.7. Tumour Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) Antibody Infliximab

Therapeutic antibodies such as infliximab can inhibit TNF-α activity. In a case series [39], infliximab was applied topically to eight patients with 14 chronic ulcers of more than 4-month duration, which failed to respond to any previous conventional treatment. Infliximab was applied repeatedly to ulcers either as a 10 mg/mL solution or as a gel formulation (0.45, 1, or 4.5 mg/g). The authors observed, after 8 weeks, that five ulcers completely healed, while another four were reduced by more than 75% in size.

3.4. Technology
3.4.1. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been shown to accelerate the healing of chronic wounds in human subjects and induced wounds in animal models [40, 41]. More specifically, it has been shown to significantly increase the rate of wound epithelialization [40] and contraction [42]. Kutlu et al. [43] demonstrated that TENS of incised wounds improves healing by increasing growth factors (epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor-A, and fibroblast growth factor-2) in the dermis and epidermis. In a later study, Gürgen et al. [44] showed marked decreases in the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the dermis of the TENS-treated group, which suggests that TENS shortened the healing process by inhibiting the inflammation phase.

3.4.2. Hyperbaric Oxygen

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), an effective tool that helps skin wound healing, is defined as delivery of 100% oxygen at greater than one atmospheric pressure (ATA) into the core of the wound [45]. Delivery of this increased amount of oxygen to the cells of unhealed tissues expedites healing of subacute and chronic cutaneous wounds [46].

Hyperbaric oxygen works by the following four dominant mechanisms: (1)Augmented hydroxylation: it helps improve collagen synthesis. (2)Angiogenesis: HBOT creates a large oxygen gradient between the center and periphery of the wound that strongly stimulates angiogenesis, which is seminal for wound healing [47]. (3)Increased bactericidal activity. (4)Increased collagen deposition.

Kalani et al. showed that when diabetic foot ulcers were treated with HBOT, after 3 years of therapy, they healed completely in 76% of patients, whereas the ulcers of only 48% patients healed completely with conventional treatment [48]. In a randomized study by Kessler et al., either HBOT or standard treatment was given to 28 hospitalized patients with neuropathic ulcers (Wagner grades I to III). After two weeks of treatment, the ulcer area was reduced by half in the HBOT group (41.8 ± 25.5 versus 21.7 ± 16.9%, ). This improvement, however, disappeared at the two-week follow-up [49].

3.4.3. Silver Dressings

Ionized silver (Ag+) has both anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties with a broad spectrum of action [5052]. Jemec et al. [53] found that treatment with silver dressings during the initial four weeks produced a total cost saving compared with treatment with nonsilver dressings. In addition, the wounds of patients treated with silver dressings closed faster than those treated with nonsilver dressings. Bisson et al. [54] found that silver dressings produced significant anti-inflammatory effects in chronic skin inflammation. It is believed that silver can improve wound healing due to its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties.

Wu et al. [55] found that nanocrystalline silver can also reduce inflammation and promote scald wound healing in animal models. Sibbald et al. [56] concluded that evidence indicates that nanocrystalline silver dressings may reduce bacterial levels, decrease the chronic inflammatory response, and thus promote wound healing. Likewise, healing of chronic venous leg ulcers was associated with less wound bacteria and less neutrophilic inflammation but was associated with persistent or high lymphocyte count; greater numbers of lymphocytes were associated with more reduction in ulcer size.

3.4.4. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)

According to prospective and retrospective clinical and experimental studies [57, 58], negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used to facilitate healing of acute and chronic wounds. This therapy has been shown to provide a moist wound healing environment, increase granulation tissue formation, reduce edema, and stimulate angiogenesis and blood flow to the wound margins [5963]. In a retrospective clinical study, Torbrand et al. [64] attributed these biological effects to the evenly distributed transduction of negative pressure to the wound bed by a vacuum pump.

The impact of NPWT on local expression of proinflammatory cytokines, the number of neutrophils, and the bacterial bioburden living on the wound surface suggest that NPWT of acutely infected soft-tissue wounds leads to increased local IL-1β and IL-8 expression in the early phase of inflammation, which may trigger infiltration of neutrophils and thus accelerate bacterial clearance. Furthermore, the success of NPWT of acute wounds can attenuate the expression of TNF-α, and this effect may partly explain why NPWT does not significantly impair wound healing [65].

