Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods to Determine the Susceptibility of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Circulating in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to Fusidic Acid

<table>Semi log scatterplot of fusidic acid MIC and zone size. MIC is shown on a log(2) scale. Horizontal dashed lines (- - -) correspond to the MIC interpretive criteria of Jones et al., and solid lines (-) correspond to MIC interpretive criteria of Skov et al.  Vertical dashed lines (- - -) correspond to zone diameters of 18 mm and 21 mm proposed by Skov et al. MRSA (■) and MSSA (○) isolates are shown.</table>

International Journal of Microbiology

fig1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods to Determine the Susceptibility of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Circulating in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to Fusidic Acid 

Figure 1 | Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Etest Methods to Determine the Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Circulating in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to Fusidic Acid 