International Journal of Microbiology

International Journal of Microbiology / 2010 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 317512 |

Andres Pascual, Katia Jaton, Béatrice Ninet, Jacques Bille, Gilbert Greub, "New Diagnostic Real-Time PCR for Specific Detection of Mycoplasma hominis DNA", International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2010, Article ID 317512, 4 pages, 2010.

New Diagnostic Real-Time PCR for Specific Detection of Mycoplasma hominis DNA

Academic Editor: Paula J. Fedorka-Cray
Received03 Mar 2010
Accepted16 Jun 2010
Published25 Jul 2010


Mycoplasma hominis is a fastidious micro-organism causing genital and extragenital infections. We developed a specific real-time PCR that exhibits high sensitivity and low intrarun and interrun variabilities. When applied to clinical samples, this quantitative PCR allowed to confirm the role of M. hominis in three patients with severe extragenital infections.

Mycoplasma hominis are fastidious bacteria, which are not detected on routinely used axenic media [1]. Lack of a cell wall makes these organisms naturally resistant to -lactam antibiotics and not detectable by Gram staining. M. hominis is a recognized agent of genital infections in adults as well as of neonatal infections [2, 3]. Furthermore, it has been reported as the etiologic agent of various serious extra-genital infections such as brain abscess, pneumonia, mediastinitis, pericarditis, endocarditis, osteitis, arthritis, wound infections, peritonitis, and pyelonephritis both in immunosuppressed and in immunocompetent individuals [411]. Since most commonly used antibiotics in clinical practice are not active against M. hominis, the diagnosis of infections due to this fastidious bacterium is a crucial issue, especially for extra-genital cases.

In this context, we developed a real-time PCR assay for the detection of M. hominis. Then, this new PCR was applied to clinical samples obtained from patients suffering from extra-genital M. hominis infections.

A forward primer MhF (5-TTTGGTCAAGTCCTGCAACGA-3, position 2472–2493 of GenBank sequence AF443616), a reverse primer MhR (5-CCCCACCTTCCTCCCAGTTA-3, position 2553–2572 of AF443616), which amplifies a 101 bp part of the 16S rRNA-encoding gene, and a minor-groove binder probe labeled with 5 VIC (TACTAACATTAAGTTGAGGACTCTA, position 2513–2537 of AF443616) were selected using the Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The reactions were performed in a final volume of 20  l, including 0.2  M of each primer, 0.2. M of probe, 10  l 2 TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and 5  l of DNA sample. The cycling conditions were 2 min at 50°C and 10 min at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. An ABI Prism 7900 instrument (Applied Biosystems) was used for the amplification and detection of the PCR products. The specificity of the real-time PCR was high, being increased by the use of a TaqMan probe. No cross-amplification was observed when 5 ng of genomic DNA of humans, fungus (Candida albicans ATCC 10231), and 15 different bacterial strains were tested (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Ureaplasma parvum, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Gardnerella vaginalis, Lactobacillus sp., Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus agalactiae). A plasmid containing the target gene was constructed to perform the quantification step, as described previously [12].

Duplicates of 10-fold serial dilutions of the plasmid were run in ten independent experiments in order to analyze the sensitivity and the reproducibility of the PCR results. As shown in Figure 1(a), the intrarun reproducibility was excellent. As expected, intrarun variability was slightly higher at very low concentration of target DNA (Figure 1(b)). The interrun variability was low, except at a low concentration of 10 plasmid copies per 5  l (Figure 1(c)). Thus, the mean Ct values +/ standard deviation were of (1.28%), (1.10%), and (1.34%) for 1000, 100, and 10 DNA copies per 5  l. The analytical sensitivity of the real-time PCR was 10 copies of plasmid control DNA per reaction mixture, that is, similar to the light-cycler PCR already reported by Baczynska et al. [14]. This sensitivity is about 10-fold better than the 16SrRNA broad-range PCR developed by Bosshard et al. [15]. When testing genomic DNA obtained by growing M. hominis in culture, we again obtained an excellent sensitivity which was of about 1000 bacteria/ml. When serially diluting a clinical sample (inguinal abscess of patient 1), the eubacterial PCR was slightly positive when the real-time specific Mycoplasma PCR was positive with a Ct of 33.4 (45 copies in 5  l of DNA) whereas eubacterial PCR was negative when the real-time specific Mycoplasma PCR was positive with a Ct of 36.3 (6.5 copies in 5  l of DNA).

Since growing evidence supports the role of M. hominis as an emerging agent of extra-genital infections, the real-time PCR was tested in 34 clinical samples taken from 15 patients suffering from various extra-genital infections. These samples included physiologically sterile sites such as pleural fluid, percardial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, and cardiac valve ( ) and from samples potentially contaminated with oropharyngeal flora ( ), that is, mainly respiratory tract samples ( ). DNA was extracted from 200  l of samples using the MagNAPureLC automated system (Roche) and the MagnaPureLC DNA isolation kit 1 (Roche). DNA was eluted in a final volume of 100  l of the elution buffer provided in the kit. A negative extraction control (DNA free water extracted in parallel of the specimen) was tested for each extraction run. Each sample was amplified in duplicate. Inhibition control (specimen spiked with 1  l containing 200 plasmid copies) and negative PCR mixture control were systematically tested. All samples were investigated because of clinical suspicion except two, for which the presence of M. hominis DNA was already detected by a broad spectrum 16SrRNA PCR directly performed on the specimens [16]. Both were confirmed positive by the new PCR with very high bacterial load (Table 1). DNA of M. hominis was also found in samples of 1 out of the 13 remaining patients.

