Table of Contents
Research Letters in Inorganic Chemistry
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 243296, 4 pages
Research Letter

Exchange Interaction in Complex Bis[(1,3-Dithiole-2-Thione- 4,5-Dithiolato)-di-(Carbonyl)-Cyclopentadienyl Iron(II)]

1V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 61077 Kharkiv, Ukraine
2Institute of Chemistry, Jan Kochanovski University, 25020 Kielce, Poland
3Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
4Centre of Low Temperature Physics, Faculty of Science, P.J. Šafárik University; IEP SAS, 04180 Košice, Slovakia

Received 22 June 2009; Accepted 5 August 2009

Academic Editor: George Koutsantonis

Copyright © 2009 S. V. Vitushkina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The splitting of the quasidegenerate electronic states in dinuclear bis[(1,3-dithiole-2-thione-4,5-dithiolato)-di-(carbonyl) -cyclopentadienyliron (II)] complex with the bridging, S–S coupled, dimerized sulfur-rich dithiolate ligands, [Fe(C5H5)(CO)2(C3S5-C3S5)Fe(C5H5)(CO)2] (I) was found by the means of Mössbauer spectroscopy and by the measurement of the temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility in a wide temperature range from 2?K to 300?K. The experimental results were confirmed by the calculations of the singlet and triplet states of the complex, as well as of the distribution of spin density within the bounds of the DFT method in the B3LYP/6-31(dp)G basis. In the more stable triplet state, the spin density is significantly delocalized, which is a characteristic of olefindithiolate complexes.

1. Introduction

During the last decade the chemistry of 1,3-dithiole-2-thione-4,5-dithiole complexes (dmit complexes) was developing rapidly. The interest was motivated above all by the possibility of preparation of molecular metals, superconductors, and magnetically ordered structures based on them [13]. Mixed-ligand complexes, containing in addition to dmit also heterocycle amine molecules, have perspective application as materials for non-linear optics [4] and dye-sensitized solar cells [57]. Moreover, the complex [Cu(SP)(mnt)] (SP = (–)sparteine (6R, 11S), mnt—maleonitriledithiolate) with a distorted tetrahedral geometry has been studied as a model of blue copper protein [8].

In previous paper [9] the mixed-ligand complex bis [(1,3-dithiole-2-thione-4,5-dithiolato)-di(carbonyl)-cyclopentadienyliron (II)] (I) and its crystal structure has been described (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Schematic view of the complex (I).

The ability of dmit to form complexes having the properties of molecular metals and/or superconductors is explained by the existence of shortened intermolecular contacts S?S including S2 atoms in crystals of these complexes. Unusual structural properties for C–S–S*–C* bonds have been investigated [10]. As a consequence of this the issue of conductivity of the chain Fe–S–C=C–S–S*–C*=C*–S*–Fe* for complex (I) (the stars mark the atoms of complex which are connected with the rotation axis C2) arises. The higher the conductivity of the chain is, the stronger are the exchange interactions between paramagnetic atoms of iron in complex (I). Due to this, we performed a study of the complex by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy which is very sensitive to the changes of energy [11] and by the measurement of the temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility in a wide temperature range from 2?K to 300?K.

2. Experimental

The authors in [9] have prepared complex (I) in two steps. At first the mixture of C3S5(CH2CH2CN)2 and sodium ethylate was treated with ultrasonic waves in ethyl alcohol to prepare the Na2dmit salt. To the resulting solution the solution of [(C5H5)Fe(CO)2I] complex was added. After stirring, the complex (I) was separated from the reaction mixture with a 60% yield. In this paper, the complex (I) was synthesized by a method described in [12] which is a method of one-step synthesis of this complex with an 83% yield. Notably, C6S10 was added to the methanolic solution of [(C5H5)Fe(CO)2] with stirring. The resulting mixture was brought to the boiling point and stirred about 20 hour. After cooling, the complex (I) was separated from the reaction mixture.

The 57Fe Mössbauer spectra were recorded at different temperatures using a conventional constant-acceleration spectrometer. The radiation source 57Co(Rh) was kept at the room temperature. All isomer shifts refer to the ??-Fe absorber at 300?K.

In Figure 2 the spectra of 57Fe atoms, obtained at different temperatures (300?K and 77?K resp.) are shown. Table 1 shows the results of the mathematical evaluation of spectra as a superposition of two quadrupole doublets, which have been described by linear combination of Gaussian and Lorentz functions.

Table 1: Basic parameters of the Mössbauer spectra of complex (??). Symbols: ??-value of isomer shift; ?-value of quadrupole splitting; G1/2-halfwidth of the line; S-relative probability of the effect.
Figure 2: Mössbauer spectra of the complex (I) at the temperatures 77?K and 300?K.

The magnetic susceptibility and magnetization were studied using a commercial Quantum Design MPMS device. The temperature dependence of susceptibility was investigated in the temperature range from 2?K to 300?K in applied magnetic fields 100?mT and 1?T. The diamagnetic contribution to the susceptibility was estimated using Pascal’s constants [13] and subtracted from the total susceptibility.

Quantum chemical calculations of the triplet and singlet states of complex (I) were performed by the RODFT method in the B3LYP/6-31(dp)G basis using structural data from [9]. The advantage of the DFT methods is that they methods allow, in principle, to calculate accurately the spin state splitting. The calculated trends are roughly independent on the choice of the density functional and are consistent with the experimental data [14, 15].

3. Results and Discussion

In the crystals of complex (I) the magnetic interactions between paramagnetic centers of neighbouring molecules is practicaly impossible (shortened contacts between atoms of neighbouring molecules are missing [9]). Two Fe(C5H5)(CO)2 groups are bound together by the ionic bridge C6S2-10. The only symmetry element—C2 axis—passes over the center of the disulphide S–S bridge bond, hence the point symmetry group of the molecule of the complex is C2. Since this symmetry group has only one-dimensional irreducible representations, the double degenerated state of complex (I) (complex consists of two equivalent parts) has to split. This effect is fully analogical to the familiar Davydov (or exciton) splitting in crystals [16]. Resulting from the stoichiometry of the complex (I) we can come to the conclusion that the oxidation degree of iron is +2, with electron configuration 3??6. In such a case, in the absence of interactions between iron atoms in the complex, it is necessary to expect diamagnetic ground state (cyclopentadienyl-anion and CO molecules are ligands of strong field). Nevertheless, according to the magnetic measurements the complex (I) is paramagnetic.

57Fe Mössbauer spectra measured at temperature 300?K and 77?K (Figure 2) correspond to the superposition of two quadrupole doublets with close values of chemical shift ??, but with apparently different values of quadrupole splitting ? (Table 1). We point out that these values are characteristic for low-spin complexes with Fe(II) or Fe(III) [17, 18].

As we know, quadrupole splitting is a result of three contributions: the asymmetry of the crystal lattice (this contribution is absent in cubic crystals), the presence of so-called imbalanced electrons in d-suborbital, and the asymmetry of the electron distribution in internal orbitals [18]. With regard to the features of the complex (I) crystal structure (which may be classified as a molecular crystal), the first contribution should be negligible and the second one (for ion with configuration ??6 in strong fields) is equal zero. Thus the main contribution to the gradient of electric field on 57Fe atoms is determined by the asymmetry (polarization) of internal electron orbitals. This contribution is practically temperature independent what was confirmed by experiments (Table 1).

The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility is shown in Figure 3. It is like dependence for paramagnets, but it still cannot be described by the Curie-Weiss law. In the entire temperature range it can be described by an empirical formula:

Figure 3: Temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility of the complex (I), experimental data (open circles) are fitted with formula 1 (solid line). Inset shows the linear fit (solid line) to inverse susceptibility.


with parameters ??0=-2.83·10-3?emu/mol, ???=2·10-5?emu/mol, ??=1.214?emu·K/mol, ??=-6.5?K and with the correlation coefficient ??=0.9982%. The value of the effective magnetic moment was estimated from the Curie constant as 3.13?????. It corresponds to two unpaired electrons per formula unit of the complex and signifies that every symmetrical moiety [Fe(Cp)(CO)2C3S5] has one electron. The negative value of the Wiess constant ?? indicates the presence of antiferromagnetic interactions in the system.

If for magnetism of complex (I) only the Fe(II) ions were responsible, the complex would be either diamagnetic (spin-coupled state of Fe(II)), or would have four unpaired electrons (two on each Fe(II) ion). Therefore, the presence of two unpaired electrons means that the stable state of complex (I) is a triplet state with delocalized spin density.

The results of the quantum chemistry calculations, presented in Table 2, agree well with experimental data. According to the calculations the triplet state of the complex is more stable than the singlet state at 1.56?eV (150?kJ/mol). The spin density distribution in the complex molecule (Figure 4) from which it can be seen that the spin density is localized mainly on iron atoms, sulfur S4 atoms, and carbon atoms C3 of dithiolate ion C6S2-10, serving as a bridge in the binuclear complex.

Table 2: Values of electron bond energies of some core levels of triplet (ground) state of complex (??), E total(LS)-E total (HS)=??.???????? in hartree (a. u), LS: low spin state, HS: high spin state.
Figure 4: Spin density distribution at the molecule of the complex (I).

The energy splitting of core levels, which gives main contribution to the electric field gradient on iron atoms, is practically absent or very weak. For example, the energy of the E(Fe3s) state described by the symmetric wave function (irreducible representation ?? of group C2) is only by 0.0027?eV more stable than the state with symmetry ?? (Table 2). More symmetrical orbitals—orbitals transformed by the irreducible representation ?? of C2 group—give lower contribution to the gradient and orbitals with ?? symmetry give a larger one. The existence of two doublets in the Mössbauer spectra of complex (I) can be explained in such a way that they originate from two different electronic states with practically the same value of the isomer shift but with different symmetry. The doublet with quadrupole splitting 0.64?mm/s originates from the states with ?? symmetry and the doublet with ? = 1.09 mm/s from the states with ?? symmetry.

Thus, as a result of the performed study, an unusual effect of the splitting of electron states of the binuclear low symmetry complex, caused by a notable electron conductivity of the Fe-S3-C2-S2-S?2-C?2-S?3-Fe? chain, was found.


This work was supported by the grants of Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contracts LPP-0102-06, no. APVV-VVCE-0058-07, no. APVV-0006-07 and VEGA 1/0159/09. The financial support of U.S. Steel–DZ Energetika Košice is acknowledged.


  1. P. Cassoux, “Molecular (super)conductors derived from bis-dithiolate metal complexes,” Coordination Chemical Reviews, vol. 185-186, pp. 213–232, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. N. Robertson and L. Cronin, “Metal bis-1,2-dithiolene complexes in conducting or magnetic crystalline assemblies,” Coordination Chemical Reviews, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 93–127, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Akutagawa and T. Nakamura, “Control of assembly and magnetism of metal-dmit complexes by supramolecular cations,” Coordination Chemical Reviews, vol. 226, no. 1-2, pp. 3–9, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. M. Liu, D. Q. Zhang, Y. L. Song, C. L. Zhan, Y. L. Li, and D. D. Zhu, “Synthesis, crystal structure and third-order nonlinear optical behavior of a novel dimeric mixed-ligand zinc(II) complex of 1,3,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2002, no. 7, pp. 1591–1594, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. B. W. Smucker, J. M. Hudson, M. A. Omary, and K. R. Dunbar, “Structural, magnetic, and optoelectronic properties of (diimine)(dithiolato)platinum(II) and -palladium(II) complexes and their charge-transfer adducts with nitrile acceptors,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 15, pp. 4714–4723, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. E. A. M. Geary, N. Hirata, J. Clifford et al., “Synthesis, structure and properties of [Pt(2,2'-bipyridyl-5,5'-dicarboxylic acid)(3,4-toluenedithiolate)]: tuning molecular properties for application in dye-sensitised solar cells,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, pp. 3757–3762, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. A. M. Geary, L. J. Yellowlees, L. A. Jack et al., “Synthesis, structure, and properties of [Pt(II)(diimine)(dithiolate)] dyes with 3,3'-, 4,4'-, and 5,5'-disubstituted bipyridyl: applications in dye-sensitized solar cells,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 242–250, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. J. Kim, S. O. Kim, Y. I. Kim, and S. N. Choi, “A mimic molecule of blue copper protein active site [(−)-sparteine-N,N](maleonitriledithiolato- S,S)copper(II),” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 17, pp. 4481–4484, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G.-E. Matsubayashi, T. Ryowa, H. Tamura, M. Nakano, and R. Arakawa, “Preparation and properties of dinuclear bis[dicarbonyl(cyclopentadienyl)]diiron(II) complexes with S-S coupled, dimerized sulfur-rich dithiolate ligands,” Journal of Organometalic Chemistry, vol. 645, no. 1-2, pp. 94–100, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. G. Breitzer, A. I. Smirnov, L. F. Szczepura, S. R. Wilson, and T. B. Rauchfuss, “Redox properties of C6S8n- and C3S5n-(n=0,1,2): stable radicals and unusual structural properties for C-S-S-C bonds,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1421–1429, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Danon, Lectures on the Mössbauer Effect, Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 1968.
  12. S. V. Vitushkina and V. A. Starodub, “Synthesis and properties of bis[(1,3-dithiole-2-thione-4,5-dithiolato)-di-(carbonyl)- cyclopentadienyliron(II)]dinuclear complex,” Bulletin of V.N.Karazin National University, vol. 13, no. 36, p. 148, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. C. O'Connor, Progress in Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 29, S.J. Lippard, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  14. H. Paulsen, J. A. Wolny, and A. X. Trautwein, “Chemical bonds and spin state splittings in spin crossover complexes. A DFT and QTAIM analysis,” Monatshefte für Chemie, vol. 136, no. 6, pp. 1107–1118, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. F. Neese, “Prediction of molecular properties and molecular spectroscopy with density functional theory: from fundamental theory to exchange-coupling,” Coordination Chemical Reviews, vol. 253, no. 5-6, pp. 526–563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. S. Davydov, The Theory of Solid, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1976.
  17. M. Nihei, T. Shiga, Y. Maeda, and H. Oshio, “Spin crossover iron(III) complexes,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 251, no. 21–24, pp. 2606–2621, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. L. G. Lavrenova, O. G. Shakirova, and V. N. Ikorskii, “A11T52 spin transition in new thermochromic iron(II) complexes with 1,2,4-triazole and 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole,” Russian Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. V. I. Nefedov, “X-Ray Electron Spectroscopy of Chemical Compounds,” Chemistry, Moscow, Russia, 1984. View at Google Scholar