NPWT not only enhances the granulation tissue in the more superficial layer of the wound bed but also appears to affect deeper layers, with relief of chronic inflammation and tissue stabilization. It is believed that NPWT removes excess fluid and thereby removes proteolytic enzymes that negatively influence the healing process [66].

Interestingly, studies have shown that the activity of some matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) is elevated in chronic wounds and the presence of these molecules is related to impairing wound healing. For instance, high concentrations of MMP-9 and high MMP-9 : tissue inhibitors of MMP (TIMP-1) ratio in wound fluid predict poor wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers [67]. In addition, in chronic wound exudates, mainly MMP-1 type collagenase is present [68]. These findings may partially explain the cause of difficult healing in chronic wounds.

On the other hand, data strongly suggest that NPWT influences the microenvironment of the wound by reducing the levels of MMPs and the MMP : TIMP ratio. Mouës et al. [69] found significantly lower levels of pro-MMP-9 and a lower total MMP-9 : TIMP-1 ratio in TNP-treated wounds during 10 days of follow-up. Stechmiller et al. showed that NPWT-treated wounds had decreased levels of MMP-3 and MMP-9 and lower MMP-3 : TIMP-1 ratios in wound fluid from pressure ulcers [70]. NPWT may lower collagenase activity and thereby prevent exaggerated degradation of collagen and promote wound healing.

In addition, some studies compared different types of interface material for the application of NPWT with other common dressings. Tuncel et al. [71], who studied dressings applied to rabbit wounds, found NPWT superior to control saline-moistened gauze dressing but found no difference among three different interface materials (polyurethane foam, saline soaked antimicrobial gauze, and loofah sponge) used in association with NPWT (Figure 1).

3.5. Biomaterials and Cellular Therapy

The use of acellular and cell-based tissue-engineered dermal substitutes has become increasingly routine [72]. Dermal matrices and other biomimetic scaffolds for delivery of adult stem cells have been shown to augment the regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and enhance wound healing through their presumptive ability to recreate a regenerative niche [7375]. Besides their ability to improve the efficiency and quality of cutaneous wound healing, existing products have not yet been able to promote repair that approximates uninjured skin. The continuous evolution of superior biomaterials will depend upon a greater understanding of the role that individual components play in the regenerative niches of uninjured and injured skin, particularly the ECM constituents. Further, the development of successful biomimetic and bioresponsive substrates should incorporate the knowledge of not only how cells interact with these substrates but also how these cells then respond by remodelling and depositing their own ECM.

Of note, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have shown significant promise in treatment of problematic wounds. Initial proof-of-principle studies that investigated the use of exogenously applied adult stem cells for the treatment of chronic wounds provided support for their vulnerary effects [76, 77]. MSCs have been shown to improve wound healing through their ability to directly contribute cells and ECM components to the repair process, as well as their ability to direct other cells participating in the repair process through their production of paracrine mediators (Figure 2) [78]. Human MSCs appear to have potent immune regulatory actions that make them attractive for use in human diseases that involve tissue injury and/or inflammation. Although initial attempts with injection of cells alone showed improved healing, it is clear that delivery strategies that reproduce complex stem cell niches will be required to maximize their potential. Given the ability of the ECM to influence many key aspects of that niche, such as signaling events, regulation of growth factor bioavailability, and mechanosensation, the identification of specific ECM components that most accurately recreate a functional stem cell niche for incorporation into therapeutic biomaterials remains a focus of intense investigation.

4. Specific Wounds

4.1. Diabetic Wound

Diabetes is a multisystem disorder, and its complications induce physiological changes in tissues and cells that impair the normal healing process. However, the pathophysiologic relationship between diabetes and impaired healing is complex. Diabetic wounds become halted in the inflammatory phase, which is characterized by a continuing influx of neutrophils that release cytotoxic enzymes, free radicals, and inflammatory mediators that cause extensive collateral damage to surrounding tissue. These destructive processes counteract the healing process in such wounds, and the overproduction of free radicals, which induce oxidative stress, results in detrimental cytotoxic effects that delay wound healing [79, 80].

