Table of Contents
International Journal of Metals
Volume 2014, Article ID 389416, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/389416
Research Article

Synthesis of MgO Nanoparticles by Solvent Mixed Spray Pyrolysis Technique for Optical Investigation

Department of Physics, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati 444 602, India

Received 27 October 2013; Accepted 30 March 2014; Published 14 April 2014

Academic Editor: Yuanshi Li

Copyright © 2014 K. R. Nemade and S. A. Waghuley. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Solvent mixed spray pyrolysis technique has attracted a global interest in the synthesis of nanomaterials since reactions can be run in liquid state without further heating. Magnesium oxide (MgO) is a category of the practical semiconductor metal oxides, which is extensively used as catalyst and optical material. In the present study, MgO nanoparticles were successfully synthesized using a solvent mixed spray pyrolysis. The X-ray diffraction pattern confirmed the formation of MgO phase with an excellent crystalline structure. Debye-Scherrer equation is used for the determination of particle size, which was found to be 9.2 nm. Tunneling electron microscope analysis indicated that the as-synthesized particles are nanoparticles with an average particle size of 9 nm. Meanwhile, the ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy of the resulting product was evaluated to study its optical property via measurement of the band gap energy value.

1. Introduction

In last two decades, synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles has attracted considerable attention [1, 2]. Abundant techniques have been also developed to prepare nanoparticles of MgO. This nanoparticle has attracted much attention due to its wide band gap [3]. However, most of the techniques need high temperatures and perform under a costly inert atmosphere. Kaviyarasu and Devarajan reported a versatile route to synthesize MgO nanoparticles by combustion technique [4]. Lange and Obendorf studied the effect of plasma etching on destructive adsorption properties of polypropylene fibres containing magnesium oxide nanoparticles [5]. Jin and He demonstrated antibacterial activities of MgO nanoparticles against food borne pathogens [6]. Mirzaei and Davoodnia reported the microwave assisted sol-gel synthesis of MgO nanoparticles and their catalytic activity in the synthesis of Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines [7]. Camtakan et al. studied the uranium sorption properties of MgO [8].

For the present work, solvent mixed spray pyrolysis method was undertaken to prepare MgO nanoparticles. To the best of our knowledge, no report is present in the literature of material science on optical study of MgO nanoparticles synthesized by solvent mixed spray pyrolysis method. As-synthesized MgO nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) spectroscopy.

2. Experimental

All the reagents were of analytical grade and they were used without further purification. MgO nanoparticles were prepared via quick precipitation route using magnesium nitrate (Mg(NO3)2·6H2O) and hexamethylenetetramine (C6H12N4). In the typical procedure, a stock solution of 1M solution of C6H12N4 was prepared by dissolving suitable quantity in distilled water. Similarly 1 M Mg(NO3)2·6H2O solution was prepared by dissolving in distilled water. Both solutions were mixed under magnetic stirring for 10 min at room temperature. After this procedure, prepared solution was loaded in chamber of spray pyrolysis. The reaction unit was a flame-spray apparatus consisting of high pressure gas assisted nozzle, which is made of a capillary tube with an outer diameter of 1 mm (inner diameter 0.6 mm) and an opening of 1.2 mm in diameter. The spray was evaporated by a supporting flamelets maintained at 573 K. The flow rate of the dispersion of solution was controlled by a flow controller. The product was collected on a SiO2 substrate. The prepared sample was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy, (TEM) and ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction pattern was recorded using a Rigaku miniflex-II diffractometer with CuKα radiation in the range 30°−90°. The morphology and grain size of the sample was observed by using TEM (JEOL-1200ex). UV-VIS spectrum was recorded on Perkin Elmer UV spectrophotometer in the range 200–1100 nm in solution of MgO nanoparticles dispersed in double distilled water.

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD pattern of the final product is shown in Figure 1. This pattern clearly confirmed the presence of the MgO cubic phase with a lattice parameter of  Å and space group (Fm-3m (225)). The diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 36.94°, 42.90°, 62.30°, 74.67°, and 78.61° matching the cubic MgO (PDF- 00-004-0829) indicated the formation of this compound (Figure 2). No other peaks for impurities were detected. The average crystallite size was calculated from diffraction peaks using the Debye-Scherrer equation, which was found to be 9.2 nm [9].

389416.fig.001
Figure 1: XRD pattern of the resulting MgO nanoparticles.
389416.fig.002
Figure 2: PDF card of MgO.

Figure 3 reveals the TEM images of the obtained MgO nanoparticles. This image illustrates that small amount of agglomeration is present in the as-synthesized sample. The average crystallite size seen in the micrograph is of the order of 9 nm. Both XRD and TEM analyses of samples are in concurrence with each other.

389416.fig.003
Figure 3: TEM images of the resulting MgO nanoparticles.

Figure 4 shows the UV-VIS spectrum of MgO nanoparticles, reflecting variation of % absorbance of MgO as a function of wavelength. Broad peak around 203 nm shows that the particle possesses quantum confinement [10]. This shows that charge particles are confined about three spatial dimensions. The band gap of MgO nanoparticles was estimated by plotting the (αhν)2 versus hν(eV) as shown in Figure 5. The band gap energy of MgO nanoparticle was found to be 4.2 eV. The value of particle size and band gap of MgO clearly shows that this nanomaterial is applied in photocatalytic activities and optical devices.

389416.fig.004
Figure 4: UV-VIS of MgO nanoparticles.
389416.fig.005
Figure 5: Plot of (αhν)2 versus (hν) of MgO nanoparticles.

The variation of extinction coefficient with wavelength is shown in Figure 6. The extinction coefficient () is a measure of the fraction of light lost due to scattering and absorption per unit distance of the penetration medium. The extinction coefficient is computed in the sample during the exposure of UV spectra by using the relation between % absorption and wavelength [11]. Extinction coefficient () is as shown in (1): where α is % absorption and λ is wavelength. The curve of extinction coefficient clearly shows that scattering increases gradually from 400 nm up to 1100 nm for constant distance of the penetration medium.

389416.fig.006
Figure 6: Variation of % absorbance and extinction coefficient of MgO nanoparticles as a function of wavelength.

The optical reaction of a material is mainly studied in terms of the optical conductivity (σ) which is given by the relation (2) [12] where is the velocity of light, α is the absorption coefficient, and is the refractive index. It can be seen clearly from Figure 7 that optical conductivity directly depends on the absorption coefficient and the refractive index of the material. It can be noticed that optical conductivity increases abruptly between 200 and 400 nm. The sudden increase in optical conductivity can be attributed to the decrease in absorption coefficient.

389416.fig.007
Figure 7: Variation of refractive index and optical conductivity of MgO nanoparticles as a function of wavelength.

The real and imaginary dielectric constant is a fundamental property of the material. The real and the imaginary parts of the dielectric constant can be estimated using the relations (3) [12] The real part of the dielectric constant is to measure how much it will slow down the speed of light in the material. Figure 8 shows that variation of real dielectric constant as a function of photon energy. While the imaginary dielectric constant part shows how a dielectric material absorbs energy from an electric field due to dipole motion, Figure 9 shows the variation of imaginary dielectric constant as a function of photon energy.

389416.fig.008
Figure 8: Variation of real dielectric constant as a function of photon energy.
389416.fig.009
Figure 9: Variation of imaginary dielectric constant as a function of photon energy.

4. Conclusions

In summary, nanoparticles of MgO were synthesized using a solvent mixed spray pyrolysis technique. This product was obtained by using Mg(NO3)2·6H2O and C6H12N4 as starting materials. An average particle size of the resulting nanoparticles was found to be 9 nm computed using XRD and TEM analyses. The optical property of the produced nanoparticles was studied by measuring the % absorbance and band gap energy. The estimated optical band gap energy is an accepted value for the photocatalytic activities in visible light and also for application in the solar cells and optical devices. The solvent mixed spray pyrolysis technique used in this study is a simple, useful, and an economic technique to prepare MgO nanoparticles.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to the Head of the Department of Physics, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Amravati, for providing necessary facilities.

References

  1. Y. Q. Huang, L. Meidong, Z. Yike, L. Churong, X. Donglin, and L. Shaobo, “Preparation and properties of ZnO-based ceramic films for low-voltage varistors by novel sol-gel process,” Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 232–236, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. F. Nastase, I. Stamatin, C. Nastase, D. Mihaiescu, and A. Moldovan, “Synthesis and characterization of PAni-SiO2 and PTh-SiO2 nanocomposites' thin films by plasma polymerization,” Progress in Solid State Chemistry, vol. 34, no. 2–4, pp. 191–199, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. de Matteis, L. Custardoy, R. Fernandez-Pacheco et al., “Ultrathin MgO coating of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles by combined coprecipitation and sol-gel synthesis,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 451–456, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Kaviyarasu and P. A. Devarajan, “A versatile route to synthesize MgO nanocrystals by combustion technique,” Der Pharma Chemica, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 248–254, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. E. Lange and S. K. Obendorf, “Effect of plasma etching on destructive adsorption properties of polypropylene fibers containing magnesium oxide nanoparticles,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 185–194, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Jin and Y. He, “Antibacterial activities of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 6877–6885, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Mirzaei and A. Davoodnia, “Microwave assisted sol-gel synthesis of MgO nanoparticles and their catalytic activity in the synthesis of hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 33, no. 9-10, pp. 1502–1507, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Z. Camtakan, S. Erenturk, and S. Yusan, “Magnesium oxide nanoparticles: preparation, characterization, and uranium sorption properties,” Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 536–543, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. R. Nemade and S. A. Waghuley, “LPG sensing application of graphene/CeO2 quantum dots composite,” in Proceedings of the AIP International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Physics and Material Science (RAM '13), vol. 1536, pp. 1258–1259, Rajasthan, India, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. R. Nemade and S. A. Waghuley, “UV–VIS spectroscopic study of one pot synthesized strontium oxide quantum dots,” Results in Physics, vol. 3, pp. 52–54, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. N. A. Bakr, A. M. Funde, V. S. Waman et al., “Determination of the optical parameters of a-Si:H thin films deposited by hot wire–chemical vapour deposition technique using transmission spectrum only,” Pramana: Journal of Physics, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 519–531, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Sharma and S. C. Katyal, “Determination of optical parameters of a-(As2Se3)90Ge10 thin film,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 40, no. 7, article 038, pp. 2115–2120, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus