The Pattern of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in a Single Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia
Introduction. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic arthritis in children. Our aim is to describe demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics and treatment of JIA patients followed up in Pediatric Rheumatology clinic in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia. Methods. Medical records of all patients who are followed up between January 2007 and January 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected about demographic, clinical, and laboratory features and treatment. Results. Total patients were 82, males were 31 (37.8%), and mean age of JIA onset was 7.1 ± 3.6 yr. Mean follow-up duration was 2.67±1.6 yr. Systemic onset JIA (SoJIA) was the commonest (36.5%), followed by polyarticular in 29.2% and oligoarticular in 28%. Large and small joints are involved in 76 (92%) and 30 (36.6%), respectively. Main extra-articular feature was fever in 34 (41.4%). Uveitis was diagnosed in 7 (8.5%) and in 5 (21.7%) of oligoarticular JIA. Anemia was found in 49 (59.7%), high ESR in 45 (54.8%), and leukocytosis and thrombocytosis in 33 (40.2%). Positive ANA was found in 30 (36.5%) mainly in oligoarticular subtype as 12 (52%) patients (out of 23) had this positive test. 9 patients (10.9%) required NSAIDs only, 6 patients (7.3%) required NSAIDs and intra-articular steroids only, and 19 (23%) required NSAIDs, methotrexate, steroids, and biologics. Conclusion. SoJIA is the most common JIA subtype in our study. A population based rather than a single center study will give more details about JIA characteristics in Saudi Arabia
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic arthritis in children worldwide. It is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease and defined as arthritis persisting 6 weeks or longer with onset before the age of 16 years with no identifiable etiology.
The term Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis has replaced the older terms Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis (JRA) and Juvenile Chronic Arthritis (JCA) proposed by the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) in the late 1990s.
The ILAR classified JIA according to the pattern of the arthritis in the first 6 months after onset of the disease into 8 subtypes known as persistent oligoarticular, extended oligoarticular, polyarticular Rheumatoid Factor- (RF-) negative, polyarticular RF-positive, enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), psoriatic arthritis, systemic, and undifferentiated arthritis. Each JIA subtype has its own diagnostic criteria (Table 1) .
The hallmark of JIA is joint inflammation and the presence of synovitis which causes synovial tissue thickening and accumulation of synovial fluid. This is manifested clinically as joint swelling, morning stiffness, joint pain, tenderness, and functional disability. Arthritis can occur in any joint but large joints are more commonly affected. Joint involvement can be mild and self-limiting and it can be more severe causing joint destruction, severe disability, and loss of joint function.
Extra-articular manifestations in JIA may cause significant morbidity. These include uveitis, fever, skin rash, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and serositis. Apart from uveitis, most of these extra-articular features occur in SoJIA.
There are no diagnostic laboratory investigations for JIA but some laboratory findings can help to exclude other causes of arthritis and help in JIA classification.
Aim of JIA management is to control active symptoms and to prevent chronic complications in order to improve quality of life which requires comprehensive multidisciplinary team care including rheumatologists, rehabilitation specialists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, nurses, podiatrists, dieticians, psychologists or psychiatrists, and orthopedic surgeons.
There is no curative treatment for JIA but early and aggressive management has led to prolonged remission and improved outcome.
These relative variabilities may be related to environmental, ethnic, and genetic background.
In this present study, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of a cohort of 82 JIA children who are followed up in Pediatric Rheumatology Department at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH); our objective is to present the main characteristics of JIA in children followed up in our center to know further about the pattern of the disease in Saudi Arabia and to compare these characteristics with those from other parts of the world.
2. Patients and Methods
This is an observational retrospective study carried out at Pediatric Rheumatology Department in King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), a tertiary center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Our study was approved by local ethical committee of pediatric department and by the University Research Ethics Committee.
All the medical records of the children who were diagnosed to have Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (arthritis in one or more joints lasting 2 weeks or more with no identifiable cause in those who are less than 16 years of age) from January 2007 to January 2015 were included.
The diagnosis of JIA was done by a pediatric rheumatologist and JIA classification was according to ILAR classification criteria (Table 1).
Only children who had duration of follow-up of 6 months or more were included in order to know more details about JIA characteristics.
Data were collected about number of patients of each JIA subtype, gender, age at disease onset, and duration of follow-up. The percentage of each JIA subtype was calculated and the age of disease onset and duration of follow-up were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD); these data are presented in Table 2 and Figure 1.
Main clinical data were collected about large joints involvement (knee, ankle, elbow, shoulder, and wrist) or small joints involvement and presence of uveitis during the course of the disease. The presence of fever, skin rash, hepatosplenomegaly, and lymphadenopathy at diagnosis was also recorded. These clinical findings were diagnosed by a pediatric rheumatologist while uveitis was diagnosed by ophthalmologist by slit lamp examination. These main clinical data are presented in Table 3.