Increased oxidative stress is one of the most common reasons for the delayed wound healing in the diabetic population [81]. Therefore, reduction/termination of the persistent inflammation and elimination of free radicals by the introduction of anti-inflammatory agents and antioxidants into the treatment of wounds could be an important strategy to improve healing of diabetic wounds [80].

4.2. Vascular Wound

Chronic venous, lower limb ulceration (VLU) affects 1–3% of the adult population worldwide, [82] and some patients suffer repeated cycles of ulceration, healing, and recurrence. The underlying pathogenesis of these hard-to-heal VLUs is complicated by excessive and prolonged inflammation that is often related to critical microbial colonization and early localized infection [83, 84]. A heavy bioburden of colonizing microorganisms in the wound may be one of the most important barriers to wound closure [85].

Pathophysiological events involved in the onset of chronic venous ulceration are inflammation, activation of polymorphonucleates (PMNs), and secretion of proteases such as MMPs, which degrade the ECM that supports the vascular and tissue walls. MMPs, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and inflammatory cytokines are overexpressed in VLUs, and they could play a central role in pathophysiological mechanisms of skin lesions and delayed wound healing.

4.3. Irradiated Wound

Approximately 50% of cancer patients receive radiation as an adjuvant therapy. Although radiation therapy technology has progressed substantially in the last decades, patients still suffer from various degrees of nonspecific radiation damage to noncancerous tissues. Radiation ulcers have posed an enormous challenge to reconstructive surgeons; also, they cause great distress to patients, impair their quality of life, and consume high amounts of medical resources. These kinds of chronic wounds can last for several years, and some may even lead to amputations. Strategies for treating these and other chronic wounds may include the use of various growth factors [8688], hyperbaric oxygen [89], and stem cells [90].

5. Conclusion

Over the last fifty years, the complex wound healing process became clearer allowing the development of strategies, devices, and medications that help achieve a better final scar, mainly through strategies to curb the wound-related inflammation. Nonetheless, we are still far from definitely solving the chronic wounds or the pathologic scarring issue and, even more, achieving the goal of rapid and scarless healing similar to fetal one.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. K. Moore, R. McCallion, R. J. Searle, M. C. Stacey, and K. G. Harding, “Prediction and monitoring the therapeutic response of chronic dermal wounds,” International Wound Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. W. Frantz, D. A. Bettinger, J. H. Haynes et al., “Biology of fetal repair: the presence of bacteria in fetal wounds induces an adult-like healing response,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 428–434, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. S. Ashcroft, X. Yang, A. B. Glick et al., “Mice lacking Smad3 show accelerated wound healing and an impaired local inflammatory response,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 260–266, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. S. Colwell, T.-T. Phan, W. Kong, M. T. Longaker, and P. H. Lorenz, “Hypertrophic scar fibroblasts have increased connective tissue growth factor expression after transforming growth factor-β stimulation,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 1387–1390, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. W. Madden and E. E. Peacock Jr., “Studies on the biology of collagen during wound healing. 3. Dynamic metabolism of scar collagen and remodeling of dermal wounds,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 511–520, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. M. Mercado, N. Quan, D. A. Padgett, J. F. Sheridan, and P. T. Marucha, “Restraint stress alters the expression of interleukin-1 and keratinocyte growth factor at the wound site: an in situ hybridization study,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 129, no. 1-2, pp. 74–83, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. J. Singer and R. A. F. Clark, “Cutaneous wound healing,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 10, pp. 738–746, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Molloy, Y. Wang, and G. A. C. Murrell, “The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing,” Sports Medicine, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 381–394, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. Vegesna, W. H. McBride, J. M. G. Taylor, and H. R. Withers, “The effect of interleukin-1 beta or transforming growth factor-beta on radiation-impaired murine skin wound healing,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 699–704, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Goel, S. Kumar, D. K. Singh, and A. K. Bhatia, “Wound healing potential of Ocimum sanctum linn. with induction of tumor necrosis factor-α,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 402–406, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  11. G. S. Schultz, J. M. Davidson, R. S. Kirsner, P. Bornstein, and I. M. Herman, “Dynamic reciprocity in the wound microenvironment,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 134–148, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. W. Volk, S. A. Iqbal, and A. Bayat, “Interactions of the extracellular matrix and progenitor cells in cutaneous wound healing,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 261–272, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. P. Junker, R. A. Kamel, E. J. Caterson, and E. Eriksson, “Clinical impact upon wound healing and inflammation in moist, wet, and dry environments,” Advances in Wound Care, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 348–356, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. D. Winter, “Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig,” Nature, vol. 193, no. 4812, pp. 293–294, 1962. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Singh, S. Halder, G. R. Menon et al., “Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds,” Asian Journal of Surgery, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 326–332, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Carter, “Hydropolymer dressings in the management of wound exudate,” British Journal of Community Nursing, vol. 8, no. 9, supplement, pp. S10–S16, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Fletcher, “The application of foam dressings,” Nursing Times, vol. 99, no. 31, p. 59, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  18. D. Piacquadio and D. B. Nelson, “Alginates: a ‘new’ dressing alternative,” Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 992–995, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Eisenbud, H. Hunter, L. Kessler et al., “Hydrogel wound dressings: where do we stand in 2003?” Ostomy Wound Manage, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 52–57, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  20. B. Kickhöfen, H. Wokalek, D. Scheel, and H. Ruh, “Chemical and physical properties of a hydrogel wound dressing,” Biomaterials, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. C. Dumville, S. Deshpande, S. O'Meara, and K. Speak, “Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, Article ID CD009099, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. C. Dumville, S. Deshpande, S. O'Meara, and K. Speak, “Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, Article ID CD009111, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. C. Dumville, S. O'Meara, S. Deshpande, and K. Speak, “Alginate dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, Article ID CD009110, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  24. J. C. Dumville, S. O'Meara, S. Deshpande, and K. Speak, “Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 9, Article ID CD009101, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. Wiechula, “The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review,” International Journal of Nursing Practice, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. S9–S17, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. S. Atiyeh, C. A. Amm, and K. A. El Musa, “Improved scar quality following primary and secondary healing of cutaneous wounds,” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 411–417, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. C. Robson and A. Barbul, “Guidelines for the best care of chronic wounds,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 647–648, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. G. Reish, B. Zuhaili, J. Bergmann et al., “Modulation of scarring in a liquid environment in the Yorkshire pig,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 806–816, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Georgiev-Hristov, M. García-Arranz, I. García-Gómez et al., “Sutures enriched with adipose-derived stem cells decrease the local acute inflammation after tracheal anastomosis in a murine model,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. e40–e47, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Kant, A. Gopal, N. N. Pathak, P. Kumar, S. K. Tandan, and D. Kumar, “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential of curcumin accelerated the cutaneous wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 322–330, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. S. Sidhu, H. Mani, J. P. Gaddipati et al., “Curcumin enhances wound healing in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats and genetically diabetic mice,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 362–374, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. C. Jagetia and G. K. Rajanikant, “Acceleration of wound repair by curcumin in the excision wound of mice exposed to different doses of fractionated gamma radiation,” International Wound Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76–92, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. K. A.