Research Article

Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases

Table 3

The performance characteristics of scoring functions in discrimination of true binders after docking.

ā€‰Scoring methodAUC of ROC curveEF20%EF10%EF2%EF1%

Glide (HTS)Glide0.6533482.1428572.51.7857143.571429
F-Score0.2427760000
PMF-Score0.5010410.5357140.71428600
G-Score0.5516841.4285711.4285715.35714310.71429
D-Score0.5159961.4285711.7857147.1428577.142857
ChemScore0.6483632.6785713.5714297.14285714.28571
X-Score0.560541.251.7857141.7857143.571429
DSX0.6323412.1428572.8571431.7857140
Autodock0.6467751.9642862.1428577.14285710.71429
Vina0.5600971.251.07142900

Glide (SP)Glide0.7300622.7586213.4482768.6206913.7931
F-Score0.4099750.1724140.34482800
PMF-Score0.4965980.6896550.68965500
G-Score0.565241.7241381.7241381.7241383.448276
D-Score0.5498381.2068971.7241381.7241380
ChemScore0.7571742.7586214.82758612.7241420.68966
X-Score0.6050011.8965521.7241381.7241383.448276
DSX0.6834762.5862073.7931036.89655210.34483
Autodock0.6902341.8965523.79310312.0689713.7931
Vina0.5924551.5517241.379311.7241383.448276
PC10.799633.4482765.86206918.9655234.48276