Patient no.AgeSexClinical infectionUnderlying conditionsOther etiologyClinical specimenM. hominis qPCR results in copies/mLOther positive diagnostic tests

154FemaleInguinal lymphadenitis with abscess formationNeutropenia, HIVNoneAbscess fluid 16,175,000Specific culture and broad-spectrum PCR
Cervix swab4,400
Vaginal swab130

215FemalePneumonia and pericarditisNoneNoneAbscess fluid 98,500,000Specific culture and broad-spectrum PCR
Pleural fluid380,000
Pericardiac fluid85
Sputum 6
Pleural fluid 0

356MaleMediastinitisType A aortic dissectionNoneMediastinal fluid 7,000Blood agar
Mediastinal swab460

First samples documenting the infection;
Samples taken a few days after treatment start;
Culture media: Mycoplasma IST, bioMérieux, France;
Conventional culture positive on blood agar plate followed by sequencing for identification [13].

For all 3 positive patients, DNA of M. hominis was detected in 3 specimens (Table 1). Moreover, for each of these 3 patients, at least one of the positive molecular results was further confirmed by culture with a commercial media (Mycoplasma IST, bioMérieux, France) or on blood agar (thin layer of bacteria and sequencing for identification) [13]. Due to the high level of conservation of the 16S rRNA, our real-time PCR is likely amplifying any member of the M. hominis group that includes M. salivarium, M. orale, and M. arginii. All cases presented in this paper were M. hominis sensu stricto as confirmed by sequencing 16S rRNA encoding gene. The clinical presentation of these three cases is summarized in Table 1.

In conclusion, we developed a new PCR that exhibited high sensitivity and that allowed us to diagnose or confirm three extra-genital cases of M. hominis infections, which may remain undetected due to the fastidious growth of this bacterium. Recently, Masalma et al., using a cloning and/or pyrosequencing sequencing approach, also identified two extragenital M. hominis cerebral infections [4]. The advantage of their strategy is the broad spectrum of the approach that is not limited to Mycoplasma whereas the advantages of our real-time PCR are simplicity, rapidity, and lower risk of contamination.

This new real-time PCR represents an efficient tool for the diagnosis of M. hominis infections that may contribute to better defining of the prevalence and pathogenicity of M. hominis. Moreover, it could help to improve clinical outcomes of severe extra-genital infections in patients not responding to commonly used beta-lactam antibiotics.


G. Greub is supported by the Leenards Foundation through a career award entitled “Bourse Leenards pour la Relève Académique en Médecine Clinique à Lausanne’’. The authors thank Ph. Tarr for reviewing this paper. A. Pascual and K. Jaton contributed equally to this work.


  1. K. B. Waites and T. Robinson, “Mycoplasma and ureaplasma,” in Manual of Clinical Microbiology, P. R. Murray, Ed., pp. 1004–1020, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  2. P. Taylor, “Medical significance of mycoplasmas,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 104, pp. 7–15, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  3. K. B. Waites, B. Katz, and R. L. Schelonka, “Mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas as neonatal pathogens,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 757–789, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. A. Masalma, F. Armougom, W. M. Scheld et al., “The expansion of the microbiological spectrum of brain abscesses with use of multiple 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1169–1178, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. Fenollar, V. Gauduchon, J. P. Casalta, H. Lepidi, F. Vandenesch, and D. Raoult, “Mycoplasma endocarditis: two case reports and a review,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. e21–e24, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. García, E. Ugalde, I. Monteagudo et al., “Isolation of Mycoplasma hominis in critically ill patients with pulmonary infections: clinical and microbiological analysis in an intensive care unit,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 143–147, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. M. Lyon, J. A. Alspaugh, F. T. Meredith et al., “Mycoplasma hominis pneumonia complicating bilateral lung transplantation: case report and review of the literature,” Chest, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 1428–1432, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  8. H. Marini, V. Merle, N. Frébourg et al., “Mycoplasma hominis wound infection after a vascular allograft,” Journal of Infection, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 272–274, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. Mechai, G. Le Moal, S. Duchêne, C. Burucoa, C. Godet, and M. Freslon, “Mycoplasma hominis osteitis in an immunocompetent man,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 715–717, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Norton and L. Mollison, “Mycoplasma hominis pneumonia in Aboriginal adults,” Pathology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 58–60, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. S.-Y. Wong and K.-Y. Yuen, “Acute pyelonephritis caused by Mycoplasma hominis,” Pathology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 61–63, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Jaton, J. Bille, and G. Greub, “A novel real-time PCR to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine or genital swabs,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1667–1674, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Petti, P. Bosshard, M. Brandt et al., “Interpretative criteria for identification of bacteria and fungi by DNA target sequencing,” Approved Guideline, vol. 28, no. 12, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. Baczynska, H. F. Svenstrup, J. Fedder, S. Birkelund, and G. Christiansen, “Development of real-time PCR for detection of Mycoplasma hominis,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 4, article no. 35, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. P. Bosshard, A. Kronenberg, R. Zbinden, C. Ruef, E. C. Böttger, and M. Altwegg, “Etiologic diagnosis of infective endocarditis by broad-range polymerase chain reaction: a 3-year experience,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Goldenberger, A. Künzli, P. Vogt, R. Zbinden, and M. Altwegg, “Molecular diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis by broad-range PCR amplification and direct sequencing,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2733–2739, 1997. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Andres Pascual et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.