-H. Abdel-Salam, “Modulatory effect of whey proteins in some cytokines involved in wound healing in male diabetic albino rats,” Inflammation, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1616–1622, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. Serra, R. Grande, L. Butrico et al., “Effects of a new nutraceutical substance on clinical and molecular parameters in patients with chronic venous ulceration,” International Wound Journal, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Pradhan, C. Nabzdyk, N. D. Andersen, F. W. LoGerfo, and A. Veves, “Inflammation and neuropeptides: the connection in diabetic wound healing,” Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, vol. 11, article e2, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. I. F. Moura, A. M. A. Dias, E. Suesca et al., “Neurotensin-loaded collagen dressings reduce inflammation and improve wound healing in diabetic mice,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1842, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. J. Mills, M. D. Farrar, G. S. Ashcroft, C. E. M. Griffiths, M. J. Hardman, and L. E. Rhodes, “Topical photodynamic therapy following excisional wounding of human skin increases production of transforming growth factor-β3 and matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 9, with associated improvement in dermal matrix organization,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. Serra, L. Gallelli, G. Buffone et al., “Doxycycline speeds up healing of chronic venous ulcers,” International Wound Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 179–184, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Streit, Z. Beleznay, and L. R. Braathen, “Topical application of the tumour necrosis factor-α antibody infliximab improves healing of chronic wounds,” International Wound Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 171–191, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. O. M. Alvarez, P. M. Mertz, R. V. Smerbeck, and W. H. Eaglstein, “The healing of superficial skin wounds is stimulated by external electrical current,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 144–148, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Brown, M. K. McDonnell, and D. N. Menton, “Polarity effects on wound healing using electric stimulation in rabbits,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 624–627, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  42. B. V. Stromberg, “Effects of electrical currents on wound contraction,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 121–123, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. K. Kutlu, D. Çeçen, S. G. Gürgen, O. Sayn, and F. Çetin, “A comparison study of growth factor expression following treatment with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, saline solution, povidone-iodine, and lavender oil in wounds healing,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 361832, 9 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. G. Gürgen, O. Sayin, F. Çetin, and A. Tuç Yücel, “Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) accelerates cutaneous wound healing and inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines,” Inflammation, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 775–784, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. E. Fife, C. Buyukcakir, G. Otto, P. Sheffield, T. Love, and R. Warriner III, “Factors influencing the outcome of lower-extremity diabetic ulcers treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 322–331, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. M. Eskes, D. T. Ubbink, M. J. Lubbers, C. Lucas, and H. Vermeulen, “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: solution for difficult to heal acute wounds? Systematic review,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 535–542, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Bhutani and G. Vishwanath, “Hyperbaric oxygen and wound healing,” Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 316–324, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Kalani, G. Jörneskog, N. Naderi, F. Lind, and K. Brismar, “Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy in treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: long-term follow-up,” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 153–158, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Kessler, P. Bilbault, F. Ortéga et al., “Hyperbaric oxygenation accelerates the healing rate of nonischemic chronic diabetic foot ulcers a prospective randomized study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2378–2382, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. H. Hermans, “Silver-containing dressings and the need for evidence,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 166–165, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. B. Lansdown, “Silver. I: its antibacterial properties and mechanism of action,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 125–130, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. D. J. Leaper, “Silver dressings: their role in wound management,” International Wound Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 282–311, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. B. E. Jemec, J. C. Kerihuel, K. Ousey, S. L. Lauemløler, and D. J. Leaper, “Cost-effective use of silver dressings for the treatment of hard-to-heal chronic venous leg ulcers,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 6, Article ID e100582, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J.-F. Bisson, S. Hidalgo-Lucas, M. Bouschbacher, and L. Thomassin, “Effects of TLC-Ag dressings on skin inflammation,” Journal of Dermatology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 463–470, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Wu, Y. Zheng, X. Wen, Q. Lin, X. Chen, and Z. Wu, “Silver nanoparticle/bacterial cellulose gel membranes for antibacterial wound dressing: investigation in vitro and in vivo,” Biomedical Materials, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID 035005, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. R. G. Sibbald, J. Contreras-Ruiz, P. Coutts, M. Fierheller, A. Rothman, and K. Woo, “Bacteriology, inflammation, and healing: a study of nanocrystalline silver dressings in chronic venous leg ulcers,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 549–558, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. J. Morykwas, J. Simpson, K. Punger, A. Argenta, L. Kremers, and J. Argenta, “Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 117, no. 7, supplement, pp. 121S–126S, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. P. E. Banwell and L. Téot, “Topical negative pressure (TNP): the evolution of a novel wound therapy,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. Steingrimsson, M. Gottfredsson, I. Gudmundsdottir, J. Sjögren, and T. Gudbjartsson, “Negative-pressure wound therapy for deep sternal wound infections reduces the rate of surgical interventions for early re-infections,” Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 406–410, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. P. E. Banwell, “Topical negative pressure therapy in wound care,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 79–84, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. J. Morykwas, L. C. Argenta, E. I. Shelton-Brown, and W. McGuirt, “Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 553–562, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S.-Z. Chen, J. Li, X.-Y. Li, and L.-S. Xu, “Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: an experimental study,” Asian Journal of Surgery, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 211–217, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. K. Greene, M. Puder, R. Roy et al., “Microdeformational wound therapy: effects on angiogenesis and matrix metalloproteinases in chronic wounds of 3 debilitated patients,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 418–422, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. Torbrand, R. Ingemansson, L. Gustafsson, P. Paulsson, and M. Malmsjö, “Pressure transduction to the thoracic cavity during topical negative pressure therapy of a sternotomy wound,” International Wound Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 579–584, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. D. Liu, L. Zhang, T. Li et al., “Negative-pressure wound therapy enhances local inflammatory responses in acute infected soft-tissue wound,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 539–547, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. F. Bassetto, L. Lancerotto, R. Salmaso et al., “Histological evolution of chronic wounds under negative pressure therapy,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. Y. Liu, D. Min, T. Bolton et al., “Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 predicts poor wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers,” Diabetes Care, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 117–119, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. B. Shi, P. Zhang, W.-Z. Li, S.-Z. Chen, and J.-Q. Li, “Effect of vacuum assisted closure on collagenase activity in human chronic wound,” Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 465–467, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  69. C. M. Mouës, A. W. Van Toorenenbergen, F. Heule, W. C. Hop, and S. E. R. Hovius, “The role of topical negative pressure in wound repair: expression of biochemical markers in wound fluid during wound healing,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 488–494, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J. K. Stechmiller, D. V. Kilpadi, B. Childress, and G. S. Schultz, “Effect of Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy on the expression of cytokines and proteases in wound fluid of adults with pressure ulcers,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 371–374, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. U. Tuncel, A. Turan, F. Markoc, U. Erkorkmaz, C. Elmas, and N. Kostakoglu, “Loofah sponge as an interface dressing material in negative pressure wound therapy: results of an in vivo study,” Ostomy Wound Management, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 37–45, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  72. T. Hodgkinson and A. Bayat, “Dermal substitute-assisted healing: enhancing stem cell therapy with novel biomaterial design,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 303, no. 5, pp. 301–315, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. K. C. Rustad, V. W. Wong, M. Sorkin et al., “Enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capacity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Y. Zhou, Z. Yan, H. Zhang et al., “Expansion and delivery of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on three microcarriers for soft tissue regeneration,” Tissue Engineering—Part A, vol. 17, no. 23-24, pp. 2981–2997, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. M. Altman, N. Matthias, Y. Yan et al., “Dermal matrix as a carrier for in vivo delivery of human adipose-derived stem cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1431–1442, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. W. Volk, A. Radu, L. Zhang, and K. W. Liechty, “Stromal progenitor cell therapy corrects the wound-healing defect in the ischemic rabbit ear model of chronic wound repair,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 736–747, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. T. Badillo, R. A. Redden, L. Zhang, E. J. Doolin, and K. W. Liechty, “Treatment of diabetic wounds with fetal murine mesenchymal stromal cells enhances wound closure,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 329, no. 2, pp. 301–311, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. N. G. Singer and A. I. Caplan, “Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 6, pp. 457–478, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. V. Falanga, “Classifications for wound bed preparation and stimulation of chronic wounds,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 347–352, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. J. Dissemond, M. Goos, and S. N. Wagner, “The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis and therapy of chronic wounds,” Hautarzt, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 718–723, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. Soneja, M. Drews, and T. Malinski, “Role of nitric oxide, nitroxidative and oxidative stress in wound healing,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 57, supplement, pp. 108–119, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  82. D. J. Margolis, W. Bilker, J. Santanna, and M. Baumgarten, “Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 381–386, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. C. E. Davies, K. E. Hill, R. G. Newcombe et al., “A prospective study of the microbiology of chronic venous leg ulcers to reevaluate the clinical predictive value of tissue biopsies and swabs,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. N. J. Trengove, H. Bielefeldt-Ohmann, and M. C. Stacey, “Mitogenic activity and cytokine levels in non-healing and healing chronic leg ulcers,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. R. J. White and K. F. Cutting, “Critical colonizationg—the concept under scrutiny,” Ostomy Wound Management, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 50–56, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  86. R. Goldman, “Growth factors and chronic wound healing: past, present, and future,” Advances in Skin & Wound Care, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 24–35, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. P. A. Efron and L. L. Moldawer, “Cytokines and wound healing: the role of cytokine and anticytokine therapy in the repair response,” Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–160, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. A. E. Brissett and D. B. Hom, “The effects of tissue sealants, platelet gels, and growth factors on wound healing,” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 245–250, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. P. Kranke, M. Bennett, I. Roeckl-Wiedmann, and S. Debus, “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD004123, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  90. J. Cha and V. Falanga, “Stem cells in cutaneous wound healing,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Rodrigo G. Rosique et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.