Laboratory investigations were all done at KAUH laboratories.
Initial data at diagnosis included white blood cells (leukocytosis defined as WBC > 11 × 109/L), hemoglobin level (anemia defined as Hb < 110 g/L), platelets count (thrombocytosis defined as PLT > 450 × 109/L), ESR > 20 mm/hr, elevated CRP > 3 mg/L and positivity of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), Rheumatoid Factor (RF), and HLAB27.
ANA was done by ELISA technique and ANA titre of 1:80 or more was considered positive. Positivity of ANA and RF is considered only if two samples were positive in at least three months apart. Table 4 shows the percentage of these laboratory investigation results in all JIA subtypes.
Review of anti-rheumatic pharmacologic treatments used during the study period included (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intra-articular corticosteroids (IAC) or systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate (MTX), and biologic agents) was done. Number and percentage of those who were treated with NSAIDs alone, NSAIDs and IAC, NSAIDs, IAC and MTX, NSAIDs and systemic steroids, NSAIDs and MTX, NSAIDs, MTX and systemic steroids, NSAIDs, MTX and biologics, NSAIDs, MTX, and biologics and IAC and those who had joint surgery in each JIA subtype were calculated and presented in Table 5.
Other Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) like leflunomide, cyclosporine, and azathioprine were infrequently used and they were not included.
Data statistical analysis was done manually.
Total patients reviewed in this study were 85; 3 patients were excluded because of insufficient data due to irregular follow-up (2 oligoarticular JIA, 1 polyarticular JIA).
Table 2 shows general characteristics of the patients: systemic onset JIA was the most common JIA subtype 36.5% (30 patients) followed by polyarticular JIA subtype 29.26% (24 patients) and then oligoarticular JIA subtype 28% (23 patients). No unclassified patients JIA were diagnosed.
Of our 82 patients, 51 (62.2%) were females and female gender was predominant in all JIA subtypes except in ERA. Female-to-male ratio was 1.64 : 1 (51/31).
The range of age at onset of symptoms was between 8 months and 14.5 years and the mean age at JIA onset was years.
The duration of follow-up was from 6 months to 8 years; mean was years.
Table 3 shows main clinical features of our patients; large joints were affected in most of patients 92.68% (76/82 patients) while small joints were affected in 36.6% (30/82 patients).
Fever was present in all systemic onset JIA subtype and in 41.46% of the total number (34/82 patients).
Uveitis was diagnosed during the course of the disease in 7 patients (8.53%) and in 5 patients (21.7%) of oligoarticular JIA subtype.
Table 4 shows main laboratory investigations which were done. The most common finding at presentation was anemia in 49/82 patients (59.75%), followed by elevated ESR in 45/82 patients (54.87%) and then elevated CRP and leukocytosis in 33/82 patients (40.24%), while thrombocytosis was found in 31/82 patients (37.8%).
Anemia, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, elevated ESR, and CRP were present mostly in SoJIA.
Positive ANA was present in 30/82 patients (36.58%) and mostly in oligoarticular JIA 12/23 patients (52.17%) and polyarticular JIA 11/24 patients (45.83%).
Positive Rheumatoid Factor was found only in RF-positive polyarticular JIA.
Table 5 shows the antirheumatic pharmacologic treatment received by our patients during the course of the disease. NSAIDs as the only treating agent were used in 9/82 patients (10.97%) while NSAIDs, methotrexate, systemic steroids, and biologics were received by 19/82 patients (23.17%) at different and varying length of time.
Biologic agents were given to 31/82 patients (37.8%); of these patients, 15 belonged to SoJIA. Biologic agents were mainly in decreasing order of frequency: etanercept (Enbrel), adalimumab (Humira), abatacept (Orencia), rituximab (Mabthera), and tocilizumab (Actemra).
Joint surgery, other than intra-articular corticosteroid injection, was needed in 3 patients only: one case of oligoarticular JIA, RF-negative polyarticular JIA, and RF-positive polyarticular JIA.
This observational study was carried out in Pediatric Department at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, which is a tertiary care hospital in Jeddah, western coast of Saudi Arabia.
We aimed at this study to present the clinical features of children with JIA followed up in our center as knowing the characteristics of this disease in our community is essential to provide a better planning for medical care.
To our best of knowledge, there is only one hospital-based similar study describing the pattern of JIA in Saudi children which was published in 1997 in which arthritis classification was not according to the currently used ILAR classification system for JIA .
Unlike most of previous similar studies where oligoarticular JIA was found to be the most common, mainly in Europe, USA, Canada, South America, and Turkey [3, 16–18], the frequency of JIA subtypes in our cohort showed that systemic onset JIA was the most common subtype: 30/82 (36.5%).
This is similar to a previous tertiary hospital-based study done in central province of Saudi Arabia which reviewed clinical features of 115 patients with JRA in which the percentage of SoJIA was found to constitute 44% of Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis cases . In a large population-based study in Japan which included 540 children, SoJIA constituted 54% of JIA cases .
Polyarticular JIA was also the predominant JIA subtype in some other cohorts from South Africa, Bangladesh, and Pakistan and in a multinational study done by the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) which included patients from western and eastern Europe and Latin America [4, 19–21]. ERA was found to be the predominant in other studies [6, 22].
Since our study was done in a tertiary center, we believe that this may affect our results as some cases of mild JIA especially oligoarticular may be treated by general pediatricians or orthopedic doctors and may not be referred to a higher center. We believe also that a single center study may not reflect the correct distribution of JIA subtypes in our country which needs multicenter- or a population-based study.
Our present data shows female predominance as 51/82 patients (62.2%) were female. Apart from the only male child with ERA, female number was more in all JIA subtypes.
The mean age of onset of JIA symptoms in our patients was years (range: 8 months–14.5 years), which is not largely different from most studies [9, 14, 25, 27, 28]. However it is higher than the mean age in a large study which included 3167 patients from Europe and Latin America where mean age of onset of JIA symptoms was 5.8 years  but lower than a mean age of 9.5 years recorded in a cohort from Taiwan of 195 patients .
It is well known that JIA involves large joints—except hip—more often than small joints; our data showed that 92.68% (76/82) had large joint involvement either alone or associated with small joints.
Fever in SoJIA is considered one of the diagnostic features according to ILAR criteria and it may be the main presenting symptom . As reported in other studies, all our SoJIA patients had fever [8, 29–31].
Among all our JIA children, fever was present in 34/82 (41.46%) patients which is higher than other similar studies [3, 29]. which is probably due to the predominance of SoJIA in our cohort. However a higher percent (67.6%) of fever in JRA was reported in one series .
Uveitis is a well-known extra-articular manifestation that affects children with JIA and it occurs more commonly in oligoarticular subtype. It may start before the onset arthritis or later during the course of the disease. Among all our JIA patients 7/82 (8.53%) had uveitis and 5/23 (21.7%) of oligoarticular JIA had developed uveitis. The overall rate is approximately close to what was reported in Spain  and Taiwan .
However there is significant variability in frequency of uveitis in JIA; in a series of 214 JIA children in India, only 2.2% were found to have uveitis while a rate of 29.65% was reported in another series of 172 patients .
Anemia in JIA is commonly caused by iron deficiency or due to chronic inflammation .
Anemia was the most common abnormal laboratory investigation in our patients 49/82 (59.75%) and it was recorded in 80% of SoJIA patients. Anemia was considered as hemoglobin level less than 110 g/L which is—according to WHO definition of anemia—a 2SD below the mean for the majority of our patients [35, 36].
The prevalence of anemia in our children may be increased as most of cases were SoJIA in which the anemia is more common than other JIA subtypes.
Furthermore, at presentation, it was not known if this anemia was due to JIA alone or due to other common causes as the frequency of anemia in children in our population was 22.3% and 30% in two local studies [37, 38].
Being slightly higher than a local study (115 patients) and studies from UK (572 patients), Turkey (634 patients), and Taiwan (195 patients), the frequency of ANA positivity in our children was 36.58% [3, 9, 22, 39] although higher and more lower frequencies were reported [4, 39].
As expected most ANA positivity cases were in oligoarticular JIA.
The aim of multidisciplinary JIA management is to control active symptoms, achieve remission, prevent joint damage, and preserve joints function to prevent disability as well as maintaining normal growth which may require early and aggressive management .
Pharmacologic therapy of JIA has major advances over the last two decades since the introduction of biologic agents which are being increasingly used and these agents may be used as initial therapy .
We usually start with NSAIDs for 4 to 6 weeks followed by DMARDs, most commonly methotrexate in case of no adequate response to NSAIDs. IAC are used to relieve joint inflammation and systemic steroids are usually used for a short time with the lowest effective dose and are tapered once we get the desired response. In case of failure of methotrexate, a trial of another DMARD or biologic therapy is introduced.
In our study, all patients were started on NSAIDs either alone or combined with other antirheumatic agents but they were the only used agent in 9/82 patients (11%).
JIA was found to be the most common indication for biologic treatment among pediatric rheumatologic conditions in a national study .
As shown in Table 5, 31/82 patients (37.8%) received biologic treatment during their course of the diseases.
A major limitation of our study is being a retrospective record-based in nature and a single center-based with a relatively small sample size. However our study can be a starting point for further future nationwide multicenter-based study.
In our study, systemic onset JIA is the most common JIA subtype.
Although a population-based rather than a single center study will give more details about JIA characteristics in Saudi Arabia, our study can be the start point to a nationwide multicenter study.
|JIA:||Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis|
|ILAR:||International League of Associations for Rheumatology|
|SoJIA:||Systemic onset Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis|
|DMARDs:||Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs|
|NSAIDs:||Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs|
Conflict of Interests
All authors have no competing interests to declare.
Mohammad H. Al-Hemairi and Mohammed A. Muzaffer helped in the conception and design of the study, the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work and Shatha M. Albokhari helped in the design of the study and critically revised the paper for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
The authors would like to thank the patients, their families, and the medical staff of Pediatric Rheumatology Clinics at King Abdulaziz University Hospital.
R. E. Petty, T. R. Southwood, P. Manners et al., “International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 390–392, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
E. Demirkaya, S. Özen, Y. Bilginer et al., “The distribution of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the eastern Mediterranean: results from the registry of the Turkish paediatric rheumatology association,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 111–116, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
S. Naz, A. Mushtaq, S. Rehman et al., “Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 409–421, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
V. Kunjir, A. Venugopalan, and A. Chopra, “Profile of Indian patients with juvenile onset chronic inflammatory joint disease using the ILAR classification criteria for JIA: a community-based cohort study,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1756–1762, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bahabri, W. Al-Sewairi, A. Al-Mazyad et al., “Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: the Saudi experience,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 413–418, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
F. A. Khuffash, H. A. Majeed, M. M. Lubani, K. N. Najdi, S. S. Gunawardana, and R. Bushnaq, “Epidemiology of juvenile chronic arthritis and other connective tissue diseases among children in Kuwait,” Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 255–259, 1990.View at: Google Scholar
K. Minden, M. Niewerth, J. Listing, A. Zink, and German Study Group of Pediatric Rheumatologists, “Health care provision in pediatric rheumatology in Germany-national rheumatologic database,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 622–628, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
N. Adib, K. Hyrich, J. Thornton et al., “Association between duration of symptoms and severity of disease at first presentation to paediatric rheumatology: results from the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study,” Rheumatology, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 991–995, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ahmed, S. R. Ali, S. Ishaque, and N. Sami, “Clinical and biochemical characteristics of children with Juvenile idiopathic Arthritis,” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 498–502, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
R. Gutiérrez-Suárez, A. Pistorio, A. Cespedes Cruz et al., “Health-related quality of life of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis coming from 3 different geographic areas. The PRINTO multinational quality of life cohort study,” Rheumatology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 314–320, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-C. Shen, K.-W. Yeh, L.-S. Ou, T.-C. Yao, L.-C. Chen, and J.-L. Huang, “Clinical features of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis using the ILAR classification criteria: a community-based cohort study in Taiwan,” Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 288–294, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Cassidy and R. E. Petty, “Chronic arthritis in childhood,” in Text Book of Pediatric Rheumatology, J. T. Cassidy, R. E. Petty, R. M. Laxer, and C. B. Lindsley, Eds., pp. 211–286, Saunders Elesvier, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 6th edition, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
J.-L. Huang, “New advances in juvenile idiopathic arthritis,” Chang Gung Medical Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. K. Reininga, L. I. Los, N. M. Wulffraat, and W. Armbrust, “The evaluation of uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JLA) patients: are current ophthalmologic screening guidelines adequate?” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 367–372, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
K. L. Hyrich, S. D. Lal, H. E. Foster et al., “Disease activity and disability in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis one year following presentation to paediatric rheumatology. Results from the Childhood Arthritis Prospective study,” Rheumatology, vol. 49, no. 1, Article ID kep352, pp. 116–122, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-Y. Tsai, J.-H. Lee, H.-H. Yu, L.-C. Wang, Y.-H. Yang, and B.-L. Chiang, “Initial manifestations and clinical course of systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a ten-year retrospective study,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 542–549, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Aggarwal, V. Agarwal, D. Danda, and R. Misra, “Outcome in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in India,” Indian Pediatrics, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 180–184, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
D. Ben Ezra, C. Evelyne, and F. Behar-Cohen, “Uveitis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a cohort study,” Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ), vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 513–518, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
J. Janus and S. K. Moerschel, “Evaluation of anemia in children,” American Family Physician, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 1462–1471, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
N. Moe and M. Rygg, “Epidemiology of juvenile chronic arthritis in northern Norway: a ten-year retrospective study,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 99–101, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
A. Consolaro, G. Negro, S. Lanni, N. Solari, A. Martini, and A. Ravelli, “Toward a treat-to-target approach in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 30, supplement 73, pp. S157–S162, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
S. Ringold, P. F. Weiss, T. Beukelman et al., “2013 update of the 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: recommendations for the medical therapy of children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and tuberculosis screening among children receiving biologic medications,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 2499–2512, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar